Egypt pushing 60-day Gaza truce tied to hostage release, aid entry
ISTANBUL, June 30 — Egypt's foreign minister said Sunday evening that his country is working on a new Gaza deal that includes a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of some Israeli hostages and the rapid entry of humanitarian aid into the besieged enclave, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported.
'We're working towards a durable solution and a permanent ceasefire,' Badr Abdelatty said in a televised interview with the local OnTV television.
He said the proposal is a joint effort by Egypt, Qatar and the United States (US) and represents 'a first step' towards a sustainable ceasefire.
'What's on the table now is a 60-day truce in exchange for the release of a number of Israeli hostages and the swift delivery of aid to Gaza, including medical supplies,' he added.
This move, the top diplomat said, 'would create momentum to move towards a lasting ceasefire, eventually leading to the implementation of the Jan 19 agreement.' — Bernama-Anadolu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Palestinian rights group loses legal fight to block UK from supplying components for Israeli F-35 warplanes
LONDON, June 30 — The High Court in London rejected a legal challenge today brought by a Palestinian rights group seeking to block the UK from supplying components for Israeli F-35 fighter jets. Israel has used the jets to devastating effect in its bombardment of Gaza. Both sides have been accused of atrocities during a conflict that has killed tens of thousands -- the vast majority of them Palestinian civilians, according to figures the United Nations deems reliable. The UK government suspended some export licences for military equipment after concluding there was a risk Israel could be breaching international humanitarian law but made an exemption for some parts for Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth jets. In its claim to the High Court, rights group Al-Haq called for a judicial review, saying the 'carve out' was unlawful and alleging the government had misunderstood the applicable rules of international law. It was supported by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and others in its case. Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said they 'reject all' of the grounds for challenging the government's decision. The case was not about 'whether the UK should supply arms or other military equipment to Israel', said the judges. Rather, the case was concerned with 'whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration' because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components may be used by Israel in the Gaza war in actions that could break international humanitarian law. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament, and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts,' said the judges. 'Once the true nature of the issue is identified, it is clear that the claim must fail. Accordingly, permission to bring a judicial review claim is refused,' they added. Shawan Jabarin, General Director of Al-Haq said in a statement issued to AFP: 'By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough. 'We will continue to persevere in the UK and beyond until governments are held accountable. Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised,' he added. 'Loophole' The UK contributes components to an international defence programme that produces and maintains the F-35s. Defence Secretary John Healey argued a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'. Lawyers for Al-Haq said the government had known there was a 'clear risk' Israel would use the jet parts to commit violations of international law. But government lawyer James Eadie said the court was not placed to rule on the legality of Israel's actions, and that attempting to do so could have a 'potentially deleterious' effect on 'foreign relations with a friendly state, namely Israel'. In September 2024, the new Labour government announced it was suspending around 30 of 350 export licences following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. But the partial ban did not cover British-made F-35 parts, which include refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats, according to Oxfam. Healey has previously said suspending F-35 licences would 'undermine US confidence in the UK and NATO' but lawyers for Al-Haq have described the exemption as a 'loophole'. UK-based NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade has said that licencing figures showed the government had made a 'shocking increase in military exports to Israel' in the months after its September 2024 announcement of partial suspensions. It said the figures showed the UK approved £127.6 million (RM715 million) in military equipment to Israel in single-issue licences from October to December 2024, saying this was more than for the period from 2020 to 2023 combined. Most of the licences were for military radars, components and software, as well as targeting equipment, according to the NGO, which was involved in the case against the government. Israel launched war on Gaza after an attack by militants from Palestinian group Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, an occupied Palestinian territory, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. The UN considers these figures to be reliable. — AFP
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Terrible failures': Netanyahu's Iran lustre fades, comes under fire at home as pressure grows to end Gaza war
JERUSALEM, June 30 — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's rise in popularity during the war with Iran may already be fading, as pressure mounts at home to end the conflict in Gaza. Netanyahu claimed victory over the Islamic republic in the 12-day war that ended with a ceasefire last week, after President Donald Trump ordered US warplanes to join in bombing Iranian nuclear sites. Political scientist Assaf Meydani, in a column on Israeli website Ynet on Saturday, said that alongside a 'victory for both Trump and Netanyahu' in Iran, the Israeli leader 'will have to explain a series of failures'. Most notable among them, according to Meydani, is Netanyahu's 'failure to end the campaign in Gaza', where Israel has been fighting to crush the Palestinian militant group Hamas since October 2023. 'Hamas, though battered, has not been destroyed, and 'Swords of Iron' has become prolonged attrition,' Meydani said, using Israel's name for its military campaign in the Gaza Strip. 'The people of Israel are strong, but tensions are simmering.' Israelis fearful of the threat of a nuclear Iran rallied behind Netanyahu as he led the campaign against Israel's longtime rival. Now that that war is over, domestic and international pressure has resumed to secure an end to the fighting in Gaza. A public opinion poll published by Israel's Kan public broadcaster the day after Tuesday's ceasefire with Iran suggested a rise in support for Netanyahu. But while his approval ratings went up compared to previous polls, 52 percent of respondents in the Kan survey still said they wanted Netanyahu — Israel's longest-serving prime minister — out of office. Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed said they wanted the Gaza war to end, compared to 22 percent who favoured continuing the fighting. Israeli newspaper Maariv said Friday that its polling showed a 'surge' for Netanyahu immediately after the ceasefire with Iran had 'evaporated almost entirely' within days. In the coastal hub of Tel Aviv on Saturday, thousands of people gathered to demand a ceasefire deal that would bring home the dozens of hostages still held in Gaza since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war. Liri Albag, who was released from captivity in January under a short-lived truce, told the crowd that Netanyahu and Trump 'made brave decisions on Iran. Now make the brave decision to end the war in Gaza and bring (the hostages) home.' A demonstrator in a clown costume with a mask depicting US President Donald Trump holds a baby puppet depicting Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next to a man lying on the ground depicting an Israeli hostage. — AFP pic 'Terrible failures' Trump wrote on Saturday on his Truth Social platform that 'Netanyahu is negotiating a deal with Hamas that will include the release of the hostages.' On Sunday, he added: 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' On the same day, Netanyahu said that the war with Iran had created 'opportunities' to free the remaining hostages. Netanyahu has also faced renewed pressure from one of his political rivals, former prime minister Naftali Bennett. Criticising the Netanyahu government's 'inability to decide' on Gaza, Bennett called for 'a comprehensive agreement that includes the release of all the hostages' to end 'the terrible impasse and political confusion'. 'Netanyahu must step down. He has been in power for 20 years... that's far too long', Bennett told Israel's Channel 12 in an interview that aired on Saturday. 'The people want change, they want calm,' added Bennett, who is widely expected to run for office again in the next elections, scheduled for late 2026. Gil Dickman, a prominent activist demanding action by Israel to secure the release of the hostages, said that while 'the operation in Iran was a success', Netanyahu had 'failed' to 'make people forget his responsibility' for failing to prevent Hamas's unprecedented 2023 attack. Dickman, whose cousin Carmel Gat was killed in captivity and her body retrieved from Gaza in August, told AFP that Netanyahu's 'terrible failures and the abandonment of the hostages will not be forgotten'. Expressing 'cautious optimism' after Trump's recent remarks, Dickman said there was 'apparently an opportunity to end the war'. 'We couldn't save my cousin, but we can still save those who are still alive in Gaza.' — AFP
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Istanbul mayor jailed and protests rage: Aftermath as Erdogan eyes compliant opposition in Turkiye's leadership shake-up
ANKARA, June 30 — A court hearing that could upend the leadership of Turkey's main opposition CHP is the latest bid to hobble the party behind a wave of spring protests that shook the government, analysts say. The hearing, which takes place on Monday at an Ankara court, could render null and void the result of a leadership primary within the Republican People's Party (CHP) in November 2023 on grounds of alleged fraud — thereby overturning the election of leader Ozgur Ozel. In February, the Ankara public prosecutor opened an investigation into allegations of vote buying at the congress which resulted in Ozel defeating longtime incumbent Kemal Kilicdaroglu. The CHP has denied the allegations. The outcome could see several CHP figures — including jailed Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu — facing up to three years in prison and a political ban for graft, Turkish media reported. And if the election result is cancelled, the party leadership would almost certainly revert to 76-year-old Kilicdaroglu. He was ousted five months after losing a bitterly fought presidential campaign against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that was widely seen as the most important vote in generations, leaving the party in crisis. Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right) arrives for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Heads of State and Government summit in The Hague, on June 25, 2025. NATO leaders hold a two-day summit on June 24 and 25 in The Hague. — AFP pic Taming the opposition 'This is a bid to reshape the CHP and create an opposition that is controlled by a government which is becoming more and more authoritarian,' Berk Esen, a political science expert at Istanbul's Sabanci University, told AFP. 'This will provoke a split within the party, putting a weak, defeated leader in charge whom the voters don't want any more,' he said. Kilicdaroglu has already said he would be willing to take on the party leadership again if the court overturned the primary result, sparking uproar within the CHP. 'It would be out of the question to not recognise such a verdict. Would it be better if a trustee was appointed to lead the party?' he said, also voicing his disapproval of the mass protests called by the CHP following Imamoglu's arrest and jailing in March. Widely seen as the only politician capable of defeating Erdogan at the ballot box, Imamoglu was arrested in connection with a graft and terror probe which the CHP has denounced as groundless. He was jailed on the day that he was named CHP's candidate for the 2028 presidential race, his removal sparking Turkey's worst street unrest since 2013. 'I feel a deep sense of betrayal. I cannot stomach such remarks when so many people are in prison,' Imamoglu said in response to Kilicdaroglu's remarks. 'Kilicdaroglu is a politician who will be remembered very badly. Some accuse him of working for (Erdogan's ruling) AKP but I think it's more a case of his ambition knowing no bounds,' said Esen. 'He is collaborating with an authoritarian government in order to get his own power back.' Following Imamoglu's arrest, Ozel went from being a relatively low-profile leader to the face of the protests, his impassioned speeches sharpening both his own image and that of the CHP, which has since held rallies across the country and is now leading the polls. According to a survey by Ank-Ar Research published last week, if an election were to be held now, the CHP would win 34.6 percent, more than five percentage points higher than the 29.4 percent for the AKP. And the government is not happy. Protesters and members of the Collective for the Defence of Human Rights in Turkey demonstrate outside the Council of Europe, in Strasbourg, eastern France, on June 25, 2025. — AFP pic No more demonstrations 'From the government's perspective, it is crucial they get the CHP off the streets because Ozel is seen as dangerous,' said Eren Aksoyoglu, an expert in political communication. 'By contrast, Kilicdaroglu is making conciliatory noises to those in power, saying he no longer wants any demonstrations and that he is ready to negotiate a change to the constitution,' he said. If he were to take over the party leadership, it would 'put the CHP in a position where it was negotiating with the government rather than fighting it,' agreed Esen. Observers say a more sympathetic opposition would give Erdogan much greater room for manoeuvre in the government's negotiations with the PKK after the Kurdish militants said they were ending their decades-long armed struggle. It could also help the government push through a constitutional amendment to allow Erdogan to extend his term in office beyond 2028 — a step that would require opposition support to be voted through. 'I don't think Kilicdaroglu would be able to hold on to the CHP leadership in the long term, but if the process (of leadership change) is drawn out over the course of a year, for example, that would let the government to change the constitution,' said Esen. And that would spell 'total disaster for the opposition', he said. In any event, Monday's hearing would likely spark 'a new wave of protest, which will have economic and political consequences for the government', he added. — AFP
