Canadian community foundations rally to support local news, calling it essential to democracy
But I did find plenty of news from down south. While the erosion of democracy in the United States is something to pay attention to, some news outlets appear to be capitalizing on its sensational aspects.
When Donald Trump and Elon Musk get into an online fistfight, local news can seem like the less glamorous cousin.
But there's really not much we can do about American democracy.
Still, U.S. media reports have contributed to news burnout. Many Canadians are tuning out from their regular news sources. Forty per cent of Canadians responding to a survey from the 2025 Reuters Digital News Report said they were sometimes or often avoiding the news, as compared to 28 per cent eight years earlier.
Hearing about problems we can't do much about is disempowering, according to a study on solutions journalism. Researchers found that readers who were treated as active civic participants rather than passive consumers felt more empowered.
The news about my kid's school is something that profoundly impacts my family. And I can do something about it, at least in theory. I can attend public meetings and organize my neighbours to take a stand, in hopes of affecting the outcome of the discussions.
Local news can help me do that. It's the very stuff that can help rebuild frayed community ties and mis- and disinformation. Without access to quality local news, malicious entities can more easily step into communities with misinformation designed to sway or mislead.
Voter turnout is higher in places with more newspapers. Local journalists act as news brokers, ensuring the flow of information, which is essential to fulfilling the information needs of communities. We know that when less local news is present, communities become more polarized, and that polarization leads to increased sharing of misinformation.
But local news is increasingly in trouble. Local news outlets are closing - 566 across Canada, to be precise, between 2008 and April 2025. That's compared to the 283 that opened and remain in operation in that same period, according to the Local News Research Project.
My recent report for The Canadian Philanthropy Partnership Research Network, "In Defense of the Local: How Community Foundations Across Canada are Supporting Local News" describes an increasingly popular way to support these local news outlets.
Through case studies, I documented - along with my research assistant, Jessica Botelho-Urbanski, and supported by our research team at OCADU - the early signs of a growing movement of Canadian community foundations supporting local journalism.
Community foundations across Canada are becoming ever more aware that many of the issues they care about, like building just and sustainable communities, are connected to the availability of local journalism.
And some communities are starting to fund their local news outlets.
For example, the Toronto Foundation made a rare, 10-year commitment to support The Local, a non-profit news outlet founded in 2019 that describes itself as "unabashedly Toronto, reporting from corners of the city that are too often ignored or misunderstood."
Sharon Avery, Toronto Foundation's president and CEO, says the organization hadn't spent much time prioritizing journalism because "the dots have not been connected ...that a healthy local journalism equals a healthy community." But she grew convinced of the essential links between local news and democracy, and realized local news is a powerful tool.
The Winnipeg Foundation has been interested in local news for a while. Most recently, it funded the salary for one reporter, shared between Winnipeg's The Free Press, a major local newspaper, and The Narwhal, an environmentally focused digital news startup that had been looking to expand its coverage in the Prairies.
This kind of collaboration can improve the quality of work produced while also increasing the attention garnered by the resulting journalism in a way that is truly a win-win for all partners.
All of this is happening alongside government support, delivered through solutions like the Local Journalism Initiative, which funds journalists to report on under-covered topics, and the Canadian Journalism Labour Tax Credit, which covers a portion of salaries of eligible journalists.
Our report also includes recommendations on how place-based foundations can turn these initiatives into a movement to support local journalism. Community foundations could start by getting to know their local news ecosystems. What news organizations exist? What audiences do they serve?
They should also consider policies to direct some of their ad spending to local media, following the lead of the provincial government in Ontario, which has its four largest agencies allocate at least one-quarter of their annual advertising budgets to Ontario publishers.
Perhaps the most powerful - and most challenging - of our recommendations includes working with other local players to set up a community news fund.
the U.S., Europe and South America.
Community foundations have the power to promote journalistic collaboration, which can help to combat mis- and disinformation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Forward
25 minutes ago
- Japan Forward
Why is Ishiba Letting Trump Call the Shots in Tariff Talks?
このページを 日本語 で読む There seems to be no end in sight for the Japan-United States tariff negotiations. With such slow progress, President Donald Trump has been stepping up his criticism of Japan. Trump has said that it is "unfair" that US auto exports to Japan are at such a low level and has rebuffed Japan's requests to scrap or reconsider the 25% additional tariffs his administration has slapped on Japanese cars. The President has also complained that the Japanese imports of US rice are insufficient. Trump has been pointing to both of these issues for quite some time. Nevertheless, the reason why he has recently intensified his criticism of Japan by name is likely a desire to shake up Tokyo. He wants to force major concessions from Japan in order to start eliminating the bilateral trade deficit. Of course, the self-righteous US criticism regarding motor vehicle imports is unacceptable. Additionally, Japan imported 346,000 tons of American rice in 2024, more than twice the amount from the next largest external source, Thailand. At the same time, rice production constitutes the foundation of Japan's food security. So there is no need for our nation to blindly comply with US demands for increased imports of American rice. Japan should remain undeterred by Trump's provocative words and actions and continue to negotiate tenaciously. What is worrisome is the fact that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has been out of the picture. Minister Ryosei Akazawa leaves the meeting with Commerce Secretary Robert Lutnick on June 27 in Washington. (©Kyodo) Trump personally calls the shots as to whether the US will revise its tariff measures. The only person who can directly influence this impasse is the Prime Minister. So why is there no sign of Ishiba becoming proactively involved in the negotiations? After agreement could not be reached at the June summit, the parties decided to continue negotiations at the Cabinet minister level. However, leaving the negotiations to Ryosei Akazawa, Minister of State for Economic Revitalization, does not solve the problem. Akazawa is not in a position to negotiate directly with the President. Ishiba has a responsibility as prime minister to protect the national interest. If he just allows Trump to dictate the pace of negotiations, he will be unable to fulfill that responsibility. Currently, the Japan-US tariff talks remain stymied over the additional tariffs on Japanese motor vehicles imported into the United States. That sector is a priority for Japan. Akazawa visited the US at the end of June for the seventh ministerial meeting. However, he was unable to even meet with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is overseeing the US side in the talks. Trump's moratorium on the imposition of additional "reciprocal tariffs" is due to expire on July 9. Yet, no progress has been made in the negotiations, including regarding the possibility of extending the deadline. Prime Minister Ishiba answers reporters' questions on June 22. (©Sankei) Trump unilaterally established that deadline. The US President also mentioned that he might send a letter to Japan ending the negotiations and setting the tariff level. It is problematic that Trump continues to unilaterally impose his will without fairly considering the ministerial-level talks and other input. However, it is also questionable whether the Ishiba administration is capable of managing such Trump-style dealmaking. The Prime Minister must demonstrate the leadership necessary to break the impasse. That, of course, includes arranging a telephone summit with Trump, as well as writing him directly. The time has come for Prime Minister Ishiba to prove his ability. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump reassures base after Iran strikes with Ukraine freeze
WASHINGTON, D.C.: President Donald Trump is drawing praise from his core supporters after halting key arms shipments to Ukraine, a move seen as reinforcing his promise to reduce U.S. involvement in foreign wars. The pause affects critical air defense systems, including Patriot missiles and precision artillery. It comes just weeks after Trump ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear sites—actions that had alarmed some in his base. Following the Iran strikes, many "America First" advocates questioned whether Trump was straying from his pledge to avoid "stupid wars." But the Ukraine decision appears designed to reassure them. Trump has repeatedly criticized U.S. aid to Ukraine, calling it a waste of taxpayer money. Dan Caldwell, a former senior defense adviser, said the choice was between equipping American troops or aiding a conflict where U.S. interests are limited. "We chose our own troops," he said. Jack Posobiec, a far-right commentator, echoed that sentiment on X: "America FIRST." The Pentagon insists the pause aligns with Trump's campaign platform. "The president was elected to put America first," said Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell. However, the move has divided Republicans. More hawkish members are alarmed, especially as Russia steps up attacks in Ukraine. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania wrote to Trump and the Pentagon requesting an emergency briefing, warning that the timing could embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, emphasized continued support for Ukraine: "Now is the time to show Putin we mean business," he posted. "That starts with delivering the weapons Congress approved." On July 3, Trump held a phone call with Putin—their sixth conversation since Trump returned to office. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, confirmed they discussed Ukraine and Iran but did not specifically address the weapons freeze. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said during a visit to Denmark that he hopes to speak with Trump soon. The White House says the pause is part of a broader review of U.S. military readiness, following US$70 billion in arms transfers to Ukraine since 2022. Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy official, led the review. At his Senate hearing, Colby stressed the U.S. lacks the capacity for multiple wars and should prioritize threats from China. Analysts supporting a more cautious U.S. posture say the arms pause is overdue. "We're reaching a point where continued aid to Ukraine could weaken our ability to respond to future crises," said Jennifer Kavanagh of Defense Priorities. "You have to be cautious."
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Trump's global tariff pause is supposed to expire soon. What's at stake for Canada?
U.S. President Donald Trump's three-month pause on his sweeping global tariffs is set to expire in just a few days, unless he opts to give countries extra time to negotiate deals — as his advisers have suggested this weekend. Ahead of the deadline, some trade experts say Canada still faces big risks, despite avoiding that round of levies back in April. "What the president needs is a bunch of wins by July 9 because he needs to show that his strategy is working," said Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, during an interview with CBC's The House that aired Saturday. On April 2, Trump held up a list in the Rose Garden of the White House and announced what he called "reciprocal tariffs" on more than 150 countries, including China and the European Union. The rates for individual countries on the list varied from 10 per cent to more than 40 per cent. Canada wasn't on that list, though other tariffs Trump had previously imposed on Canadian goods remained. One week after he unveiled the list, the president backed down and said he would freeze the global tariffs for 90 days to allow each country to negotiate deals with his administration. The problem for Canada is Trump hasn't closed many deals in those 90 days, Manak said. So far, the U.S. has reached agreements with Britain and Vietnam. Negotiations with other top markets like China, India, the European Union and Japan are ongoing. "If we don't see a lot of deals coming out of this, what we're likely to see is [Trump] to get more agitated and ask for more concessions from the countries that he knows he can push a little harder," Manak said. "So I think for Canada, that would be a very bad situation." Carlo Dade, international policy director at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, told CBC News "there's a risk every day of the week that [Trump] decides to come after Canada. That is not an exaggeration." "We're open to this potential as long as the president has unrestrained power to implement tariffs whenever, wherever, however he wants," he said. Trump used a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to apply the worldwide tariffs and his earlier fentanyl tariffs on Canada and Mexico. The law is intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. In late May, the New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade ruled Trump exceeded his authority by invoking IEEPA. The White House swiftly appealed and a federal appeals court allowed IEEPA tariffs to remain in effect while it reviewed the decision. WATCH | Europe gets a reprieve on tariffs: Trump delays tariff threat on EU to July 1 month ago Duration 2:52 U.S. President Donald Trump says he will delay his 50 per cent tariff on imports from the European Union until July 9 after a weekend phone call between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Manak said another challenge is Trump isn't facing political consequences for his tariffs right now — and no major economic fallout, either. "Right now, he's kind of sitting at a point where he feels he can kind of get away with maintaining the pressure that exists. And that pressure is enough to get other countries to the table," she said. At a White House news conference at the end of June, Trump told reporters the U.S. "can do whatever we want. We could extend [the July 9 deadline]. We could make it shorter. I'd like to make it shorter." On Sunday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested the July 9 deadline is being pushed back by about a month. He said on CNN's State of the Union that the Trump administration would send letters to trading partners "saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level." "So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly," Bessent told host Dana Bash. He also said Aug. 1 is "not a new deadline." Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters Sunday the higher tariffs would take effect on Aug. 1, but Trump was "setting the rates and the deals right now." Is there opportunity for Canada? Fen Osler Hampson, co-chair of the Expert Group on Canada-U.S. Relations at Carleton University, said Canada could leverage the economic uncertainty from Trump's tariffs and "put the pedal to the metal" to expand trade with European and Asian allies. Hampson added that Canada already has good trading relationships with those regions through the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). WATCH | Trump isn't pleased with taunts of 'chickening out' on trade: Does Trump 'always chicken out' on tariffs? 1 month ago Duration 5:34 Investors are poking fun at U.S. President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats, calling it 'TACO' trade — which stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' When asked about the term, Trump called it a 'nasty question.' CBC's Katie Simpson reports. With U.S. tariffs, Hampson said those countries are "going to be looking for other market opportunities, both to sell and buy. I think our challenge is to get serious and to realize the real dividends that can come from those two major regional trading agreements." Diversifying Canada's trading partners is one of Prime Minister Mark Carney's top goals — and a key objective for International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu. "I think Canada has a lot to offer and we should be screaming that at the top of our lungs," Sidhu told CBC's The House in an interview that aired Saturday. Canada has already deepened its trade relationships with countries such as Ecuador and the United Arab Emirates since Carney and Sidhu came into office. But key markets that could make a big dent in easing Canada's reliance on U.S. trade — like the U.K., India and China — are thornier due to fraught diplomatic relationships and other irritants. Colin Robertson, a former Canadian diplomat and vice-president at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, agreed that Canada can do more trade with other countries, but added a note of caution: businesses, not governments, are the only ones who can decide which companies they trade with. "Ultimately, business has to see a business opportunity," Robertson said, adding that the U.S. continues to be the market with the easiest access for Canadian businesses. On The House, Sidhu told guest host Janyce McGregor that Canadian businesses were indeed comfortable dealing with the U.S., but now they're asking him to help facilitate access to more countries. Canada-U.S. trade talks Carney and Trump continue to negotiate a Canada-U.S. trade deal, after setting a deadline of July 21. Hampson said the deadline helps Canada hold the Americans' attention as the Trump administration negotiates with other countries. The Americans also have an interest in getting a deal done soon, Robertson said. Canada and U.S. restarted negotiations Monday morning, Carney says 6 days ago Duration 1:15 Prime Minister Mark Carney says he had a 'good' conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday, and that the two leaders will keep working to reach a deal by July 21. The federal government scrapped the digital services tax over the weekend after Trump paused all trade talks. "If [the Americans] can't do it with Canada, their ally and their partner, it's much harder to do with Mexico, much harder with China," he said. "We should be the lowest of the hanging fruit from the American perspective." Trade discussions hit a roadblock in late June when Trump announced he would walk away from the negotiating table over Canada's digital services tax. The federal government scrapped the tax a few days later and discussions got back on track. Robertson said he's a bit skeptical about how far Canada will get with the U.S. by July 21, but adds that Trump enjoys declaring victory even if the agreement is "only 80 per cent of the way there." "Would we settle for 80 per cent? Be basically there and leave the rest to be cleaned up? I think so," he said. "Because if Trump's taken his eye off it and says it's basically there, then that's sufficient from where we're coming from."
