Windrush commissioner: Apprehension and suspicion remains towards Home Office
Last month just ahead of announcing his appointment, immigration minister Seema Malhotra confirmed around 64 claimants had died after applying for payouts, as she set out the Government's wish to speed up 'justice'.
On Wednesday, she will attend an event with Mr Foster where people affected by the scandal, which erupted in 2018 when British citizens were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live in Britain, will hear from the commissioner on his aims for his role.
A total of 10,326 claims had been made under the scheme as of May this year, according to the latest Home Office data.
The figures also showed that just over £112 million has been paid out so far, covering 3,334 claims.
In an interview with the PA news agency ahead of the event, Mr Foster said he will be advocating for a 'fair, accessible and trauma-informed' compensation scheme.
While some campaigners have called for the scheme to be moved out of the Home Office altogether, due to applicants' lack of trust in the department, Mr Foster appeared to disagree with such a change.
He told PA: 'I think what I will be pushing for is to make sure that this compensation scheme must be seen to be fair, accessible and trauma-informed, and I will be pushing to get swifter outcomes.
'I know there's been a call for movement into another area (out of the Home Office), but I think we should be careful what we wish for.
'I think it's important that we make the scheme workable.'
Asked if he felt moving it to another department might risk further delays to payouts, he said: 'I think that is a possibility.'
He said the Home Office would not want a situation where it has 'further 'reasons why it cannot be giving out fast decisions and compensation to people who have been terribly affected as a result of the scandal, and so this movement, I think, would inevitably cause some of that slowing down, and I think that is something that we have to be aware of'.
He said he had already pressed on the minister the need for guarantees around pension losses being covered by the scheme.
Ms Malhotra has previously said officials in her department are 'reviewing the current exclusion within the rules of compensation for private and occupational pensions'.
Mr Foster said he will work with 'like-minded campaigners' to address problems with the scheme and 'to inform the Home Office where they're getting it right and where they're getting it wrong, without fear or favour'.
Asked to describe the level of trust in the Home Office currently among those affected by the scandal, he said: 'I'm afraid I still feel that there is apprehension and some suspicion with regards to, 'is this working towards better outcomes?'
'What we need to accelerate is the actions and activities that are going to build trust. I always say 'you can't cross a bridge until you've built it.''
He said the department must show through actions rather than only words 'that there is going to be a culture change'.
Mr Foster, a senior pastor at the Pilgrim Church in Nottingham and the son of parents who migrated to the UK from Jamaica in 1959, said he will 'be reaching out to communities and acting as that advocate and trusted voice, as it were, going forward'.
Among his top priorities will be ensuring people are comfortable to come forward and get the correct documentation to ensure they have settled status and are not 'wrongly classified as illegal'.
He said: 'People still need to feel that they can be respected and accepted to come forward without that fear of being penalised as a result of not having (the right documentation).'
Meanwhile, Mr Foster said he will also be working to ensure the legacy of the Windrush generation is celebrated in the future, including through the annual Notting Hill Carnival.
Campaigners last month called on the Government to step in to protect the future of the west London carnival, which they said was in jeopardy, as they asked for urgent funding to save the world-famous event.
Mr Foster said carnival 'brings so much to the country, and I think that is an expression of the Windrush generation legacy'.
He added: 'One of the things in my role would be to be looking to ensure that we continue to celebrate the legacy and the contribution of the Windrush generation, and carnival is one of those aspects, and I'll be happy to engage in conversations to look at that going forward.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
14 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Fujitsu ‘kicking can down the road' on compensation, says Post Office campaigner
Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, who played a pivotal role in exposing the outrage, accused the Japanese tech giant of holding out with a view to reducing the amount it would ultimately have to pay. He argued the only way to change the under-fire company's attitude would be for the Government to stop awarding it contracts. Despite its involvement in the Post Office debacle, the firm has continued to secure multimillion-pound deals with Whitehall, bankrolled by the taxpayer. Fujitsu has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation, pending the outcome of the public inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams. The firm has come under renewed pressure after the publication of the first part of Sir Wyn's final report. It found around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted after Fujitsu's defective Horizon accounting system made it appear that money was missing at their Post Office branches. Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives. The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, which highlighted the scandal. Sir Wyn said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims following what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history. Speaking in Parliament, Lord Arbuthnot said: 'This matter has taken place over many years, under Labour ministers, Lib Dem ministers, Conservative ministers, 'We should all, frankly, hang our heads in shame.' He added: 'I went along to The Oval last week to listen to Sir Wyn give his excellent report, and he used a telling phrase about Fujitsu, namely that they were kicking the can down the road. 'That's exactly what they are doing. 'The longer they think they can stave off paying a single penny towards the victims of this matter, the less they think they will have to pay. 'Does the Government recognise that the only way we can change that behaviour is to stop giving them contracts?' Responding, business minister Baroness Jones of Whitchurch said: 'I must pay absolute tribute to him for all of his involvement in this running scandal over many years, and for helping to bring the scandal to light.' She said the Government was in 'active dialogue' with Fujitsu on the issue of compensation. The company has said it will not bid for contracts 'with new Government customers' until the Post Office Horizon inquiry concludes. However, this still leaves it open to tender for work with existing Whitehall clients or 'where there is an agreed need for Fujitsu's skills and capabilities'. Latest figures show a further 12 new deals had been struck with the company over the last year, in addition to extensions of existing contracts. The Government has said the majority are for services already provided by Fujitsu and were put in place to ensure continuity of services. Lady Jones told peers: 'The extent of Fujitsu's role on the scandal is not fully known, and therefore we feel it would be inappropriate for the Government to take further action until we have all parts of the inquiry before us.' A Fujitsu spokesperson said: 'We have apologised for, and deeply regret, our role in subpostmasters' suffering. We hope for a swift resolution that ensures a just outcome for the victims. 'We are considering the recommendations set out by Sir Wyn in volume one of the inquiry's report, and are engaged with Government regarding Fujitsu's contribution to compensation.'
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Football clubs and agents named as ‘emerging risk' in money laundering report
Football clubs and football agents have been named for the first time as emerging risks for money laundering and terrorist financing in an annual government report, published on Thursday . The sport's 'hidden nature' was raised as a specific issue, which means 'the scale of criminality' remains 'an intelligence gap' that is 'difficult to accurately estimate'. Even more pressingly for the game's authorities, the document cited diverse ownership models, profound financial inequality and distressed clubs as specific vulnerabilities, as well as how proceeds of crime could occur through multiple routes, from transfers to falsification of services. The report, titled 'National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 2025' states for the first time that that 'alongside money laundering, football has the potential to be abused for a range of other crimes, including illegal betting, match fixing and bribes' or as an opportunity to 'invest illicit funds'. The report states: 'Many clubs have complex offshore corporate structures involving overseas-based enablers and financial products, often in jurisdictions with limited regulatory oversight… Ownership structures using layered front and shell companies, often based overseas or in jurisdictions with low transparency, could obscure the ultimate beneficiaries of clubs and other major stakeholders, such as sponsorship arrangements'. The report specifically states how 'financial distress' of lower-league clubs is a particular risk if they are 'unable to access loans from traditional lenders'. Clubs' propensity for debt to be carried as 'normal financial practice' is cited as another vulnerability that could be exploited, and potentially further enabled by poor application of due diligence on investors. The theme is particularly pointed amid an ongoing impasse between the Premier League and EFL over a redistribution deal, that could yet see the soon-to-be-implement independent football regulator step in. 'Clubs could be used as a vehicle both to launder funds, as well as a final destination for criminal money to be invested,' the report goes on to read. 'Players values in particular are difficult to objectively determine which increases the risk of manipulation for money laundering.' The wider financial industries around football, particularly agents, are also highlighted. 'Professional service providers including accountants, lawyers, trust or company service providers and wealth managers are common features in football related transactions so could be exposed to a risk of facilitating money laundering,' the report states. 'In many cases these services are employed in-house by clubs, potentially presenting conflict of interests in detecting and reporting suspicious financial activity. 'As they are employed in house rather than 'by way of business', many agents and 'fixers' in the sector operate without regulatory supervision, compounding the opportunities and risks of money laundering. Fees paid to agents, intermediaries and others involved in transactions could be a convenient route by which to launder money or pay bribes. 'This risk is raised when agents represent both player and club during a transaction. Lawyers, accountants, financial service firms and others associated with processing these fees and payments should take all necessary steps to understand their purpose and source to ensure they are legitimate.'
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The awful truth about Labour? They're just continuity Sunak
At Prime Minister's Questions this week, Keir Starmer told us 'Mr Speaker, we're only just getting started'. I fear so. It's time to cower under the beds. For if this first year of Labour government is anything to go by, we have a grim prospect ahead. Let's review the record. GDP per head is at the same level as mid-2022. It flatlined in Labour's first six months, grew in the first quarter of this year only by pulling activity forward to avoid the April tax increases, and will no doubt shrink in the second. Nobody is getting better off – or if they are, it's at someone else's expense. In parallel, and not coincidentally, Rachel Reeves pushed up the tax burden by around 1.5 per cent of GDP, driving it to the highest levels for over 70 years – and yet managed to increase rather than reduce the deficit too. Labour's backbenches won't allow any spending cuts or even restraint. It is not surprising, then, that the OBR said this month that 'UK public finances [are] in a relatively vulnerable position and facing mounting risks.' So Reeves is now in a vicious circle: tax increases cause slower growth, receipts then fall, tax goes up further, and the real economy starts to collapse. Accordingly, wealth creators are fleeing, employment is falling and unemployment is growing, and inflation is well over target. The once outlandish idea of a wealth tax – rejected even by the 1970s Labour government – now seems a real prospect. We are well into a downward spiral. All this is made worse by the deranged doubling down on net zero, a policy which is based on simple untruths about the cost of wind and solar power. Indeed the so-called renewables industry is not a business in any meaningful sense of the word: it only exists because of subsidy and government regulation and therefore destroys value for the country rather than creates it. Its results are that Britain pays some of the highest electricity prices in the Western world, energy-intensive industry flees the country, and the government's 'industrial strategy' robs Peter to pay Paul to subsidise energy costs for their favoured clients. Meanwhile, Reeves denounces the burden of regulation but does nothing about it. The new Employment Bill will disastrously weaken Britain's labour market. The Renters' Rights Bill will push up housing costs further. Bridget Phillipson's Schools Bill is destroying one of the successes of recent years. Even football has got its new regulator. The planning system is not being deregulated, just worked harder, and housebuilding is still falling, disastrously so in London. The country's social contract feels dangerously close to fraying. Non-European legal net migration in 2024 was over half a million, 544,000 to be precise. The overall figure was only lower, at 431,000, because more Brits and EU citizens left than arrived – and who can blame them? Illegal immigration on small boats is at its highest level ever, and there is now a growing culture of suspicion and confrontation, not surprisingly, between communities and illegal arrivals dumped in hotels. Dissent is repressed and awkward facts are covered up. That's why, as shadow minister Alex Burghart put it on Thursday, the potential for civil unrest is 'underpriced'. And finally, Starmer points to his trade deals with India and the US, yet can't bring himself to admit that neither would be possible if we were still in the EU. And he has just agreed a deal with the EU itself that allows Brussels to set our food and agriculture rules and our carbon prices, without any say in them, makes us pay for the privilege, and gives away our fishing grounds for another 12 years too: a joke negotiation with a dangerous result. Truly, Britain has not had such a dreadful and incompetent government for many years, a government that not only doesn't govern in the interests of the people but doesn't even seem to like them very much, a government that feels more like an imposed colonial regime than one with any genuine popular consent. Yet one thing must be acknowledged. Yes, things are getting worse fast. But the direction of travel hasn't changed, only the pace. High taxes and spending; net zero; high immigration; the destruction of the rental market; the football regulator; the smoking ban: all these were the projects of the last years of the Conservative government. In many ways, the premiership of Starmer is a mere continuation of Rishi Sunak's 20 months in office. Labour has doubled down on them, and added madnesses of their own, but they are on a well-travelled path which the Conservative Party has not yet convincingly disowned – as its poll ratings show. Kemi Badenoch claims that the Tory party is 'under new management': well, maybe, but there isn't yet a new plan. One is needed soon. British voters' consent for the current ways of doing things is now fragile. Yet much of our insouciant political class seems simply indifferent to this reality. A prospectus for radical change is needed if there is to be an effective opposition and if we are, as a country, to dig ourselves out of this mess. Who can pick up the baton and get us onto a new track? Perhaps we will find out this autumn.
