PH MPs briefed on judiciary and tribunal formation in Putrajaya
Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil confirmed the discussions included an explanation of Article 125 of the Federal Constitution, which governs the appointment and dismissal of judges.
The briefing was led by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said.
Fahmi stated, 'There was also (an explanation) regarding the formation of a tribunal and several related matters, that's all.' He added that further details would be shared during the post-Cabinet press conference.
The meeting, lasting nearly two hours, follows a similar session with Barisan Nasional (BN) MPs earlier this week.
Fahmi described the session as productive, saying, 'This meeting was very, very good and well received by MPs. God willing, we will see what happens after this.' - Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
33 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Anwar: Tabling FOI Bill soon, to provide clarity on govt decisions
The Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill is expected to be tabled in Parliament later this year. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said the tabling of the bill is crucial to gain public confidence and provide clarity on government decisions. 'This is an important step in...
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Govt to review JAC Act for clarity on judicial appointments
PUTRAJAYA: The government will reassess the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 following public uncertainty surrounding the recent Chief Justice appointment. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said confirmed a special committee will be formed to examine the law. The committee will include members of the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, alongside constitutional experts, legal practitioners, and academics. Azalina highlighted the need for improvements, noting that while the JAC has overseen the appointment of five Chief Justices since 2009 without issue, recent confusion has prompted a review. 'We have to improve because what is happening now is that there is a lot of confusion. (There's) no clarity from the public perspective. But then this particular JAC, which was passed and established in 2009, is responsible for the appointment of five Chief Justices. It has never been an issue,' she told reporters after attending the International Conference on Integrity and Governance. Azalina clarified that the JAC's role is advisory, not binding. The commission screens, assesses, and recommends candidates to the Prime Minister, but final appointments must align with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution. – Bernama
Barnama
2 hours ago
- Barnama
Gov't To Review JAC Act For Improvements
PUTRAJAYA, July 15 (Bernama) -- The government will review the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 amid public confusion over the recent Chief Justice appointment process. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said a special committee will be established, comprising members of the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, as well as constitutional experts, legal practitioners and academics. "We have to improve because what is happening now is that there is a lot of confusion. (There's) no clarity from the public perspective. But then this particular JAC, which was passed and established in 2009, is responsible for the appointment of five Chief Justices. It has never been an issue. "Sadly, now there is an issue, so we have to study it. Where did the non-clarity or confusion come in? Is it the processes, or is it the wording of the Act?" she said to reporters after attending the International Conference on Integrity and Governance here today. Yesterday, Azalina clarified that the JAC does not have binding authority in judicial appointments. She explained that the JAC's primary role is to screen, assess and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court must ultimately comply with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution. -- BERNAMA
