M'sia urges concrete action in global city partnerships
The Housing and Local Government Ministry (KPKT) said Minister Nga Kor Ming (pic), in his capacity as the UN-Habitat Assembly president, made the call in his special address during the World Cities Summit 2025, which is being held in Vienna, Austria.
Nga, in addressing over 75 mayors and city leaders from around the world, underscored the urgency for city-level action rooted in local implementation and backed by innovation.
'Collaboration must lead to projects that solve real urban challenges. We must institutionalise knowledge-sharing and back our intentions with innovation funding, technical hubs and measurable outcomes,' he said in a Bernama report that is based on the KPKT statement yesterday.
Nga outlined a forward-looking approach that encourages cities to work together through mechanisms such as joint innovation funding, regional coordination on shared urban concerns, and standardised urban metrics to track the effectiveness of their initiatives.
He stressed that these are not mere theoretical but tested strategies grounded in Malaysia's own experience.
'Through platforms such as the Malaysia SDG Cities Roadmap, the Asean Smart Cities Network, and the Asia-Pacific New Urban Agenda Platform, we actively promote knowledge exchange and scalable solutions for sustainable urban development,' he added.
In reinforcing his call, Nga highlighted transformative urban models from around the world, including Barcelona's Superblocks, Yokohama's Zero Waste policy, and Curitiba's Bus Rapid Transit, describing them as examples of urban innovation that achieved global impact through networked learning.
Kuala Lumpur mayor and adviser on Sustainable Urbanisation Datuk Seri Dr Maimunah Mohd Sharif also shared several key insights on delivering affordable housing during her intervention speech at the Mayors Forum on Thursday.
She said affordable housing is more than a development target, it is a reflection of the government's social compact with the people.
'Real affordability takes more than policy, it demands shared conviction ... a truly inclusive city is one that listens, adapts, and responds in order to build a genuine sense of belonging with its people,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Opinion - Borders etched in ink: The 2000 MoU and Cambodia's irrefutable sovereignty
The 2000 MoU clearly identifies the agreed upon maps. - Photo: Supplied PHNOM PENH: On June 14, 2000, the Royal Government of Cambodia and the Royal Government of Thailand took a significant step toward peace and cooperation by signing the Memorandum of Understanding on the Survey and Demarcation Work of Land Boundary. Far from a vague political gesture, the agreement is an official treaty instrument drafted in three languages, — Khmer, Thai and English — and formally deposited with the Secretariat-General of the UN, making it not only bilaterally binding but internationally recognised. A treaty built on history The 2000 MoU does not exist in a vacuum. It clearly states that the ongoing survey and demarcation of the Cambodia–Thailand border must be conducted based on existing legal documents and maps—specifically those derived from the Franco–Siamese treaties of 1904 and 1907 and the associated Annex I map series produced by the Franco–Siamese Mixed Commission. These maps, endorsed and used for over a century by both states, leave little room for ambiguity: the temples of Ta Moan Thom, Ta Moan Tauch and Ta Krabei are located well within Cambodian territory. Legal clarity, not political convenience The legal strength of the 2000 MoU lies in its clarity. Article 1 of the MoU explicitly confirms the mutual recognition of the existing legal framework as the baseline for border work. Article 2 further establishes a joint commission responsible for border surveys and demarcation, emphasising cooperation and respect for previously agreed references. Nowhere does it suggest that any unilateral reinterpretation or political manoeuvring can override this legal foundation. This is crucial when considering recent provocative claims from certain Thai political figures asserting sovereignty over border temples. Such claims not only ignore historical treaties and cartographic facts but also violate the very MoU their own government co-signed. The UN Treaty Series: Global witness to bilateral commitments What makes the 2000 MoU even more binding is its registration with the U. According to Article 102 of the UN Charter, treaties registered and published with the UN carry increased international legitimacy and are subject to the scrutiny of international law. This means Thailand cannot feign ignorance or claim that the MoU is outdated — it remains an active, enforceable instrument under international treaty law. A commitment worth upholding For Cambodia, the 2000 MoU represents more than just a legal document — it is a pledge to peace, to historical truth and to international order. It acknowledges centuries-old facts, aligns with universally recognised maps, and provides a framework for settling disputes through dialogue and law — not through military provocations or cultural appropriation. Cambodia has consistently honoured this agreement. We have cooperated through the Joint Boundary Commission, respected legal channels and advocated for peaceful resolution. We expect the same in return. In the face of misinformation and political posturing, the 2000 MoU stands as a reminder that sovereignty is not up for debate when it has already been settled by law. It is time for all parties to return to the spirit of mutual respect, legality, and cooperation that defined the 2000 agreement. Cambodia's territorial integrity is not based on sentiment — it is built on centuries of documented history and codified international treaties. The line has already been drawn — and it is drawn in ink, not in sand.' - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN [Roth Santepheap is a Phnom Penh-based geopolitical analyst. The views and opinions expressed are his own.]
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
In Singapore, Louis Vuitton wins S$200,000 fight against ‘recalcitrant' Instagram counterfeit seller
SINGAPORE, July 6 — A Singapore-based Instagram seller who marketed counterfeit Louis Vuitton products as authentic and ignored a lawsuit has been ordered to pay the luxury fashion house S$200,000 (RM662,500) in damages for trademark infringement. The Straits Times reported today that Ng Hoe Seng, who operated through the Instagram accounts 'emcase_sg' and 'emcrafts_sg', sold fake phone cases, passport covers, card holders and purses at a fraction of the price of genuine Louis Vuitton goods. For example, a counterfeit passport cover was priced at S$159 — compared to the authentic version, which retails for between S$560 and S$945. Louis Vuitton Malletier (LVM) discovered the counterfeit operation in July 2022 and conducted a sting, buying S$2,100 worth of items through Ng's first account. After confirming the items were fake, the company issued a cease-and-desist letter in March 2023. But Ng simply switched to another Instagram account and resumed operations. A second undercover purchase led to LVM filing a trademark infringement lawsuit in August 2023. Ng failed to participate in any part of the court proceedings. On November 30, 2023, the Singapore High Court ruled in LVM's favour. On July 2, Justice Dedar Singh Gill awarded damages of S$200,000, far short of the S$2.9 million LVM had claimed based on 29 alleged infringements. 'The claimant's proposed quantum of S$2.9 million is grossly excessive,' the judge wrote, as reported by The Straits Times. While the statutory cap for each infringement is S$100,000, the judge limited the award to nine categories of goods, making the maximum possible S$900,000. Justice Gill also cast doubt on the financial harm to LVM, noting that 'knock-offs of luxury goods are usually not substitutable with the genuine goods'. In his judgment, the judge described Ng as 'a recalcitrant infringer' who engaged in 'deceptive marketing tactics', including reposting rave reviews from customers and enlisting influencers to promote the fake goods as authentic. Ng had also claimed the items were 'upcycled' from genuine Louis Vuitton material — a claim the court dismissed as 'a lie upon a lie'. According to The Straits Times, Justice Gill criticised Ng's behaviour, including making his account private while allowing followers to continue viewing posts, calling it 'an attempt... to mask his infringing activities'. He warned that online infringers pose a unique enforcement challenge. 'An online retailer can avail himself of a hydra-like approach... even if one head is sliced off, another can easily spring up.' Ng was unrepresented in court. LVM was represented by lawyers Ravindran Muthucumarasamy, Chan Wenqiang and Neo Xuan Hao Edwin of Ravindran Associates. Despite the court victory, it remains unclear whether LVM will recover the S$200,000. The Straits Times said, as of July 3, Ng's business, EMCASE SG, has been deregistered and both Instagram accounts mentioned in court have disappeared. However, a similarly named account — ' — remains active and appears to be selling Louis Vuitton-branded items.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Japan won't back down in tariff showdown with Trump, says PM Ishiba
TOKYO, July 6 — Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said today he won't 'easily compromise' in talks with Washington as Tokyo seeks to avert President Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs of up to 35 per cent on Japanese goods. 'We will not easily compromise. That's why it is taking time and why it is tough,' Ishiba told a television talk show. His comments came as Japan rushes to negotiate with the Trump administration before the Wednesday deadline for trade deals. While Trump imposed a sweeping 10 per cent tariff on imports from most trading partners in April, he unveiled — then paused — higher rates on dozens of economies including Japan to allow room for negotiations. This pause will expire July 9, meaning the elevated rates are due to kick in if countries fail to reach agreements with Washington to avert them. Trump has said he was going to write a letter to Japan, asking it to 'pay a 30 per cent, 35 per cent or whatever the number is that we determine,' and called the bilateral trade relation 'unfair'. He has particularly pressed Japan to accept more US automobiles and rice. Ryosei Akazawa, Tokyo's trade envoy, held telephone calls with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday and Saturday. In the Sunday television show, Ishiba reiterated that Japan, as the biggest investor nation in the US economy, should be treated differently from other countries. 'What is unfair? How is it unfair? We need to examine each one' of the US claims, he said. 'We are allies, but we have to say what we have to say. We are the world's largest investor nation and the largest job creator (in the US). We are different,' he said. On another Sunday television show, Ishiba said Japan was 'preparing to deal with all kinds of situations', when asked about how he plans to deal with Trump's letter. — AFP
