TGEC conducts high-level seminar over English as medium of instruction
On Monday, the workshop was chaired by Akunuri Murali, the Chairperson of TGEC, and opened by member Prof P L Vishweshwar Rao. The Commission has long been engaged with the policy question of language in education, particularly concerning the balance between equity, quality, and employability. In his welcome address, Prof Vishweshwar Rao emphasised that the issue is being considered with an open mind, prioritsing the best interests of students.
Members of the Working Group on 'Spoken English Initiatives in Telangana Government Schools,' which includes Dr Vijay Kumar Tadakamalla (BITS Pilani, Hyderabad), R. Sridhar Rao (Azim Premji University, Bengaluru), and Dr Santhosh Mahapatra (BITS Pilani, Hyderabad), were among the key speakers. The TGEC Chairperson clarified that the workshop focused not on pedagogy but on the role of English as a medium of instruction.
He pointed out the ideological tensions that sometimes lead to recommendations for other languages as the medium of instruction. He also highlighted practical considerations such as access to higher education and employability. Santosh Eshram, who works with tribal communities, shared that children often encounter unfamiliar content in English textbooks and stressed the importance of learning conversational English in context, particularly through simple, play-based teaching methods. Ashok Reddy, a School Assistant in English and a Fulbright Fellow, noted that while government schools are officially English medium, classroom teaching still heavily depends on Telugu.
He advocated for a bridge training programme for teachers and emphasised the need for a gradual and structured transition. Prof Sujatha Surepally and other speakers underscored the cultural and political dimensions of language, advocating for mother-tongue instruction in early grades and a distinction between English language learning and the medium of instruction. Prof Raju Naik and Mazher Hussain (COVA) supported early exposure to English, citing neuroplasticity research that shows language learning is most effective before the age of nine.
Dr Santhosh Mahapatra challenged the idea of a fixed medium of instruction and suggested using Telugu to learn English, with resources provided in English. Prof Vijaya Kumar aimed to dispel misconceptions that introducing a language earlier leads to better learning outcomes or that more languages introduced at an early age are beneficial, citing research that contradicts these claims. Dr Lina Mukhopadhyaya (EFLU) highlighted the importance of linguistic diversity and home-language support while recognizing the societal demand for English in a digitized and globalised world. Prof Padmaja Shaw pointed out the potential cultural implications when advocating for the mother tongue as the medium of instruction. Drawing from communication theories, she noted that those with English language skills are typically better positioned to seize opportunities in today's digitised and globalised world.
During the open session, teachers, parents, and students provided diverse perspectives. Some shared their personal experiences of language as a marker of opportunity and discrimination, while others expressed concerns regarding cultural loss and the preparedness of teachers. In his closing remarks, Murali addressed the practical challenges of reverting to regional language instruction in a system where public perception equates English with opportunity. He reiterated that 'any policy must centre on the needs of the child and the aspirations of families.' Prof P L Vishweshwar Rao mentioned that the Commission had visited every district in the state and found overwhelming community support, even in underprivileged areas, for English medium education, reflecting a grassroots aspiration for equal opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Meet actress who allegedly dated star cricketer, later married into a royal family, sparked controversy due to..., she is...
While most heroines were told their careers ended with motherhood, Moon Moon Sen did the exact opposite. She married into royalty, had two daughters, and then made her big-screen debut at 30. With her first film Andar Baahar in 1984, she raised eyebrows. But it wasn't just her looks that made headlines; it was her confidence and bold choices, both onscreen and off. She later shared screen space with Madhuri Dixit in 100 Days and acted in a string of notable films like Kuch Toh Hai, Zakhmi Dil, Mohabbat Ki Kasam, and Sheesha opposite Mithun Chakraborty. Across Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Kannada films, she appeared in over 60 films and 40+ TV shows. Where did she come from? Born into privilege, Moon Moon was the daughter of Bengali legend Suchitra Sen and granddaughter of a wealthy businessman, Adinath Sen. She was an English literature teacher in Kolkata and studied at Oxford before Bollywood found her. She married Bharat Dev Varma, from a royal lineage, in 1978. The couple has two daughters, Riya and Raima, both of whom tried their hand at acting. What about the Imran Khan connection? The buzz around Moon Moon wasn't limited to her films. Over the years, she was linked to several high-profile names, from Saif Ali Khan and Romu Sippy to Victor Banerjee. But the most talked-about was her alleged affair with former Pakistani cricketer and PM, Imran Khan. The media claimed the two dated and even shot for a magazine together, while Moon Moon was married. In a 2019 interview with PTI, she addressed it, 'I like spending time with Imran. If my husband doesn't have a problem, why should others?' She added that they were just friends. But the buzz never quite died down. Did she stop at films? Nope. Moon Moon later joined politics, becoming a member of Mamata Banerjee's Trinamool Congress and winning a Lok Sabha seat. Politics, like cinema, welcomed her late, but she made it count. Moon Moon Sen's story is one of charm, controversy, and breaking conventions. From teaching English to starring in 6 languages and facing political elections, her script was anything but ordinary.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Lokesh appeals to Telugu diaspora to invest in Andhra Pradesh and contribute to its growth
Minister of IT and HRD Nara Lokesh said Andhra Pradesh (A.P.) would undergo a dramatic transformation if a sizable chunk of the investments flowing into India from Singapore come to the State, and that the A.P. Government would extend all possible support to the Telugu diaspora living in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, Hong Kong and Indonesia, who were keen on investing in the State, and contributing to preservation of Telugu language, culture, and traditions. Participating in a meeting of the Telugu Diaspora from South-East Asia organised by the A.P. Non-Resident Telugu Society (APNRTS) and the A.P. Economic Development Board (APEDB) in Singapore on Sunday, Mr. Lokesh said A.P. was destroyed during the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) rule, and the present NDA Government was rebuilding the State amidst heavy odds under the leadership of Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, whose reputation was a big advantage. He highlighted the investment opportunities in A.P., and asserted that the APEDB would extend the necessary hand-holding to Telugu entrepreneurs coming forward to partner with the government of their home State. He said A.P. was following Singapore as a role model in implementing new policies, with focus on 'speed-of-doing business' and it needed the cooperation of the Telugu people in realising Mr. Naidu's vision. 'A.P. has over 1,000 km of coastline, a string of seaports and airports, highways, waterways, land, and connectivity, which make it an ideal place to invest. Also, the State has a rich talent pool,' he said. 'One capital — decentralised development' was the coalition government's slogan, in tune with which industries were being promoted in all the regions of the State, and due priority was given to the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSME), Mr. Lokesh added.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Long before Magna Carta, Cholas had ‘ballot pots': What is the ancient voting system PM Modi lauded?
Standing before the thousand-year-old stone temple built by Rajendra Chola I, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday said the Chola empire carried forward India's ancient democratic traditions. 'Historians talk about Britain's Magna Carta in the name of democracy,' he said, referring to the 1215 English charter. 'But many centuries ago, elections were held in the Chola Empire through a democratic method.' Long before the Enlightenment in Europe birthed the ideals of representative governance, the Cholas had etched out rules for local self-rule, literally inscribed into stone. The inscriptions of Uttaramerur, a village in present-day Kanchipuram district, offer some of the world's earliest surviving evidence of a formal electoral system. As chronicled by K A Nilakanta Sastri in The Cholas (1935), the Chola administrative framework was built on two foundational units: the Sabha for Brahmin settlements and the Ur for non-Brahmin villages. These were not symbolic councils but elected bodies with real powers over revenue, irrigation, temple management, and even justice. 'It was democracy at the grassroots — built into the fabric of Tamil civic life,' Sastri wrote in Chapter VIII, 'Local Self-Government'. But what made the system particularly striking was the method of voting, a process called the Kudavolai system or 'ballot pot' election. Under this method, as detailed in the Uttaramerur Inscriptions documented in Epigraphia Indica Vol. XXII (1933–34), the names of eligible candidates were inscribed on palm leaves and placed inside a pot. A young boy, typically chosen for his impartiality, would draw the lot in full public view. This randomised draw was not a game of chance but a civic ritual rooted in transparency, fairness, and collective consent. While many historians say it as one designed to combine divine will and civic integrity, essentially to ensure that power was not monopolised by dynastic elites, eligibility criteria under the system were strict. Candidates had to own tax-paying land, be between 35 and 70 years old, possess knowledge of Vedic texts or administration, and have no record of crime or domestic abuse. Debt defaulters, alcoholics, and close relatives of sitting members were disqualified. 'The disqualifications were perhaps even more revealing than the qualifications, laying out a moral vision of public service,' Sastri wrote. Accountability was embedded. Annual audits were mandatory. Misappropriation of funds or dereliction of duty could lead to disqualification from future office, a radical mechanism even by modern standards. Inscription no. 24 from Epigraphia Indica details the dismissal of a treasury officer over embezzlement, followed by a fine. These weren't isolated experiments. As Anirudh Kanisetti notes in Lords of the Earth and Sea (Penguin, 2023), the Chola model of statecraft relied heavily on decentralised administrative systems. By empowering merchant guilds such as the Manigramam and Ayyavole, and sustaining local assemblies, the Cholas expanded both trade and legitimacy. 'Imperial rule,' Kanisetti wrote, 'was constructed not just through conquest, but by engineering sustainable civic systems'. This is the vision Modi looked to tap into when he said, 'We hear about kings who brought gold, silver, and livestock after conquests. But Rajendra Chola brought Gangajal', a reference to the emperor's symbolic act of bringing Ganga water to his new capital, Gangaikonda Cholapuram, in 1025 CE. The act, memorialised in copper plates (as cited in Sastri's The Cholas), was described as building a 'liquid pillar of victory (ganga-jalamayam jayastambham)', merging military triumph with ritual statecraft. However, the Chola system was far from egalitarian in the modern sense. It excluded women, labourers, and landless groups. But as historian Tansen Sen wrote in The Military Campaigns of Rajendra Chola, the Cholas were masters of strategic signalling, not just through naval conquests but in governance structures that prefigured electoral thought.
