Ryanair's new baggage rules - what are they and when are they coming into effect?
It is. As it stands
Ryanair
passengers can bring a free bag measuring 40x25x20cm on-board and place it under the seat in front of them.
Under the changes
, the size of the bags permitted will increase to 40x30x20cm. That amounts to an extra 5cm along one side.
Hmm, that doesn't sound like a huge amount?
It is and it isn't. The enhanced size should allow you to bring a couple of extra T-shirts or maybe three pairs of rolled up socks on to the plane with you.
Michael O'Leary
has said it might even stretch to an additional pair of trousers too.
So, why are Ryanair doing this?
The on-board baggage allowances of all airlines have been under scrutiny by law makers in the EU of late with members of the European Parliament pushing for changes that would force airlines to allow passengers to carry on two cabin bags at no cost.
The European Commission has not gone that far but it has agreed a standard size of small bag, which is 40x30x15cm. Mr O'Leary said this week that Ryanair wants 'our personal baggage allowance, our free bag allowance to be bigger than the EU standard so we're moving ours up. We want you to have a big free bag but limit yourself to that one free bag and don't bring a second one.'
READ MORE
[
Michael O'Leary calls for Ursula von der Leyen's resignation amidst French airport strikes
Opens in new window
]
Ryanair is not acting along. In what is considered a pre-emptive strike – the airlines' trade body, Airlines for Europe (A4E), which includes Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air France and Lufthansa announced enhanced standards for a free under-seat bag that its members will roll out by the end of summer.
And those are the dimensions Ryanair are introducing?
Actually, no. The minimum dimensions proposed by the A4E are 40x30x15cm, it said – so Ryanair is actually promising slightly bigger bags.
What do the A4E people say about the two free bags business?
It is against the rules and has said it would strip passengers of choice and force services on them they don't need. As Ourania Georgoutsakou, A4E's managing director, put it recently: 'What's next? Mandatory popcorn and drinks as part of your cinema ticket?' .
So when are the Ryanair changes coming into effect?
The new free bag size is likely to come into effect before the end of the summer as the bag sizers it uses at boarding gates are adjusted to the new standard.
Bag sizers? That reminds me, weren't there some issues around Ryanair bags recently?
Oh yes. In recent months, this newspaper has highlighted the experiences of many Ryanair passengers who have been hit with unexpected charges of up to €75 at boarding gates after their bags – often bags they have used many times without issue – were deemed to be too big for the airline's sizers.
Ryanair has insisted there has been no changes to how it polices carry-on luggage in recent months, and says while 'new stickers have been fitted to the front and sides of our sizers to show the exact permitted dimensions of our two bag sizes (40 x 20 x 25cm) and (55 x 40 x 20cm), [the] stickers show that our permitted dimensions are smaller than our sizers. Our sizers are, therefore, bigger than our permitted/agreed bag sizes. Only bags that do not fit within our sizers (and so considerably exceed our agreed bag sizes) get charged for.'
So what is the policy when it comes to bags?
It insists that its 'bag policy is simple: if it fits in our bag sizer (which is bigger than our agreed dimensions), it gets on free of charge. If it doesn't fit within our sizers, it will be charged. There has been no change in this policy for many years.'
And more generally, what are the rules when it comes to bags?
Passengers are strongly urged to check with airlines before they pack as it really does help to know the rules.
Anyone looking to bring a 10kg bag on-board a short-haul Aer Lingus flight must book 'carry-on bag with priority boarding' at a cost of €9.99.
But 10kg bags can be checked in for free. If you show up at the boarding gate with your bag without paying in advance you will be charged a €35 fee.
Checking in a 20kg bag is between €25 and €55 depending on the length of a flight. Checking in a 40kg spread over two bags costs between €65 and €85. The excess baggage rate charged by the airline is €10 per kilo over your allowance.
Priority boarding with Ryanair gets you your 10kg on board bag for 'free' – although remember, if it is deemed too big, you will pay through the nose If you check it in, it can cost between €9.49 and €44.99, depending on the time and distance of the flight.
A 20kg checked-in bag with Ryanair costs between €18.99 and €59.99. The pricing for excess baggage is €13.99 per each added kilogram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
18 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Taoiseach accuses Pearse Doherty of ‘asserting falsehoods' over claim Japan flight rebooked for hurling semi-final
Micheál Martin accused Pearse Doherty TD of "asserting falsehoods" and "poor politics" when he made the suggestion, based on media reports. He also said there was no additional cost from a late decision to fly east, via Toronto, rather than west, via Dubai. But the Taoiseach then said the final costs "haven't been reconciled," but would be published in due course on his Department's website. The story was "unequivocally and categorically" wrong, he said, because the Cork v Dublin All-Ireland hurling semi-final was due to begin at 5pm. One flight would have landed him back in the capital at 8am and the other at noon, so he was going to see the match in either case, he said. He indeed attended Croke Park to see his native county's famous win. The Finance committee was discussing revised estimates when Mr Doherty said: "Your travel made the media recently. You returned from a trip to Japan, and you rebooked that trip home through Toronto. "It is suggested that that was on the basis of security advice. Can you explain, if that is the case, why you didn't share the security advice with any of the media corps who were travelling, in relation to their security?" Mr Martin replied: "It's a nonsense story. It is important that the context is made very clear. The story is suggesting there was a rescheduling to do with the match. There wasn't. "The alternative would have had me in at 12 o'clock. The way I went, I came in at eight. I had nothing to do with it. I don't book the travel. "And in terms of the security at the time, these were booked a week in advance. And in the Middle East there are issues, as we all know. It was a precautionary approach." Mr Doherty asked him to explain why, if it was security advice that avoided the risk of flying through Dubai, he had not shared that information "with other Irish citizens who were accompanying you on the trip." Mr Martin said: "Two things. First of all, there wasn't additional cost as a result of that, to my knowledge. I don't get into the minutiae of the routes. "Anybody who's a journalist sent out by their media organisation, they take their own advices. They organise their own travel and so forth. "The people who were organising on my behalf took a view that the Middle East was problematic in terms of cancelations and in terms of activity. "That's what I've been told." Mr Doherty said it was "a bit bizarre", saying the Taoiseach had suggested it was "more about [onward flight] cancellation, as opposed to anything personally happening yourself." Instead of "an abundance of caution," he said the Taoiseach "flew through Toronto because there was a risk of cancelation, and therefore you would miss the match." Mr Martin said the assertion was wrong. "I just want to unequivocally say to you, and categorically -- like the truth does matter on these matters - this had nothing to do with the match. "The match was on at five o'clock that day. So either route would have got me in at eight or 12. "This has nothing to do with budget spending, it's just political. That's what you're at, and it's regrettable." Mr Martin said that the switch was "to mitigate any risk of flight cancelations," Mr Doherty said. "You would have missed the match. That is simple fact, because the security situation already had resulted in extensive Middle East airspace being closed in the days prior to this being booked." Mr Martin snapped: "You're not asking a question. You're asserting falsehoods. And you don't want to allow a reasonable, rational explanation to be given."
Irish Times
44 minutes ago
- Irish Times
EU and US on brink of tariff deal to avoid trade war
The European Union and the United States are believed to be on the brink of a deal that would stop the transatlantic dispute over tariffs escalating into a full blown trade war. Negotiations between the two sides are near to concluding an 'agreement in principle', which sources say could be finalised imminently, if approved by US president Donald Trump . The 'agreement in principle', if signed off on by Mr Trump, would buy time for technical negotiations to continue, to iron out the more complex details of the future EU-US trading relationship, without the threat of steeper tariffs hanging over the discussions. The European Commission's trade negotiators, led by Maroš Šefčovič , are understood to be close to an agreement on the broad parameters of a deal on tariffs with US officials. Mr Šefčovič spoke to commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in the last 48 hours and had a further call scheduled with trade negotiator Jamieson Greer on Wednesday evening. READ MORE The high-level contact follows a telephone call on Sunday between Mr Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen , which she said helped 'move things forward'. The outline of a draft agreement negotiated between the EU and US would see the 10 per cent tariff Mr Trump put on nearly all EU imports remain. However, EU officials were hopeful of securing tariff exemptions for the aviation and spirits sectors in the deal, according to briefings given to diplomats in Brussels in recent days. The exact details of the agreement could be subject to change before it is finally signed off. US tariffs charged on imports coming from the EU were due to increase to at least 20 per cent on July 9th, but the deadline was extended to August 1st by Mr Trump earlier this week. Negotiations between US and EU officials had intensified in recent weeks, as the initial deadline loomed. [ EU working 'day and night' for tariff deal, Ursula von der Leyen says Opens in new window ] EU negotiators have been pushing back on a last-minute proposal tabled by the Trump administration, that would have seen tariffs on EU agricultural products set at a higher 17 per cent rate. The text of any deal will likely only run to several pages. It is unclear whether it will include a reference to pharmaceuticals, a sector Mr Trump has promised to hit with huge import duties at a later date. The negotiating teams have been exploring a quota scheme that would allow European car manufacturers to offset some portion of the tariffs they would be charged, based on the size of their manufacturing footprint in the US. The commission had threatened to put counter-tariffs on imports of a range of US products, such as aircraft, medical devices, automobiles, bourbon and agricultural produce, in the event talks collapsed without agreement. Government sources in Dublin said they were on standby for developments, but cautioned it was hard to be sure a deal would be concluded in the coming days, given the unpredictability of the Trump administration. [ China warns countries on agreeing US tariff deal that would come at Beijing's expense Opens in new window ] While much of the substance of the agreement was believed to be very close to being settled, diplomatic sources in Brussels also warned that Mr Trump could decide to reopen large aspects of the negotiations unexpectedly. An agreement that averts the prospect of cripplingly high US tariffs on European trade from the start of next month would be hugely welcomed in Government Buildings. However, there is concern about the possibility Mr Trump could introduce separate tariffs on pharmaceutical products at a later date. Pharmaceuticals make up the bulk of the Republic's exports across the Atlantic, given the large concentration of US pharma firms with manufacturing sites in Ireland.
Irish Post
3 hours ago
- Irish Post
Trump's latest tariff threats renew fears for Irish exports
DONALD Trump has reignited trade tensions with the EU by reversing his earlier decision to extend tariff negotiations. In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared there would be 'no extension' beyond today's deadline, raising the risk of steep new tariffs on European goods. Trump had previously signalled August 1st as the cutoff for a deal, but that grace period is now off the table. The EU is scrambling to reach at least a basic agreement to avoid new tariffs — including threatened 50% duties on key imports — though progress has been slow. Ireland is already affected by existing 10% US tariffs on products like butter, whiskey, and some medical goods. While the broader pharmaceutical sector has so far been spared, a recent US review could pave the way for 25% tariffs — a major concern for one of Ireland's most critical industries. Tánaiste Simon Harris has called for a 'zero for zero' tariff deal, but such an outcome looks unlikely. There are reports that planes and alcohol may be excluded from future tariffs, which would offer some relief to Irish exporters. Although the Irish economy hasn't yet seen major damage, the uncertainty is putting investment decisions on hold and weighing on exporters already hit by the weak US dollar and trade friction. Meanwhile, divisions within the EU are complicating the bloc's response. Germany favours a quick deal to protect its car industry, while France is pushing for a tougher stance. The EU has so far avoided retaliatory action, but officials warn that cannot continue if Trump escalates. While markets currently expect cooler heads to prevail, there's growing concern that talks could collapse, triggering a damaging trade war. Ireland's export-heavy economy and reliance on US investment make it particularly vulnerable to these tariff threats. See More: Donald Trump, EU, Simon Harris, Tariffs
