‘What happened?': Decade long reality Lena Dunham hasn't been able to escape
The 39-year-old was just 24 when her critically acclaimed show Girls debuted on HBO in 2012. It instantly cemented itself as a grittier version of Sex and the City.
The show followed four privileged women in their early 20s, who were often unlikeable, rarely had good sex and certainly weren't glitzy or aspirational.
It wasn't just must-see television, but after every episode aired, a new cultural debate would erupt about everything from abortion to consent.
Dunham was the showrunner, the star, and mastermind behind the success, but instead of her body of work being discussed, it was her body that made the most headlines.
She was in her early 20s at the time and her weight and body were dissected, scrutinised and criticised throughout the show's six seasons.
At some point, there was even some disturbing online discourse that Dunham wasn't attractive enough for it to be believable that she was dating the men she cast as her love interests on the show.
For years, the commentary on Dunham's body was treated almost like a sport.
She was too thin, or too fat, or not thin enough in the right places, or not the right body shape; it was endless.
It would have been immeasurably tough on Dunham, who was just in her 20s at the time, and the ultimate irony was that she always looked great.
It was also tough on any woman who read anything cruel about Dunham's body because most women look more like Dunham than a Hadid sister.
It became bizarrely normal in pop culture for Dunham to be torn apart physically.
After the show wrapped, and following a public breakup with producer Jack Antonoff, known for his work with Taylor Swift and Lorde, Sabrina Carpenter.
Dunham took a break from the spotlight, moving to London, where she married indie musician Luis Felber and she has carved out a quieter life for herself.
She has worked mostly behind the camera, including on the critically acclaimed coming-of-age film Catherine Called Birdy.
At the moment, she's back in the spotlight again, promoting her new Netflix show Too Much, which she wrote and directed, and stars as a supporting character.
Once again her weight is back to being a discussion.
Between 2012 and 2025, we saw the rise of the body positivity movement, which then morphed into the body neutral movement.
For a second there it seemed like we were getting somewhere. One of the most famous models in the world is Ashley Graham, who is plus-size, and singer Lizzo was also leading the charge of self-love.
Fast-forward to now, and Lizzo's been partly cancelled and is on a weight loss journey; body neutrality has fallen by the wayside and has been replaced with the thinness epidemic.
Most women in Hollywood have become so gaunt that they all kind of look the same, but we can't really say anything because that would be shaming women. For god sake even low-rise jeans are back.
Just as Dunham re-emerged back into the spotlight, we're back at square one.
Dunham told the New Yorker that the reason she's playing a supporting cast member instead of the star of her new show, Too Much, is because she wasn't ready to open herself up to being body-shamed.
'Physically, I was just not up for having my body dissected again. It was a hard choice,' she said.
Similarly, in a profile with Variety, Dunham claimed body-shaming in Hollywood is 'pretty inevitable' in 2025, and not much has improved since she first became famous in 2012.
'Just because I've become used to it for myself. Doesn't mean that I feel comfortable about it for anyone else,' she added.
'I have been in Hollywood at every size. I have been a sample size, I have had my body change because of life, illness, ageing, menopause and it is merciless wherever you are.'
So there you go.
It has been over a decade since Dunham first became famous, and under a TikTok I just watched of her promoting the new show, someone commented, 'What happened to Lena Dunham?'
A clear crack at her weight gain. The real question is what happened to the culture? Why are we going backwards instead of forwards, and why the hell are we still talking about Dunham's weight?
It has been a decade and we've learned nothing.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Who is the biggest movie star of the 21st century?
There's a phenomenon that occurs when a bona fide movie star enters a room. After more than a decade as an entertainment journalist, interviewing countless actors, it's something I've experienced only a handful of times. Before you even know they're there, you feel the atmosphere inexplicably shift. It becomes electric, suddenly charged. You can't see them yet - but you already know they're there. With more celebrities crammed into Hollywood than ever before, it's only the most top-tier of movie stars that can manage this science-defying feat. Tom Cruise. Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson. Cate Blanchett. I've seen - or literally felt - all of them do it, first-hand. Our 25@25 series will finally put to bed the debates you've been having at the pub and around dinner tables for years – and some that are just too much fun not to include. Every generation has their own top-billing stars. The sixties and seventies had John Wayne, Clint Eastwood and Barbra Streisand. You get my drift. But here we are, 25 years into the new century (arguably a defining era of cinema), which begs the question: who is the face of it? It's not just box office success, although that's a major factor. It's also their general presence, talent, global name recognition, and their ability to dominate premium headlines throughout their career … not just around the release of their biggest movies. With all those factors in mind, I've whittled down all the options to just 10 nominations so we can decide, once and for all, who should be named the Biggest Movie Star of the last 25 years. As noted above, Cruise, Johnson and Blanchett are obviously on that list. They're joined by Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Nicole Kidman, Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington, Scarlett Johansson and Angelina Jolie. Now as part of 25@25 series, I need you, our valued readers, to help me on my noble quest to figure out who takes out the top prize. Listen, just for the record, I vote Tom Cruise. Only a true star can deliver a smackdown like this. But don't give me that much power! Cast your own vote in the poll above, and help us pick the ultimate winner. And if you're looking for some genuinely bonkers facts you probably didn't know about all these megastars, watch the video above - from near-death experiences to weird phobias, it'll blow your mind.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
'Beneath The Skin' Nnenna Freelon
Enjoy a new record from singer Nnenna Freelon. She's an American vocalist who has worked with the who's who of jazz - from Herbie Hancock to Al Jarreau to George Benson - and her latest record is a showcase of the singer's original songwriting that melds her love of improvised music with elements of soul, swing and the blues. Joining Freelon across this session are names like Steve Hass on drums and Keith Granz on guitar as well as pianist Alan Pasqua who also contributed to the project as an arranger.

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Mike Tyson calls out Jake Paul over $1.5m promise after Katie Taylor beats Amanda Serrano again
Mike Tyson warned Jake Paul he is coming for his $1.5 million winnings … and their dinner date. Tyson controversially came out of retirement last November aged 58 to face YouTuber-turned-boxer Paul. He lost on points over eight shorter two minute rounds as 100 million people tuned in to watch on Netflix. On the undercard, over 50m watched Katie Taylor's rematch win over Amanda Serrano which came two years after her initial victory. Paul – who promotes Serrano – put $1.5m up in a wager against Tyson – who was backing Taylor, according to The Sun. But Iron Mike insisted he must also be taken out for dinner by multi-millionaire Paul if he won. And his bet paid off after Taylor closed out her trilogy series with a hat-trick of wins over her great rival Serrano. Tyson, now 59, immediately posted online: 'Congrats to @KatieTaylor and @Serranosisters on the trilogy fight on Netflix. '@jakepaul see you at dinner to collect my million!' Taylor took a majority-decision and said: 'I just want to thank Amanda Serrano as well, what an amazing fighter, we've made history here. 'I thought I boxed very smart, very well. She wasn't catching me with much. 'It was obviously very, very close. Just thank God my hand was raised. I planned to come in here and be disciplined and smart. 'I executed the game plan very well. Total respect for Amanda, what a warrior. I love you all, I love my country. Thank you so much.' Serrano, 36, said: 'We tried something different, it was all about working smarter, not harder. 'I tried to keep my distance because apparently it didn't work the first two fights. So we tried to stick with the long punches and it just wasn't enough. 'I don't know, I have to go back and watch it. My team told me they think I won, I'm going to believe what they tell me. 'I was really trying to apply what they were telling me. I really want to support every single one of you for coming out and supporting me and women's boxing. 'What an amazing night for all of us women. I'm crying at the support, thanks to all of you. 'Thank you Jake Paul, you've changed my life. Thank you Netflix for showcasing us warriors. 'Thank you Katie Taylor for an incredible 30 rounds, it's been a true honour.'