Problems with Auckland's Watercare bills after more than 13,000 smart meters not working
Photo:
Michael Heim/ 123rf
A number of Aucklanders have received Watercare bills that say they've used zero water, while others claim they're being overcharged.
The zero fee bills claim customers have not used a single drop in the past month or in some cases for months.
The issue stems from Watercare's smart meters, which it told
Checkpoint
more than 13,000 of are not working.
The water supplier also said they've known about problems with one type of smart meter since October last year, and the fault has so far affected around one third of the 40,000 meters installed since 2022.
Greg is one customer who has been receiving zero fee bills, the first one arriving in May.
"We got the bill that said we had used no water and there was just the sort of standard monthly charge. And I just thought oh well, they've forgotten to read it or they haven't got around to reading it. And I just made a note that the next bill was gonna be bigger and then the next bill came and once again we'd used no water."
Greg contacted Watercare about the issue, who told him his smart metre must not be working.
"They said could you take a photo of the metre and then we can send you the proper bill. And I said, well, no, that's not possible because I've had knee surgery. I can't get down to take a photo."
He was then told the water supplier could send someone out to take the photo for him, but it would cost $35.
He said he was yet to receive the correct bill but had been told they would now be reading his metre manually.
Kyle was on to his second smart meter after the first one stopped sending signal a few months ago. But he told
Checkpoint
his water bills were now coming in much higher than he would expect.
"Our water bill on average was about $100 or $120 a month and then it jumped to about $200 and it I'm like yeah, no, that doesn't seem quite right.
"[Watercare] were basing it on estimates from the previous water bill, which would have been around summer, and me being a gardener I obviously used a bit more water."
Kyle said Watercare made no effort to contact him about the issue, and it was him who raised it with the agency.
He said they came back to him and told him his metre had temporarily stopped communicating.
"They used the word temporary, but if it was temporary, then why are they replacing it?"
He said he was still waiting to have the issue resolved.
"I disputed it initially. Sent them a photo of the meter, heard nothing back for them... then I sent them the photo and said, 'hey, can I please get a bill amended?' They said it would take three to five working days and I'm still waiting for it."
Watercare's head of retail operations Evan James said the fault means the meter eventually stops sending data but keeps recording water use.
Watercare stopped installing that particular model and started returning affected meters to manual reading, leading to ''catch up'' bills that are higher than previous months.
He said Watercare sincerely apologised for the inconvenience and it was offering payment options to help ease the impact.
Utilities Disputes told
Checkpoint
they would expect Watercare to inform customers if it was aware of issues with meters, and explore the options, like letting customers know they can self-report their use to avoid significant back bills.
Watercare has around 500,000 meters and of these, around 70,000 are smart meters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Teenagers who gain work experience at school more likely to be employed by age 20
Gateway supported short-term, work-based placements while Trades Academies provided learning in trades-related. (File photo) Photo: Supplied/ UCOL Teenagers who gain trade and workplace experience at school are more likely to get a qualification and complete apprenticeships, a report finds. A Ministry of Education report said students who participated in the Gateway and Trades Academy programmes were also more likely to be in substantial employment by the age of 20 than other students with similar characteristics. The report considered the cohorts that participated in the programmes in 2014 and in 2018 and compared their education and employment outcomes with similar students who did not participate. It said Gateway was set up in 2001 and supported short-term, work-based placements while Trades Academies had provided learning in trades-related fields since 2010. "Both programmes increased the likelihood of students staying in education at age 17 and achieving a Level 2 or higher qualification by age 18. "These effects were consistent across genders and ethnic groups," the report said. "Men in both programmes were more likely to enrol in and complete apprenticeships, though rates remained lower for Māori and Pacific men. Women's apprenticeship participation remained low. "Both programmes reduced the likelihood of being in limited employment and increased students being in substantial employment, particularly for men. "Gateway had a stronger effect than Trades Academies in reducing limited employment for women, especially Māori and Pacific women." The report said 87-90 percent of Gateway and Trades Academy students had a level two qualification by the age of 18, compared with 78-79 percent for similar students who had done neither programme. It said 10-12 percent had completed an apprenticeship by age 24, compared with six percent for similar students. About a quarter of the group of similar students were in limited employment when they were 18, compared to 16-19 percent for the cohorts that had participated in the programmes. By age 20, 46-53 percent of the Trades Academy and Gateway cohorts were in substantial employment, compared with 35-38 percent for the group that had done neither programme. The report said the programmes appeared to have "a protective role for educational participation and achievement during the pandemic". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ratepayers foot bill for rubbish dumped along South Wairarapa coast
The local council described the dumping as "enormously irresponsible and disappointing". Photo: Emily Ireland Ratepayers will foot the $145,000 bill to to remove 26 tonnes of illegally dumped rubbish along on the South Wairarapa Coast. Environmental Protection Authority, police and specialist contractors needed more than two weeks to clean up waste dumped along the coast, which included 3.7 tonnes of scrap metal - bikes, whiteware and even a car. The clean-up was an urgent recommendation from the Environmental Protection Authority. "The overall cost came in at approximately $145,000, which is about $50,000 less than originally forecast," said South Wairarapa District Council chief executive Janice Smith. Rubbish is removed from the South Wairarapa coastline. Photo: Supplied/SWDC Smith said people dumping this amount of rubbish was "enormously irresponsible and disappointing", as items like bikes and whiteware can be disposed of at transfer stations for no cost. The council said illegal dumping was a serious issue, as it could pose a serious health issue, when it contained harmful materials, such as glass, metal and hazardous matter. It said the clean-up process also ended up being expensive for both the council and ratepayers, and on the environment, with abandoned waste damaging ecosytems, polluting airways and harming wildlife. The site is now permanently blocked off, with security cameras in place to monitor it. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
Clutha council confident Mt Cooee Landfill won't run out of room
Mt Cooee Landfill. Photo: Facebook/Wasteco The Clutha District Council is confident a solution will be in place at a local landfill before it runs out of room. In February, the council reported the Mt Cooee Landfill area was critically close to capacity - it could need to stop accepting waste by August - and could cost an estimated $157,000 a month to ship waste elsewhere. Work has been underway to reduce, mitigate or eliminate that risk. That work included a 3D survey to figure out how much capacity was left and how long it would take to fill up and plans to build a general waste transfer pad so waste could be moved out of the district to another landfill until a decision was made about building a new landfill at Mt Cooee. The pad was expected to be finished by early September. "At this stage, council staff are working to define the detail designs required for the transfer station and then go out to tender for this urgent work," the council said. The council acknowledged it had not been smooth sailing as councillors expressed serious concern at the early advice. "Staff worked in the background on the risk and were successful in the various risk elimination measures," the council said. "Council is very confident that a solution will be in place before it is needed." The resource consent for the continued operation, expansion and progressive rehabilitation of the Mt Cooee Landfill was signed off by the Otago Regional Council in May. Work to enable an extension of the current landfill cell was nearly done, but existing cell had about 15 months of capacity left, the council said. The extension was expected to cost about $200,000. The total budget available for Mt Cooee upgrades was $7.1 million, which also included the transfer station and a possible resource centre. Building a new landfill cell was also a possible option. "Staff are intending to bring back to council a decision over the economics of operating Mt Cooee versus operating a transfer station as the long-term solution." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.