Teagasc publishes guidelines for farmers thinking about contract rearing
The guide aims to inform farmers on both sides of contract rearing agreements about the key requirements to operate successful livestock rearing arrangements.
Topics such as the impact on whole farm stocking rate, the contract agreement, animal performance targets, grass growth requirements, cost structure, disease control and a number of case studies are covered in the publication.
Ruth Fennell, collaborative farming specialist with Teagasc, said: 'Contract rearing involves the movement of livestock from the owner's farm to be raised by another farmer. Typically, replacement heifers leave the dairy farm to be reared on a drystock farm, then return in-calf and ready for milk production.
"Due to dairy herd expansion, reduced stocking limits for derogation farmers, and reductions in leased land availability, demand for contract rearing has grown. Recent ICBF data estimates over 780 dairy farmers rear heifers under contract, with a similar number providing rearing services.'
From the dairy farmer's perspective, having the heifers contract reared simplifies the system, allowing more time to be allocated to managing the cows.
It reduces not only the stocking rate on the farm, but also the requirement for slurry storage facilities if heifers remain with the contract rearer for one, or possibly two, winters.
In addition, the reduction in stocking rate should result in greater availability of grass for the cows, thus reducing the cost of producing a kilogram of milk solids.
From the rearer's perspective, there are numerous advantages associated with contract rearing, including removing the risks associated with volatile markets, better cash flow as payments are generally made on a monthly basis, no investment in livestock required, and it can often complement existing farm enterprises.
It is not only important that the contract rearer has excellent stockmanship abilities, but they must also be able to manage grass so that growth rates can be maximised to ensure that heifers reach weight for age targets.
The dairy farmer must ensure that calves arrive healthy and on target on the rearer's farm, and that payments are made in a timely manner. These arrangements need to be a 'win-win' for both parties.
Teagasc has advisors within each of its advisory regions who are assigned the role of providing support and technical advice to those considering and operating under contract rearing arrangements. Many of these advisors also have discussion groups specifically established for those involved in contract rearing.
Read More
Contract-rearing pivot for former sheep farmer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Teagasc publishes guidelines for farmers thinking about contract rearing
Teagasc has launched a new booklet titled ' Guidelines to Contract Rearing' during an event in Sligo organised for farmer clients involved in contract rearing. The guide aims to inform farmers on both sides of contract rearing agreements about the key requirements to operate successful livestock rearing arrangements. Topics such as the impact on whole farm stocking rate, the contract agreement, animal performance targets, grass growth requirements, cost structure, disease control and a number of case studies are covered in the publication. Ruth Fennell, collaborative farming specialist with Teagasc, said: 'Contract rearing involves the movement of livestock from the owner's farm to be raised by another farmer. Typically, replacement heifers leave the dairy farm to be reared on a drystock farm, then return in-calf and ready for milk production. "Due to dairy herd expansion, reduced stocking limits for derogation farmers, and reductions in leased land availability, demand for contract rearing has grown. Recent ICBF data estimates over 780 dairy farmers rear heifers under contract, with a similar number providing rearing services.' From the dairy farmer's perspective, having the heifers contract reared simplifies the system, allowing more time to be allocated to managing the cows. It reduces not only the stocking rate on the farm, but also the requirement for slurry storage facilities if heifers remain with the contract rearer for one, or possibly two, winters. In addition, the reduction in stocking rate should result in greater availability of grass for the cows, thus reducing the cost of producing a kilogram of milk solids. From the rearer's perspective, there are numerous advantages associated with contract rearing, including removing the risks associated with volatile markets, better cash flow as payments are generally made on a monthly basis, no investment in livestock required, and it can often complement existing farm enterprises. It is not only important that the contract rearer has excellent stockmanship abilities, but they must also be able to manage grass so that growth rates can be maximised to ensure that heifers reach weight for age targets. The dairy farmer must ensure that calves arrive healthy and on target on the rearer's farm, and that payments are made in a timely manner. These arrangements need to be a 'win-win' for both parties. Teagasc has advisors within each of its advisory regions who are assigned the role of providing support and technical advice to those considering and operating under contract rearing arrangements. Many of these advisors also have discussion groups specifically established for those involved in contract rearing. Read More Contract-rearing pivot for former sheep farmer
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
Permission given for Kinsealy homes despite opposition
Fingal County Council has granted planning permission to the Land Development Agency (LDA) for 193 homes on a site of the former Teagasc Research Centre at the Malahide Road near Kinsealy in north Dublin despite local opposition. The council gave permission after concluding the scheme 'would provide a high quality new residential area and would be an excellent example of plan-led development'. The 49 page council planner's report development also found the scheme 'thoroughly conforms to the planning framework provided for the area'. The council concluded that the scheme 'provides a satisfactory standard for residential amenity, would be acceptable in terms of urban design and quantum of development'. READ MORE The LDA lodged the plans in February after Teagasc agreed to transfer the lands to the LDA for the development of affordable housing in accordance with its mandate to accelerate the delivery of affordable new homes throughout Ireland. The scheme comprises 193 residential dwellings including 153 houses and 40 duplex units arranged in three storey blocks on a site south of Kinsealy village centre and 4km south-eastsoutheast. The scheme also provides for 229 car parking spaces, 345 bicycle spaces and four acres of public open space while in addition, 5.4 acres of greenbelt zoned lands are included to the south and southeast of the residential development area to accommodate a playing pitch. In response to the scheme, on behalf of the Kinsealy and Chapel Road Community Organisation, Sean Crawford told the council that 'building more houses is not just the answer - it'– about creating sustainable communities that can truly thrive'. He said that building the scheme without a comprehensive vision 'will ultimately increase strain on current residents and diminish quality of life throughout the growing communities of Fingal'. Mr Crawford stated that the proposed three-storey duplexes fundamentally violate the area's rural character and objectives of the Fingal Development Plan which explicitly safeguard rural aesthetics and require appropriate density and scale. In his objection, David Bent from Gandon Lane, Kinsealy contended: 'While I appreciate the need for new housing and development in our area, I have serious concerns regarding the lack of supporting infrastructure, which would significantly impact the safety and wellbeing of current and future residents.' He said: 'The local schools are already operating at or near full capacity. This development would place additional pressure on these institutions, limiting access to quality education for families moving into the area.'
Irish Independent
01-07-2025
- Irish Independent
‘We urgently need to refocus on cost control at farm level'
This is according to Teagasc's Laurence Shalloo, who was speaking ahead of tomorrow's Moorepark Open Day. Shalloo – who heads Teagasc's Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Programme – said an analysis of CSO data shows a steep rise in agricultural input prices between 2020 and 2024. 'Since 2022, input price indices are showing reductions in costs, but input costs in 2024 were still approximately 35pc higher than 2020,' he will say. While many of the inflationary pressures at farm level were driven by external shocks – including the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine — Shalloo will say these were compounded by an increase in the use of purchased concentrate feed on farms. National Farm Survey data published last week shows that purchased concentrate expenditure on dairy farms typically totalled €61,517 in 2024. While this was actually a 5pc decrease relative to 2023 due to a fall in feed prices, feed volumes averaged 1,357kg per dairy cow in 2024, an increase compared to 2023. Costs per unit of milk have increased by over 50pc between 2020 and 2024, while only moderate increases in costs were observed over the previous 10 years 'Costs per unit of milk have increased by over 50pc between 2020 and 2024, while only moderate increases in costs were observed over the previous 10 years,' Shalloo will state. 'These inflationary pressures, compounded by weather-related pressures in 2023 and 2024, and a loss of focus on pasture management and utilisation, have resulted in significant cost pressures at farm level – which are particularly evident when milk price is reduced, such as in 2023. 'There is an urgent requirement to refocus on cost control at farm level.' Shalloo will highlight that grass silage and concentrate feed are three and four times more expensive, respectively, than grazed grass – making it essential for farmers to maximise the proportion of grazed grass in the dairy cow's diet to drive profitability. ADVERTISEMENT 'Key to this process is increasing pasture utilisation per hectare and reducing the proportion of bought-in feed in the diet of dairy cows,' he will say. On the environmental front, Shalloo will point to positive recent data from the EPA on water quality and emissions, noting that improvements are already being seen. He attributes these to policy changes under the Nitrates Directive, reduced fertiliser nitrogen use on farms, a greater focus on nutrient use efficiency, and improved weather and nutrient management at farm level. Notably, Shalloo will reveal that a forthcoming Teagasc report shows the average dairy cow in Ireland produces approximately 20pc more manure per week while housed than previously assumed. This, he says, will require additional investment in manure storage infrastructure on many farms, but could also unlock more value from nutrients in slurry.
