Teacher in B.C. Interior suspended after telling girls he 'was not a pedophile': regulator
Todd Erin Graham consented to a one-day suspension of his teaching certificate and to attend a respectful boundaries course, as part of discipline relating to events in the 2022-23 school year.
As part of a consent agreement posted online on Tuesday, the regulator found that Graham was teaching a fitness and conditioning class to Grade 11 students between September and December 2022 when he separated the girls from the boys.
"In that meeting, Graham told the girls that he was 'not a pedophile' but that he might have to 'grab them' to show them proper form or to spot them," the consent agreement reads.
"Graham then told them that he had no attraction to them as he was 52 and they were 15."
The female students reportedly felt uncomfortable after the meeting, with Graham also saying that he would periodically touch students to help them with their form or work muscle groups.
Those included occasions when he touched the side of a female student's chest while she was performing a bench press and asked, "Can you feel that?"
Graham was also found to have pushed a student's hips while she used a squat rack, and complimented another student's legs while she used a leg press machine.
Demeaning comments
The regulator also found that he made demeaning comments to both an Indigenous student and a student with diverse needs, while singling them out in front of their classmates in the 2022-23 school year.
Following those events, the school district gave him a letter of discipline and ordered him to attend two online courses regarding Indigenous cultural safety and reconciliation.
The commissioner's consent agreement says that Graham agreed his actions constituted professional misconduct and agreed to his one-day suspension.
"Graham failed to create a positive learning environment or to model appropriate behaviour," the agreement reads.
"Graham failed to respect appropriate boundaries, making students feel uncomfortable."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him
The N.W.T. Court of Appeal has dismissed an application from former Denesoline CEO Ron Barlas. Barlas had sought to appeal an N.W.T. Supreme Court ruling against him, which ordered, among other things, his removal as CEO of Łutsel K'e Dene First Nation's (LKDFN) business arm, Denesoline Corporation. Supreme Court Justice Karan Shaner found Barlas had used his authority improperly to enrich himself and his family. In a decision Friday, Court of Appeal justices Jack Watson, Jolaine Antonio and Karen Wenkebach wrote that neither of the grounds Barlas cited for appeal — whether Shaner had given him and his wife Zeba a fair hearing, and whether the remedies granted to LKDFN were justified — had merit. The decision comes as the latest development in the wide-ranging civil lawsuit LKDFN filed against Barlas, who for years ran Denesoline Corporation. The First Nation accused him of diverting nearly $12 million from its companies for his own gain. The decision states Barlas objected to the fact Shaner's decision relied on affidavits, questioning, documents and lawyers' oral presentations, and felt she should have ordered a trial. "Barlas ... disputes various findings by [Shaner] about discreditable conduct that she found was revealed by his own words and the documentary record," the decision noted. The Court of Appeal found Shaner canvassed similar cases from other jurisdictions of Canada to help her come to a decision. The court wrote that the suggestion that Shaner's decision to not order a trial led to unfairness is "not an accurate way of looking at what happened here." It cited case law where a judge observed that the ultimate question in a fairness test isn't whether a decision was "the" fair one, but rather "a" fair one. "The appellants have no basis to claim that they did not have fair notice or opportunity to present evidence and argument," the court wrote. The Court of Appeal wrote that Shaner's findings, including her characterization of Barlas' actions and attitude, were "amply supported by the evidence."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Airline Employee Who Survived Toronto Crash Claims Pilot Was 'Inexperienced and Inadequately Trained'
Vanessa Miles, an employee of Delta's regional subsidiary, was "deadheading" when her flight to Toronto crash landed on Feb. 17NEED TO KNOW A passenger on board the Delta Air Lines plane that crashed in Toronto is now suing the company Vanessa Miles and her lawyers claim the company's alleged negligence led to the violent crash All 80 people on board survived the Feb. 17 incident, with 18 people transported to local hospitalsA passenger on board the Delta plane that rolled over during a crash landing in Toronto in February is now suing the airline. According to a lawsuit filed on July 28, Michigan resident Vanessa Miles boarded Toronto-bound Endeavor Air Flight 4819 in Minneapolis on Feb. 17, 2025. The woman was an employee of Endeavor Air — a regional Delta subsidiary — but was traveling as a passenger to reach another assignment location, a practice known as 'deadheading.' According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the flight crash landed at Toronto Pearson International Airport at around 2:45 p.m. local time. Footage and photos captured during the incident show the jet catching fire as it hit the runway, skidded out and rolled over, coming to rest upside down. All 80 people on board — 76 passengers and four crew members — were evacuated, per the FAA. On the day of the incident, Delta issued a statement stating that 18 customers with injuries were transported to local hospitals. Miles and her lawyers claim the incident was a result of Delta's alleged 'grossly negligent operation of the aircraft.' 'This accident was caused, at least in part, by Defendants knowing assigning an inexperienced and inadequately trained pilot to operate the flight,' the lawsuit claims. 'Defendants cut corners on safety by rushing pilots through training programs and knowingly putting passengers at risk with inexperienced flight crew.'The suit details Miles' alleged injuries during the crash. She claims she was left temporarily unconscious while hanging upside down in the inverted aircraft. She says she was soaked in jet fuel and surrounded by smoke. After unlocking her seatbelt and attempting to escape, she says she fell 6-7 feet to the ground because the emergency slides were not deployed. Then, she allegedly had to wait an hour in 15-degree weather for transportation to the hospital. Miles allegedly suffered severe and permanent injuries, including a fractured shoulder, traumatic brain injury, back injuries, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and claims include strict liability, negligence and gross negligence. Miles demands damages of at least $75 million on top of legal costs. 'Ms. Miles suffered significant injuries when Delta Air Lines/Endeavor Air Flight 4819 crash-landed in Toronto after preventable safety, training, and evacuation failures, as alleged in our complaint," Madeline Sinkovich, an attorney with Mike Morse Law Firm, shared in a statement with PEOPLE. "We are pursuing full accountability and compensation in court.' Delta Air Lines declined to comment on pending litigation, though a spokesperson for the company said Delta 'continues to support the Transportation Safety Board of Canada's ongoing investigation.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The agency's preliminary report, released on March 20, found winds were gusting up to 35 knots at the time the plane approached Runway 23 for landing. After the rapid descent, the right main landing gear fractured and the wind detached from the plane. 'For everyone at Endeavor Air and Delta, nothing is more important than the safety of our customers and our people. That's why we remain fully engaged as participants in the investigation led by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Out of respect for the integrity of this work that will continue through their final report, Endeavor Air and Delta will refrain from comment,' the company shared at the time. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit against Graham James tossed after judge finds evidence 'too unreliable'
This article may affect those who have experienced sexual violence or know someone affected by it. A Manitoba judge has dismissed a $6-million lawsuit against disgraced hockey coach Graham James and the St. James-Assiniboia School Division after she found the evidence presented by the plaintiff had inconsistencies, contradictions and was "too unreliable" to prove the convicted sexual offender abused a 10-year-old student in 1983. "I am satisfied on the evidence adduced by the defendant that there is no genuine issue requiring a trial as to whether James sexually assaulted [the boy]," Court of King's Bench Judge Sarah Inness wrote in her decision. The lawsuit, filed in November 2023, claimed James placed his hand on the boy's tights, making contact with his genitals, while James was his substitute teacher at the Winnipeg school division. The statement of claim also alleged James assaulted the student at a relative's home the same year, forcing sexual acts on him and encouraging the boy's sister, who was a girl at the time, to sexually touch him. Inness said at issue in the lawsuit is whether James was the perpetrator of the alleged sexual assaults. "[The man's] beliefs that James is the person responsible, even if sincere, are not evidence upon which a finding of liability can reliably rest," the judge's decision said. The judge said care was taken to assess the claims of the plaintiff, given James is "a notorious child sex offender." He spent several years in prison for sexually assaulting multiple young players he coached in the 1980s and 1990s. But the evidence presented by the plaintiff at the lawsuit raised concerns over contradictions and inconsistencies, including the timeline of the events, the judge's decision said. The man initially claimed in the lawsuit and criminal complaint that the assault happened in May and the summer of 1983. But following a Winnipeg Police Service investigation that found the man was not a student at the school until later that year, he filed an amended lawsuit claiming the sexual abuse had instead started in September and the fall of 1983. "I recognize that a mistake as to the time frame of historical sexual abuse allegations alone may be explained by [the man's] age at the time and the number of years that have passed since then," the judge wrote in her decision. But there were other concerns. The judge pointed to the physical description the man gave police of the substitute teacher, which matched two photographs of James that were in news articles about the coach's sexual offending. The plaintiff admitted he came across those while doing research for his lawsuit. "I find the reason he conducted research prior to making a criminal complaint was to assist himself in identifying his abuser. Either he did not know or he was unsure it was James," the decision said. 'Unaware of the identity,' says judge Through interviews with the man's relatives, police found he never stayed overnight at the house where he said James assaulted him, and he had only been there for a visit over Christmas, where he left shortly after arriving, the decision said. In the statement of claim, the man also said he saw James talking with another person the morning after the sexual abuse. At cross-examination, the man identified the person as his uncle. When asked why he hadn't before, the plaintiff said he didn't want to unnecessarily involve his family. The judge said this was problematic. "His failure to adduce such evidence, knowing that the defendants were challenging the veracity of those claims, adds doubts to the accuracy of his account," the decision said. "The fact that he was researching substitute teachers who were convicted, and his reluctance to involve his family as witnesses, suggests he was unaware of the identity of the person." Records provided by the school division during the litigation show James had no days logged with them between September 1983 and June 1984. The judge said that while that evidence doesn't prove the former coach didn't work for the division after May 1983, it is reasonable to infer it. James denied sexually assaulting the boy and said he was hired full-time as an assistant coach for the Winnipeg Warriors in or around May 1983. The judge said that if he had worked at the division after, there would have been some record or documentation.
