Orissa HC rejects IAS officer Manish Agarwal's anticipatory bail plea in suicide abetment case
Agarwal, presently additional secretary Planning and Convergence department, sought pre-arrest bail after the court of SDJM, Malkangiri, rejected his petition seeking through his counsel exemption from appearance during trial.
The SDJM had stressed that under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, an accused's first appearance in a criminal case must be physical. The accused should first present himself before the SDJM court and then may seek exemption from personal attendance before the trial court, which is the sessions court.
Agarwal sought protection expressing apprehension that if he appears before the SDJM Court, he will be remanded to custody on the ground that offence under section 306 of the IPC (abetting suicide) is triable by the court of sessions.
However, the single judge bench of Justice V Narasingh declined to grant exceptional remedy of anticipatory bail as he did not find any merit in the submissions made on his behalf. While citing an observation of the Supreme Court, Justice Narasingh said, 'Just as liberty is precious for an individual so is the interest of the society in maintaining law and order. Both are extremely important for the survival of a civilised society.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Karnataka HC allows trial against UP man over voyeurism
BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court allowed the trial against a 31-year-old man from Uttar Pradesh for allegedly blackmailing a woman by recording her private videos on the promise of marriage, after he came in contact with her while preparing for the UPSC examination in Delhi. Quashing the charges of stalking, the court said, insofar as the allegation of voyeurism as obtained under Section 354C is concerned, the contents of the complaint and the summary of the charge sheet clearly meet the offence of voyeurism. 'The petitioner is alleged to have shot several videos of intimate moments, or even videos of the parts of the body of the complainant. If this is the allegation, and it is sustained while filing the charge sheet, it would undoubtedly meet the allegation of voyeurism', said Justice M Nagaprasanna while partly allowing the petition filed by the accused questioning the legality of the crime registered by the complainant against him. The complaint was registered under the provisions of the IPC, Information Technology Act and in light of the fact that the complainant belongs to a Scheduled Tribe, the provisions of the Act were also invoked. Additional State Public Prosecutor BN prayed the court to dismiss the petition, saying that the allegations in the charge sheet are quite vivid for the offences that are laid. The court said: 'The case at hand, except the offence of stalking, revolves around seriously disputed questions of fact, which would require further proceedings before the concerned court. Therefore, this court declines to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr P C, to obliterate the proceedings qua all offences except the offence under Section 354D - stalking, as permitting further trial qua the said offence would undoubtedly become an abuse of the process of law'.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Foul language doesn't mean stalking, rules Karnataka high court
Bengaluru: Using swear words at each other in private messaging between two individuals could be indecent, but it does not necessarily mean 'stalking', Karnataka high court has ruled, striking down charges of stalking against an Allahabad man who faced allegations of voyeurism and criminal intimidation. Justice M Nagaprasanna, who delivered the ruling, emphasised that for a charge of stalking to be legally valid, it must meet specific criteria laid out in Section 354D of IPC. The section defines 'stalking' as a man following or contacting a woman repeatedly to foster personal interaction, despite clear disinterest from the woman; or monitoring her use of electronic communication. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru "In the present case, the allegation is loosely laid," the judge noted, adding: "The exchange of messages, even those containing profanity, does not by itself constitute stalking." Background The case involves a Bengaluru-based woman and the accused, who had met in 2022 while preparing for their UPSC exams in Delhi. Their interaction, which was initially based on sharing study materials, gradually blossomed into an intimate relationship. The woman used to stay at a rented accommodation in Delhi, arranged by the accused. However, following a breakup, the woman filed a police complaint in Bengaluru in October 2023, alleging that the man had secretly recorded private footage of her and threatened to circulate it on social media. The case invoked multiple charges under the IPC and Information Technology Act, with additional sections added under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as the complainant belongs to a Scheduled Tribe community. The complainant even filed a rape case against the accused in Prayagraj on November 2, 2023. The accused man, though, insisted they were in a consensual relationship. Despite the allegations and counter-allegations, the couple's marriage was registered on November 10, reportedly facilitated by their families. However, the complainant later alleged that her consent was obtained under duress and she filed another complaint on December 14, 2023, in Prayagraj. Courtroom drama Partially allowing the petition, the court upheld multiple charges against the accused, including voyeurism and offences under the Atrocities Act, given the accused's awareness of the complainant's ST status. The disputed facts, though, required trial resolution. "The complaint details several serious allegations against the accused, reportedly committed under the promise of marriage. The consensual sexual relationship between both the parties is documented. Regarding the stalking charges, the complainant's allegations primarily concern sexual acts under marriage promises," the judge noted in his order while pointing that the offence of stalking was loosely laid against the petitioner.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Relief for HCS officer: HC stay on chargesheet clears IAS path
1 2 Chandigarh: In a major setback to the state vigilance bureau of Haryana, the Punjab and Haryana high court has stayed a chargesheet filed by the bureau against a Haryana Civil Service (HCS) officer, who was facing prosecution in connection with irregularities in the selection of 2001-batch HCS officers. This order paves the way for the elevation of the officer, Jagdeep Dhanda, into the coveted IAS under the state's promotion quota. The HC has also issued a notice to the Haryana govt seeking the state's reply on the officer's plea to quash the criminal proceedings. In his plea, Dhanda contended that the entire sequence shows that it was only to exclude him from the process of selection to the IAS cadre that he was included as an accused in the charge sheet, though none of the ingredients of the alleged offences are established against him. "State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the state and seeks time to file a detailed reply to the petition… In the meanwhile, operation and effect of the impugned charge sheet, dated June 30, 2023, qua the petitioner shall remain stayed," the HC ordered. Justice Tribhuvan Singh Dahiya passed these orders while hearing the petition filed by HCS officer Jagdeep Dhanda. Counsels representing the petitioner, senior advocate Gurminder Singh and advocate Inder Pal Goyat, submitted that there was no material before the investigating agency to conclude against the petitioner, nor have any been referred to. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The counsels also relied upon the opinion given by the advocate general, dated Nov 24, 2023, in the matter that the said FIR had no bearing on consideration of the select list for promotion to the IAS cadre. Based thereupon, the petitioner was issued an integrity certificate for the purpose, and the same was sent to the UPSC also, the HC was informed. However, the counsel representing the state contended that the petitioner remains an accused in the charge sheet filed and, therefore, has no right to be considered for promotion. The matter has now been fixed for August 22 for further hearing. Wide Ramifications Although the order has been passed by the HC on one officer's plea, the order would also have ramifications on other officers who were also charge-sheeted in the same case and are in line for promotion to the IAS. Several officers of the 2001 batch have been charge sheeted by the SVB under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Some of such officers are Sarita Malik, Kamlesh Kumar Bhadoo, Kuldhir Singh, Vatsal Vashisht, Veena Hooda, Surender Singh, Jag Niwas, and Ranjit Kaur (now retired). The Case The state vigilance bureau (SVB, now ACB) Haryana submitted a charge sheet against 29 persons, including the then HPSC chairman, members, examiners of the commission, and some of the HCS officers of the 2001 batch, pointing to massive irregularities in the selection of this provincial state civil services examination held during the then INLD regime led by Om Prakash Chautala. The trial of the case is pending at the district court in Hisar. MSID:: 122405052 413 |
