Du Val property group heads to court to fight decision to put it into receivership
Photo:
kenyonclarke.com
Some subbies still owed money in the Du Val collapse say their companies have barely survived and they doubt they will ever see a cent.
The Du Val property group is heading to court on Monday to try to fight the decision to put it into receivership and freeze the assets of founders Charlotte and Kenyon Clarke.
The
group of about 70 entities
and the Clarkes themselves were put into receivership by the Financial Markets Authority last year, with the companies eventually put into the more serious statutory management by the government in August. At last count
its debts were more than $300 million
.
Despite that, Kenyon Clarke maintained none of the current situation "was our making," suggesting it was Du Val that was the victim.
Deccan Property Services did painting, GIB stopping and fixing, and provided general labour at a Du Val development in Mount Wellington.
Its owner, Aniket Bapat, said the company was owed about $230,000 - a debt that nearly wiped his company out.
"We've... been just hanging by a thin strand of hair, not even thread," he said.
His was one of about 75 companies listed by statutory managers, PWC, as being owed money by Du Val Construction, otherwise known as Blue River Holdings, a residential building arm of the property group.
Many were family businesses.
Bapat said his company had to use profits from all their other jobs to pay their own staff and bills from the Du Val job, and they had to use a loan and overdraft to help, he said.
Most of the next year's profits had gone into paying off the loan and they were still struggling, he said.
"Even now if we don't see enough jobs coming, we are paranoid... we are literally just keeping the tip of our nose above water," he said.
As the company began to recover, it had put in more safeguards, and Bapat has had therapy to help with the mental health impact.
"It was bloody stressful," he said.
Like the other creditors, he will have to wait for the outcome of the statutory management process to see if he gets paid, but has had to move on.
Lisa Moroni owns Precision Cleaning Services and said she was owed about $80,000.
"It was very hard because... we are a small to medium business and we run pay cheque to pay cheque and that was a massive project for us," she said.
Most of the outstanding amount was from a big, final clean of one of the developments after construction was complete, she said.
"It's a lot of work done in two or three months and when you don't get paid it does affect the business a lot," she said.
They had to lay off staff and move out of their downtown office to cut costs," she said.
An owner of a large concrete cutting and drilling firm who did not want to be named said they were owed about $17,000.
Though it was not as big as some others' debts, it had still been stressful, she said.
She went to Du Val to try to get some money back to no avail.
"We drill a hole through a wall... so if we don't get paid there is nothing that we can go retrieve, like our consumables or materials," she said.
"We laugh that we should maybe go and fill the hole back up."
Bapat said he regretted giving Du Val the benefit of the doubt that money was coming - and had learned a hard lesson to be less trusting.
RNZ spoke to several more Du Val Construction creditors who did not want to be interviewed but expressed similar sentiments.
They said they did not expect to get any money back but they wanted more information from PWC about what was happening in the process.
A handful of other creditors said they had been paid in full and did not have a problem.
One felt if Du Val had been allowed to keep operating, it could have gone on to sell its developments and everyone would have been paid.
The Du Val founders remain defiant, suggesting it is the company and its investors who are the victims of heavy handedness by the Financial Markets Authority and the receivers.
In a lengthy statement to RNZ, Kenyon Clarke said prior to the FMA actions there were no financial concerns that were not capable of being managed and the group was on track to deliver a return to shareholders, investors and contractors.
"We can confidently say that none of this was of our making and was action taken without us being able to fight for those we have worked closely for and with," he said.
"It has been a horrible and frightening thing to witness, and we understand and feel for all those impacted."
It was telling that the FMA had not taken any further action in the 10 months since statutory management, he said.
Clarke also hits out at the PWC saying it lacked business acumen in the development sector and had made the group's financial position worse.
The company would seek compensation, he said.
At the time the government put Du Val into statutory management, it said it was an option of last resort used only where there was complex corporate failure.
It did so because of the complexity and scale, saying there were between 120 and 150 home buyers and commercial lenders "tangled up" in the situation, it said.
Du Val creditors spoken to by RNZ maintain there were sometimes months-long delays in getting paid in the lead up to the statutory management.
PWC and the FMA declined to comment on Clarke's statements.
PWC said creditors who wanted more information could find it on its website, or email the team.
"To most effectively and efficiently work with the large number of entities and stakeholders related to the Du Val Group, we prioritise providing updates when significant matters are resolved or analysis completed," a spokesperson said.
The legal action taking place on Monday is in the civil branch of the High Court in Auckland. There are no charges against Du Val or the Clarkes.
The Clarkes are challenging the Financial Market Authorities' decision to appoint receivers for both for them and Du Val last year, which culminated in the government putting Du Val into statutory management on the FMA's recommendation.
PWC has been both the statutory managers and the receivers for the Clarkes' personal financial situation since then.
Despite the legal challenge, the statutory management and receivership processes have been continuing.
At least part of the delay to allow the Clarkes to appoint a lawyer. They now have Ron Mansfield KC.
The Clarkes have also been given the right to appeal a High Court decision forcing them to be interviewed under oath by receivers, PWC.
PWC wants to interview the couple about the assets in their possession - including whether they were purchased by the Clarkes themselves or by Du Val companies.
So far the couple has refused and it will be up to the Court of Appeal to decide.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Zealand not part of 'trifecta' with Cook Islands and China, Winston Peters says
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, left, and Cook Islands Prime MinisterMark Brown. Photo: RNZ/Pacific Islands Forum/123RF Winston Peters says the Cook Islands has described its relationship with New Zealand as "part of a trifecta" when dealing with China. The comment from the New Zealand foreign minister comes at a time of increased tension between Cook Islands and New Zealand. At the heart of that tension is four agreements Cook Islands signed with China in February. Peters told Pacific Waves "there are things going wrong". He also rejected Cook Islands' Prime Minister Mark Brown's position that the two nations had a reciprocal relationship , therefore neither had to consult one another on foreign trade arrangements. "They were required under our arrangement and agreement to consult with us when these matters might affect more widely themselves but also other countries and our relationship," Peters said. "To describe us as part of a trifecta when we've got the special relationship for 60 years is utterly wrong." A spokesman for Peters clarified Peters was referring to the way New Zealand had effectively been described as a third-party by the Cook Islands in its agreements with China. Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand. Under that arrangement, implemented in 1965, the country governed its own affairs, but New Zealand provided assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief and defence. Despite that, the current diplomatic rift has resulted in a pause in funding of $18.2 million by the New Zealand government. That occurred last month. And while there have been ongoing discussions between the two nations, this week Prime Minister Mark Brown told a Cook Islands audience that if New Zealand could not afford to fund the country's national infrastructure investment plan - funding the development needs of the Cook Islands was a major motivator in signing the agreements with China. Peters' responded by challenging Brown to call a referendum - a position he doubled-down on when he spoke to Pacific Waves . "They can let us know whether they want the relationship or whether they want independence," he said. "Because if you behave like you want independence, then above all, that, should be up to the Cook Islands people to decide, not just a temporarily-empowered politician or government." The whole population of the Cook Islands should have a say, he said. "Politicians come and go, governments come and go, ministers come and go. But our purpose is to ensure the long-term, enduring relationship between the New Zealand people and the Cook Islands people." Peters also touched on previous disagreements with the Cook Islands over its sovereignty and foreign policy arrangements. "There were times in the past when this issue arose and we had agreements and pacts, declarations or statements … to give us the parameters of our future relationship, as we last did in [2001] under Helen Clark and [Terepai] Moate, who was then the prime minister of the Cook Islands. "And here we are, 24 years … on and that has been called into question. So we are saying… if it's going to change, then we are accountable to the Cook Islands people. Next month, the Cook Islands celebrates its 60th constitution anniversary. Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro was due to attend as the New Zealand government's representative. Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have said they would not attend - a move that has been labelled a snub amidst the break-down in bilateral relations. Peters said Kiro was the appropriate representative from New Zealand. "We're sending the highest person constitutionally in our country to go… this is very fitting."

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland cafe sees further drop-off in customers after street closure
Hoardings that were in place around the former Fitzroy Hotel in Auckland's CBD in July 2024. . Photo: Rose Garratt An Auckland city cafe owner is worried for his business after the road it sits on was effectively turned into a cul-de-sac. Hoardings have been placed around the former Fitzroy Hotel in the inner city, as the cracked building is deemed dangerous and unstable. But it's having a knock on effect on nearby businesses, with footfall down and parking limited. Nick Worthington owns The Tuesday Cafe, which sits on one of the affected streets. He told Checkpoint he was only first made aware of the hoardings when builders turned up and began erecting them last week. He said the hoardings were six feet high, and blocked off certain entrances to the back street they were situated on. "Now that back street hasn't got access for pedestrians to come down off Wakefield St... so you've just got no foot traffic. You've got no passing traffic. No one's coming down the street. If you come into it, you can't get out the street. "For a cafe it's marginal at the best of times, so it's not ideal." Worthington said while it was fair to put up the hoardings in order to ensure safety, what came next had been unclear. "They don't have a plan beyond putting the hoardings up because they think the building is potentially unsafe... I think not having a plan of how this is gonna flow is pretty scary." The Tuesday Club on the corner of Lyndock Street looking up towards the former Fitzroy Hotel when half of the street was boarded up in 2024. Photo: Google Maps The Tuesday Club consists of three floors of workshops, gallery space and offices, with the cafe the only public fronting space and key point of income for the business. "The cafe, you know has just been sort of making ends meet... it's been running servicing the building." Worthington said times had already been challenging, with the street closure now presenting further struggles. "We've had Covid, we've had major building works down the street, which frequently block off the street, it's been challenging anyway. "We've been working very, very hard to just, you know, get the people back." He said they had seen a further drop-off of customers, and they were now forced to think of new ways to attract people. He started by inviting any council employee to visit for a free coffee and a chat about how the issue could be solved. The former Fitzroy Hotel in Wakefield Street, Auckland from 1909. Photo: E Gilling, Auckland Weekly News Auckland Council compliance manager Adrian Wilson told Checkpoint they had informed businesses in the area prior to the hoardings going up, and had spoken to the affected businesses in the area and provided them with both assistance and guidance on the matter and would continue to do so. He said the council was currently waiting on the owner of the dangerous building at 75-77 Wakefield Street to conduct the work necessary to remove the danger. The owner has been asked for confirmation of contractor engagement no later than Friday, 1 August 2025, with physical works to commence no later than Tuesday, 19 August 2025. The council cannot confirm when the site will be made safe, however once this is confirmed they will review the need for the hoarding. The former Fitzroy Hotel was built in 1854-55 and is considered the oldest brick building the Auckland's city centre. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Gumboot Friday gets green light for second year of funding
Gumboot Friday has had a green light for its second year of funding but has had its targets increased after meeting the minimum numbers set for its first year. Last year the process by which the charity was awarded 24 million dollars funding came under scrutiny by the auditor-general who said the way the decision came about was "unusual and inconsistent". But mental health Minister Matt Doocey has backed the charity saying it's helping thousands of young people get access to support faster. Founder of Gumboot Friday Mike King, spoke to Melissa Chan-Green. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.