Israel plans to hold Gazan population in ‘humanitarian city' on ruins of Rafah, Israeli media reports
Dana Karni, Mostafa Salem
and
Oren Liebermann
, CNN
Displaced Palestinians carry the humanitarian aid they have received from a United Nations distribution point in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2025.
Photo:
AFP/SAEED JARAS
Israel's defence minister said he told the military to advance plans for what he called a
"humanitarian city"
built on the ruins of Rafah in southern Gaza, according to reports in Israeli media.
In a briefing to reporters on Monday (local time), Israel Katz said the zone would initially house some 600,000 displaced Palestinians who have been forced to evacuate to the Al-Mawasi area along the coast of southern Gaza, multiple outlets who attended in the briefing reported.
Palestinians who enter the zone will go through a screening to check that they are not members of Hamas.
They will not be allowed to leave, Katz said, according to Israeli media. Eventually, the defence minister said the entire population of Gaza - more than 2 million Palestinians - will be held in the zone. Katz then vowed that Israel would implement a plan, first floated by US President Donald Trump, to allow Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza to other countries.
A Palestinian child looks on as smoke billows in the distance during Israeli bombardment in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, on 11 June 2025.
Photo:
AFP
Israeli politicians, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have eagerly supported the emigration plan, despite no country publicly expressing any willingness to take part.
At a White House dinner with Trump on Monday, Netanyahu said, "We're working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realise what they always said, that they want to give the Palestinians a better future, and I think we're getting close to finding several countries."
Katz said the zone for displaced Palestinians will be run by international bodies, not the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), Israeli media reported. The IDF would secure the zone from a distance, Katz said, in a plan that appears to imitate the aid distribution mechanism of the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). GHF operates the distribution sites, but the IDF surrounds them militarily.
It's unclear what bodies would agree to participate in Katz's plan, especially since most international organisations refuse to take part in GHF's distribution sites due to serious concerns about impartiality and the safety of the Palestinian population.
Hundreds of Palestinians
have been killed trying to approach the distribution sites
since they began operating a month ago, according to health officials in Gaza and the United Nations.
A spokesperson for Katz has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
Asked about the plan at a press conference on Tuesday evening, IDF spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said the military "will present several options to the political echelon".
"Every option has its implications. We will act according to the directives of the political echelon," Defrin added.
On Tuesday, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK opposes the new plan, just as it opposed GHF.
"I'm surprised at the statements that I've seen from Mr Katz over the last 24 hours," Lammy told a parliamentary committee. "They run contra to the proximity to a ceasefire that I thought we were heading towards."
Lammy added that he does not recognise the plan "as a serious context in which the people of Gaza can get the aid and support that they need at this time".
In a statement on Tuesday, Hamas said that Israel's "persistent efforts to forcibly displace our people and impose ethnic cleansing have met with legendary resilience. Our people have stood firm in the face of killing, hunger, and bombardment, rejecting any future dictated from intelligence headquarters or political bargaining tables".
Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, said Katz's plan amounts to the forcible transfer of a population in preparation for deportation. Both of these are war crimes, Sfard told CNN.
"If they are done on a massive scale - whole communities - they can amount to war crimes," Sfard said, dismissing the notion that any departure from Gaza could be considered voluntary.
"There is no consensual departure. There is no voluntary departure. People will flee from Gaza because Israel is mounting on them coercive measures that would make their life in Gaza impossible," he said. "Under international law, you don't have to load people on trucks at gunpoint in order to commit the crime of deportation."
A senior diplomat from the United Arab Emirates, considered one of the key countries in any plan for post-war Gaza, said removing Palestinians from the enclave would be unacceptable.
"The UAE has publicly and categorically rejected the forced displacement of Palestinians…our public position and our private position is that we reject the forced dislocation of any Palestinians from the territory now to rebuild Gaza," Lana Nusseibeh told CNN.
Qatar, which is now hosting proximity talks between Israel and Hamas, also rejected the deportation of Gaza's population.
"We have said very clearly we are against any forced relocation of Palestinians, or any relocation of Palestinians outside their land," Majed Al Ansari, spokesperson for the Qatari Foreign Ministry, said on Tuesday.
-CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
15 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Hamas agrees partial hostage release in ‘difficult' truce talks
Hamas has said it will release 10 hostages as part of Gaza ceasefire talks after Israel struck an upbeat note about the prospects for a deal to stop the fighting. The Islamist group's statement came after four days of indirect talks brokered by Qatar and as the United States
1News
a day ago
- 1News
UK bans pro-Palestinian groups under anti-terrorism laws
The pro-Palestinian activist group Palestine Action lost a bid to block the British government's decision to ban it under anti-terrorism laws after activists broke into a military base last month and vandalised two planes. At a hearing at the High Court in London, the group had sought to temporarily block what it considered to be an "authoritarian" ban, which will go into effect at midnight. The ban will make membership of the group and support of its actions a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. But Justice Martin Chamberlain, who spent all day listening to lawyers representing the group and the government, declined to give the organisation interim relief from the ban, which was first proposed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and approved by lawmakers earlier this week. While conceding that the order to proscribe Palestine Action a terrorist organisation may have "wider consequences for the way the public understands the concept of 'terrorism'," he said it is not "the court's function to comment on the wisdom of the use of the power in the case". ADVERTISEMENT Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, was hoping the court would temporarily block the government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 before a potential legal challenge. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas and al-Qaida. Demonstrators during a protest by Palestine Action group in London. (Source: Associated Press) Ammori's lawyer Raza Husain had asked the court to suspend the "ill-considered" and "authoritarian abuse of statutory power" until a hearing, which is due around July 21. "This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists," he said. He added that his client had been "inspired" by a long history of direct action in the UK, "from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq War activists". The ban was triggered after pro-Palestinian activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton, damaging two planes using red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza. Police said that the incident caused around 7 million pounds (NZ$15.7 million) worth of damage, with four people charged in connection with the incident. The four, aged between 22 and 35, were charged Thursday (local time) with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the UK. No pleas were entered at Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London and the four are scheduled to appear on July 18 at the Central Criminal Court. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation a few days after the break-in. She said the vandalism to the two planes was "disgraceful," adding that the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
What is Rocket Lab launching into space and why are people angry about it?
On Friday, picket signs bearing Palestine flags and banners about genocide gathered around three Rocket Lab locations in New Zealand. Why? Rocket Lab, founded in 2006 by Sir Peter Beck, is often lauded in New Zealand for catalysing our space industry. Today it still leads the sector, one with a quickly growing revenue – it was $2.68b in 2024. It's not just glowey-eyed nationalism that paints Rocket Lab favourably. Outside of New Zealand, it's seen as an ' innovative, exciting young space tech company,' and in the first quarter of 2025, Rocket Lab recorded $123 million in revenue, 32% up year-on-year. Rocket Lab is now an American corporation with headquarters in California. It offers launches from Māhia Peninsula and Virginia USA as well as aerospace manufacturing and design. While in 2008 Beck stated, ' if it's involved in the military we don't want anything to do with it,' the company won contracts from at least three US defence agencies in 2009, and seemingly never looked back. In May, Rocket Lab announced a $460 million deal with a US missile tracking tech company, positioning itself as a major contractor to US national security. In the US, Rocket Lab's rockets are the second most launched (after SpaceX). Here in New Zealand, concerns have been raised, and largely ignored by politicians, that Rocket Lab's ability to replace satellites makes the country a military target. Over the years, groups like Auckland Peace Action and Rocket Lab Monitor have accused Rocket Lab of being part of the militarisation of space and breaching New Zealand's Nuclear Free status. Many of the complaints have centered around its US military contracts. These groups have pointed out that Lockheed Martin, the world's largest weapons manufacturer, has invested in Rocket Lab and that the aerospace intelligence and communications technology that Rocket Lab develops, manufactures and launches could be used in weapon systems and other military operations. The most recent protests, from Friday, were led by Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA). Beyond the pickets, the group, along with a lawyer, have referred Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck, minister for space and for defence Judith Collins and others to the office of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Why? Because PSNA believes that Rocket Lab activities may have intentionally contributed to war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide committed by Israel. In a statement provided to The Spinoff, a Rocket Lab spokesperson said the company 'strongly refutes PSNA's false and irresponsible claims' and that it is considering its legal options. They followed with a bullet-pointed summary of New Zealand's legal requirements for launching rockets. So what does Rocket Lab launch into space from Māhia? Rocket Lab's website says that its launches, numbering over 200 since 2018, have enabled ' operations in national security, scientific research, space debris mitigation, Earth observation, climate monitoring, and communications '. In the past the company has said it does not and will not launch weapons as this is against its commitment and New Zealand law. New Zealand's space activities are regulated by the Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Act 2017. Apart from safety considerations, the act takes into account New Zealand's international obligations and national interests like economic benefits, risks to national security and international relations. Anything launched into space must have a license granted by discretion of the government on a case-by-case basis. Cabinet has outlined some payloads not to be permitted – payloads that contribute to nuclear weapons programmes or capabilities; payloads with the intended end use of harming, interfering with, or destroying other spacecraft, or space systems; payloads with the intended end use of supporting or enabling specific defence, security or intelligence operations that are contrary to government policy; payloads where the intended end use is likely to cause serious or irreversible harm to the environment. Rocket Lab's website includes a log of launched missions. Among the clients listed are Hawkeye360, BlackSky, Capella Space, NASA, the US National Reconnaissance Office, the United States Space Force, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and RideShare. A few are labelled 'confidential commercial customer' or simply 'undisclosed'. Some media coverage states that Hawkeye360, BlackSky, Capella Space, all space-based intelligence firms, have links to the Israeli Ministry of Defense, though unsurprisingly it's hard to track down evidence and details. In its ICC referral, PSNA has taken issue with Rocket Lab's BlackSky launches in particular, claiming that ' these satellites provide high resolution images to Israel which are very likely used to assist with striking civilians in Gaza '. BlackSky has a network of satellites and sensors that capture high-frequency imagery of Earth. They monitor places and activities for clients, providing high-resolution photographs and AI-enabled analytics every hour under subscription models. This year, Rocket Lab is launching a series of BlackSky's Gen-3 satellites from Māhia Peninsula which are faster, can automatically identify smaller objects and can capture imagery through clouds, smoke or haze. In 2024, Intelligence Online, an intelligence trade publication, reported that 'BlackSky has a secret $150m contract to supply high temporal frequency images and analysis to the Israeli defence ministry'. This claim has not been reported elsewhere, but BlackSky has recently announced a new, $100+ million contract from a 'strategic international defense sector customer' for its Gen-3 monitoring capabilities. When Rocket Lab was asked by Newsroom in November last year whether payloads it had launched had been used to inform Israeli air strikes, a spokesperson pointed to other uses of commercial satellite imagery and data like disaster and humanitarian response, emergency management, national security, commerce, and environmental monitoring. A recent mission launched satellites for wildfire detection and monitoring. What don't we know? There is much we don't know and may never know about what Rocket Lab and its clients do. Some payloads have been kept confidential, yet all launches from New Zealand have to disclose information to the government in order to get the needed licenses. It's not cut and dry when the government might have obligations to release that information – under the Official Information Act information can be withheld on grounds of commercial or national security. The Spinoff contacted the office of Judith Collins for comment on Rocket Lab and the ICC referral. We were referred to the office of the prime minister who provided the following comment from a spokesperson: 'People are free to express their views but New Zealand has consistently made clear the situation in Gaza is deeply distressing, and the crisis must end. Our response to the Israel-Hamas conflict has been consistently grounded in the importance of upholding international law.'
