logo
Iran conflict poses minimal threat to US gas prices

Iran conflict poses minimal threat to US gas prices

The Hill24-06-2025
Americans could see modest increases in the prices they pay at the pump in the wake of increasing conflict with Iran, analysts say.
Andrew Lipow, president of consulting firm Lipow Oil Associates, told The Hill on Monday that any additional increases in gasoline prices will likely be just a few cents.
'I expect that gasoline prices are going to drift up about three to five cents a gallon over the next couple of weeks,' Lipow said.
He added that after an initial 5 percent jump in the price of crude oil, 'the market has sold off since then and now has turned negative.'
Oil prices fell on Monday, and U.S. benchmark WTI crude was down to about $69 per barrel on Monday afternoon — after jumping as high as $75 per barrel late last week in anticipation of U.S. strikes on Iran.
The U.S. hit Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday night, bringing the country directly into Iran's conflict with Israel.
Gasoline prices were higher on Monday, averaging $3.22 per gallon, up from $3.14 a week ago.
Austin Lin, principal analyst for refining and oil products at Wood Mackenzie, told The Hill he believed that fuel prices were higher than they would otherwise be as a result of the conflict, but that he did not believe they would rise much further.
'There's a good argument that says Q3 versus everyone's expectations from a month ago is going to see higher pricing,' Lin said. 'I would temper that and say, I don't think there's probably a lot of uplift from where we currently are.'
Vincent Piazza, senior energy analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, said he also 'wouldn't expect any drastic or dramatic change as we move into the summer months.'
Piazza said there's 'no reason to panic right now,' noting that there's not currently any new obstructions to Middle Eastern oil and gas.
'The keys, what we want to think about is…is capacity being curtailed? Is the flow of molecules being curtailed? Globally, we're fairly well supplied at this point,' he said.
The oil market is a global one, meaning that events around the world can impact what prices U.S. consumers pay at the pump.
Iran itself is a significant producer of oil, though it cannot sell to the U.S. or many countries due to sanctions. It does still sell to China.
While current conditions do not appear to be having a dramatic impact outside of an initial jump, that could change amid further retaliation, or if Iran decides to try to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil flows.
'The market thinks that China, who's already purchasing over 90 percent of Iranian oil exports, along with significant quantities of other Middle Eastern crude oil, is pressuring Iran to avoid shutting the Strait of Hormuz,' Lipow said.
Lin said that he believes it's unlikely that Iran will close the strait because doing so would hurt its own economy.
'It would be political suicide, both with their neighbors and with their primary purchasers,' he said.
'The Iranian economy is largely popped up by oil exports,' he said. 'And if you take away China's supply of Middle Eastern oil, not just from Iran, they are pretty quickly going to stop being your friend when it comes to buying sanctioned oil.'
The Trump administration, however, appears to be politically sensitive to gasoline prices, as President Trump campaigned specifically on bringing them down. Over the weekend, Secretary of State Marco Rubio encouraged China to tell Iran to keep the strait open.
'I would encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio told Fox News.
And on Monday, President Trump wrote on Truth Social ''EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN.'
'I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navarro on jobs report: ‘It's either incompetence or political interference'
Navarro on jobs report: ‘It's either incompetence or political interference'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Navarro on jobs report: ‘It's either incompetence or political interference'

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Friday slammed the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for a series of reports on job growth he deemed inaccurate. The longtime Trump adviser said the BLS had an 'unsettling pattern' of presenting the public with the wrong information. 'The BLS doesn't seem to be able to get that jobs number right. This has been going on for over a year,' Navarro said during a Friday appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill.' 'It's either incompetence or political interference, either way ahead, roll today, and that's appropriate, because this simply isn't right,' he told anchor Blake Burman. The BLS reported that 73,000 jobs were created last month after correcting May's report to reflect the creation of 19,000 jobs compared to an initial report of 144,000. The Bureau also corrected the number from June to 14,000 job adds after an initial report of 147,000. President Trump on Thursday fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, alleging she inflated job reports for the Biden administration ahead of the 2024 election. He said she 'faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory.' 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump in a Friday Truth Social post. Navarro told Burman on Friday that Trump's move was 'healthy.' The BLS did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. The bureau often revises jobs report, but the scale of Friday's changes surprised experts. Navarro, in his Friday interview, said the revisions cost the Fed much needed inflationary cuts, which held rates steady on Wednesday. 'It's is that if we had gotten that data when, when we should have got that data, the Federal Reserve yesterday would have lowered interest rates by at least 50 basis points. So you think so kind of incompetence or political no question about it,' Navarro told Burman. 'I mean, look, you had three months that were two months that revised significantly downward, one which was lower than expectations. I mean, the Fed, that's a completely different picture. I mean, there was a strong case for a 50 day there's an overwhelming case for a 50 basis point cut,' he added. Trump and his allies have pushed Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates to reset the economy for months. The president has threatened to fire Powell who has refused to shift course under pressure. 'The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out?' Trump wrote on Friday. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture.; Thank you for your attention to this matter,' he added. Later in the day, he walked back his stance when Newsmax's Rob Finnerty asked if the Fed chair would remain in place for now during an interview. 'Well, it's very disruptive if you fire,' he told him. 'So, I would say most likely, yeah.'

US notches worst 3 months for jobs growth since pandemic
US notches worst 3 months for jobs growth since pandemic

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

US notches worst 3 months for jobs growth since pandemic

U.S. job growth cooled sharply over the past three months and the unemployment rate rose, showing the labor market is shifting into a lower gear amid widespread economic uncertainty. Payrolls increased 73,000 in July after the prior two months were revised down by nearly 260,000, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report out Friday. In the last three months, employment growth has averaged a paltry 35,000 - the worst since the pandemic. The data send a stronger signal that the labor market is weakening more noticeably. Not only is job growth cooling markedly and unemployment rising, it's harder for unemployed Americans to get a job and wage gains have largely stalled. That poses further risks to a slowdown in consumer and business spending that's already underway. The report caps a week of high-profile data that show underlying economic momentum is cooling and inflation progress is stagnating, reasons why the Federal Reserve chose to keep interest rates unchanged again in a divided decision. Chair Jerome Powell maintained that the labor market is solid and the central bank needs to be wary of inflation risks - especially with President Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs. "The cracks in the labor market have widened substantially and add further pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates and support the dissenting Fed Governors' views that the FOMC should have lowered rates this week," Nationwide Chief Economist Kathy Bostjancic said in a note. She was referring to the Federal Open Market Committee, the panel that sets interest rates. The S&P 500 opened lower while Treasury yields and the dollar fell as traders upped their bets that the Fed will cut rates at their next meeting in September. Officials will see another employment report and a few more on inflation before then. After the report, Trump again called on the Fed to cut rates in a social media post. The sluggish payrolls growth reflected declines in manufacturing, professional and business services as well as government. Downward revisions to local government education payrolls contributed to the overall revisions in the prior two months. Private payrolls rebounded after barely rising in June, in large part due to health care and social assistance. Trump's efforts to pull back on government spending are still rippling through the job market. The federal government shed jobs for a sixth month in July, and unemployment is creeping higher in parts of the country that are hubs for government work, including the nation's capital. The cuts have also spilled over to layoffs at universities and nonprofits reliant on federal funding. Elsewhere in the labor market, demand for workers remains mostly healthy. Vacancies are still hovering above prepandemic levels, and initial applications for unemployment benefits have fallen in recent weeks, suggesting companies are holding on to their workers. Layoffs are generally low, though rising particularly in the tech sector due in part to the rise of artificial intelligence. Data later Friday showed consumer sentiment rose to a five-month high in July on a recent stock-market rally, while U.S. factory activity contracted at the fastest pace in nine months. "The main takeaway from the jobs report is that labor demand appears to be falling faster than labor supply - the labor market is not 'solid,' as Powell characterized it, and we expect him to revise his opinion accordingly. While a rate cut in December remains our base case, we see growing chances of an earlier move." The jobs report is composed of two surveys - one of businesses, which produces the payrolls figures, and another of households, which publishes unemployment and participation, among other metrics. The participation rate - the share of the population that is working or looking for work - dropped to 62.2%, the lowest in nearly three years. The rate for those between the ages of 25 and 54, known as prime-age workers, also declined. Some economists say Trump's immigration crackdown is pushing foreign-born workers out of the labor force, which is taking a toll on participation and also helping keep a lid on unemployment. The rise in joblessness partly reflected more people who lost their jobs outright. The number of people unemployed for 27 weeks or longer rose to 1.83 million, the highest since the end of 2021. The jobless rate among Black Americans rose sharply also to the highest since late 2021. Central bankers pay close attention to how labor supply and demand dynamics are impacting wage gains - especially with inflation risks poised to the upside. The report showed average hourly earnings rose 3.9% from a year ago. ______ (With assistance from Chris Middleton, Jarrell Dillard, Reade Pickert and Nazmul Ahasan.) Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a cornerstone of American culture for three generations, announced Friday it would take steps toward its own closure after being defunded by Congress — marking the end of a nearly six-decade era in which it fueled the production of renowned educational programming, cultural content and even emergency alerts. The demise of the corporation, known as CPB, is a direct result of President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. The closure is expected to have a profound impact on the journalistic and cultural landscape — in particular, public radio and TV stations in small communities across the United States. CPB helps fund both PBS and NPR, but most of its funding is distributed to more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations around the country. The corporation also has deep ties to much of the nation's most familiar programming, from NPR's 'All Things Considered' to, historically, 'Sesame Street,' 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' and the documentaries of Ken Burns. The corporation said its end, 58 years after being signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, would come in an 'orderly wind-down.' In a statement, it said the decision came after the passage through Congress of a package that clawed back its funding for the next two budget years — about $1.1 billion. Then, the Senate Appropriations Committee reinforced that policy change Thursday by excluding funding for the corporation for the first time in more than 50 years as part of a broader spending bill. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' said Patricia Harrison, the corporation's president and CEO. As part of Thursday's committee deliberations, Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., authored but then withdrew an amendment to restore CPB funding for the coming budget year. She said she still believed there was a path forward 'to fix this before there are devastating consequences for public radio and television stations across the country.' 'It's hard to believe we've ended up in the situation we're in,' she said. 'And I'm going to continue to work with my colleagues to fix it.' But Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, sounded a less optimistic tone. 'I understand your concerns, but we all know we litigated this two weeks ago,' Capito said. 'Adopting this amendment would have been contrary to what we have already voted on.' CPB said it informed employees Friday that most staff positions will end with the fiscal year on Sept. 30. It said a small transition team will stay in place until January to finish any remaining work — including, it said, 'ensuring continuity for music rights and royalties that remain essential to the public media system.' 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,' Harrison said. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.' The impact will be widespread NPR stations use millions of dollars in federal money to pay music licensing fees. Now, many will have to renegotiate these deals. That could impact, in particular, outlets that build their programming around music discovery. NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher estimated recently, for example, that some 96% of all classical music broadcast in the United States is on public radio stations. Federal money for public radio and television has traditionally been appropriated to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes it to NPR and PBS. Roughly 70% of the money goes directly to the 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations across the country, although that's only a shorthand way to describe its potential impact. Trump, who has called the CPB a 'monstrosity,' has long said that public broadcasting displays an extreme liberal bias, helped create the momentum in recent months for an anti-public broadcasting groundswell among his supporters in Congress and around the country. It is part of a larger initiative in which he has targeted institutions — particularly cultural ones — that produce content or espouse attitudes that he considers 'un-American.' The CPB's demise represents a political victory for those efforts. His impact on the media landscape has been profound. He has also gone after U.S. government media that had independence charters, including the venerable Voice of America, ending that media outlet's operations after many decades. Trump also fired three members of the corporation's board of directors in April. In legal action at the time, the fired directors said their dismissal was governmental overreach targeting an entity whose charter guarantees it independence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store