Rosmah's lawyer argues trial judge erred in refusing to recuse himself
Counsel for Rosmah, Datuk Jagjit Singh, submitted that the then High Court Judge, Datuk Mohamed Zaini Mazlan (now elevated to the Court of Appeal), ought to have disqualified himself from hearing the case after he allegedly instructed the court's Research Unit to prepare a draft judgment prior to the delivery of his decision.
'The judge erred in dismissing the recusal application on the basis that the 71-page document or the two purported judgments were merely opinions by the Research Unit.
'The Research Unit would not have prepared the draft opinions if instructions were not specifically given. The research unit would not venture on a frolic of its own without instructions and directions,' he submitted before a three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, sitting with Justices Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin.
Jagjit further submitted that the delegation of the preparation of a written judgment, whether in draft or final form, to the court's Research Unit on behalf of the judge was improper, unacceptable and gravely prejudiced his client.
'Therefore, the appellant (Rosmah) did not get a fair trial when her constitutional rights and liberty had been violated, thus resulting in a serious miscarriage of justice,' he said at the hearing of Rosmah's appeal to recuse Judge Mohamed Zaini from presiding over her solar case.
On Sept 1, 2022, Rosmah Mansor, 73, failed in her bid to recuse Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan from presiding over her corruption trial, following allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery.
On the same day, Rosmah was convicted on three charges of corruption in connection with the RM1.25 billion hybrid solar project in Sarawak.
She was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of RM970 million, in default 30 years in prison.
However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal.
Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin.
The hearing is scheduled to resume on June 25.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Outgoing appeals court president to judges: Continue to uphold legacy of justice
KUALA LUMPUR: Outgoing Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim marked his final day in office with a heartfelt farewell, urging the next generation of judges to preserve and strengthen the legacy of the country's judiciary. "I pray that the legacy of the Malaysian judiciary in upholding justice will be continued by the next generation of judges," he said in a note today. He said he trusts the judges will uphold justice with transparency, integrity, and courage. Abang Iskandar's judicial career spanned 18 years, beginning in 2007 and culminating in his appointment as Court of Appeal president, the second-highest judicial office in the country. "It has been a journey filled with challenges that shaped meaningful memories," he said, reflecting on nearly two decades of service. He expressed deep gratitude for the opportunities he had received and acknowledged the support of colleagues throughout the judiciary, legal profession, and academia. "During this time, I met many kind, dedicated and noble-hearted individuals… who have always extended their cooperation in the pursuit of justice," he said. Abang Iskandar said their contributions made his duties more manageable, both as Court of Appeal president and as a Federal Court judge. He admitted he would miss the daily camaraderie and wished his colleagues continued success. Describing his emotions as a mixture of joy and sadness, he said retirement would allow him more time with family, charitable work and personal pursuits. "I leave this role with immense gratitude, reflection, and a peaceful heart. This is the start of a new phase in life," he said.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
PM Anwar meets Italian industrial leaders to boost Malaysia investments
ROME: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim held high-level discussions with top executives from Italy's leading industrial firms, reinforcing Malaysia's position as a stable and progressive investment destination. The meetings, held on the second day of his working visit, focused on strategic sectors like defence and energy. Anwar engaged with shipbuilding giant Fincantieri's CEO Pierroberto Folgiero and Leonardo's senior vice-president Tomasso Pani, both key players in defence and aerospace. The talks aimed to strengthen Malaysia's role as a regional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) hub through government-to-government (G2G) partnerships. The Prime Minister also met ENI's CEO Claudio Descalzi to explore energy collaborations with Petronas. 'I emphasised Malaysia's readiness for mutually beneficial investments and urged concrete actions to realise proposed projects within set timelines,' Anwar stated. Accompanied by ministers including Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan and Defence Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin, Anwar later met Italy's Deputy Prime Minister Antonio Tajani ahead of the Malaysia-Italy Economic Partnership Roundtable. Trade between Malaysia and Italy grew by 3.3% year-on-year in early 2025, reaching RM6.5 billion. Italy remains Malaysia's fifth-largest trading partner and a major importer of Malaysian palm oil in the EU.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Federal court rules in favour of LHDN over RM1.8bil tax appeal against TNB
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court on Wednesday (July 2) allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (LHDN) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8bil against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the LHDN's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Minister of Finance. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The LHDN argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the LHDN's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the LHDN informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the LHDN issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the LHDN's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At Wednesday's hearing, the LHDN was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. - Bernama
