US supreme court clears way for deportations of eight men to South Sudan
Most of the men are from countries including Vietnam, South Korea, Mexico, Laos, Cuba and Myanmar. Just one is from South Sudan.
The supreme court's order on Thursday came after the court's conservative majority last month decided that immigration officials can quickly deport people to countries to which they have no connection. That order paused a district judge's earlier ruling that immigrants being sent to third countries must first be given an opportunity to prove they would face torture, persecution or death if they were sent there.
Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the eight men and executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said the eight men could 'face perilous conditions, and potentially immediate detention, upon arrival'.
Two liberal justices dissented – Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson – by saying the ruling gives the government special treatment. 'What the government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death,' Sotomayor wrote.
'Today's order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial,' she added.
The Trump administration has been seeking deals with various countries to accept deportees that the US government cannot quickly send back to their homelands.
The eight men awaiting deportation to South Sudan have all been convicted of serious crimes, which the Trump administration has emphasized in justifying their banishment. Many had either finished or were close to finishing serving sentences, and had 'orders of removal' directing them to leave the US.
Some, like Tuan Thanh Phan – who came to the United States from Vietnam as a child and was convicted of killing someone in a gang altercation when he was 18 – had already planned to return to his home country after serving his sentence.
Instead, the US government first told these men that they would be deported to South Africa, and they were asked to sign documents acknowledging their deportation. They refused, and their case came before judge Brian E Murphy of the district of Massachusetts, who ruled that the government must provide 'written notice' to any immigrant facing deportation to a third country, and give them an opportunity to voice a 'reasonable fear' of torture.
The men were told instead that they were being deported to South Sudan. The government did not provide Murphy with immediate information about where the men were, and where they were being sent. Eventually, their flight landed in Camp Lemonnier, an American military base in Djibouti.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents worked 12-hour shifts guarding the men. In a sworn court declaration, an official described illness among the detainees and government agents, inadequate medical care, risks of malaria and worry about attacks from militants in Yemen.
In May, the Trump administration asked the supreme court to intervene and allow the government to deport the men to South Sudan.
They sought agreements with several countries to house immigrants if authorities could not quickly send them back to their homelands.
The White House and Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
The Associated Press contributed reporting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
First Thing: ‘Corrupt kleptocracy' – Democrats furious over passage of Trump bill
Good morning. The House of Representatives passed Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill by 218 to 214 votes yesterday, handing the president a significant legislative victory. The Democratic House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, made an unsuccessful last-ditch effort to halt the bill's passage by giving a floor speech lasting eight hours and 44 minutes, the longest ever. Among other things, the plan will increase immigration enforcement, cut social security, damage the green energy industry and extend and deepen the large-scale tax cuts – which benefit wealthy earners most – that Trump first enacted in 2017. Democrats erupted in outrage over the bill's passage. The congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Bluesky: 'I am grieving the barbarism that is going to unfurl from all this. People are going to die. Livelihoods gone. All to feed a corrupt kleptocracy.' What will it mean for deportation policy? Thousands of new immigration enforcement officers; tens of thousands of extra detention beds; fees on asylum applications; and further construction on the border wall. Here's how Trump's bill will supercharge mass deportations by funneling $170bn to Ice. What about social security? According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the welfare cuts will result in about 10.6 million people losing their Medicaid healthcare and 8 million people losing their Snap food stamp benefits. And the deficit? It comes with a huge price tag, increasing the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034, according to the non-partisan congressional budget Office. Most of that is the extension of the 2017 tax cuts. Israel has escalated its offensive in Gaza before imminent talks about a ceasefire, with warships and artillery launching one of the deadliest and most intense bombardments in the devastated Palestinian territory for months. Medics and officials in Gaza reported that about 90 people were killed overnight and on Thursday by Israeli bombing, including many women and children. On Tuesday night and Wednesday the toll was higher, they said. Casualties included Marwan al-Sultan, a cardiologist and director of the Indonesian hospital in northern Gaza, who died in an airstrike that also killed his wife and five children. In all, about 300 people may have been killed this week and thousands more injured, the officials say. What's the latest on ceasefire talks? Hamas leaders are close to accepting a proposed deal for a ceasefire in Gaza but want stronger guarantees that any pause in hostilities would lead to a permanent end to the 20-month war, sources close to the group have said. Hamas officials met on Thursday in Istanbul to discuss the ceasefire proposals. Barack Obama sounded the alarm about Joe Biden's ailing re-election attempt almost a year before polling day, warning his former vice-president's staff 'your campaign is a mess', a new book reveals. The former president's intervention came amid tensions between the Obama and Biden camps as they braced for a tough fight against Donald Trump. Obama's prescient anxiety is captured in the forthcoming book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, by the journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf. What does the book say? It says that at a lunch meeting with Biden in December 2023, Obama argued dividing the campaign leadership between Wilmington and Washington was not suitable for the fast decision-making required in a modern presidential election. Obama allegedly bluntly told White House staff: 'Your campaign is a mess.' Tributes have poured in for the actor Michael Madsen, who died at home in Malibu after a cardiac arrest. The star of Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill and Donnie Brasco was 67. A wildfire fanned by gale-force winds has forced the evacuation of more than 1,500 people on the Greek island of Crete, as swathes of continental Europe faced a continuing heatwave. Moscow confirmed a deputy commander of the Russian navy has been killed near the frontline with Ukraine. Maj Gen Mikhail Gudkov had previously led one of the military's most notorious brigades. It came as Russia launched a devastating attack with a record number of drones and ballistic missiles on Kyiv, hours after Trump and Vladimir Putin spoke by phone. The Liverpool soccer player Diogo Jota has been killed in a car accident in north-western Spain. He was 28, recently married and had three young children. The US economy added 147,000 jobs in June, surpassing expectations as economists largely anticipated a fall in openings. There were job gains in state government and healthcare of 47,000 and 39,000 respectively. But in the same month employment in federal government and the private sector fell, by 7,000 and 33,000 respectively. The phrase 'time blindness', which can be a symptom of ADHD or other conditions such as anxiety or autism spectrum disorder, seems everywhere right now. But, asks Alaina Demopoulos, is it always a get-out-jail-free card? 'Everyone has their slow days, but some TikTokers argue that people who are habitually 30 or 45 minutes late are claiming time blindness when in reality they're being inconsiderate,' she writes. Dairy production will be threatened by the increasing frequency and intensity of heatwaves, suggests a study from researchers at the Universities of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Chicago. Drawing on records from more than 130,000 cows over 12 years, the report suggests extreme heat reduces dairy cows' ability to produce milk by 10%. Last year Joey 'Jaws' Chestnut, 41, was excluded from entering Nathan's annual hotdog-eating competition in New York City after he signed a deal with a rival plant-based meat company. But this year the world champion – who won the accolade for scoffing 83 dogs and buns in a single 10-minute period – returns, in pursuit of his 17th mustard belt. Happy 4 July! First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you're not already signed up, subscribe now. If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Deporting criminal would ‘hurt his son's mental health'
A convicted Pakistani criminal can stay in the UK after a judge ruled his deportation would damage his son's mental health. The father of two was jailed for more than two years for holding false identity documents after living in Britain for 18 years, an asylum tribunal was told. The Home Office decided to deport him, yet he has successfully appealed under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing that his son would not be able to get the same mental support in his home country. The court was told his 14-year-old son's mental health had deteriorated during his father's time in prison and would only get worse should be deported. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their removal. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to a family life, and article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The 56-year-old Pakistani national, who entered the UK in 2007 as a visitor, is married and has two children, aged 14 and 10. His wife suffers from depression and is undergoing therapy for chronic low mood, high anxiety levels and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. In February 2020, he was convicted of possession of false identity documents and sentenced to 28 months in prison. The Home Office decided to deport him but he launched legal action claiming the move would be 'unduly harsh' on his family. The lower tier tribunal judge accepted the claim by the man, known only as AA, saying he was genuinely remorseful and had a low risk of reoffending. The Home Office appealed the ruling. However, the upper tribunal was told by a psychologist that his eldest child was vulnerable and would be 'significantly affected' by his father's deportation. It was likely to worsen his 'extremely elevated levels of anxiety, depression and stress'. 'Should the child be forced to leave the UK with his family, the detrimental impact on his mental health would likely be profound,' the psychologist told the tribunal. 'He has a lack of family support in Pakistan, speaks limited Urdu and there are difficulties he would face adjusting to a different educational and cultural environment and the absence of his established support network leading to increased feelings of isolation, which could trigger self-harming behaviours.' Children's interests 'primary consideration' Another psychologist added: 'While I am not familiar with the conditions in Pakistan for children, as a UK-based psychiatrist, I would anticipate his mental health would deteriorate if removed from the UK and required to live in a country where he does not want to reside.' The Home Office argued that it would be 'extraordinary to imagine there being a scenario in a deportation case where a child would not feel disappointed by the prospect of his family departing the United Kingdom'. However, Judge Sarah Pinder, sitting on the upper tribunal, ruled in the criminal's favour. 'I must have regard to the children's best interests as a primary consideration,' she said. 'I am satisfied that [AA] has demonstrated, through the submission of medical, expert and country background evidence, that the health and needs of his eldest son in particular will be exacerbated upon any return to Pakistan. 'Expecting the eldest child to accompany the appellant to Pakistan would have a profoundly detrimental impact on his mental health. 'With the eldest child's needs, I do not consider that a move to Pakistan for him would just be merely uncomfortable, inconvenient, undesirable or just difficult. Rather, I am satisfied that, for him, such a move would be unjustifiably severe and would meet the threshold of 'unduly harsh'.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government warned over single-sex toilet policy
In a formal legal letter sent on Wednesday, the organisation said ministers must urgently rewrite internal guidance on single-sex facilities to bring it into line with a recent Supreme Court judgment on biological sex. READ MORE The warning centres on the Scottish Government estate — made up of 66 sites and 1,016 toilet facilities — where existing policy allows staff to use facilities based on self-identified gender rather than biological sex. Around 18% of the facilities are gender-neutral single-user 'superloos', while the rest are designated as either male or female. There are also numerous smaller sites — including fisheries and field-monitoring offices — where facilities may be shared or gender-neutral. In April, the UK's highest court ruled unanimously that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter a person's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender. That ruling meant every organisation in the country needed to review their equality policies. The Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act means biological sexWhile First Minister John Swinney initially welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the ruling, the Scottish Government has said it is waiting for further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission before issuing new advice to Scotland's public sector — including prisons, schools and the NHS. However, earlier this week, Dr Lesley Sawers, Deputy Chair and Scotland Commissioner for the EHRC, told The Herald that Scottish ministers had 'a responsibility to ensure their adherence to the Public Sector Equality Duty' — the legal requirement for public authorities in Scotland to consider protected characteristics, including biological sex, when carrying out their functions. In response, a spokesperson said work was 'proceeding at pace to implement the ruling across Government'. The Scottish Government's trans inclusion policy, signed off in January, states that 'staff should choose to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with' and that a GRC is not required to access single-sex spaces. In a letter to John Somers, Director of Equality, Inclusion and Human Rights, Maya Forstater, Chief Executive of Sex Matters, said the policy was 'clearly unlawful'. She added: 'The problem is not lack of infrastructure, but that the Scottish Government continues to operate an unlawful policy. 'As far as we can see, there is nothing to stop the Scottish Government immediately bringing the policy on toilets into line with the law, by making a statement that all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available. This would be in line with the Supreme Court judgment and the action taken by the Scottish Parliament. 'It is clearly a reasonably practical step in order to address the risk of individuals using opposite-sex toilets and other facilities. 'Please confirm, therefore, that you will take this step within seven days of the date of this letter. 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 require separate changing and toilet facilities for men and women 'where necessary for reasons of propriety'. Failure to provide such facilities, or to protect staff from discomfort or distress in those spaces, may also amount to unlawful harassment under the Equality Act. The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
