logo
Woman fined Dhs20,000 for insulting another woman via WhatsApp in Al Ain

Woman fined Dhs20,000 for insulting another woman via WhatsApp in Al Ain

Gulf Today4 days ago
Al Ain Court of First Instance obligated a woman to pay Dhs20,000 to another woman for insulting her via WhatsApp. The defendant had been convicted of this charge in a previous lawsuit.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant in which she requested the court to obligate the latter to pay her Dhs100,000 in compensation for the material and moral harms she had befallen plus the fees and expenses.
The plaintiff pleaded that the defendant had verbally abused her via WhatsApp and had already been convicted of this charge in a previous lawsuit, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal. As she had suffered several harms due to what the defendant did, the plaintiff was prompted to file this lawsuit with the aforementioned requests.
The court explained that the defendant's error was proven and resulted in psychological, moral and material harms to the plaintiff. As there was a causal relationship between the error and the harm, the defendant is legally obligated to compensate the plaintiff for those harms. The court thereby estimated the compensation due to the plaintiff at Dhs20,000.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abu Dhabi man fined Dhs7,000 for insulting woman verbally and on social media
Abu Dhabi man fined Dhs7,000 for insulting woman verbally and on social media

Gulf Today

time11 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Abu Dhabi man fined Dhs7,000 for insulting woman verbally and on social media

Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Cases Court obligated a man to pay a compensation of Dhs7,000 to a woman after he had verbally abused her during a phone call and then sent audio clips on a social media platform. As a result, the victim filed a criminal case and a verdict was accordingly issued. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which she requested the court to obligate the defendant to pay Dhs30,000 in compensation for the harm she had befallen as a result of the words he uttered on a social media platforms that tarnished her reputation and caused her serious harm. She also requested the court to obligate the defendant to pay the incurred expenses and lawyer's fees. The court explained that it was established from the previous criminal case that the defendant was charged with insulting the victim with offensive words over the phone and insulting her again in a way that tarnished her reputation by sending the messages indicated in the report to a social media platform. According to the provisions of Articles 292 and 293/1 of the Civil Transactions Law, any harm to others necessitates the perpetrator to pay a compensation, the court said, adding that the defendant's mistake caused the plaintiff moral harm as embodied in pain and grief. Based on the above, the court estimated that the compensation the victim deserves for the trauma she suffered to be Dhs7,000.

CBUAE imposes financial sanctions of Dhs4.1 million on three exchange houses
CBUAE imposes financial sanctions of Dhs4.1 million on three exchange houses

Gulf Today

timea day ago

  • Gulf Today

CBUAE imposes financial sanctions of Dhs4.1 million on three exchange houses

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) imposed varying financial sanctions amounting to Dhs4,100,000 on three exchange houses, pursuant to Article (14) of the Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Illegal Organisations and its amendments. The financial sanction has been imposed after assessing the findings of examination conducted by the CBUAE, which revealed that the three exchange houses failed to comply with AML/CFT policies and procedures. The CBUAE, through its supervisory and regulatory mandates, endeavours to ensure that all exchange houses, their owners, and staff abide by the UAE laws, regulations and standards established by the CBUAE to maintain transparency and integrity of the financial transactions and safeguard the UAE financial system. WAM

Al Ain man buys vehicle for Dhs11,500 but pays only Dhs300, court tells him to pay remaining amount
Al Ain man buys vehicle for Dhs11,500 but pays only Dhs300, court tells him to pay remaining amount

Gulf Today

time2 days ago

  • Gulf Today

Al Ain man buys vehicle for Dhs11,500 but pays only Dhs300, court tells him to pay remaining amount

Al Ain Court for Civil, Commercial and Administrative Cases obligated a person to pay Dhs11,200 to another for abstaining from settling the remaining price of a vehicle already delivered to him. The defendant paid only Dhs300 although he had an agreement with the plaintiff to buy the vehicle for a specific sum of money. Earlier, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which he requested the court to obligate the defendant to pay him Dhs11,200 plus Dhs3,000 in compensation for the material and moral harms and the legal expenses and fees. The plaintiff pleaded that pursuant to an agreement between them, he sold the vehicle subject of the lawsuit to the defendant for Dhs11,500 but the latter paid only Dhs300 and refused to pay the remainder despite the expiry of the agreed-upon period. This caused him material and moral harms and prompted him to file this lawsuit to obtain a verdict in his favour, he said. To support his lawsuit, the plaintiff submitted a copy of the sales contract. After reviewing the case, the court was hereby satisfied that the plaintiff was entitled to what he was requesting, especially since the defendant did not dispute the validity of the debt and did not present anything that contradicted the related documents. Based on this, the court ruled that the plaintiff's requests be fulfilled and the remaining amount stated in the sales contract be paid. As far as the compensation claim was concerned, the court stated that according to Article 292 of the Civil Transactions Law, compensation should cover both the actual loss suffered by the victim and any loss of profit, provided that these are a direct consequence of the harmful act. As the plaintiff, with whom the burden of proof lies, neither explained the nature of the harms nor the losses he sustained as a result of what the defendant did, the court hereby rejected this claim as it stood.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store