logo
Trust your gut: How gut health impacts our overall wellbeing

Trust your gut: How gut health impacts our overall wellbeing

Yahoo5 days ago

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — About 40% of Americans suffer from digestive health issues and research shows gut health is not just about digestion — it plays a vital role in overall wellness.
Margaret Brown, senior director of care management at Priority Health, said symptoms like diarrhea, constipation and bloating are signs your gut is unhealthy.
'We know that the gut is such a critical component to our overall health, meaning that it helps to contribute how we balance our emotions. It also contributes to how well we're able to fight off and combat different diseases,' Brown explained.
Sleep, diet, activity: How to take care of your brain
The gut-brain connection is a bi-directional system that requires good communication between the two. If you're seeing signs of an unhealthy gut, you may also be experiencing mental issues like memory, decision making, depression or anxiety. To improve gut health, focus on your diet, Brown says.
'Foods that are perhaps high in being processed or high in sugar can really harm our gut and it can set off what we call our microbiome. So instead, we want to really look for foods such that are high in fiber, so your fruits, your vegetables, your beans, your legumes, looking for fermented foods as well that you can find in yogurt,' Brown suggested.
You should also look toward how well you're managing your stress levels. Chronic stress can lead to increased inflammation in the gut, according to Brown. Plenty of water and physical activity as well as adequate amounts of sleep can also help improve gut health.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics
The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

We live in a world where everyone wants to be young forever and thanks to dedicated surgeons that is now possible through using your own stem cells. Stem cells harvesting can enhance your aesthetic while making it look natural. Stem cell therapy has gained immense popularity in recent years, with cosmetic surgery patients seeking options that offer more than traditional cosmetic enhancements. By utilising the body's own regenerative cells, cosmetic surgeons can achieve more natural-looking results, while also minimising recovery times and reducing the risk of complications. So, what is stem cell harvesting? Stem cell harvesting involves collecting stem cells, typically from adipose (fat) tissue, which can then be re-injected into the body to promote healing and rejuvenation. These cells have the remarkable ability to differentiate into various cell types, aiding in tissue repair and regeneration. As a result, patients undergoing procedures such as face lifts, liposuction and reconstruction/enhancement of buttocks, breasts and burns. Benefits of stem cell use in cosmetic surgery: Natural results: Stem cell therapy allows for more organic-looking enhancements, as the body recognises and integrates these cells. Accelerated healing: The regenerative properties of stem cells can significantly reduce downtime, allowing patients to return to their daily activities sooner. Minimise Scarring: Procedures utilising stem cells often results in less scarring compared to traditional methods. Versatile applications: From facial rejuvenation,hair restoration and body contouring, stem cells can be applied in various cosmetic procedures, providing versatile treatment options. Read more | 11 foods that may be making you struggle to lose weight 'The technology around stem cells is already changing the world of medicine, offering a better life for so many people around the world. That technology is also being incorporated into plastic surgery. It's without a doubt become a focal point for my team and I this year' says Dr Weyers. Dr Deon Weyers, South Africa's leader in plastic surgery, has recently begun this offering of cutting-edge stem cell harvesting techniques to his patients and is one of the first to do so in South Africa What are some of the advantages to stem cells in the world of plastic surgery? 'Benefits include their ability to transform into most cell types, thereby repairing damaged tissue. Because of this, researchers think they may have a role in treating a range of medical conditions. The growth factors, genetic messengers and tissue cells are good for all types of the skin but also injured tissue such as skin that is affected by aging, injury, cancer. These substances can help repair, rejuvenate and protect.'

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum
Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Computer graphics of dollar banknotes stream flying around United States Capitol. Colorful twilight ... More sky with clouds in backgrounds. Finance, banking, monetary policy and quantitative easing concept. The great wave off Kanagawa homage to Hokusai. As the U.S. Senate deliberates the One Big Beautiful Bill, a key healthcare issue sparking debate is how to divide Medicaid costs, which serve low-income Americans, between state and federal taxpayers. Since 2014, Medicaid spending has surged 76%, reaching $872 billion in 2023—only 15% less than Medicare's budget, which serves seniors and Americans with disabilities. Medicaid's budget has grown faster than Medicare (66%), Social Security (60%), and the U.S. GDP (57%). Policymakers aiming to curb federal spending naturally focus on Medicaid. Medicaid costs are shared between the federal and state governments. One commonly used state funding practice—provider taxes—raises fiscal concerns for the federal government, according to the Government Accountability Office. Here's how it works: A state levies a provider tax on hospitals and other healthcare providers, based on revenue or other measures of size. It then claims this tax revenue (e.g., $1 billion) as its share of Medicaid funding and receives $3 billion in federal matching funds. The state returns most of the combined $4 billion to hospitals and uses the reminder for self-directed purposes related to Medicaid. It's a lucrative investment for hospitals—pay $1, get nearly $3 back. For states, it's an even better deal: a windfall of federal dollars with no real cost. But this game is rigged against federal taxpayers, who are left footing the bill. Worse still, both hospitals and states are now incentivized to expand provider taxes for bigger payoffs, further burdening federal taxpayers. The Government Accountability Office found that provider taxes drive a substantial and rapidly growing share of Medicaid spending, undermining accountability to federal taxpayers and limiting resources for patients in need. Moreover, as health policy expert Ann Kempski and I wrote in Health Affairs Forefront, this harms employers and workers. Directly, hospitals raise commercial prices to maximize Medicaid payments. Indirectly, large hospitals gain a competitive edge over smaller facilities and independent physicians, accelerating market consolidation and driving up commercial prices. States can achieve federal matching rates exceeding 12:1 for social needs, such as purchasing air conditioners for Medicaid beneficiaries. By offering such strong incentives, the federal government is effectively urging states to pursue these windfalls. It would be almost fiscally irresponsible for states not to do so. The root cause undermining Medicaid's program integrity is the separation between management and funding: federal taxpayers do not administer the program but generously foot the bill, giving states every incentive to overspend in order to receive even more. Various solutions have been proposed to address the Medicaid funding conundrum, including federalizing the program, delinking federal payments from state contributions, reducing matching rates, freezing provider taxes, and capping service payments. Solutions that tackle the root cause—the separation between management and funding—would generate greater federal savings but face stronger resistance due to their fiscal impact on states and providers, compared to those that merely treat the symptoms. Soon, we'll find out where the political winds in Washington settle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store