logo
Zohran Mamdani's college application debacle is just one more example of privileged kids acting oppressed

Zohran Mamdani's college application debacle is just one more example of privileged kids acting oppressed

New York Post5 hours ago
Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee in New York City's mayoral race, has been outed for checking the 'African American' box on his 2009 application to Columbia University — and he's just one of many progressive hypocrites eager to shortchange the underprivileged.
When college application season comes around, limousine liberals eagerly throw their morals out the window. Affirmative action, which was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2023, was designed to give a leg up to the truly underserved, but has been gamed by privileged kids who have mastered the art of masquerading as underprivileged.
6 Zohran Mamdani was exposed for checking the 'African American' box on his Columbia application.
REUTERS
Advertisement
In the cut-throat world of selective college admissions, anything goes … including fudging your racial identity.
We can't crawl into teenage Mamdani's head when he checked the 'African American' box, but I'm betting he knew that it certainly wouldn't hurt his admissions odds.
Yes, it's true that Mamdani, who is of Indian descent, was born in Uganda, where his father's family had lived for several generations. But, let's be real: Every American in their right mind knows that does not make him African-American in the American conception of race.
6 Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani applied to Columbia University but attended Bowdoin College. Above is a scene from Columbia's 2025 graduation ceremony.
AP
Advertisement
One can't even argue that 'African American' fits because he is African and American. Mamdani wasn't even yet an American citizen when he applied to college in 2009.
His case might prove that our racial categories are too simplistic, but it's pretty clear that the African-American box was not the best possible option — it was the most expedient one.
The scandal is part of a frustrating larger trend among privileged elites. For all their handwringing and virtue signaling about oppression, many are perfectly willing to shortchange the lesser fortunate for their own gain.
6 Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, seen here with New York Attorney General Letitia James, was born in Uganda but is of Indian descent.
Kristin Callahan/Shutterstock
Advertisement
I graduated from the Lawrenceville School, a prep school in New Jersey that sends about a third of its students to Ivy League universities every year, and I saw firsthand the games people play to convince admissions officers they're oppressed.
A big one: How can you make your place in life look as unfortunate as possible?
Students who didn't fit into what could be considered, from an admissions perspective, an 'advantageous' group, often contorted their identities by writing about their life's biggest struggle in college admissions essays, or emphasizing their membership in a 'disadvantaged' class — like how they're gay or a child of divorce — on their applications.
6 The Lawrenceville School in New Jersey — a place where exceptionally wealthy and privileged students of color benefited from affirmative action policies — sends roughly 1 in 3 graduates to an Ivy League school.
The Lawrenceville School
Advertisement
The Common Application platform, which is used by most colleges and universities, even tees up students for an oppression essay with the following prompt: 'The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?'
Lawrenceville was also a place where exceptionally wealthy and privileged students of color benefited from affirmative action policies, likely displacing less fortunate non-white students for whom those policies were actually designed.
Not to mention, affirmative action was conceived to help mend some of the wounds left behind by the legacy of slavery. It was a well-meaning attempt to rectify historical sins. But many of the students benefiting from affirmative action today are not the descendants of slaves, including the 'African American' Mamdani.
6 The Supreme Court overturned race based admissions policies in June of 2023.
REUTERS
6 Zohran Mamdani is the son of a college professor and a renowned filmmaker.
Getty Images
Even if you squinted hard enough and agreed that Mamdani is somehow 'African American,' he's hardly the type who needed a leg up from affirmative action. His father is a Columbia university president (who ironically lists 'race' as one of his research interests) and his mother is an Oscar- and Golden Globe-nominated filmmaker.
The college admissions oppression Olympics is a whole bunch of hypocrisy that shortchanges the truly underserved.
Advertisement
Many of these same students — and their parents, and the college counselors and teachers who help craft their sob story essays — would surely consider themselves good progressives.
But when it comes to college apps? They have no problem directly stealing from the truly marginalized if that means getting an admissions letter from the fancy university of their dreams.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump caught off guard by Pentagon's abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say
Trump caught off guard by Pentagon's abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump caught off guard by Pentagon's abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's decision to send more defensive weapons to Ukraine came after he privately expressed frustration with Pentagon officials for announcing a pause in some deliveries last week — a move that he felt wasn't properly coordinated with the White House, according to three people familiar with the matter. The Pentagon, which announced last week that it would hold back some air defense missiles, precision-guided artillery and other weapons pledged to Ukraine because of what U.S. officials said were concerns that American stockpiles were in short supply. Donald Trump said Monday that the U.S. will have to send more weapons to Ukraine, effectively reversing the move. Two of the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity about the sensitive internal discussions, said there was some internal opposition among Pentagon brass to the pause — coordinated by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby — before it was announced. One of the people described Trump as being caught 'flat footed' by the announcement. The White House did not respond to queries about whether Trump was surprised by the Pentagon pause. Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson denied that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had acted without consulting the president. 'It is the job of the Secretary of Defense to make military recommendations to the commander-in-chief. Secretary Hegseth provided a framework for the President to evaluate military aid shipments and assess existing stockpiles. This effort was coordinated across government. The Department will continue to give the President robust options regarding military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end and putting America first,' Wilson said in a statement to The Associated Press. The pause in critical weapons deliveries had come at a difficult moment for Ukraine, which has faced increasing — and more complex — air barrages from Russia during the more than three-year-old war. Trump acknowledged that in announcing the reversal on Monday night, saying, "They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now." Asked by a reporter Tuesday who approved the pause, Trump bristled at the question while he was gathered with his Cabinet. 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?" Trump's change in tone on Putin The president also laid into Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting he was unnecessarily prolonging the war that Trump has said he's determined to quickly conclude. Trump has struggled to find a resolution, with talks between the sides stalled. The Republican leader has sounded increasingly exasperated with Putin in recent days. The two spoke by phone last week. 'We get a lot of bull---- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump said during Tuesday's Cabinet meeting. "He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' He has threatened, but held off on, imposing new sanctions against Russia's oil industry to try to prod Putin into peace talks. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said last week that Trump has given him the go-ahead to push forward with a bill he's co-sponsoring that calls, in part, for a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that continue to buy Russian oil. The move would have huge ramifications for China and India, two economic behemoths that buy Russian oil. Trump said Tuesday that he's 'looking at it very strongly.' Pentagon says it's going to resume shipments to Ukraine The weapons pause announced last week impacted shipments of Patriot missiles, precision-guided GMLRS, Hellfire missiles and Howitzer rounds and more, taking not only Ukrainian officials and other allies by surprise but also U.S. lawmakers and other parts of the Trump administration, including the State Department. The Pentagon said late Monday that at Trump's direction, it would resume weapons shipments to Ukraine 'to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops.' Still, spokesman Sean Parnell added that its review for Trump to evaluate military shipments worldwide continues as part of 'America First' defense priorities. It's also unclear which weaponry would now be sent, though Trump said that the U.S. will primarily be assisting Ukraine with defensive weapons. Counting the weapons On Tuesday, each of the services and the combatant commands — the multiservice organizations that spearhead U.S. military operations around the world — were still sending up information on their stockpiles of specific munitions to Pentagon leadership, a U.S. official said. 'They are literally still doing the math,' the official said. The information was being presented on a stoplight chart — where munitions were either in a red, yellow or green status, similar to slides that had been created the week before, the official said. That earlier study had concluded that some munitions were OK to keep sending to Ukraine — but others were reaching concerning levels. Getting a full visibility on the numbers of actual munitions on hand takes time, the official said, because while Patriot missiles, for example, initially belong to the Army, once they are requested and sent to a combatant command, such as U.S. Central Command, the service loses visibility on those numbers in inventory. The vast majority of the munitions and weapons the U.S. has shipped to Ukraine have been pulled from the Army, which has monitored levels closely in recent years, particularly for high-demand items like 155mm artillery shells and Patriot missiles for air defenses. It's been harder for the Army to ramp up production on those items than had been planned: It was trying to hit a goal of producing 100,000 155mm shells a month by the end of 2025 but won't meet that goal now until 2026, Army spokesman Steve Warren said. Ramping up Patriot missile production also has been challenging, Warren said. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a statement Tuesday that he was glad Trump was resuming deliveries to Ukraine. 'This time, the President will need to reject calls from the isolationists and restrainers within his Administration to limit these deliveries to defensive weapons," McConnell said. 'And he should disregard those at DoD who invoke munitions shortages to block aid while refusing to invest seriously in expanding munitions production.' ___ Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro and Matthew Lee contributed to this report.

What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America?

time17 minutes ago

What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America?

On the heels of the Fourth of July -- and amid his feud with President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans over the president's tax policy bill -- tech billionaire Elon Musk announced plans for a brand new political party, dubbed "America Party," to represent what he called "the 80% in the middle." Musk, who recently left his temporary government post as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, told his X followers that his new party will "give you back your freedom." In a series of posts over the weekend, Musk said his party would use "extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield" to target "2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," which he believes "would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws." So what would it take for Musk to launch his third-party effort? Here's an overview. Getting on the ballot To start, Musk would have to get his party on the ballots in the states where he wants to compete -- each with its own process for qualifying. In many states -- including Kentucky, where the race to fill retiring Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell's open seat in 2026 is heating up -- a party-designated candidate must win a nomination from a state-recognized political party that has received a certain percentage of votes in the previous presidential election -- or else a candidate has to run as an independent or a write-in candidate. In other states, the America Party's name itself could present a problem -- like in New York, where state law prohibits political parties from having the word "American," or any part of it, as part of their party names, according to Election Law Blog. Bankrolling these state-level efforts would take significant resources. Experts would be needed to navigate each state's election laws and political systems in order to identify and nominate promising candidates, and canvassers would have to gather thousands to tens of thousands of signatures for each candidate to get them on the ballot. Traditionally, candidates and their parties spearhead these operations, working together to strategize signature-gathering, voter registration, and campaign fundraising and spending. But Musk's America Party is unlikely to become a certified political party anytime soon, because the Federal Election Commission, which reviews political organizations' qualification as political parties, has not been in quorum to do so since a commissioner resigned in April, leaving the agency with just three commissioners. FEC commissioners can only be appointed by President Trump himself. It's not yet clear if Musk has filed any paperwork for his America Party, and an FEC spokesperson declined to comment on whether the agency has received any paperwork from Musk's team. Going the PAC route Faced with the long odds of gaining party certification, some election experts say that Musk, at least for the time being, could focus on House and Senate candidates through a super PAC. That's because ballot access for congressional races is governed by the states -- not the federal government -- so the America Party could still put its designated candidates on the ballot without the FEC's certification, as long as they pass state qualifications. And because super PACs are unconstrained by fundraising or spending limits, an America Party super PAC could be funded by unlimited donations from supporters including Musk himself, and could independently spend an unlimited amount of money in support of its candidates. The only catch is that super PACs are unable to work directly with campaigns the way FEC-certified political parties can -- but election lawyer Matt Sanderson of Caplin and Drysdale told ABC News that the efficiency of a super PAC can actually outweigh the advantages of a political party. "Form a super PAC, just call yourselves a political party -- that's not against the rules. The FEC blessing is not needed," said Sanderson, who was legal counsel for the No Labels movement during the 2024 election. "I actually don't think it makes a lick of sense in this day and age to try to form yourself as a national party committee." "They can call themselves whatever they want," Sanderson said, explaining that the FEC doesn't prohibit a super PAC from calling itself a political party as long as it doesn't coordinate directly with campaigns. "Just skip right past this very cumbersome and not-all-that-beneficial process, hold themselves out as a political party, and move forward." Joining forces Additionally, Musk could enlist the help of existing third parties, like the Libertarian Party or the Green Party. However, third parties historically have had little success in gaining office in the United States. During the 2024 election, the centrist group No Labels led a third-party presidential movement but ended its efforts months before the Republican and Democratic national conventions, after failing to find their candidate before their self-imposed deadline. Longstanding Libertarian Party nominee Chase Oliver ran in the 2024 presidential race but received less than 0.5% of the total vote. Still, a possible collaboration could be in the works: Musk has been in touch with one-time Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who in recent days has spearheaded a third party centrist effort of his own, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News. Caleb Burns, an election lawyer at Wiley Rein, acknowledged the potential significance of obtaining an official party status through the FEC instead of bypassing that step with a super PAC -- stressing the role of a political party as a "brand for politicians." "The success of any new political party will turn on whether there are sufficient candidates -- and, by extension, members of the public -- interested in aligning with that new brand," Burns said. "If the answer is yes, then it makes sense to do everything possible to enhance and promote that brand -- which means proceeding with the organizational and legal burdens necessary to create and formalize a new political party." "The critical predicate, however, is the political question of whether or not there is sufficient interest in a new brand of politician," Burns said. "For that, it seems we will have to wait and see what Mr. Musk concludes."

College group Zohran Mamdani co-founded welcomed radical speaker who blamed US for 9/11 attacks: 'Made its bed'
College group Zohran Mamdani co-founded welcomed radical speaker who blamed US for 9/11 attacks: 'Made its bed'

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

College group Zohran Mamdani co-founded welcomed radical speaker who blamed US for 9/11 attacks: 'Made its bed'

Mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani co-founded a college club that invited a radical speaker who called Israel a bigger terror threat than Hamas – and boasted he was greatly influenced by a Palestinian leader nicknamed the 'godfather of Middle-eastern terrorism.' The professor, As'ad AbuKhalil, also later claimed that the US brought the Sept. 11 attack on itself and accused the government of inflicting 'many 9/11s' on the world. In November 2013, Students for Justice in Palestine at Bowdoin College — which Mamdani helped launch — welcomed the controversial Lebanese-American academic to campus. Advertisement 7 Mamdani co-founded a college club that invited a radical speaker who called Israel a bigger terror threat than Hamas. Paul Martinka for NY Post AbuKhalil was invited to speak to SJP about 'trends in the Middle East in the age of uprising' while Mamdani was still a student. Years after the invite, he hadn't tampered down his inflammatory rhetoric. Advertisement 'We have to remember that the US basically was hit on 9/11 by forces that were reactionary and fanatic and were raised and armed and sponsored by America and its allies in the Middle East,' Abukhalil said in 2021. 'People forget that 9/11 is a repercussion of the Cold War when the US made its bed and clearly with the religious fanatics of the Muslim world,' he also said. 'This is a time where socialists around the world in Chile, in the Arab world and everywhere were under attack by the US. Reactionary forces in support.' 7 AbuKhalil was invited to speak to SJP about 'trends in the Middle East in the age of uprising' while Mamdani was still a student. GiraZapatistaBE/X While AbuKhalil stressed it's 'heart-wrenching remembering all these people who came from 80 nationalities, the ones who died on 9/11 here in the United States,' he also argued, 'but there were many earlier 9/11s that the US inflicted on people around the world.' Advertisement The questionable invite was one of several inflammatory actions the students group has taken in the past decade after Mamdani helped launch the small liberal arts school's branch of the activist organization. The democratic socialist who won big in the crowded Democratic primary for Big Apple mayor, has faced a wave of criticism for his association with leaders accused of antisemitism and past comments. 7 New York's Zohran Mamdani holds rally with union leaders inside HTC (Hotel & Gaming Trades Council) midtown HQ at 707 8th Avenue (between 44th and 45th streets) in midtown Manhattan. Paul Martinka for NY Post AbuKhalil's most eyebrow-raising 9/11 comments came after he was invited to Bowdoin but he made several shocking statements leading up to the event. Advertisement In 2006, AbuKhalil claimed Israel committed more destructive terrorism than Hamas and slammed Americans for not acknowledging that. 'And if Hamas has practiced versions of indiscriminate and aimless violence—which I personally reject on principle–, it should be pointed out that Israeli terrorism—in scale and in magnitude–by far exceeds that of Hamas, but nobody has noticed here in the US. Fatah is facing a dilemma, and it does not know how to respond,' he wrote in a blog post. 7 AbuKhalil's most eyebrow-raising 9/11 comments came after he was invited to Bowdoin. Bowdoin SJP/X AbuKhalil said he was 'honored to have known' George Habash, the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which has been designated a terror organization by the US since 1997. 'He was a great Palestinian leader,' said AbuKhalil in 2012 to an audience in Edinburgh that was pointed out by Canary Mission. AbuKhalil also commended Habash as a figure who had 'tremendous influence' on the academic. 'Of course if you look at newspapers he would be seen as terrorist,' he said. A Time magazine story in 2008 about his death assailed Habash as 'the godfather of Middle East terrorism.' Advertisement 'The PFLP was founded in 1967 by a group of radical socialists led by George Habash and became infamous in the 1970s for airplane hijackings,' according to the Anti-Defamation League. 7 AbuKhalil said he was 'honored to have known' George Habash, the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. An email seeking comment from AbuKhalil, who teaches at California State University Stanislaus, was not immediately returned. Longshot mayoral candidate Jim Walden slammed Mamdani for his past ties to the student. Advertisement 'Mamdani needs to come clean with voters on his support for Islamic radicals and terrorists while at Bowdoin,' said Walden, an attorney. Mamdani's campaign did not immediately reply to a request for comment. It's unclear if Mamdani was involved in getting AbuKhalil to campus or if he attended the talk. 7 It's unclear if Mamdani was involved in getting AbuKhalil to campus or if he attended the talk. asadabukhalil/X While Mamdani graduated from Bowdoin in spring 2014, the SJP chapter has had other instances in which it was a hotbed for radical activism. Advertisement SJP occupied a first floor of a campus building earlier this year tied to protesting the school's investment practices and President Trump hinting at taking control of war-torn Gaza, according to the Bowdoin Orient. 'As Israeli aggression obliterates Palestinian homes and guns down children in Jenin, as unspeakable suffering continues in Gaza, and as America descends further into fascism, we ask – what type of institution does Bowdoin want to be?' the group argued in a press release. 'One that cowers to authoritarianism, that chooses cowardice in the face of injustice? The choice is Bowdoin's.' 7 New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani attends a press conference with union leaders and supporters in New York City, July 2, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement Scrutiny into Mamdani's background has only intensified since he easily coasted to victory in the Democratic Party primary last month, clobbering former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and a slew of other candidates in the ranked-choice vote. In resurfaced tweets Mamdani appeared to defend al Qaeda fiend Anwar al-Awalaki, who was later killed in a drone strike approved by then-President Barack Obama. It was also revealed last week that Mamdani, who was born in Uganda, claimed he was 'African American' along with 'Asian' in a college application to Columbia University that was ultimately rejected. The far-left darling still needs to get past the general election in which he'll face GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa as well as Mayor Eric Adams, Cuomo and Walden each of whom are appearing on minor ballot lines. Big Apple moderates are in a frenzy in a bid to stop his ascension to City Hall while prominent Democrats in New York have yet to endorse his candidacy despite Mamdani clinching the most votes ever in a city primary.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store