logo
Russia becomes first country to formally recognise Taliban-led Afghanistan government

Russia becomes first country to formally recognise Taliban-led Afghanistan government

KABUL: Afghanistan's government said on Thursday that Russia had become the first country to officially recognise its rule, calling it a "brave decision."
The Taliban swept back to power in 2021 after ousting the foreign-backed government and have imposed an austere version of Islamic law. They have keenly sought official international recognition and investment, as the country recovers from four decades of war, including the Soviet invasion from 1979 to 1989.
The announcement was made after Afghanistan's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi met with Russia's ambassador to Afghanistan, Dmitry Zhirnov, in Kabul on Thursday.
"This brave decision will be an example for others... Now that the process of recognition has started, Russia was ahead of everyone," Muttaqi said in a video of the meeting on X.
"Russia is the first country which has officially recognised the Islamic Emirate," Taliban foreign ministry spokesman Zia Ahmad Takal told AFP, using the government's name for their administration.
Muttaqi said it was "a new phase of positive relations, mutual respect, and constructive engagement", the foreign ministry posted on X.
Russia's foreign ministry added on Telegram: "We believe that the act of official recognition of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will boost the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in several areas." It highlighted potential "commercial and economic" cooperation in "energy, transportation, agriculture and infrastructure."
The ministry said that Moscow hoped to continue helping Kabul "reinforce regional security and fight against the threats of terrorism and drug-trafficking."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine Attacked With Putin's Largest Barrage Of War Shortly After Trump Call
Ukraine Attacked With Putin's Largest Barrage Of War Shortly After Trump Call

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Ukraine Attacked With Putin's Largest Barrage Of War Shortly After Trump Call

Ukraine: Russia launched its largest-ever drone and missile attack on Ukraine overnight on Friday just hours after a telephone call between US and Russian presidents ended without any breakthrough. AFP journalists in the capital heard drones buzzing over Kyiv and explosions ringing out as Ukrainian air defence systems fended off the attack. President Donald Trump said he had made no progress with Vladimir Putin on ending the war in a call, as the Kremlin insisted Russia would pursue its war aims. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the air alerts had begun echoing out across the country as reports of the presidents' call emerged. "Yet again, Russia is showing it has no intention of ending the war and terror," Zelensky said on social media. "All of this is clear evidence that without truly large-scale pressure, Russia will not change its dumb, destructive behaviour," he added, urging the United States in particular to ramp up pressure on Moscow. He said that 23 people were wounded in the Russian barrage that the air force said included 539 Russian drones of various types and 11 missiles. A representative of Ukraine's air force told Ukrainian media that the attack was the largest of the Russian invasion. 'Complete disregard' Overnight Russia attacks have escalated over recent weeks. An AFP tally shows Moscow launched a record number of drones and missiles at Ukraine in June, as direct peace talks between Kyiv and Moscow appeared to stall. "Putin clearly shows his complete disregard for the United States and everyone who has called for an end to the war," Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga wrote on social media after the attack. In Kyiv, AFP journalists saw dozens of residents of the capital taking shelter in a metro station. Russian attacks escalated as concerns mount in Kyiv over continued delivery of US military aid, which is key to Ukraine's ability to fend off the drone and missile barrages. The US announced this week that it was reducing some deliveries of military aid to Ukraine, in what EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said was a clear signal that the bloc needed to "step up". Trump's view of the call with Putin was unusually bleak. After most of his previous five calls with Putin since returning to power in January he has given optimistic reports of progress towards a deal. But he has shown increasing frustration with Putin after an early pivot towards the Russian leader. Ukraine has also ramped up its drone strikes in Russia, where a woman was killed when a Ukrainian drone crashed into an apartment building, the region's acting governor said.

Writers, thinkers, criticise govt. order against Muharram
Writers, thinkers, criticise govt. order against Muharram

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Writers, thinkers, criticise govt. order against Muharram

The government's decision to ban Muharram celebrations in some villages in a few districts owing to possible law and order disturbances, has come under fire from intellectuals and writers, who say the festival that promotes harmony should be encouraged and not banned. Citing concerns over law and order, district administrations in Ballari and Raichur have imposed prohibitory orders in several villages during the observance of Muharram. The restrictions prohibit public gatherings, processions, and the installation of symbolic structures (Panjas) in specific areas known for communal sensitivities. In Ballari, Deputy Commissioner Prashant Kumar Mishra and Deputy Commissioner K. Nitish issued the orders, under provisions of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, following intelligence reports that indicated a potential for tensions during Muharram observances in 21 villages in Ballari district and in 23 villages in Raichur district, respectively. The officers cited past incidents of clashes involving youth from different communities during Muharram as the reason for the decision. The aim, they added in the orders, was to prevent any threat to public safety, life, or property. Officials clarified that the restrictions are precautionary, not absolute bans, but reasonable restrictions. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Mishra said that similar restrictions were imposed in the past as well, after evaluating the law and order situations in certain villages. 'This is not a blanket prohibition on the observance of Muharram. The decision is based on police intelligence inputs and is imposed every year in sensitive areas to maintain peace. These are specific restrictions on certain activities. It is not a new thing as the administration does it every year,' he said. Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar, is a period of mourning that commemorates the martyrdom of Imam Hussain, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad, at the Battle of Karbala. In many parts of Kalyana Karnataka, Muharram is observed with communal harmony, where both Muslims and Hindus participate in the rituals with mutual respect and solidarity, displaying the region's tradition of peaceful and harmonious coexistence. Janekal, a village in Raichur district with no Muslim households, is a notable example where locals have traditionally observed Muharram by inviting a Muslim family from a neighbouring village to perform the rituals. However, the district administration banned the observance there following a violent clash between Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in 2013—an incident reportedly unrelated to the festival. 'The administration should focus on identifying and acting against troublemakers, rather than restricting religious or cultural practices that have long fostered unity,' said Channabasava, a resident of Janekal. Authorities maintain that the orders are temporary and purely intended to preserve communal peace during a sensitive period. Bellary based writer and publisher Lohia Chanabasavanna said that this was a regressive step. 'Muharram is not a festival of Muslims but of all communities. The government should support it and not ban it. If the government has specific intelligence input about any law and order issue in any village, it should depute additional police force and allow the festival, and not curb it,' he said. Ladai Basu, writer and activist based in Gadag, said that such orders were an indication of the deep penetration of the right wing elements in to the government set-up. 'Such officers are disturbing harmony by crafting such inputs that lead to banning of such cultural events. The government should identify and weed them out. Otherwise, there will be no difference between this government and the earlier government,' Mr. Basu said. Sabiha Bhoomi Gowda, former Vice-Chancellor of Karnataka State Akkamahadevi Women's University, recalls her childhood in Gajendragad where she watched the whole town celebrate Muharram. 'No one termed it a Muslim festival. There is no point banning such festivals. They bind the society together. We need more such celebrations, in these days where divisive forces are at work relentlessly,' she said. I may miss other festivals, but I do not miss the annual Muharram in my village of Bedkihal. The Alabi deities are treated as village deities. It is a time for home coming for labourers who have migrated to Bengaluru and Mumbai, Dadasaheb S. Chougale, theatre personality, said. As an artist, I feel it is a cultural event and not a religious festival. It is unfortunate that officers are trying to stifle them, he said. Yallappa Himmadi, chairman, Basavaraj Kattimani trust, spoke of Muharram celebrations in villages without a single Muslim families across northern Karnataka. 'The government should take a stand in favour of equality, liberalism and secularism and allow Muharram celebrations,' he said. Thinker Rahamat Tarikere, who has studied and documented Muharram traditions across Karnataka and some other States, said festivals like Muharram were tools for reconciliation and friendship between communities and families. 'There may have been some law and order problems in some villages in the past during Muharram, but we should give an opportunity for healing. We should promote more such festivals to reduce hatred and promote harmony, rather than keeping communities isolated. Entire rural communities should not suffer a cultural punishment due to the mistakes of criminal elements,' he said.

After Russia, is China next in line to legitimise Taliban as rulers of Afghanistan?
After Russia, is China next in line to legitimise Taliban as rulers of Afghanistan?

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

After Russia, is China next in line to legitimise Taliban as rulers of Afghanistan?

After Russia became the first country to officially recognise the Taliban government, China has welcomed the move, fuelling speculation it may be next. As regional powers deepen ties with Kabul, questions mount about the global legitimacy of Afghanistan's isolated rulers. read more Following Russia's formal recognition of the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government, speculation is mounting over whether China may soon follow suit, a potential turning point in the Islamist group's long-sought campaign for global legitimacy. On Friday, China's foreign ministry welcomed Russia's move, with spokesperson Mao Ning stating that Beijing has 'always believed that Afghanistan should not be excluded from the international community.' While stopping short of recognising the Taliban government, Mao reiterated China's ongoing diplomatic engagement with Kabul, noting that embassies in both countries remain operational and functional. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As a traditional friendly neighbour of Afghanistan, the Chinese side has maintained normal diplomatic relations and continues to pursue a policy of friendship with the Afghan people,' she said. China currently hosts a Taliban-appointed ambassador in Beijing but, like many countries, has withheld full diplomatic recognition. Officials have previously suggested that any formal recognition would hinge on political reforms, improved domestic security, and stronger regional ties from the Taliban leadership. Russia's landmark move Russia broke ranks with most of the international community on Thursday by officially acknowledging the Taliban as the rulers of Afghanistan. Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi announced the development after meeting Russian Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov in Kabul, calling Moscow's decision 'brave' and 'historic.' 'This bold step will serve as a model for others. Now that the recognition process has begun, Russia has taken the lead,' Muttaqi said in a video message. Taliban foreign ministry spokesperson Zia Ahmad Takal also confirmed the move, stating, 'Russia is the first country to officially recognise the Islamic Emirate,' using the Taliban's formal name for their administration. Russia's foreign ministry said the recognition would pave the way for deeper cooperation in sectors such as energy, transport, agriculture and infrastructure. It also highlighted joint efforts to tackle terrorism and drug trafficking as key priorities in future bilateral relations. The move comes after a series of steps by Moscow to normalise ties with the Taliban, including delisting the group from its register of terrorist organisations earlier this year and welcoming a Taliban envoy to Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Vladimir Putin has referred to the Taliban as 'allies in the fight against terrorism,' and Russia has positioned itself to expand economic ties by using Afghanistan as a gas transit route to Southeast Asia. The China question Beijing's endorsement of Russia's stance has reignited debate over whether China will be the next major power to legitimise the Taliban government. Although China has yet to take that step, its diplomatic engagement has steadily deepened since the Taliban took control in 2021. The two countries maintain close trade and infrastructure discussions, and China is among a handful of nations that has accepted a Taliban ambassador. China's long-term strategic interests in Afghanistan including securing its Belt and Road investments, curbing extremism near its Xinjiang region, and tapping into Afghanistan's mineral wealth are seen as possible incentives for recognition. Western silence, Afghan outrage The Taliban's return to power in 2021 brought with it a rollback of human rights—particularly for women and girls, who remain barred from education and most forms of public life. This has stalled recognition efforts from Western nations and triggered strong condemnation from Afghan civil society. Former Afghan parliamentarian Mariam Solaimankhil criticised Russia's decision, calling it a betrayal of fundamental rights. 'This legitimises a regime that flogs women publicly, denies education to girls, and shelters terrorists under UN sanctions,' she said. Another former lawmaker, Fawzia Koofi, warned that recognition without reform would embolden impunity. 'This move risks not only Afghanistan's stability but could have wider implications for global security,' she said. Despite such concerns, China and Russia's growing engagement signals a shift in how regional powers view Afghanistan's Taliban leadership. With Moscow taking the lead, attention now turns to Beijing—and whether strategic interests will override lingering concerns about governance, human rights, and international norms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store