D.C. Housing Authority reaches $20,000 settlement with former agency head
After a year-long legal fight, the D.C. Housing Authority has agreed to pay its former executive director Brenda Donald $20,000 to settle a lone breach-of-contract claim left standing after a judge dismissed all of her other allegations surrounding her decision to leave that position.
In exchange, she has agreed not to disparage an agency long criticized over its performance serving some of the city's neediest residents, according to the settlement agreement, which The Washington Post obtained this week through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Mace requests Trump to unfreeze Biden-era climate funding: Report
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) reportedly requested the Trump administration to unfreeze Biden-era climate funding in support of a car manufacturing plant in her southeastern district, which covers much of the Palmetto State's lowcountry region. In a Tuesday letter obtained by The Washington Post, Mace asked the Department of Energy (DOE) to release the funds for a Mercedes-Benz plant's refashioning to produce electric vehicles, stating the move would bring roughly 800 jobs to her district. The staunch Trump ally argued in the letter addressed to Energy Secretary Chris Wright, per The Post, that the grant would help 'ensure America-made options remain available in the commercial vehicle sector.' The project sought nearly $300,000 from the federal government. The report comes after Mace backed the House-passed spending and tax bill, which includes significant cuts to green energy tax credits. Many Republicans in the Senate, which is currently working through their own version of the legislation, voiced concern that renewable energy cuts may be too vast. President Trump, in his broad efforts to curb government spending and root out fraud and abuse, nixed the South Carolina grant program when he halted the disbursement of former President Biden's climate programs earlier this year. 'We strongly support President Trump's initiative to restore fiscal responsibility within the executive branch, particularly in reducing waste, fraud, and redundancies,' the letter reads, according to The Post. 'While we understand and support the necessity of such measures, we believe that federal investments should continue to prioritize projects with sustained economic growth.' Mace's office as well as the DOE did not respond to an immediate request for comment on the matter. As The Post noted, it is difficult to assess how much climate funding Trump has withheld after he signed an executive order on Inauguration Day rescinding funds disbursed through Biden's landmark Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The move wasn't unexpected, however. On the campaign trail, he vowed to end the 'madness' of national emphasis on developing EVs and accompanying infrastructure and has continued to rail against green funding touted by his predecessor. Still, it drew widespread pushback from Democrats and imperiled billions of dollars, including projects in red states and districts, which sparked some concern from Republicans on Capitol Hill. It has even provoked a number of lawsuits against the Trump administration. In March, farmers and environmental groups sued over the grant pause, including the halting of a $300 million program seeking to aid farmers install renewable energy or efficiency upgrades. Earlier this week, a judge blocked the administration from withholding funds for EV charging infrastructure. Still, Trump has maintained his distaste for climate-related funding. This month, the president blasted green tax credits that were still included in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL. They are largely a giant SCAM,' he posted last weekend. The Senate has taken a less aggressive approach to climate funding compared to their House counterparts. The upper chamber is expected to take up its own version on Saturday, after the text was unveiled overnight. The new bill text would still need House approval.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
New study uncovers big banks' alarming practices that could be harmful to homeowners: 'It's quite concerning'
Big banks are issuing fewer mortgages in wildfire-prone areas in California, which could make it harder for prospective buyers to afford homes. As The Washington Post reported, the shifting climate is contributing to larger and more frequent fires in the Golden State, prompting traditional lenders to hesitate in approving home loans, and some are pulling out of the market altogether. However, online or "fintech" lenders have moved in to fill the void, offering more attractive loan terms to borrowers in areas with high fire hazard severity. While online lending platforms give homebuyers more options, experts worry that the trend could be disastrous if too many residents default on their loans after a fire or other natural disaster. Tyler Haupert, an assistant professor of urban studies at NYU Shanghai, told the Post that the practice "could cause losses for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage giants whose debts are guaranteed by taxpayers." Meanwhile, if home insurance is more expensive and harder to obtain, it could discourage homeownership in high-risk areas. Parinitha Sastry, an assistant professor of finance at Columbia Business School, said that big banks are increasingly incorporating insurance into their climate risk management strategies. "But if you look at the actual trends on the ground with insurance markets, it's quite concerning." As the warming planet contributes to more extreme weather events in vulnerable places, such as California, big banks are becoming more cautious about extending home loans to borrowers, as the risk of defaults increases substantially. Across the globe, major disasters such as floods, hurricanes, and fires have caused significant damage to properties, making it more expensive to repair them and causing insurance companies to raise premiums. In places like California, where properties and insurance rates are already expensive, the shifting climate is making homeownership unaffordable for many. Those who can afford it may have to settle for costly insurance policies, or last resort options such as the California FAIR Plan, which is less expensive but only covers the basics. Do you think America is in a housing crisis? Definitely Not sure No way Only in some cities Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Online lenders are another option, but Haupert said that "he fears these companies' willingness to lend in areas with high wildfire risk could have far-reaching effects on the housing market." While government-backed mortgage giants have plenty of resources at their disposal to weather climate shocks, the system is under increasing strain on multiple fronts. As insurers exit markets that they've deemed too risky to continue operating in, or increase rates to offset losses, homebuyers are more likely to default on home loans, according to a study by S&P Global. California lawmakers are employing catastrophe models that can gauge wildfire risks and estimate costs of potential disasters, which could make it easier for insurers to manage risks. The state has also implemented measures designed to protect homeowners in wildfire-prone areas by requiring insurance providers to write a certain percentage of policies in these areas. Some city councils have also proposed fire prevention regulations — such as requiring homeowners to clear debris near their properties and create firebreaks — that could keep homes from burning down in wildfires. This can lead to lower premiums and more affordable insurance. If you live in a high-risk area, it's a good idea to keep tabs on the specific climate issues that may impact your city or town. By staying one step ahead, you can make smart choices to mitigate potential hazards and keep you and your property safe. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio
Washington Post
a day ago
- Washington Post
D.C. Housing Authority reaches $20,000 settlement with former agency head
After a year-long legal fight, the D.C. Housing Authority has agreed to pay its former executive director Brenda Donald $20,000 to settle a lone breach-of-contract claim left standing after a judge dismissed all of her other allegations surrounding her decision to leave that position. In exchange, she has agreed not to disparage an agency long criticized over its performance serving some of the city's neediest residents, according to the settlement agreement, which The Washington Post obtained this week through a Freedom of Information Act request.
