Donald Trump Has Wrapped His Political Career in the American Flag
Trump has wrapped his political career in the American flag, making the Stars and Stripes a central visual in his 'Make America Great Again' movement. On Friday, he celebrated July Fourth from the South Lawn of the White House, where he recently installed an 88-foot flagpole. He attended a picnic there with military families and signed his signature tax and spending legislation in front of more than a dozen American flags. He wore his signature uniform: a red tie, white shirt and blue suit, along with a MAGA cap that had an American flag embroidered on the side.
Almost every politician uses the American flag as a backdrop, but no other has deployed the national symbol as their own brand as extensively as the former retail and licensing mogul. His family business sells dozens of 'Trump' branded trinkets with flag imagery, including a $120 rubber beach tote and a $110 knit sweater. His supporters have imposed his face on American flags, which they fly from their vehicles or wave from the crowds at his political rallies. His campaign peddled gold lapel pins with 'TRUMP' emblazoned on the flag, available for a $50 donation.
And only Trump has transformed the meaning of the American flag into one of the most divisive topics in modern discourse.
As flags are raised throughout the country to honor the traditionally unifying anniversary of the country's birthday, Trump's efforts to absorb the American flag into the branding of his Republican Party have left the nation divided over how to celebrate. He calls his supporters 'patriots' and his opponents anti-American, ripping open long-simmering debates over what it means to wave the flag and who gets to define American freedom. He has also spurred efforts among some Democrats and Trump opponents to embrace the flag and Independence Day celebrations – while, among others who do not care for Trump, he has pushed them away from such traditionally patriotic activities.
'It is fitting that the President of the United States loves the Star-Spangled Banner, which represents our nation's brave heroes that have fought and died for our freedom,' said White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers. 'The American flag has always been important to the President's identity – from the day he was born, on Flag Day, it was clear that his DNA is USA.'
This year, some July Fourth barbecues and block parties served as undisguised anti-Trump demonstrations. The Women's March planned 'Free America' rallies throughout the country, where they encouraged organizers to entice people to protest with hot dogs and veggie burgers.
'The dream of American freedom belongs to all of us, and we will not stop in our pursuit of its promise, now or ever,' wrote the Women's March on a website announcing the plans.
Some Democrats in Congress are trying to unite the Democratic Party around the flag at a time when the party is scrambling to find a cohesive way to counter Trump.
About half of Americans have an American flag at home, but a higher share of Republicans report owning flags than Democrats, according to YouGov survey. In the same survey, 89 percent of Republicans said flying the flag was an act of patriotism, compared with only 58 percent of Democrats. Reps. Pat Ryan (D-New York) and Chris Deluzio (D-Pennsylvania) passed out 4-inch-by-6-inch American flags to their colleagues ahead of Flag Day.
'Patriotism does not belong to one party,' an accompanying letter said. 'The flag, and the values it stands for, belong to every single American.'
Deluzio, who served in Iraq in the Navy, said he was motivated to distribute the flags because no one party has a 'monopoly' on American pride. Trump undermines his flag-waving displays by showing 'disdain' for service members and attacking political rivals in the presence of military leaders, Deluzio said in an interview.
'I refuse to take a lecture on patriotism from this guy,' Deluzio said.
After November 2020, as Trump falsely claimed that he had won the election, many of his supporters displayed upside-down American flags as an anti-Biden symbol. Rioters carried such a flag into the U.S. Capitol when they sought to block the certification of the election results on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump's supporters widely shared the upside-down flag again last year, after he was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to an adult-film actress ahead of the 2016 election. The U.S. Flag Code generally prohibits flying the American flag upside down except in a signal of 'dire distress.'
Despite Trump's displays of pride in the American flag, he has frequently flouted the U.S. Flag Code, which dictates how the American flag should be folded, stored and displayed. The law requires that flags be flown at half-staff for 30 days following the death of the president. Trump was furious when he learned that the rule would be in effect during his inauguration festivities in January following the death of former president Jimmy Carter.
'The Democrats are all 'giddy' about our magnificent American Flag potentially being at 'half mast' during my Inauguration,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'They think it's so great, and are so happy about it because, in actuality, they don't love our Country, they only think about themselves.'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) ultimately ordered the flag to be raised to full height during Trump's inauguration and then returned to half-staff the day after.
Trump's famous hug of the flag at CPAC and his history of emblazoning his name over images of the flag have also been criticized as disrespectful to the national symbol.
He has also criticized others for desecrating the flag, calling for criminal penalties against protesters who burn flags despite a 1989 Supreme Court ruling that burning the flag is protected speech under the First Amendment.
DeLuzio spoke to The Washington Post from Congress on Wednesday, as House lawmakers were battling over the future of an immigration and tax package that has deeply divided the parties. But he called on Americans to put those differences aside for July Fourth.
'Go celebrate our Independence Day,' DeLuzio said. 'We need some unifying moments in our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: In election, parties should discuss Japan's role in restoring rules-based order
With the return to power of U.S. President Donald Trump, who champions an America First policy, international order is being shaken, putting pressure on Japan to restructure its diplomatic and security policies. Each political party in Japan needs to present its strategy through debate in the upcoming House of Councillors election. Postwar Japan has relied on U.S. deterrence for security, and achieved economic growth under a free trade system. However, the Trump administration views alliances as liabilities rather than assets, and the relationship that has been the linchpin of the alliance is creaking under the strain. Washington has imposed high tariffs on even allies and has also demanded increased defense spending. The security environment surrounding Japan is becoming increasingly severe. China has continued with its military expansion, and is boosting its maritime advancements into the East and South China seas. Meanwhile, North Korea, which is accelerating its development of nuclear weapons and missiles, has formed a military alliance with Russia, which is continuing its war in Ukraine. The threat toward Japan is only increasing. Strains in the Japan-U.S. alliance A concern is that it remains uncertain just how much the U.S. aims to get involved in stabilizing East Asia. A U.S. Department of Defense spokesperson suggested that Asian allies, including Japan, should raise their defense-related spending to 5% of gross domestic product, similar to NATO member countries. Due to Russia's prolonged invasion of Ukraine, most European countries belonging to NATO have complied with U.S. requests. Japan has decided to increase its defense spending to 2% of GDP by fiscal 2027. Both the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan have pledged to "fundamentally strengthen defense capabilities," but they have not provided a blueprint showing how far they intend to go. Japan should not be preparing defense capabilities based on numerical targets in the first place. Rather, it is essential to first accurately assess the military capabilities and intentions of neighboring countries and identify threats. Strategies should then be developed to address these threats, and the necessary equipment and other items should be selected accordingly. Addressing personnel shortages in the Self-Defense Forces due to Japan's declining birth rate is another urgent matter. Increasing defense spending could impact other policies like social security. There should be in-depth discussions about the appropriate scale relative to national strength. In light of China's moves to increase military pressure, such as its deployment of two aircraft carriers in the Western Pacific, it is important to maintain deterrence. But rather than just strengthening defense capabilities, efforts need to be made to build a stable relationship with repeated talks so as not to heighten tensions. Negotiations between Tokyo and Washington over high tariffs have cast a shadow over Japan's upper house election. Trump's approach not only undermines Japan's national interests but also threatens to disrupt global supply chains for goods and services. A strategy to uphold the free trade system is necessary. The European Union is cooperating with member countries of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership to establish new trade rules. Japan, having benefited from free trade, should take an active role. Strategy to strengthen alliance needed The goal should be multilateral diplomacy. To restore international order damaged by ongoing wars in Europe and the Middle East and Trump's high-handed tariff policies, it is essential for middle powers like Japan and Europe to band together. Japan must further strengthen ties with countries sharing values of freedom and democracy, such as Australia and South Korea, as well as with members of emerging and developing countries collectively known as the Global South, including India and those in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). While the words and actions of Trump, who is prioritizing his own country, have shaken the prestige of the United States, China is increasing its presence in Asia. It is leveraging geoeconomic strategies like the Belt and Road Initiative and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank to draw in ASEAN countries targeted by high tariffs. Japan has built trust with Asian countries since the postwar period through economic assistance and other such measures. It is crucial to leverage this experience to contribute to regional stability. There is concern that Japan's commitment to the rule of law, which it has valued, and other principles is weakening. If Japan cannot bring itself to criticize the self-righteous actions of Trump, who believes in "peace through strength," out of consideration for him, it will only lose the trust of the Global South. While maintaining its important relationship with the U.S., which is crucial for Japan's security and economy, efforts to restore a rules-based international order are indispensable. Each party should engage in robust discussions on the role Japan should play in achieving this.
Japan Today
2 hours ago
- Japan Today
Where do trade talks stand in the rush to avert higher U.S. tariffs?
US President Donald Trump unveiled tariffs customized to dozens of trading partners in April, as the White House slammed a lack of 'reciprocity' in trade ties By Beiyi SEOW and Julien GIRAULT U.S. President Donald Trump has said he will send letters to select trade partners facing tariff hikes as early as Monday, piling pressure on countries to strike a deal with Washington before a new August 1 deadline. The White House announced sharp levies on dozens of economies in April, citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trade relations, which were set to kick in on Wednesday, July 9. Trump announced on Friday the levies' imposition would be pushed to August 1 to allow time for talks to wrap up, but said he signed 12 letters to inform some countries of rate hikes, which will likely be sent on Monday. With Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the administration was "close to several deals," where do things stand for economies from Taiwan to the European Union? Japan: Rice, autos at stake Despite being a close U.S. ally and major source of foreign investment, Japan might not escape Trump's tariff hike. Tokyo's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa has made numerous trips to Washington through the end of June. But Trump recently criticized what he described as Japan's reluctance to open up further to U.S. rice and auto exports. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal," Trump said, adding that the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." EU: 'Ready' for deal The European Union said it is "ready for a deal" with Washington, with the bloc's trade chief meeting his U.S. counterparts Thursday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU was targeting an "agreement in principle" when it came to the initial July 9 cutoff. Bessent said the European Union is "making very good progress" after a slow start. With no deal, the U.S. tariff on EU goods doubles from the "baseline" of 10 percent to 20 percent -- with Trump previously threatening a 50 percent level. Vietnam: A pact with uncertainties Washington and Hanoi unveiled a trade pact Wednesday with much fanfare and few details, but it allowed Vietnam to avoid Trump's initial 46 percent tariff. Under the agreement, Vietnamese goods face a minimum 20 percent tariff while products made elsewhere face a 40 percent levy -- a clause to restrict "transshipping" by Chinese groups. But there remain questions on how the higher levy would apply to products using foreign parts. There is also a risk that Beijing will adopt retaliatory measures, analysts warned. India: A good position Indian manufacturers and exporters want to believe they can avoid a 26 percent tariff. Negotiations between both countries have been going well for weeks, and Trump himself suggested at the end of June that a "very big" agreement was imminent. Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said the feedback he received "suggests positive developments." But he maintained that the situation was fluid. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has stressed that agriculture and dairy products remain "very big red lines." South Korea: Muted optimism Seoul, which is already reeling from U.S. tariffs on steel and autos, wants to avert a sweeping 25 percent levy on its other exports. Cooperation in shipbuilding could be a bargaining chip, but "at this stage, both sides still haven't clearly defined what exactly they want," said new President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday. "I can't say with confidence that we'll be able to wrap everything up by July 8," he added. Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan in the wings Other Asian economies including Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia, which faces a 49 percent tariff, wait with bated breath. Indonesia has indicated willingness to boost energy, agriculture and merchandise imports from the United States. Bangladesh is proposing to buy Boeing planes and step up imports of U.S. agriculture products. Taiwan, for whom Washington is a vital security partner, faces a 32 percent duty without a pact. Although both sides have faced bumps along the way, Taiwanese Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said "negotiators from both sides are working diligently" to find a path forward. Switzerland: Hope for delay Switzerland's government said Washington has acknowledged it was acting in good faith, and assumes its tariff level will remain at 10 percent on July 9 while negotiations continue. But without a decision by the president as of the end of June, Switzerland did not rule out that levies could still rise to a promised 31 percent. © 2025 AFP
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Waseda Professor: Vietnam Should Change Industrial Structure Based on Indirect Exports; Focus on Domestic Industries
Vietnam should strive to transform and upgrade its industrial structure to revitalize its domestic industries, Tran Van Tho, professor emeritus of Waseda University, said in a recent interview with The Yomiuri Shimbun. Tho also said Japan should take a strong stance in defending free trade, which would benefit the global economy. The following is excerpted from the interview, which was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent Shunpei Takeuchi. Japan and other Asian countries have grown thanks to the strength of the United States' huge and diversified market, where everything from luxury goods to inexpensive daily necessities sell. Following the Japan-U.S. trade friction [in the 1980s], South Korean and Taiwanese exports to the United States grew. However, Washington's trade deficit with them also expanded, causing trade friction. In recent years, China and Southeast Asian nations have expanded their exports to the United States and received benefits. China, in particular, has accelerated its industrialization as the 'world's factory' on the back of its abundant labor force to become a superpower. China has become something that the United States can ill afford to ignore, and the first administration of U.S. President Donald Trump focused on measures against China. The result of the U.S.-China trade friction at that time was China's accelerated relocation of production bases to Southeast Asian countries and India. Vietnam, which borders China, in particular saw an influx of capital, partly because it was easy for Chinese businesses to relocate production bases or to establish a framework on the division of labor. I, as a member of the economic advisory group to Vietnam's then-Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc from 2016 to 2021, viewed the move as a golden opportunity for Vietnam to receive more direct foreign investment. However, I was also concerned that Vietnam's growing reliance on foreign capital could hinder the development of domestic companies. I advised the prime minister to prevent the unrestricted influx of new foreign investment into the country and select foreign capital that can help facilitate industrial restructuring. Chinese companies [over the past decade] have stepped up their efforts to manufacture products in Vietnam to reroute Chinese products for export to the United States. With foreign-invested enterprises accounting for more than 70% of the country's total exports by value, Vietnam prospered from exports to the United States. But last year Washington had a trade deficit with Vietnam in excess of $100 billion, its third largest. Trump can be considered a 'businessman.' He applies business management techniques to domestic and foreign politics, and makes deals without regard for aligning interests. This trend has intensified in his second administration, with the announcement of reciprocal tariffs aimed at even allied countries. Trump announced that tariffs on goods imported from Cambodia will be increased to 49%, for instance, as he sees Southeast Asian countries as locations for rerouting Chinese products for export to the United States. On July 2, Trump said he had reached a tariff deal with Vietnam, ahead of other Asian countries. He said Vietnam will see its exports face a 20% tariff — less than half the 46% he had initially announced. Vietnam apparently made a significant concession in the trade negotiations by setting tariffs on U.S. products at 0%. If the agreement is implemented, Vietnam's exports to the United States will slow down, while the United States will export to Vietnam aircraft, liquefied natural gas and other items which are in high demand in the country, thereby reducing its trade deficit. Trump will leverage this achievement to pressure other countries into making concessions. Products transshipped in Vietnam for export to the United States will be subject to a 40% tariff. Vietnam should transform its industrial structure, which relies on exporting finished products made with intermediate goods from China and South Korea, to reduce its dependence on foreign capital and advance the upgrading of domestic industries. Diversifying export destinations is also necessary. The presence of Japan is significant in terms of formulating responses to U.S. tariff measures. As a leader that has spearheaded the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement, Japan should strongly affirm its stance in defending free trade, which would benefit the global economy.
