logo
Telescope built in the Bay Area captures photos of space like never before

Telescope built in the Bay Area captures photos of space like never before

CBS News24-06-2025
The first images of the universe from the world's largest digital camera were released on Monday. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park unveiled the never-before-seen images of our universe.
The Rubin Observatory sits on the summit of Cerro Pachón in Chile with the digital camera scanning the sky to create an ultra-wide, ultra-high definition timelapse of our universe
Phil Marshall is passionate about uncovering the secrets to our incredible universe. He is the Deputy Director of Operations at Rubin Observatory.
Marshall has been waiting for years to see the very first images from Rubin Observatory's digital camera, capturing the cosmos in a way unlike anything else.
"I think I described it as a dream come true," said Marshall. "I've been thinking about this for so long. It's kind of amazing that it's here now. On the other hand, this is just the beginning. It's very exciting to be at the start of the survey, just about able to do all the investigations of the universe that we've been planning for so long.
These sharper, clearer images of our universe are like nothing we've seen before with millions of galaxies in each snapshot in amazing detail.
"Honestly, it's just mind-blowing," said Risa Wechsler, Stanford & SLAC Director of Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology. "It makes me very, very excited about the future of astrophysics. Previously, we've been able to see a lot of the sky or we've been able to go deep and what is really different about these images is that it's both. It really is sort of simultaneously a very wide area so that you can see many galaxies you know, millions and millions of galaxies in one snapshot and then also go really deep and going deep will do two things. One, for the nearby galaxies, you can really see all the way into the outskirts, and you can see all these incredible details of how they formed and then for the far away galaxies, you just get so many of them. "
"We should be able to see the entire sky at that level of sensitivity, that level of spatial detail, and with that time resolution, to see how the university evolves, how variable stars are varying, how supernovae are exploding, how asteroids are moving within our own solar system," said Adam Bolton, SLAC Senior Scientist. "We have all that within a digital database that we can query in any way we could imagine. That's something that's never existed before."
Every night at Rubin Observatory in Chile, the digital camera will scan the sky, capturing a new 3,200-megapixel image every 40 seconds, providing near-real-time, valuable data of our universe.
"It really makes it clear that the universe is full of galaxies," said Marshall. "Our galaxy is full of stars and our universe is full of galaxies," said Marshall. "There's billions of them to be observed and you can see that in the images now, each one of those galaxies itself contains billions of stars, and so it's very humbling to see these images. It puts us right in our place, so to speak."
Marshall said these first images are truly awe-inspiring as scientists move one step closer to unlocking the mysteries of our universe.
The Rubin Observatory will continue capturing images of our universe in a 10-year scientific mission. The amount of data gathered by Rubin Observatory in its first year alone will be greater than that collected by all other optical observatories combined.
NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory is jointly funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science. SLAC is operated by Stanford University for the DOE.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Humans May Only Have 41,000 Years to Catch Signs of Aliens Before They Fade
Humans May Only Have 41,000 Years to Catch Signs of Aliens Before They Fade

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Humans May Only Have 41,000 Years to Catch Signs of Aliens Before They Fade

Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Dyson swarms—theoretical arrangements of satellites orbiting a star to harness its energy—may seem like they could be eternal once constructed, but they are still at the mercy of gravity. A new theoretical study argues that gravitational instabilities within an abandoned swarm could have satellites colliding and causing the whole thing to disintegrate in as little as a few tens of thousands of years. If these things exist out in the universe, we better get cracking on searching for them. So long as humans have wondered about other forms of intelligent life in the universe, we've hoped E.T. would phone home. But so far, no one has ever called. Even our most powerful antennas have only picked up false positives and radio silence. Could it be because any hypothetical civilizations made of beings with brains to rival our own have long since vanished, with even any advanced technosignatures they might have left behind turned to nothing more than space dust? Breakthrough Listen is hoping to figure that out. It is the largest ever SETI (Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence) initiative on Earth, and it not only surveys the million closest stars to our planet, but scans the entire galaxy and literally listens for messages from any beings out there who might be trying to communicate with us. Some of its spectroscopic instruments are hypersensitive enough to detect a laser with no more energy than a lightbulb from 25 trillion miles away. If that little energy can show up at such a distance, it seems like it should be only a matter of time before a megastructure like a Dyson swarm—satellites arranged around a star to harvest its energy or send intergalactic messages—could be found. (That is, if they exist at all. The jury is still very much out on that one). The question is whether we have that time. If you ask one theorist, we might only have about 41,000 years to find a swarm large enough to surround a star the size of the Sun before it falls apart completely. Theoretical astronomer Brian C. Lacki of Breakthrough Listen delves into such mind-bending topics as how intelligent aliens might be functioning, traveling, or making communication attempts—and now, he's looking into whether Dyson swarms could hang around long enough for us to find them. He thinks that we might have far less time to detect one of these megastructures than experts may have originally thought. If the civilization that created them vanishes, even behemoth technosignatures like these would ultimately be doomed without maintenance. 'Although long-lived megaswarms are extremely powerful technosignatures, they are liable to be subject to collisional cascades once guidance systems start failing,' Lacki said in a study recently published in The Astrophysical Journal. 'Structuring the swarm orbits does not prolong the initial collisional time as long as there is enough randomness to ensure collisions, although it can reduce collision velocities.' Lacki argues that while Dyson swarms may seem like they should be indestructible (and would definitely be more resilient than the similarly hypothetical Dyson sphere, first dreamed up by physicist and mathematician Freeman Dyson in the early 1960s), they are prone to gravitational instabilities that would inevitably trigger collisions. These might be relatively minor at first—like fragments of space junk scraping against each other as they orbit Earth—but if the swarm were abandoned by the civilization that established it, just one collision could spell its ultimate destruction. Satellites already orbiting at high speeds would crash into each other just as fast. Shards of destroyed satellites would scatter and strike other satellites, possibly causing further perturbations that lead to more collisions until every structure and scrap was reduced to dust. And even dust might not be around for long. 'The final result of a collisional cascade is to grind a swarm down into microscopic particles,' he said. 'These artificial grains are blown out into the general ISM if the host star is bright enough. Otherwise, the swarm is ultimately reduced into ionized gas.' The only way to prevent this would be to somehow push planets in the star system out of the way, and that would give a civilization nowhere nearby to restart if their own planet fails them. Maybe any intelligent aliens out there have already figured that out, and decided to come up with an alternative method of capturing stellar energy. If they have, maybe we have more than a few ten thousand of years to find it. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword

Light pollution is making it harder for astronomers to study the universe
Light pollution is making it harder for astronomers to study the universe

Fast Company

timea day ago

  • Fast Company

Light pollution is making it harder for astronomers to study the universe

Outdoor lighting for buildings, roads and advertising can help people see in the dark of night, but many astronomers are growing increasingly concerned that these lights could be blinding us to the rest of the universe. Hot science in the cold, dark night While orbiting telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope give researchers a unique view of the cosmos—particularly because they can see light blocked by the Earth's atmosphere—ground-based telescopes also continue to drive cutting-edge discovery. Telescopes on the ground capture light with gigantic and precise focusing mirrors that can be 20 to 35 feet wide. Moving all astronomical observations to space to escape light pollution would not be possible, because space missions have a much greater cost and so many large ground-based telescopes are already in operation or under construction. Around the world, there are 17 ground-based telescopes with primary mirrors as big or bigger than Webb's 20-foot mirror, and three more under construction with mirrors planned to span 80 to 130 feet. The newest telescope starting its scientific mission right now, the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, has a mirror with a 28-foot diameter and a 3-gigapixel camera. One of its missions is to map the distribution of dark matter in the universe. To do that, it will collect a sample of 2.6 billion galaxies. The typical galaxy in that sample is 100 times fainter than the natural glow in the nighttime air in the Earth's atmosphere, so this Rubin Observatory program depends on near-total natural darkness. Any light scattered at night—road lighting, building illumination, billboards—would add glare and noise to the scene, greatly reducing the number of galaxies Rubin can reliably measure in the same time, or greatly increasing the total exposure time required to get the same result. The LED revolution Astronomers care specifically about artificial light in the blue-green range of the electromagnetic spectrum, as that used to be the darkest part of the night sky. A decade ago, the most common outdoor lighting was from sodium vapor discharge lamps. They produced an orange-pink glow, which meant that they put out very little blue and green light. Even observatories relatively close to growing urban areas had skies that were naturally dark in the blue and green part of the spectrum, enabling all kinds of new observations. Then came the solid-state LED lighting revolution. Those lights put out a broad rainbow of color with very high efficiency, meaning they produce lots of light per watt of electricity. The earliest versions of LEDs put out a large fraction of their energy in the blue and green, but advancing technology now gets the same efficiency with 'warmer' lights that have much less blue and green. Nevertheless, the formerly pristine darkness of the night sky now has much more light, particularly in the blue and green, from LEDs in cities and towns, lighting roads, public spaces, and advertising. The broad output of color from LEDs affects the whole spectrum, from ultraviolet through deep red. The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned a study in 2019 which predicted that the higher energy efficiency of LEDs would mean that the amount of power used for lights at night would go down, with the amount of light emitted staying roughly the same. But satellites looking down at the Earth reveal that just isn't the case. The amount of light is going steadily up, meaning that cities and businesses were willing to keep their electricity bills about the same as energy efficiency improved, and just get more light. Natural darkness in retreat As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles away. When these urban areas are adjacent to an observatory, the addition to the skyglow is much stronger, making detection of the faintest galaxies and stars that much harder. When the Mount Wilson Observatory was constructed in the Angeles National Forest near Pasadena, California, in the early 1900s, it was a very dark site, considerably far from the 500,000 people living in Greater Los Angeles. Today, 18.6 million people live in the L.A. area, and urban sprawl has brought civilization much closer to Mount Wilson. When Kitt Peak National Observatory was first under construction in the late 1950s, it was far from metro Tucson, Arizona, with its population of 230,000. Today, that area houses 1 million people, and Kitt Peak faces much more light pollution. Even telescopes in darker, more secluded regions—like northern Chile or western Texas—experience light pollution from industrial activities like open-pit mining or oil and gas facilities. The case of the European Southern Observatory An interesting modern challenge is facing the European Southern Observatory, which operates four of the world's largest optical telescopes. Their site in northern Chile is very remote, and it is nominally covered by strict national regulations protecting the dark sky. AES Chile, an energy provider with strong U.S. investor backing, announced a plan in December 2024 for the development of a large industrial plant and transport hub close to the observatory. The plant would produce liquid hydrogen and ammonia for green energy. Even though formally compliant with the national lighting norm, the fully built operation could scatter enough artificial light into the night sky to turn the current observatory's pristine darkness into a state similar to some of the legacy observatories now near large urban areas. This light pollution could mean the facility won't have the same ability to detect and measure the faintest galaxies and stars. Light pollution doesn't only affect observatories. Today, around 80% of the world's population cannot see the Milky Way at night. Some Asian cities are so bright that the eyes of people walking outdoors cannot become visually dark-adapted. In 2009, the International Astronomical Union declared that there is a universal right to starlight. The dark night sky belongs to all people—its awe-inspiring beauty is something that you don't have to be an astronomer to appreciate. Richard Green is an astronomer emeritus at Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.

‘World Will Go Dark On Aug. 2' Story Has Gone Viral — Here's The Truth
‘World Will Go Dark On Aug. 2' Story Has Gone Viral — Here's The Truth

Forbes

time2 days ago

  • Forbes

‘World Will Go Dark On Aug. 2' Story Has Gone Viral — Here's The Truth

A total solar eclipse on July 2, 2019 in Paiguano, Chile. (Photo by) Getty Images What will happen on Aug. 2, 2025? There will be no total solar eclipse on Aug. 2, contrary to posts going viral across social media that suggest otherwise. There are claims that on Aug. 2, 'the world will go dark for 6 minutes' and that it's a 'sight you won't see again for 100 years.' Is it true? Nothing will happen on Aug. 2. For starters, no solar eclipse — now or in the future — can cause the entire world to go dark at once. It's impossible for the whole world to go dark at the same time (Earth always has a dayside and a nightside). What the posts are mistakenly referring to is a six-minute total solar eclipse, which is happening on Aug. 2 — not in 2025, but in 2027. It will bring the longest remaining totality of the 21st century. The sun disappears behind the moon during the Great North American Eclipse on April 08, 2024 in Mazatlan, Mexico. (Photo by) Getty Images On Aug. 2, 2027, a total solar eclipse will affect parts of Europe, North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the Horn of Africa. This will be a total solar eclipse with an extraordinarily long totality, but only for those in one specific place. That place is Egypt, with totality lasting 6 minutes 22 seconds close to Luxor, the temple-stewn capital of ancient Egypt. Luxor may be where a lot of eclipse chasers are heading, but there's plenty of choice. The path of totality will, in order of when totality will happen, be seen in southern Spain, northern Morocco, northern Algeria, northern Tunisia, northern Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Somalia. According to TimeandDate, 88.9 million people live in that path of totality. Does it go dark during a total solar eclipse? Yes and no. The light levels drop dramatically once the moon blocks all of the sun, but it's more of a deep dusk. But will the 'world go dark?' Hardly — the 2027 total solar eclipse will be visible from a 160-mile (275 kilometers) wide path of totality stretching 9,462 miles (15,227 kilometers). Aerial View of The temple of Hatshepsut near Luxor in Egypt, where a total solar eclipse on Aug. 2, 2027, will bring six minutes of totality. getty Total solar eclipses are predictable. If you come across a particularly long one — such as Aug. 2, 2027 — turn the calendar back 18 years, 11 days, and 8 hours (the time it takes for the moon to orbit the Earth 223 times) and you'll find another one. On Jul. 22, 2009, a totality lasting as long as 6 minutes and 39 seconds was possible in the Pacific Ocean southeast of Japan. It was the longest of the century, but few experienced it as its maximum (and, worse still, most people in China were clouded out). Fast-forward 18 years, 11 days, and 8 hours from Aug. 2, 2027, and you'll get to Aug. 12, 2045, and a very long total solar eclipse across the U.S., the Caribbean and South America. At maximum, totality will last 6 minutes and 6 seconds — near the southeast coast of Florida. All of these eclipses — 2009, 2027 and 2045 — are members of a family of moon shadows called Saros 136. Saros means 'the repetition,' a concept used by ancient Greeks to predict eclipses. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store