Nations are meeting to drum up trillions to combat poverty — but the US isn't going
U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed said Wednesday that despite 'the headwinds' and high geopolitical tensions, there is hope the world can address one of the most important global challenges — ensuring all people have access to food, health care, education and water.
'This conference is an appeal to action,' Spain's U.N. Ambassador Hector Gomez Hernandez said, 'and we have the extraordinary opportunity to send a very strong message to defend the international community's commitment to multilateralism.'
High-level delegations, including more than 70 world leaders, are expected in Seville, Mohammed said, along with several thousand others from international financial institutions, development banks, philanthropic organizations, the private sector and civil society.
At its last preparatory meeting on June 17, the United States rejected the 38-page outcome document that had been negotiated for months by the U.N.'s 193 member nations and announced its withdrawal from the process and from the Seville conference.
Advertisement
The rest of the countries then approved the document by consensus and sent it to Seville, where it is expected to be adopted by conference participants without changes. It will be known as the Seville Commitment — or Compromiso de Sevilla in Spanish.
The document says the leaders and high-level representatives have decided to launch 'an ambitious package of reforms and actions to close the financing gap with urgency,' saying it is now estimated at $4 trillion a year.
Among the proposals and actions, it calls for minimum tax revenue of 15% of a country's gross domestic product to increase government resources, a tripling of lending by multilateral development banks, and scaling up private financing by providing incentives for investing in critical areas like infrastructure. It also calls for a number of reforms to help countries deal with rising debt.
U.N. trade chief Rebeca Grynspan told a news conference Friday that 'development is going backward' and the global debt crisis has worsened.
Last year, 3.3 billion people were living in countries that pay more interest on their debts than they spend on health or education — and the number will increase to 3.4 billion people this year, she said. And developing countries will pay $947 billion to service debts this year, up from $847 billion last year.
She spoke at a press conference where an expert group on debt appointed by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres presented 11 recommendations that they say can resolve the debt crisis, empower borrowing countries and create a fairer system.
Advertisement
While the U.S. objected to many actions in the outcome document, American diplomat Jonathan Shrier told the June 17 meeting: 'Our commitment to international cooperation and long-term economic development remains steadfast.'
He said, however, that the text 'crosses many of our red lines,' including interfering with the governance of international financial institutions, tripling the annual lending capacity of multilateral development banks and proposals envisioning a role for the U.N. in the global debt architecture.
Shrier also objected to proposals on trade, tax and innovation that are not in line with U.S. policy, as well as language on a U.N. framework convention on international tax cooperation.
The United States was the world's largest single funder of foreign aid. The Trump administration has dismantled its main aid agency, the U.S. Agency for International Development, while drastically slashing foreign assistance funding, calling it wasteful and contrary to the Republican president's agenda. Other Western donors also have cut back international aid.
The U.N.'s Mohammed said the U.S. withdrawal from the conference was 'unfortunate,' stressing that 'many of the recommendations you see cannot be pursued without a continuous engagement with the U.S.'
After Seville, 'we will engage again with the U.S. and hope that we can make the case that they be part of the success of pulling millions of people out of poverty.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DC becomes Republicans' favorite target — again
Republicans who've made a habit of using their power over DC to undercut progressive policymaking are mounting a new push to rein in the capital — and this one may have legs. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., told Semafor that he is inclined to support a House-passed bill that would bar noncitizens from serving in local office as well as voting locally in the city lawmakers call a home away from home. The bill passed the House with 56 Democratic votes in June. 'Voting in American elections should be limited to American citizens,' said Fetterman, whose wife Gisele became a US citizen in 2009. 'I say that as a guy that's absolutely very pro-immigration. The opportunity to vote, that should be for American citizens.' A similar ban passed the House last year with support from two Democrats who've since ascended to the Senate, Arizona's Ruben Gallego and Michigan's Elissa Slotkin. While it's not clear if they'd change their votes this time, should it come to the Senate floor, support from those three Democratic senators would put the GOP closer than ever to the 60 votes needed for passage. Congress has substantial constitutional power over DC, which Republicans frequently deploy to undermine the city's elected government — and point a finger at unpopular leftwing policies. After the GOP took back the House in 2023, it reversed a criminal justice reform passed by the DC council. Local Democrats expected then-President Joe Biden to veto it; he signed it into law. Democratic control of the Senate had, until this year, stalled action on other Republican-passed legislation to rein in the DC government. But under complete GOP control of Washington, the capital's government has taken further hits. A stopgap government funding bill slashed $1 billion from the DC budget, and the House GOP continues to decline to take up a Senate-passed fix. Then this month, as the Senate focused on President Donald Trump's tax-cuts bill, House Republicans passed a trio of proposals that would force DC to cooperate with Trump's immigration enforcement, scrap another police reform, and remove noncitizens' local voting rights. Senate Majority Leader John Thune's office did not return a request for comment on the chamber's timetable for taking up the House-passed bill. Republicans sold the noncitizen voting ban as a defense of DC citizens' rights. The city's rules don't affect voting in federal elections, which has long been limited to US citizens. But for the GOP, they raised the possibility that some Americans might be out-voted in DC elections by people who were neither born here or naturalized. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' said House Oversight Chair James Comer, R-Ky., during the bill's markup this month. 'Diluting that right, to its non-citizens, whether here legally or illegally, undermines the voice of DC residents.' The bill's proponents described reform as not just necessary but politically popular, and a mistake for Democrats to vote against. 'Once again, Democrats are taking the 20% side on another 80-20 issue,' said Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas. 'The American people do not want illegal aliens voting. They shouldn't be here to begin with.' For some local politicians, the legislation would hit home — in a very big way. Last year, for the very first time, Mónica Martínez López decided to run for office. Born in Mexico City, she had lived for a while in DC's Brookland neighborhood and gotten involved in the Vision Zero initiative to end traffic deaths. When her member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission moved away, Martínez López ran for her seat. By a 734-341 vote margin, she won. The House bill would remove Martínez López, along with fellow ANC member Jingwen Sun, from the voter rolls and from their posts on the commission. 'It's another example of the lack of self-determination for our city,' Martínez López told Semafor. 'The close to 1,000 neighbors/residents who registered to exercise their right to participate in local electoral processes now face the limits of Home Rule that US citizens who live in Washington DC have long faced.' Sun, who ran for council while having a green card but not citizenship, said that he would stay in the city and keep up his work, even if his vote and job were erased initially. 'I'm pretty positive that I will speak to the DC council and mayor, and run for ANC again, whenever the time comes that I become a US citizen,' Sun said. Democrats have conducted a somewhat circular conversation about how their party needs to change, less about specific policies than about a battered 'brand.' What sort of policies could they moderate or jettison, if they wanted to move right? On paper, noncitizen voting could be sacrificed without much downside for the party. The few hundred people who take advantage of it in DC can't support the party in any other way (federal voting, donations) unless they obtain citizenship. Non-citizens are often less progressive than the Democrats who give them the franchise — as we saw three years ago in San Francisco, when opponents of left-wing school board members registered recent immigrants to help recall them. So why would a majority of congressional Democrats vote with DC? They feel solidarity with the city's residents, whose progressive votes are undermined whenever Republicans run Congress. Some of them, in seats that are too blue to become GOP targets, are comfortable defending the concept that people who raise families and pay taxes in a city deserve some say in who runs their local government. But other Democrats are less eager to make a stand for that idea. Which makes it a soft target for Republicans. The House-passed bill has vocal Democratic opponents, and it's still an open question whether it would get the necessary seven votes needed to overcome a filibuster — and that's assuming all Senate Republicans vote in favor. DC Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., argued against the measure on the House floor in June, making the case that Republicans were being hypocrites and hurting American citizens as well as non-citizens. 'Republicans claim that voting is a core right for the privilege of American citizenship,' Frost said. 'Republicans have fought tooth and nail to defeat legislation that would give the American citizens who reside in DC voting representation in the House and the Senate.' Frost, like voting reform advocates in DC, pointed out that other cities let non-citizens vote in local elections, and that there was some history — not recent, but real — of letting people vote in US elections if they weren't yet Americans. That was at the heart of the reasoning when DC's city council first passed the measure. 'The idea clicked for me when I realized DC has many people who live here, pay taxes, work locally, and don't have a voice in even their local government,' said Charles Allen, the DC council member who chaired the committee that approved the voting amendment. 'My colleagues and I make decisions every day that spend their tax dollars and impact their work,' he added. 'If they can prove they live here, why shouldn't they have a say locally?' In the Austin-American Statesman, Tony Quesada an investigation into noncitizen votes in Texas, which proved less than promised. 'It turns out that a bunch of those people were naturalized citizens who were labeled possible noncitizens based on outdated — i.e., false — data.' For NPR, Mikaela Lefrak into how many noncitizens take advantage of these open systems, and how the people who control the rolls prevent fraud. 'They know that one slip-up, like a presidential ballot being mailed to a noncitizen, could end up on the national news.' In The Washington Post, Olivia George and Meagan Flynn to the DC elected officials who'd have to resign if Republicans passed this into law. 'The repeal would force special elections for those seats [and] the unpaid positions could remain vacant, leaving residents without representation.'
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Official: Monza sale brings end to Berlusconi ownership
AC Monza has officially been bought by American investment fund Becket Layne Ventures, which will bring an end to the Berlusconi family's reign over the club. Official: Berlusconi family agree to sell Monza to US investors Monza, who were relegated from Serie A at the end of the 2024-25 season, have been bought out by new American investors. Becket Layne Ventures have purchased an initial 80% stake in the club, and have agreed to purchase the remaining 20% of the shares by June 2026. Advertisement For the meantime, Fininvest, the holding company owned by the Berlusconi family, will remain minority shareholders, and will remain on the board 'in line with its remaining shareholding', it has been confirmed. epa10119403 Silvio Berlusconi (L) and Adriano Galliani before the Italian Serie A soccer match between AC Monzaa and Torino FC at U-Power Stadium, 13 August 2022. EPA-EFE/Roberto Bregani Once Becket Layne have bought out the remaining 20% of the shares from Fininvest, the Berlusconi family will no longer have control over the club. Monza was officially bought by Fininvest, then under the control of former Prime Minister of Italy and ex-Milan President Silvio Berlusconi in 2018. Along with the guidance of former Milan CEO Adriano Galliani, Monza earned promotion to Serie A for the first time in the club's history at the end of the 2021-22 season. The club remained in possession of Fininvest after the death of Silvio Berlusconi in 2023. The holding company remained under the control of the Berlusconi family, who have since agreed to sell 100% of their shares in the club following the team's relegation to Serie B at the end of the 2024-25 campaign.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Berlusconi family leaving soccer again with sale of relegated Monza to American fund
MILAN (AP) — The Berlusconi family is leaving soccer again with the sale of Monza to American fund Beckett Layne Ventures. Fininvest, the Berlusconi's family holding company, announced the deal in a statement Tuesday. 'The transaction provides for an initial transfer of 80% of the shares by this summer, with the remaining 20% to be transferred by June 2026,' it said. Fininvest purchased Monza in 2018 and oversaw the club's rise from the third division to Serie A. But the club based just outside Milan finished last in the recently concluded Serie A season and was relegated to Serie B. Fininvest was previously controlled by the late Silvio Berlusconi — the three-time Italian premier who died in 2023. Berlusconi owned AC Milan from 1986 to 2017. BLV is paying about 30 million euros ($35 million) for Monza, according to the Gazzetta dello Sport. Financial details of the deal were not announced. ___
