Elon Musk left the fate of your Social Security payments in the hands of a 21-year-old DOGE tech bro
Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency team made no attempt to understand data the tech billionaire was citing when he began claiming that 'massive fraud' was allowing Social Security payments to flow to 'illegals' in a series of X posts in early February, despite warnings from Social Security officials who told them they did not know what they were talking about, the The New York Times reported.
Instead, he ordered 21-year-old Akash Bobba, a former Palantir intern who'd been hired as a programmer for DOGE, be granted access to Social Security data without proper training so he could run his own analysis, the Times reported
When the acting commissioner, Michelle King, declined to do so, Musk had her fired and replaced with Leland Dudek. Dudek, brought back from a suspension on the DOGE team's recommendation, got Bobba the access.
But according to the Times, Bobba knew the Musk fraud claims were bunk.
He reportedly told others at the agency that he'd 'tried to deliverthe accurate context' to the world's richest person, apparently without success.
Citing interviews with dozens of people in the agency and throughout the Trump administration, the Times said Musk 'became fixated' on Social Security after he and his team misread government spending data and began to believe, incorrectly, that they'd uncovered fraud at the nation's old-age and disability pension program.
Musk's team reportedly became so obsessed and driven to prove the false claims as true that they pushed SSA officials to disregard a court order cutting off DOGE's access to sensitive data including Americans' Social Security numbers, employment history and other sensitive matters, even as the SpaceX and Tesla CEO became a target for administration critics after he referred to the massively popular New Deal program as a 'Ponzi scheme.'
One Musk ally, Michael Russo, was installed as the SSA's chief information officer. He pushed the then-acting commissioner to have agency workers analyze the data the Tesla billionaire and his team were claiming to be evidence of fraudulent payments.
When the Social Security experts said the payments in question were valid, Russo ignored them and said Musk's team wouldn't accept the conclusions of civil servants.
Musk departed government service earlier this month amid a falling-out with Trump, but his outsized wealth and ownership of the X platform mean he could create chaos surrounding the GOP's agenda and its plans for the 2026 midterms.
According to the most recent poll by The Economist and YouGov, a full 76 percent of Republicans see Musk favorably while just 18 percent view him unfavorably.
According to a poll conducted by The New York Times and Siena College in late April, 77 percent of Republicans view Musk favorably.
The billionaire is more popular than House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, or almost anyone else in the GOP save for President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
But at the same time, just fifteen percent of Democrats and 34 percent of independents have favorable views of the tech mogul.
A week after he blew up his relationship with Trump by, among other things, accusing him of being a pedophile, Musk took to X to express regret over his war of words with the president and back down by conceding that 'some' of his posts attacking the commander-in-chief had been excessive.
'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' he said, just days after Trump said 'very disappointed' in his former special adviser and campaign donor for criticizing the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' he is attempting to push through the Senate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Jury reaches partial verdict in P Diddy trial
The jury at the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against the music mogul but are struggling to reach a unanimous conclusion on a count of racketeering, according to a note passed to the judge on Tuesday night. Combs, 55, is accused of forcing two former girlfriends to have sex with male escorts in days-long performances that he referred to as 'freak-offs'. He is charged with sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and a racketeering conspiracy, which relates to allegations that he used his business empire, and his retinue of assistants and security guards, to coerce his victims. He has pleaded not guilty. A note passed to Judge Arun Subramanian on Tuesday evening said: 'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5. We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.' The four counts they have decided relate to sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, in relation to two of his former girlfriends: the singer Cassie Ventura, who dated him on and off for about eleven years until 2018, and a more recent girlfriend who testified anonymously as 'Jane'. The first count, where they are struggling to reach a verdict, refers to 'racketeering conspiracy'. The prosecution and Combs's defence attorneys both asked that jurors be told to carry on with deliberations. After consulting them, Judge Subramanian summoned the jurors into the court and told them to do so. A little later they were dismissed for the day, to continue their deliberations in the morning. The trial of Combs began in mid-May, and the prosecution case has lasted six weeks. Ventura, 38, his former girlfriend, testified over four days while heavily pregnant. She said she was in love with Combs. But she said she found the 'freak-offs' humiliating and degrading and he threatened to release video he had filmed of them if she did not participate in more. She also described a pattern of violent abuse. Former employees of Combs testified too: some under subpoena, and some said they had witnessed Combs being violent towards Ventura. A former assistant named Capricorn Clark said Combs came to her home with a gun in December 2012 after he discovered that Ventura was seeing a rapper named Scott Mescudi, and forced her to drive with him to Mescudi's home, shouting: 'We are going to kill this n*****.' The defence did not call witnesses, and presented its own case in the space of half an hour, placing before the jury text messages from Ventura to Combs, in which she told him that she loved him. Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lawyer, told jurors that theirs was 'one of the great modern love stories'.'If racketeering conspiracy had an opposite, it would be their relationship,' he said. 'They were truly, deeply in love with each other, for real.' Prosecutors said Combs regarded himself as above the law. 'That ends in this courtroom,' Maureen Comey told the jury. 'The defendant is not a god.' The jury deliberations continue.
Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
Sean 'Diddy' Combs jurors reach verdicts on four out of five charges in sex trafficking and racketeering trial
Jurors in the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs have reached a verdict on four of the five counts against him - but the hip-hop mogul will have to wait to learn his fate. In tense scenes towards the end of the court day on Tuesday, jurors sent a note to say they had reached verdicts on two charges of sex trafficking and two charges of transportation for prostitution, but had been unable to reach a unanimous decision on the charge of racketeering conspiracy. Combs 's lawyers surrounded him at the defence table after the note was sent to the court, and at one point he held his head in his hands. After discussions with prosecution and defence lawyers, Judge Arun Subramanian told jurors to continue deliberating on Wednesday rather than deliver a partial verdict. The jury has testimony from more than 30 witnesses to consider - including Combs's former long-term partner Casandra "Cassie" Ventura and another former girlfriend called "Jane", who testified under a pseudonym to protect her identity. Prosecutors allege the 55-year-old rapper used his fame and power to force Cassie and "Jane" into drug-fuelled sex sessions with male sex workers, which were referred to as "freak-offs", "wild king nights", or "hotel nights". He was also physically violent and blackmailed them with footage, jurors were told. They also heard from "Mia", a former employee who alleged she was sexually assaulted by the rapper on several occasions during her career. She also testified using a pseudonym. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and his defence team has argued that prosecutors are attempting to criminalise what they say was a consensual "swingers lifestyle". The rapper chose not to testify and his lawyers did not call any witnesses, building their arguments instead through lengthy cross-examinations of the witnesses called by the prosecution. The charges against Diddy - and potential sentences Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy - up to life in prison Count 2: Sex-trafficking of Cassie Ventura - a minimum of 15 years and maximum of life in prison Count 3: Transporting individuals including but not limited to Cassie Ventura to engage in prostitution - a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison Count 4: Sex-trafficking of Jane* - a minimum of 15 years and maximum of life in prison Count 5: Transporting individuals including but not limited to Jane to engage in prostitution - a maximum of 10 years in prison What is racketeering conspiracy? Racketeering conspiracy, which is count one on the verdict sheet, is the most complicated of the charges against Combs. Jurors need to decide not only whether the rapper created a "racketeering enterprise", but also if he was involved in various offences as part of this, including kidnapping, arson and bribery. The charge falls under the US's RICO laws (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act), which is best known for being used in relation to organised crime and drug cartel cases. After closing arguments last week, jurors began deliberation on Monday and had spent about 13 hours discussing in total by the time they sent their note. Before reaching the verdict on the four counts, they had requested to review crucial testimony from Cassie about her account of an assault in a hotel in Los Angeles in 2016. Captured on CCTV, the footage was played in court several times - showing Combs, wearing only a towel and socks, beating, kicking and dragging Cassie in a hallway. His defence team admitted in their opening statement that this was domestic violence, and said the music star regretted these actions - but that they did not amount to any of the federal charges against him. As well as Cassie's evidence on that assault, they asked to see her testimony on an incident at the Cannes Film Festival in 2013 - when she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of his yacht. On their way back to the US, she told the court, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex with an escort. Jurors also wanted to review testimony given by a male sex worker at the start of the trial. Combs could face 15 years to life in prison if he is convicted of all charges.
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
US poultry producers sued by growers over hiring and pay
July 1 (Reuters) - Poultry farmers sued a group of major U.S. meat processors on Tuesday, claiming they conspired to curtail recruitment and hiring of chicken growers and suppressed their pay below competitive levels. The proposed class action, opens new tab in the federal court in Oklahoma is the latest in a series of antitrust cases facing the meat and poultry industries. The plaintiffs, suing on behalf of thousands of chicken growers, said Foster Farms, Mountaire, George's, House of Raeford and other leading processors had illegally agreed not to compete for the growers' services. Growers provide land, labor and equipment to raise their chickens until they are ready for slaughter, when they are returned to a poultry producer. The new lawsuit alleged the poultry company defendants were conspiring to enforce a 'no poach' agreement in violation of federal antitrust law. 'The cartel members attempted to insulate themselves from normal competitive pressures,' according to the lawsuit, filed by plaintiffs law firms including Hausfeld and Berger Montague. Foster Farms, Mountaire, George's and House of Raeford did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Attorneys for the plaintiffs had no immediate comment. Some of the plaintiffs have provided services to major poultry producers in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and other states. The lawsuit builds on prior litigation that accused other processors, including Pilgrim's Pride and Tyson Foods, of similar efforts to restrain grower mobility and pay. Last year, Pilgrim's said it would pay $100 million to resolve claims against the company and Tyson agreed to a $21 million settlement. Both companies denied any wrongdoing. Pilgrim's settled after the judge in the case ruled that more than 24,300 growers could band together in a class action seeking damages of between $761 million and $924 million. The new lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and a court order against alleged anticompetitive conduct. The case is Haff Poultry et al v. Mountaire Farms Inc et al, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, No. 6:20-md-02977-RJS-CMR. For plaintiffs: Gary Smith of Hausfeld and Eric Cramer of Berger Montague For defendants: No appearances yet Read more: Ruling keeps litigation funder Burford in control of turkey price-fixing case Pilgrim's Pride in $100 million settlement over chicken farmers' pay Pilgrim's Pride agrees to pay $41 mln to settle investors' lawsuit Latest poultry workers' antitrust settlements push total to $217 million
