Iran-linked Islamic centre rebuked over calls for Israel's destruction
The Islamic Centre of England (ICE) has been issued with a formal order by the commission compelling its trustees to curb its online activity and future speakers.
The commission launched a statutory investigation into ICE in 2023 after allegations that it was the London office of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
In 2020, the centre hosted a vigil for Qassim Soleimani, the head of the Guard, who had been killed in a drone strike.
Seyed Hashem Moosavi, ICE's director, issued a statement on its website praising Soleimani as a 'great martyr'.
A commission statement said it had issued the centre with a 'formal order under section 84 of the Charities Act, compelling the trustees to provide rigorous oversight of future speakers and online activity by the charity, among other actions'.
The section 84 direction gives the commission additional powers to intervene during an inquiry where there is suspected misconduct or mismanagement.
The move comes as Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, last week announced plans for new powers to proscribe the IRGC.
Under the proposal, anyone helping or benefiting from a banned state intelligence agency will now face up to 14 years in jail.
On Monday, David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, summoned the Iranian ambassador to be 'held accountable' after three Iranian asylum seekers were charged last Saturday with spying in the UK.
Earlier this month, five Iranian men were arrested in connection with a suspected plot to mount a terror attack on the Israeli embassy in London.
The Charity Commission says its action has been taken because of ICE's 'recent failure' to fully comply with directions set by Emma Moody, the interim manager appointed as part of its investigation.
'The commission considers these, and a range of other past breaches, mismanagement and misconduct in the administration of the charity. The trustees currently dispute some of these legal findings,' the regulator said.
The commission said it would continue to monitor the centre's invited speakers, religious services and public-facing content.
Former speakers have included Syeda Umme Farwa, a charity boss who was described by an Iranian media outlet as a 'jihadi lioness' and was awarded a prize by Ebrahim Raisi, the former Iranian president known as the 'Butcher of Tehran'.
The commission said in a statement that the ICE trustees 'are instructed to ensure that all religious services, speakers and events further the objects of the charity and are in its best interests'.
Despite repeated warnings, the Islamic Centre has continued to platform controversial figures.
Earlier this year, the Jewish Chronicle revealed that the charity's YouTube channel still hosted videos from 2020 in which Ayatollah Khamenei, the leader of Iran, advocated 'multiple intifadas' to remove the 'cancerous tumour' of Israel.
Other clips accused the US and its allies of manufacturing Islamic State and enslaving the world. Some of these have since been removed.
David Holdsworth, the chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'The law requires, and the public expect, charities to operate exclusively for the public benefit... when a charity fails to operate in line with its legal duties we will step in to take action.
'We now expect the trustees to take the required action directed by the commission and will not hesitate to use further legal powers should that be necessary.
'The commission's statutory inquiry is ongoing. It is the commission's practice to publish a report setting out its findings, regulatory actions and conclusions once an inquiry has concluded.'
The charity was, however, urged to go further. Col Richard Kemp, a former head of counter-terrorism in Afghanistan, said: 'This is merely a slap on the wrist. The commission needs to take decisive action now and shut it down.
'Iran and its allies pose a direct threat to Britain. The response so far has been to try and sweep it under the carpet.
'The threat we face from Iran is deadly serious. It is of the utmost importance that firm action is taken wherever we can. This is the opposite. It needs closing down now.'
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said the charity commission was 'dragging its heels' on holding the ICE to account as its inquiry into the centre still had not concluded after more than two years.
'This isn't the first time the Charity Commission has buried its head in the sand on these issues,' he said.
A spokesman for the ICE previously said the centre was a 'purely religious and cultural organisation, which provides various services to the local communities'.
The spokesman added: 'It is an independent charity regulated by British law, which is totally funded by the local beneficiaries.
'The majority of the trustees, donors, and attendees are British citizens. Indeed, this charity is nothing to do with politics, while we strongly believe that the politically motivated lobbies are trying to drag the charity into their political disputes.'
An Islamic Centre of England spokesman pointed to a statement on the discharge of an interim manager which said this was an 'important milestone' in its 'governance journey'.
The statement said: 'The centre must ensure that it continues to deliver its religious preachings and observes its spiritual doctrines, and meets the requirements of our beneficiaries, while also ensuring legal and regulatory compliance.
'The centre cannot be insulated from world events, however, it is committed to maintaining its independence from political interference, and delivering its religious and educational charitable purposes.
'The centre plays a pivotal role in ensuring we operate in a way which respects all faiths, and where we allow our own faith to continue to be used for good, peacefully and without harm.'
By Chris Philp
Britain faces a growing and dangerous threat from the Iranian regime. It funds terror across the Middle East and beyond – arming Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, enabling Shi'a militias in Iraq and Syria, and is providing deadly drones to Putin's forces in Ukraine.
The tentacles of the Iranian state stretch out to our very own soil here in the United Kingdom.
Earlier this month, three Iranian asylum seekers were charged with spying for Tehran and plotting to inflict 'serious violence' on UK-based journalists working for Iran International, a dissident media outlet.
It came just days after another Iranian asylum seeker was one of five arrested over a plot to attack the Israeli embassy.
This is a stark illustration of how malign foreign actors are exploiting our asylum system to further their own agenda.
But it is only part of a broader pattern of Iranian aggression. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is behind a sustained campaign of cyber attacks, disinformation, and intimidation of Iranian dissidents on our streets.
The Labour Government said they would proscribe this group. Labour have now been in office for nearly a year, so why have they not yet done what they said?
And there is growing evidence of potentially dangerous Iran-linked influence within UK charities and so-called community organisations.
Yet the Charity Commission is dragging its heels on taking meaningful action when it comes to taking on organisations that try to undermine British values and sow division.
Take their investigation into the Islamic Centre for England, which opened after a director claimed that those protesting against the Iranian regime were 'soldiers of Satan' – it still hasn't been concluded after more than two years.
This isn't the first time the Charity Commission has buried its head in the sand on these issues.
The Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust has been under an ongoing investigation for several years, despite being run by self-declared Islamist revolutionaries closely aligned to Iran who say that the West is 'the enemy' and Britain a 'Stasi state'.
And last year, the Dar Alhekma Trust and its sister charity, the Abrar Islamic Foundation, based near Regent's Park, were placed under police investigation after one of their trustees allegedly praised the former IRGC commander Qasem Soleimani as a 'hero'.
The commission has bizarrely paused its review while the charities deny any wrongdoing.
This is not good enough. The commission must be more proactive. The public deserves to know why groups with apparent links to terrorist sympathisers continue to operate freely under the banner of charity.
Its job is not simply to wait for criminal prosecutions – it is to protect the integrity of the charitable sector from exploitation by extremists and foreign regimes. It's time they started acting like it.
And it's time for the Labour Government to get serious too.
The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, announced by the previous Conservative government, has been implemented which is a welcome first step.
However, we need real enforcement, real transparency, and real consequences for those who break our laws or abuse our hospitality.
Small boat crossings have increased by almost 30 per cent under Labour – 2025 is the worst year ever for such crossings.
Labour voted against our amendment to deport all illegal migrants. It is shameful that the Government is not taking the action needed on this issue.
This is not just about illegal immigration, it is about our national security.
Action against Iran also means shutting down any UK-based charities found to be linked to hostile states or extremist causes.
It means denying visas to Iranian regime officials and suspected collaborators. It means expelling diplomats involved in threats, intimidation or espionage.
And it means providing meaningful protection to journalists and dissidents targeted by Tehran.
We cannot afford to be complacent. Britain must not be a safe haven for the proxies of a state that funds terror, murders dissidentsand seeks to undermine the very freedoms we cherish.
The Conservative Party has always stood for the security of this nation. We will not be silent while this government drags its feet.
Chris Philp is the shadow home secretary
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump administration cuts $300M in UCLA research funding over antisemitism claims
The Trump administration has suspended more than $300 million in federal research grants to UCLA, citing the university's alleged failure to address antisemitism and discriminatory practices on campus. The move, part of a broader crackdown on elite universities, marks the most severe funding cut in UCLA's history. According to government letters obtained by multiple news outlets, agencies including the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health and Department of Energy are halting hundreds of active grants. Officials allege the university engaged in 'race discrimination' and 'illegal affirmative action,' and failed to prevent a hostile climate for Jewish and Israeli students, following campus protests over the Gaza war. Attorney General Pam Bondi said Tuesday that UCLA would 'pay a heavy price' for its 'deliberate indifference' to civil rights complaints. A 10-page letter Tuesday from the Department of Justice to UC President Michael Drake said the DOJ had looked into complaints of discrimination since Oct. 7, 2023, the day Hamas attacked Israel, leading to the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, which sparked protests at college campuses across the U.S. The letter cited 11 complaints from Jewish or Israeli students regarding discrimination between April 25 and May 1, 2024, while pro-Palestianian protesters occupied an encampment on the UCLA campus. 'Several complainants reported that members of the encampment prevented them from accessing parts of the campus,' the letter said, and some reported encountering intimidation or violence. The Department of Justice set a Sept. 2 deadline for the university to begin negotiations or face legal action. 'Federal research grants are not handouts,' he wrote Thursday. 'Grants lead to medical breakthroughs, economic advancement, improved national security and global competitiveness — these are national priorities.' The freeze affects more than 300 grants, with nearly $180 million already distributed, and follows similar enforcement actions against Harvard, Columbia and Brown universities. UCLA recently agreed to a $6.5 million settlement with Jewish students and a professor over claims of discrimination during 2024 campus protests. Frenk, who is of Jewish heritage, emphasized the university's efforts to combat antisemitism, including the creation of a campus safety office and an initiative to fight antisemitism and anti-Israel bias. 'Antisemitism has no place on our campus, nor does any form of discrimination,' he wrote, while insisting the funding cut 'does nothing to address any alleged discrimination.'
Boston Globe
40 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration freezes $339M in UCLA grants and accuses the school of rights violations
The Trump administration paused the research funding as part of an investigation by the government's antisemitism task force, two administration officials said. The freeze included about $240 million in research grants from the Department of Health and Human Services and the NIH, $81 million from the NSF, and $18.2 million from the Energy Department, a White House spokesperson said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The move makes UCLA the latest university to be targeted by Trump administration officials. It comes amid a broader pushback by the administration against what it sees as 'woke' ideologies. Advertisement The NSF said in a statement that it was 'suspending awards to UCLA because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' The NIH did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In recent weeks, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, Brown, and others have had federal funding reduced or threatened based on broad accusations from the Trump administration that range from antisemitism to improper support for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. In some cases, the government has used the threat of funding cuts to extract concessions and hundreds of millions of dollars from universities. Advertisement Last year, UCLA was the site of one of the nation's biggest protests against the Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip. The demonstrations prompted claims from across the political spectrum that the university didn't do enough to protect Jewish students or pro-Palestinian demonstrators. On Tuesday, the university agreed to pay more than $6 million to settle a lawsuit from Jewish students and a professor who said that the university had allowed a hostile protest on campus. After the settlement was announced, the Department of Justice separately said that it had found the university violated civil rights laws by failing to respond to students' complaints of antisemitism. Although the Trump administration intensified its attacks on UCLA this week, the school had been a target of the government's scrutiny for more than a year. In May 2024, Frenk's predecessor, Gene D. Block, testified before a congressional committee examining campus antisemitism. And in February, a Trump administration task force on antisemitism identified UCLA as one of 10 schools it intended to visit as it investigated whether 'remedial action is warranted.' In recent weeks, UCLA would not say whether any of the task force's investigators had been to the campus. Frenk said in his statement Thursday that UCLA had taken 'concrete action' to address antisemitism and discrimination, including creating a new office of campus safety. 'This far-reaching penalty of defunding lifesaving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination,' he wrote. He called the cuts a 'loss for Americans across the nation' whose work and health rely on the university's research. Advertisement The funding cut is an early test for Frenk, who became chancellor in January, as well as James B. Milliken, who took over as the University of California system's leader Friday. State and education leaders have been deeply concerned about the possibility that the Trump administration would target the university system as a whole, but especially the campuses in Los Angeles and Berkeley. Both schools were on the antisemitism task force's list for potential visits. But the Department of Education has also said it was investigating accusations of antisemitism at several other UC campuses.
41 minutes ago
Human Rights Watch says Israel committing war crimes in alleged killings of Gazans at aid sites
The international NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Friday accused Israel of war crimes and violations of international law because of the killings of people near food aid distribution sites in Gaza -- as well as deprivation of food, aid and other basic services. There have been several mass casualty events near the four sites run by the U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) since it began operating in late May, HRW said. In a statement in response to the HRW report, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it allows the GHF "to operate independently" in the distribution of aid and that troops operate "in proximity" to make sure food is delivered in an orderly fashion.' The HRW's report came as U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Gaza on Friday, inspecting food aid delivery. In previous incidents, the IDF has said that it only fires "warning shots" at crowds and when it feels like its personnel are in danger. At least 58 people were killed near Zikim aid distribution center on Wednesday, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health, and another 14 were killed near an aid center in Muraj in southern Gaza, local hospital authorities confirmed to ABC News. In response to the Zikim shooting, the IDF said troops fired "warning shots in the area, not directed at the gathering, in response to the threat posed to them." The Israeli government has also previously claimed that Hamas shoots people waiting in food lines and films the events for propaganda videos. Hamas has denied these claims. "Israeli forces are not only deliberately starving Palestinian civilians, but they are now gunning them down almost every day as they desperately seek food for their families," Belkis Wille, associate crisis and conflict director at HRW, said in a statement. "U.S.-backed Israeli forces and private contractors have put in place a flawed, militarized aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths." HRW called on nations to pressure Israel to stop using deadly force as a crowd control method, to lift restrictions on aid entering Gaza and to end the GHF system. Meanwhile, in its statement, the IDF accused Hamas of starving and endangering the population in order to maintain control over the strip and taking actions "to prevent the success of food distribution in Gaza." "The IDF stresses that, as part of its operational management of the main access routes to the distribution areas, IDF forces are conducting systematic review processes in order to improve the operational response in the area and minimize, as much as possible, any friction between the civilian population and IDF forces," the statement read, in part. "As part of these efforts, IDF forces have recently worked to reorganize the area by installing new fences, placing signs, opening additional routes, and more." "Additionally, following reports of civilian casualties near distribution areas, in-depth examinations were conducted by the Southern Command, and the incidents are under review by the authorized bodies within the IDF," the statement continued. Meanwhile, a hunger crisis is reportedly worsening across Gaza. At least 159 people have died from starvation and malnutrition, including at least 90 children, according to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health, since the war began in the wake of the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack on southern Israel. Aid slowly resumed entry into Gaza after Israel instituted an 11-week total blockade on all humanitarian supplies entering the strip earlier this year. The blockade caused widespread malnutrition and conditions likely to lead to famine, according to the U.N. and aid groups. Israeli officials have long accused Hamas of stealing aid, which Hamas denies. Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the idea that Israel is applying a campaign of starvation in Gaza is "a bold-faced lie," adding that "there is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza." However, a new report on Tuesday from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative monitoring hunger, said that "the worst-case scenario of famine is playing out in the Gaza Strip," and that "access to food and other essential items and services has plummeted to unprecedented levels." Additionally, a USAID analysis appeared to undercut some of the assertions about the extent to which Hamas had allegedly stolen humanitarian aid. A presentation reviewed by ABC News, examining more than 150 reported incidents involving the theft or loss of U.S.-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza, showed that the group failed to find any evidence that Hamas engaged in widespread diversion of aid to cause the amount of hunger seen in the strip. On Friday, Witkoff wrote in a post on X that he and Huckabee spent the previous day meeting with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza "Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza -- level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with [GHF] and other agencies," Witkoff wrote. "The purpose of the visit was to give [President Donald Trump] a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza." It came amid Trump's plan to expand aid deliveries to Gaza, although there are no signs the White House is moving away from the GHF. Hamas senior official Izzat al-Risheq criticized the visit in a statement. "Witkoff's visit to Gaza is nothing but a publicity stunt aimed at containing the growing outrage over the U.S.-Israeli partnership in starving our people in the Strip," he said. "Witkoff sees in Gaza only what the occupation wants him to see, viewing the ongoing tragedy through a misleading Israeli lens."
