Teen with rare unnamed condition can't eat any food, baffling doctors worldwide
Finley Ranson, age 14, was born with an extreme response to all food, with his body reacting as if it was a virus and causing him to bleed internally.
'I've got a rare condition where I can't have fat into my stomach,' the boy told news agency SWNS.
'It is impacting my life, as I've not been able to eat any food or drink other than water.'
The boy's digestive system cannot tolerate lipids, which are fatty compounds or oils that are found in foods.
When Ranson, who is from England, was 4 years old, he was taken to a London hospital, 'where a central line fed nutrients and minerals into his heart,' his mother said.
'It was a game-changer. He was happy, bouncing and starting to put on weight.'
Finley now regularly receives the lipid infusions via a tube, which enters his chest and goes to the central vein in his heart.
He receives carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins and minerals three times a day into his stomach via a different tube.
He started undergoing the six-hour process every week when he was 4 years old.
3 Finley Ranson, 14, is unable to eat any food due to a condition so rare that doctors said no one else has this same ailment.
Rhys Ranson / SWNS
For the past five years, it has been twice a week.
'We have to bypass the gastrointestinal tract completely,' Dr. Manas Datta, a pediatrician who has treated Finley since birth, told the BBC.
Doctors tried introducing separate ingredients from the tube into the boy's stomach, but 'as soon as they put the lipid in, we took 10 steps back,' the boy's mother, Rhys Ranson, told SWNS.
Ranson's condition is so rare that it doesn't even have a name, although he has dubbed it 'Finley-itis.'
His condition has baffled medical professionals, who believe he may be one of the only people whose body reacts to lipids in this way.
3 Ranson told SWNS that the disease has impacted his quality of life, mentioning, 'I've not been able to eat any food or drink other than water.'
James Linsell Clark / SWNS
'That's the unfortunate thing that we bump up against in medicine with rare diseases that confound doctors,' Dr. Neeta Ogden, an allergist and immunologist in Edison, New Jersey, who is not involved in Ranson's care, told Fox News Digital.
Dr. Stephen Tilles, an allergy and immunology specialist in Seattle, told Fox News Digital that Ranson's condition is not the sort of thing typically associated with a food allergy.
'Obviously, it's an adverse reaction to the lipid component of food, but that's not on the list of things that allergists will encounter in their practices,' said Tilles, who is also unaffiliated with Ranson's care.
3 Ranson's digestive system can't tolerate lipids and needs daily lipid infusions, which enter his chest and then make their way to the vein to his heart.
Rhys Ranson / SWNS
Doctors originally believed Ranson might be allergic to breast milk, but after being fed hypoallergenic milk through a tube, he still failed to thrive, his mother reported.
'His stools were all blood and mucus, and he wouldn't put on weight' when he was a baby, Rhys Ranson told SWNS.
She is now being trained to perform the lipid infusions at home, which she hopes will improve her son's quality of life.
'We're unsure what the future looks like,' she said.
'We hope there's a day that comes [when] he can have a normal diet … but if not, as long as Finley's happy and healthy and thriving the way he is, we're happy to continue what life is like for us at the moment.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Just one hot dog a day may increase risk of diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer: study
A new meta-analysis from the University of Washington suggests that no amount of processed food is safe to consume. Researchers analyzed 77 different studies to gauge the link between certain amounts of these foods and common chronic diseases. 'Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer,' lead study author Demewoz Haile, a research scientist at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, told Fox News Digital. 'There is no safe level of habitual consumption of these food groups, so they should not be included in our daily diet,' he stated. For processed meats in particular, the researchers concluded that eating as little as 0.6 to 57 grams per day was linked to an 11% greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. Consuming between 0.78 and 55 grams per day was associated with a 7% increase in colorectal cancer risk, the study found. (One hot dog, which is made up of almost entirely processed meat, is approximately 50 grams.) 5 A staffer carries a plate of 76 hot dogs to the official Weigh-in ceremony, ahead of the Coney Island's 2025 Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest in New York City, on July 3, 2025. REUTERS The researchers also analyzed the impact of sugar-sweetened beverages, finding that drinking between 1.5 and 390 grams per day could raise type 2 diabetes risk by 8%. Consuming between 0 and 365 grams of the beverages could increase the risk of ischemic heart disease — the most common type of heart disease and a leading cause of death — by 2%, the study found. Trans fatty acids were also analyzed in the study. When the unsaturated fats made up anywhere from 0.25% to 2.56% of daily energy intake, they were linked to a 3% greater risk of ischemic heart disease. (Some examples of trans fats include crackers, cookies, baked goods, frozen pizza, coffee creamer, refrigerated dough products, and vegetable shortenings and some stick margarines, according to WebMD. Some fast foods also contain it.) 5 Competitive eater Joey Chestnut attends the official weigh-in ceremony for the 2025 Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest at Hudson Yards on July 3, 2025 in New York City. Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock The findings were published in the journal Nature Medicine on June 30. Previous studies have established the link between processed foods and chronic disease, Haile acknowledged. 'However, our study evaluated the shape of the relationship with the most recent studies, using a more advanced analytical method, and objectively assessed the strength of the evidence,' he noted. 'Our analysis showed that the strongest association is observed at lower exposure levels equivalent to a serving or less, which implies that consuming these food items on a regular basis at any amount increases the risk of adverse health outcomes.' While the researchers recognized that diet is a 'personal choice' and that some may be limited in food choices, they recommend limiting or eliminating consumption of processed foods. 5 The official Weigh-In ceremony for Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Championship was held at noon today at the Hudson Yards Plaza in Manhattan. Paul Martinka 'Our findings support what is widely recommended, including by the WHO and CDC: Avoid or reduce to the minimum possible level the consumption of processed meats, sugary drinks and artificial trans fats,' Haile told Fox News Digital. 'Individuals who regularly consume these foods, even in small amounts, should be aware of the increased risk of chronic diseases.' Potential limitations The major limitations of this study are associated with dietary intake assessment, Haile acknowledged. 'Almost all of the included studies used food frequency questionnaires to assess intake, which can introduce measurement errors, primarily due to difficulties experienced by respondents in recalling long-term intake,' he told Fox News Digital. 5 For processed meats in particular, the researchers concluded that consuming as little as 0.6 to 57 grams per day was associated with an 11% higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. WS Studio – Several studies included in the analysis only looked at consumption at the start of the study, Haile noted — 'which might not accurately reflect the future dietary habits of the study participants.' Also, the study only looked at a limited set of health outcomes for each dietary risk factor. 'Consequently, our study may underestimate the total health loss associated with these foods,' Haile said. 'We also observed substantial variation across existing literature, which implies that high-quality research is still needed to strengthen the evidence and reduce uncertainty.' Experts cite caveats Dr. Nick Norwitz, M.D., PhD, a Harvard-educated clinical researcher and metabolic health educator, acknowledged that the study shows a 'relatively consistent association' between higher processed meat intake and worse health outcomes, but pointed out some caveats. 'These are associations — not necessarily causal relationships,' Norwitz, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. Additionally, as the researchers themselves acknowledged, the quality of the evidence was graded as 'weak,' Norwitz pointed out. 5 Consuming between 0.78 and 55 grams per day was associated with a 7% increase in colorectal cancer risk, the study found. Got Pink? – 'While these large studies have certain strengths, one key weakness is that they lump together many different foods within a single category,' the researcher went on. 'There are various ways to process meats, and not all will have the same biological consequences.' While it's 'certainly feasible' that processed meat can contribute to poor health outcomes, Norwitz said that more research is needed to confirm the meta-analysis' claims. 'At the end of the day, the office donut or bottle of soda is almost certainly doing more metabolic damage than a slice of deli turkey,' he added. A spokesperson from the American Association of Meat Processors (AAMP) sent the below statement to Fox News Digital regarding the study. 'We have not read the [full] report, but the abstract in the paper itself states that the assertions reflect 'weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence' and that more research is necessary. We would like to know how the paper defined 'processed meat,' or if the researchers weighed any supposed risks against the proven benefits of nutrients and protein found in meat.' In the study, the researchers defined processed meat as 'any meat preserved by smoking, curing, salting or the addition of chemical preservatives.' Fox News Digital also reached out to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for comment.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Weight-Loss Drugs Under Scrutiny Amid Pancreas Concerns
Popular weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Zepbound have revolutionized how we tackle obesity. But now, emerging reports about potential side effects have prompted a new investigation by UK health regulators. Hundreds of people reported experiencing severe pancreas problems after taking these drugs, according to the BBC. The UK government is now asking anyone who's been affected to contact them. They are particularly interested in understanding whether genetic factors may predispose certain individuals to such severe reactions. As always with health alerts, it's crucial to put this news into perspective. There's no clear evidence yet that these drugs are directly causing pancreas damage. Their known side effects are already well-documented and they remain approved as safe for use when prescribed and overseen by a doctor. Related: And that last part – doctor oversight – is vital: it's not safe to obtain these drugs through unofficial channels. Even if you can be sure you're getting what you asked for – which you can't – these medications aren't right for everyone. It's important to note that when any medication is taken up by a large number of people, it will inevitably reach some who will experience health issues regardless of the drugs they're on, and rare adverse reactions will likely also occur. But the sheer number of reports of acute or chronic pancreatitis warrants further examination, and the cases so far involve up to 10 fatalities. The investigation is being managed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and Genomics England. Collectively, the drugs being looked at are known as GPL-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists, because they target cells in the body usually activated by the natural GLP-1 hormone, which controls blood sugar and appetite – hence why they're used for diabetes and weight loss. These medications can be split into two types: those based on semaglutide (such as Ozempic and Wegovy), and those based on tirzepatide (including Mounjaro and Zepbound). The latter type also targets glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors, as well as GLP-1 receptors, for a stronger effect. To date, almost 400 reports of acute pancreatitis have been received from people using GLP-1 drugs such as Mounjaro, Wegovy, Ozempic, and liraglutide, as per The Guardian. Nearly half of those, 181, involve the tirzepatide-based drug sold as Mounjaro. Genetic risk is one of the factors being studied, which may mean some people are more prone to pancreatic issues. In the case of acute or chronic pancreatitis, this manifests itself as severe stomach pain that won't go away. Those in the UK aged over 18, who have a strong adverse reaction to one of these weight loss and diabetes drugs are being asked to register their details on the Yellow Card website (the official UK system for reporting issues with approved medications). From there, you'll be asked to submit more information and a saliva sample, if you're chosen to take part in a study of GLP-1 drugs and pancreatic issues. The effects of all medications have to be considered in relation to other factors, including existing health conditions, genetics, age, and sex. Even the most effective drugs can come with risks. "GLP-1 medicines like Ozempic and Wegovy have been making headlines, but like all medicines there can be a risk of serious side effects," says geneticist Matt Brown from Genomics England. "We believe there is real potential to minimize these, with many adverse reactions having a genetic cause." Common Motion Sickness Drug Being Used to Turn People Into Zombies Your Food Packaging Is Shedding Microplastics Into Every Meal, Study Reveals Your Brain on Speed: Is Watching Video in Fast-Forward Bad For Your Memory?
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Just one hot dog a day could raise disease risk, study suggests, but some cite caveats
A new meta-analysis from the University of Washington suggests that no amount of processed food is safe to consume. Researchers analyzed 77 different studies to gauge the link between certain amounts of these foods and common chronic diseases. "Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer," lead study author Demewoz Haile, a research scientist at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, told Fox News Digital. "There is no safe level of habitual consumption of these food groups, so they should not be included in our daily diet," he stated. For processed meats in particular, the researchers concluded that eating as little as 0.6 to 57 grams per day was linked to an 11% greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. Consuming between 0.78 and 55 grams per day was associated with a 7% increase in colorectal cancer risk, the study found. (One hot dog, which is made up of almost entirely processed meat, is approximately 50 grams.) The researchers also analyzed the impact of sugar-sweetened beverages, finding that drinking between 1.5 and 390 grams per day could raise type 2 diabetes risk by 8%. Consuming between 0 and 365 grams of the beverages could increase the risk of ischemic heart disease — the most common type of heart disease and a leading cause of death — by 2%, the study found. Trans fatty acids were also analyzed in the study. When the unsaturated fats made up anywhere from 0.25% to 2.56% of daily energy intake, they were linked to a 3% greater risk of ischemic heart disease. "There is no safe level of habitual consumption of these food groups." (Some examples of trans fats include crackers, cookies, baked goods, frozen pizza, coffee creamer, refrigerated dough products, and vegetable shortenings and some stick margarines, according to WebMD. Some fast foods also contain it.) The findings were published in the journal Nature Medicine on June 30. Previous studies have established the link between processed foods and chronic disease, Haile acknowledged. "However, our study evaluated the shape of the relationship with the most recent studies, using a more advanced analytical method, and objectively assessed the strength of the evidence," he noted. "Our analysis showed that the strongest association is observed at lower exposure levels equivalent to a serving or less, which implies that consuming these food items on a regular basis at any amount increases the risk of adverse health outcomes." While the researchers recognized that diet is a "personal choice" and that some may be limited in food choices, they recommend limiting or eliminating consumption of processed foods. "Our findings support what is widely recommended, including by the WHO and CDC: Avoid or reduce to the minimum possible level the consumption of processed meats, sugary drinks and artificial trans fats," Haile told Fox News Digital. "Individuals who regularly consume these foods, even in small amounts, should be aware of the increased risk of chronic diseases." The major limitations of this study are associated with dietary intake assessment, Haile acknowledged. "Almost all of the included studies used food frequency questionnaires to assess intake, which can introduce measurement errors, primarily due to difficulties experienced by respondents in recalling long-term intake," he told Fox News Digital. Several studies included in the analysis only looked at consumption at the start of the study, Haile noted — "which might not accurately reflect the future dietary habits of the study participants." Also, the study only looked at a limited set of health outcomes for each dietary risk factor. "Consequently, our study may underestimate the total health loss associated with these foods," Haile said. "We also observed substantial variation across existing literature, which implies that high-quality research is still needed to strengthen the evidence and reduce uncertainty." Dr. Nick Norwitz, M.D., PhD, a Harvard-educated clinical researcher and metabolic health educator, acknowledged that the study shows a "relatively consistent association" between higher processed meat intake and worse health outcomes, but pointed out some caveats. "These are associations — not necessarily causal relationships," Norwitz, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. Additionally, as the researchers themselves acknowledged, the quality of the evidence was graded as "weak," Norwitz pointed out. "At the end of the day, the office donut or bottle of soda is almost certainly doing more metabolic damage than a slice of deli turkey." "While these large studies have certain strengths, one key weakness is that they lump together many different foods within a single category," the researcher went on. "There are various ways to process meats, and not all will have the same biological consequences." While it's "certainly feasible" that processed meat can contribute to poor health outcomes, Norwitz said that more research is needed to confirm the meta-analysis' claims. "At the end of the day, the office donut or bottle of soda is almost certainly doing more metabolic damage than a slice of deli turkey," he added. A spokesperson from the American Association of Meat Processors (AAMP) sent the below statement to Fox News Digital regarding the study. "We have not read the [full] report, but the abstract in the paper itself states that the assertions reflect 'weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence' and that more research is necessary. We would like to know how the paper defined 'processed meat,' or if the researchers weighed any supposed risks against the proven benefits of nutrients and protein found in meat." For more Health articles, visit In the study, the researchers defined processed meat as "any meat preserved by smoking, curing, salting or the addition of chemical preservatives." Fox News Digital also reached out to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for comment.
