‘Very frightening': Glastonbury crowd chants anti-Israel slogans
Executive Council of Australian Jewry President Daniel Aghion KC reacts to an anti-Israel chant performed at Glastonbury.
'It's very frightening, that chant then became an echo because it was repeated in the pro-Gaza protest in Melbourne this Sunday,' he told Sky News host Steve Price.
'It's gone around the world, and it's gone local here.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Muslim preacher Wissam Haddad breached racial discrimination act in series of speeches, court finds
A Muslim preacher sued over a series of speeches in which he described Jewish people 'treacherous' and 'vile' has lost his racial discrimination case. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, fronted a four-day hearing in the Federal Court last month over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023, a month after the October 7 attack in Gaza. The speeches allegedly included derogatory language about Jewish people, including describing them as 'vile' and 'treacherous'. Proceedings were launched against Mr Haddad by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) co-chief executive Peter Wertheim AM and deputy president Robert Goot AO SC, who argued the speeches constituted unlawful discrimination. The speeches allegedly inferred Jewish people were 'very mischievous', oppressed one another, and were 'wicked and scheming' among other statements, according to ECAJ's statement of claim. The lengthy document included alleged transcripts from the speeches, with one excerpt claiming Jewish people 'used to kill their own prophets' while another described Jewish people as 'descendants of apes and pigs'. Mr Haddad claims he was referring to Islamic scripture in most cases. Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot submitted the speeches were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people in Australia. The speeches were also published online, with the action extending to the Al Madina Dawah Centre (AMDC) for allegedly posting videos of the sermons on their Facebook and Rumble pages. Justice Angus Stewart delivered his judgment on Tuesday afternoon at the NSW Federal Court, where he found Mr Haddad and AMDC did breach the racial discrimination act by delivering and publishing the lectures. Mr Haddad and AMDC have been ordered to remove the lectures from their social media. Justice Stewart also moved to restrain Mr Haddad from causing words, sounds or images to be communicated anywhere but in private which attribute characteristics to Jewish people that convey any disparaging imputations identified from the lectures.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Not good enough': Defence Minister Richard Marles starved of formal updates on military readiness for more than two years
Defence Minister Richard Marles was not kept informed of the Australian Defence Force's readiness for more than two years, the latest defence report has revealed. The Auditor General's performance audit of the Department of Defence exposed the lack of formal reporting on ADF readiness between 2023 and 2024. The revelation, uncovered by the AFR, has sparked political pressure on the Albanese government over Australia's military preparedness and low levels of defence spending. Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor described the situation as unacceptable and called on Mr Marles to clarify whether he had been left in the dark about military readiness. 'Every dollar spent by the Australian Defence Force is taxpayers' money,' Mr Taylor said in a statement provided to Sky News. 'It is critical Defence continues to meet the highest standards in its expenditure and risk practices. 'It is clearly not sufficient for formal reporting on something as critical as Australia's preparedness to be conducted informally and verbally. 'The minister must clarify what he knew, when he knew it, and whether he was satisfied from these informal reports about the status of Australia's maritime preparedness.' Senior defence strategy analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute Alex Bristow told Sky News that defence policy relies on "evidence-based advice to government". 'ASPI's Cost of Defence, published in May, also highlighted issues with the readiness of the Australian Defence Force and the progress of key acquisition and sustainment projects," he said. 'The defence readiness of the nation is a matter of legitimate public concern, especially when the Chinese ambassador is writing in the national press to dissuade the government from increasing defence spending." The report, which examined the sustainment of the Navy's Canberra-class amphibious assault ships confirmed formal reporting was suspended throughout 2023 and 2024. 'Preparedness reporting had not been provided to the Minister in 2023 and 2024 due to development of the 2023 Defence Strategic Review,' the report said. 'Defence expects the updated preparedness reporting to be in place by mid-2025.' The report added that advice to Mr Marles on preparedness has been through 'other means' over the two years, including via 'conversations'. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected suggestions the government was unaware of Australia's defence posture, calling them 'ridiculous'. 'That's just absurd. That's just absurd,' Mr Albanese told Nine's Today programme on Tuesday. 'Frankly, I haven't seen that report, but we sit in the National Security Committee with the chief of the Defence Force. 'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly.' Mr Albanese said his government had made major investments in defence since coming to office, including committing billions in new funding. NATO allies have agreed to boost military spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035, while the Albanese government has committed to a modest target of 2.3 per cent by 2033. Asked whether he was worried about a backlash from US President Donald Trump, Mr Albanese said, 'We will invest in the capability that Australia needs'.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Islamic preacher's 'vile' Jew sermons declared racist
An Islamist preacher can no longer make disparaging remarks about Jews in public after a landmark ruling on his speeches, in which he described them as vile and treacherous. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was accused of racial discrimination in relation to a series of fiery sermons, which have racked up thousands of views online, since November 2023. In the speeches, the preacher, also known as Abu Ousayd, referred to Jewish people as vile, treacherous, murderous, and mischievous. Justice Angus Stewart on Tuesday found the speeches were disparaging and likely to offend, insult, harass or intimidate Jewish people. "The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic,' Justice Stewart said. "They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group." During the landmark case testing the limits of religious expression and hate speech, two Jewish leaders argued the online lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jews. They sought the removal of the published speeches, a public declaration of error and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future. Mr Haddad denied breaching anti-discrimination laws and claimed he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He said he was speaking about "Jews of faith" rather than ethnicity while trying to explain that "what the Israeli government is doing to the people of Gaza" is "not something new". Ruling against the preacher would be tantamount to restricting the free exercise of religious expression, Mr Haddad's lawyer argued. Justice Stewart rejected the defence on Tuesday and ordered Mr Haddad to remove the speeches. He directed the preacher not to make any further comments that convey similar disparaging imputations. Mr Haddad has also been ordered to foot the legal bill for Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot. The preacher did not appear in the Federal Court when Justice Stewart handed down his decision, arriving late. His speeches were delivered during a time of heightened sensitivity after the designated terror group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking Israeli retaliation that has left the Gaza Strip in turmoil. The reporting of the war prompted questions and concerns from Mr Haddad's congregants and at the same time left Jewish Australians feeling unsafe, the court was told. An Islamist preacher can no longer make disparaging remarks about Jews in public after a landmark ruling on his speeches, in which he described them as vile and treacherous. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was accused of racial discrimination in relation to a series of fiery sermons, which have racked up thousands of views online, since November 2023. In the speeches, the preacher, also known as Abu Ousayd, referred to Jewish people as vile, treacherous, murderous, and mischievous. Justice Angus Stewart on Tuesday found the speeches were disparaging and likely to offend, insult, harass or intimidate Jewish people. "The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic,' Justice Stewart said. "They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group." During the landmark case testing the limits of religious expression and hate speech, two Jewish leaders argued the online lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jews. They sought the removal of the published speeches, a public declaration of error and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future. Mr Haddad denied breaching anti-discrimination laws and claimed he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He said he was speaking about "Jews of faith" rather than ethnicity while trying to explain that "what the Israeli government is doing to the people of Gaza" is "not something new". Ruling against the preacher would be tantamount to restricting the free exercise of religious expression, Mr Haddad's lawyer argued. Justice Stewart rejected the defence on Tuesday and ordered Mr Haddad to remove the speeches. He directed the preacher not to make any further comments that convey similar disparaging imputations. Mr Haddad has also been ordered to foot the legal bill for Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot. The preacher did not appear in the Federal Court when Justice Stewart handed down his decision, arriving late. His speeches were delivered during a time of heightened sensitivity after the designated terror group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking Israeli retaliation that has left the Gaza Strip in turmoil. The reporting of the war prompted questions and concerns from Mr Haddad's congregants and at the same time left Jewish Australians feeling unsafe, the court was told. An Islamist preacher can no longer make disparaging remarks about Jews in public after a landmark ruling on his speeches, in which he described them as vile and treacherous. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was accused of racial discrimination in relation to a series of fiery sermons, which have racked up thousands of views online, since November 2023. In the speeches, the preacher, also known as Abu Ousayd, referred to Jewish people as vile, treacherous, murderous, and mischievous. Justice Angus Stewart on Tuesday found the speeches were disparaging and likely to offend, insult, harass or intimidate Jewish people. "The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic,' Justice Stewart said. "They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group." During the landmark case testing the limits of religious expression and hate speech, two Jewish leaders argued the online lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jews. They sought the removal of the published speeches, a public declaration of error and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future. Mr Haddad denied breaching anti-discrimination laws and claimed he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He said he was speaking about "Jews of faith" rather than ethnicity while trying to explain that "what the Israeli government is doing to the people of Gaza" is "not something new". Ruling against the preacher would be tantamount to restricting the free exercise of religious expression, Mr Haddad's lawyer argued. Justice Stewart rejected the defence on Tuesday and ordered Mr Haddad to remove the speeches. He directed the preacher not to make any further comments that convey similar disparaging imputations. Mr Haddad has also been ordered to foot the legal bill for Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot. The preacher did not appear in the Federal Court when Justice Stewart handed down his decision, arriving late. His speeches were delivered during a time of heightened sensitivity after the designated terror group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking Israeli retaliation that has left the Gaza Strip in turmoil. The reporting of the war prompted questions and concerns from Mr Haddad's congregants and at the same time left Jewish Australians feeling unsafe, the court was told. An Islamist preacher can no longer make disparaging remarks about Jews in public after a landmark ruling on his speeches, in which he described them as vile and treacherous. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was accused of racial discrimination in relation to a series of fiery sermons, which have racked up thousands of views online, since November 2023. In the speeches, the preacher, also known as Abu Ousayd, referred to Jewish people as vile, treacherous, murderous, and mischievous. Justice Angus Stewart on Tuesday found the speeches were disparaging and likely to offend, insult, harass or intimidate Jewish people. "The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic,' Justice Stewart said. "They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group." During the landmark case testing the limits of religious expression and hate speech, two Jewish leaders argued the online lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jews. They sought the removal of the published speeches, a public declaration of error and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future. Mr Haddad denied breaching anti-discrimination laws and claimed he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He said he was speaking about "Jews of faith" rather than ethnicity while trying to explain that "what the Israeli government is doing to the people of Gaza" is "not something new". Ruling against the preacher would be tantamount to restricting the free exercise of religious expression, Mr Haddad's lawyer argued. Justice Stewart rejected the defence on Tuesday and ordered Mr Haddad to remove the speeches. He directed the preacher not to make any further comments that convey similar disparaging imputations. Mr Haddad has also been ordered to foot the legal bill for Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot. The preacher did not appear in the Federal Court when Justice Stewart handed down his decision, arriving late. His speeches were delivered during a time of heightened sensitivity after the designated terror group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking Israeli retaliation that has left the Gaza Strip in turmoil. The reporting of the war prompted questions and concerns from Mr Haddad's congregants and at the same time left Jewish Australians feeling unsafe, the court was told.
