logo

Soham Parekh, whose multi-startup scam grabbed headlines, sparks online outrage as he returns to set up new shop

Time of Indiaa day ago
Soham Parekh breaks silence after startup scandal | Credit: X
Soham Parekh, who was recently accused of working simultaneously at multiple startups, has finally addressed the controversy. The matter gained widespread attention after Suhail Doshi, founder of Playground AI, shared a post on social media accusing Parekh of moonlighting at three to four Y Combinator-backed startups. Parekh contacted Doshi to ask whether he had 'completely sabotaged' his career and how he could 'come clean.' Doshi confirmed the conversation, quoting Parekh's message where he expressed a desire to make amends: 'I do really love what I do.' 'Real Soham Parekh' speaks out
Shortly after, a new post from an account named 'The Real Soham Parekh' added more layers to the unfolding situation. The post claimed he was 'pissed' and had 'something to prove.' The message hinted at a desire to rebuild his reputation, stating, 'If there's one thing to know about me, it's that I love to build.' He claimed he was now working as the founding engineer at a new startup and had signed an exclusive deal, insisting it was with just one company. 'I've been isolated, written off, and shut out… But building is the only thing I've ever truly known,' he wrote. The fallout after Doshi's viral tweet
The controversy erupted after Doshi's viral tweet labeling Parekh a 'scammer' and warning founders to beware. Doshi alleged that Parekh worked at multiple startups at once, provided a falsified CV, and even lied about his visa status. According to Doshi, Parekh had been fired within his first week at Playground AI and had not stopped similar behavior since. Several founders echoed these claims, saying Parekh either worked multiple roles at once or misled them during the hiring process. Some even cancelled trials after seeing the tweet.
PSA: there's a guy named Soham Parekh (in India) who works at 3-4 startups at the same time. He's been preying on YC companies and more. Beware.
I fired this guy in his first week and told him to stop lying / scamming people. He hasn't stopped a year later. No more excuses. — Suhail (@Suhail) July 2, 2025 Background: Education, resume, and red flags
Parekh holds an MS in Computer Science from Georgia Tech and a BE from Mumbai University. His two-page resume, shared online, listed five startups with remote roles, including DynamoAI and GitHub. Questions remain around the legality of holding multiple roles in both India and the US, with companies depending on specific contract clauses. Multiple allegations, one consistent style
Other founders noted that Parekh claimed different reasons for leaving past roles, ranging from 'time zone issues' to 'burning runway.' Despite this, many admitted he performed well in interviews. His email style also caught attention, often starting with 'TL;DR: I love everything about…' and closing with 'Best, Soham.'
With questions unanswered and reputations on the line, the Soham Parekh case continues to stir debate across the startup community. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral follow Indiatimes Trending . First Published: Jul 03, 2025, 14:58 IST
Nancy Jaiswal is a journalist who started her career in reporting and has covered both hard and soft news. From serious city news developments to lighthearted lifestyle pieces, she has written on almost everything hapenning in India (except maybe alien invasions—yet!). For her, writing isn't just work; it's a passion, an obsession, and sometimes the reason she forgets to reply to texts. Read More
3/7/2025 15:31:16
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Myntra aims to stream glamour through stories, stars and songs
Myntra aims to stream glamour through stories, stars and songs

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

Myntra aims to stream glamour through stories, stars and songs

Online fashion portal Myntra, part of Walmart-backed Flipkart Group, is sharpening its content-led commerce game with the launch of Glamstream, a shoppable lifestyle content destination that brings together music videos, podcasts and bite-sized stories featuring celebrities and influencers. The company, which has onboarded film stars such as Zeenat Aman, Vijay Deverakonda, Raveena Tandon, and Tabu and rapper Badshah to feature in lifestyle content spanning fiction and songs, will allow users to shop products displayed or used in the content. Glamstream was rolled out on Friday with over 4,000 content episodes spanning 500-plus hours. 'We've noticed that over 70% of shoppers rely on influencer content to make purchases and are looking for relatability in what they buy. While we've been putting out content featuring influencers on our app for a year-and-a-half, we are adding celebrity videos now,'Sunder Balasubramanian,chief marketing officer, Myntra, said in an interview. The company has onboarded over 100 celebrities for this initiative that will include everything from styling shows to podcasts and music videos, he added. To be sure, Myntra isn't new to the social commerce game. In 2021, it had announced the launch of M-Live, a live video streaming and live commerce section, on its app that built on its existing plank of content-led commerce initiatives such as Myntra Studio and Myntra Fashion Superstar. The former is a personalised content destination and provides users access to over 20,000 fashion, beauty, and lifestyle tips and ideas. Myntra Fashion Superstar is an online reality show that works as a talent platform to identify emerging fashion and beauty influencers. Content-led commerce is booming in India, with platforms and brands leveraging stories, songs, and music by digital creators and influencers to drive product discovery and social commerce platforms like Trell and Roposo lead the surge, while some other brands have integrated content and commerce through acquisitions and in-house content creation. Roposo, for example, focuses on creator-led live commerce, where creators can host their own pop-up stores and engage with users through live streams. Short video platform Moj has partnered with Flipkart, allowing users to purchase Flipkart-tagged products directly from within the videos. Similarly, social commerce platform Meesho focuses on an assisted shopping model, empowering women entrepreneurs to resell products, particularly in tier-2 and tier-3 experts point out that innovations in video marketing—both through short-video apps and social commerce apps, have aided the surge that took place in online shopping during the pandemic. They allow for a click on products for purchase, often with the video being played on the side. According to a Bain& Company report in 2020, social commerce in India (in terms of gross merchandise value) is projected to reach $16-20 billion by 2025 and $60-70 billion by 2030. In the Ficci-EY media and entertainment report 2025, Anupriya Acharya, chief executive officer of Publicis Groupe South Asia, had said that the media and entertainment sector is evolving with consolidation, quick commerce, and niche influencers. 'AI, data, and tech-driven storytelling will deepen content, commerce, and community convergence, making 2025 a pivotal year for interactive, shoppable experiences,' she had added. Balasubramanian said the idea of the latest initiative is to marry inspiration and shopping at a unique scale, given the company's 70 million monthly active user base. 'The future of shopping is content-led commerce,' he added.

Not an ‘enemy': How India's ties with Russia reflect the West's past choices
Not an ‘enemy': How India's ties with Russia reflect the West's past choices

First Post

time13 minutes ago

  • First Post

Not an ‘enemy': How India's ties with Russia reflect the West's past choices

Rather than cast New Delhi as a liability, the West should view it as a potential bridge between democratic alliances and Eurasian realities read more A recent Telegraph article by Tom Sharpe has stirred controversy by branding India an 'enemy' over its continued partnership with Russia—a nation blamed for fuelling the Ukraine war through oil exports and defence cooperation. As a long-time observer of India's strategic calculus, I believe this framing is dangerously simplistic. Rather than vilify India, the West must reckon with how its own historical choices—and geography—shaped India's ties with Moscow. A Relationship Forged by Strategy, Not Defiance STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's ties with Russia are not born of hostility toward the West, but of historical necessity and geographic logic. During the Cold War, India's non-alignment masked a tilt towards the Soviet Union, which proved decisive during the 1971 war with Pakistan—a US-backed ally. Soviet support then was not merely symbolic; it was strategic, helping India in a conflict that played out more than 4,000 miles from Moscow's borders. That partnership matured into robust defence cooperation. The 2009 renewal of a Soviet-era agreement, joint projects like the BrahMos cruise missile, and India's $5.43 billion S-400 Triumf deal in 2018—pursued despite US CAATSA sanctions—reflect more than nostalgia. They represent a calculated hedge: Russia as a steady supplier and a counterweight to China, India's northern adversary. Sharpe's article fails to engage with this layered history. India's position was not forged in defiance of the West but shaped by the West's Cold War choices and India's need to manage its precarious neighbourhood. Moscow offered what Washington would not: reliable arms without conditionality. Oil, Ukraine, and West's Reaction Russia's war in Ukraine has sharpened scrutiny of India's neutrality. By May 2025, India was importing 1.96 million barrels of Russian crude daily—roughly 40–44 per cent of its oil supply, a 40 per cent increase since 2022, according to OPEC. This surge reflects economic pragmatism: Russian oil is cheap, plentiful, and accessible. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But economic logic has met political backlash. US Senator Lindsey Graham recently proposed a 500 per cent tariff on nations trading with Russia, aiming to cut off the lifeblood of what he calls Putin's war machine—estimated to have cost Ukraine $400 billion, per the Kiel Institute. Sharpe leans into this narrative, interpreting India's oil purchases and naval cooperation as alignment with Moscow against the West. Yet this interpretation overlooks a critical point: geography. India is nearly 4,000 miles from the front lines of Europe's war. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently urged peace in Ukraine, but India's interests remain regional—focused on border security, energy access, and economic resilience. Unlike Europe, India does not have a belligerent Russia on its doorstep. To Europe, Russia is a bad neighbour. With 80 per cent of Russians living west of the Ural Mountains, Europe faces a persistent neighbourly threat. India, however, is separated by vast distances, with no territorial disputes or shared battlefields with Russia. This geographical divide shapes a pragmatic alignment, not rivalry, challenging the West's projection of its neighbourly anxieties onto India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Russia: A Neighbourly Threat to Europe, Not to India To understand the West's frustrations, one must also understand its geography. For Europe, Russia is not a distant actor—it is a revisionist power next door. The 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine displaced over 8 million people, as the UN notes. Hybrid attacks like the 2022 Nord Stream sabotage and simmering conflicts in Georgia and Moldova have intensified European insecurity. A 2023 Chatham House report underscored this tension, pointing to Russia's proximity and history of destabilisation as central to the EU's hardened stance. This is Europe's reality—and it is not India's. New Delhi is separated from Moscow by vast geography and divergent histories. It has no territorial disputes with Russia, no competing security pacts, and no shared battlefield. Its relationship with Moscow is not one of rivalry but of steady, if pragmatic, alignment. To conflate Europe's neighbourly anxieties with India's strategic autonomy is to miss the point entirely. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Not a Pawn, Not an Enemy Branding India an enemy because of its Russia ties ignores the role the West itself played in shaping that very relationship. During the Cold War, it was Western hesitation and alignment with Pakistan that pushed India closer to Moscow. In the decades since, India has maintained a careful, multipolar approach—balancing its partnerships with Russia, the US, and other regional actors through institutions like Brics, SCO, and the Quad. India's decisions are guided not by loyalty or betrayal, but by national interest. Just as Britain acts to safeguard its own security and energy needs, so does India. Its approach to Russia reflects long-term calculations shaped by history, geography, and economic necessity—not ideological sympathy for Moscow's adventurism. The West's Opportunity: Respect India's Perspective The United States has thus far tolerated India's neutrality because it values India's role in balancing China in the Indo-Pacific. But as domestic pressure mounts in Washington, London, and Brussels, proposals like Graham's tariff threaten to upend this fragile balance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sharpe's article, though provocative, should be seen as a warning: the West risks alienating India by failing to understand its perspective. Rather than cast New Delhi as a liability, the West should view it as a potential bridge between democratic alliances and Eurasian realities. With its unique vantage point, India could help moderate tensions, not exacerbate them—if only it is treated as a partner, not a problem. The author is a strategist in international relations and economic development. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

UN reports 613 deaths near Gaza aid points run by US-backed group
UN reports 613 deaths near Gaza aid points run by US-backed group

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

UN reports 613 deaths near Gaza aid points run by US-backed group

The UN human rights office said on Friday it has recorded 613 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys and at aid distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization since it first began operations in late May. Spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the rights office was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. She said it was not immediately clear how many of those killings had taken place at GHF sites, and how many occurred near convoys. Speaking to reporters at a regular briefing, Shamdasani said the figures covered the period from May 27 through June 27, and there have been further incidents since then. She said she was basing the information on an internal situation report at the office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Shamdasani said the figures, compiled through its standard vetting processes, were not likely to tell a complete picture, and we will perhaps never be able to grasp the full scale of what's happening here because of the lack of access for UN teams to the areas. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store