146 May 9 accused released by courts
However, 58 individuals accused in connection with the violent vandalism remain absconding and have yet to appear before the courts.
According to official sources within the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government, the Prosecution Department has released detailed records of the cases currently being heard in Peshawar's Anti-Terrorism Courts (ATCs) related to the May 9 and 10 events.
The prosecution's data reveals that 42 accused had been discharged by the courts while 146 individuals had been acquitted due to lack of evidence. Cases against 276 accused remain under trial in various ATCs.
The accused are facing charges at multiple police stations including Landi Kotal, Jamrud, Ghalanai, East Peshawar, Faqirabad, Khan Raziq, Hayatabad, and the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) Peshawar. Some of these cases continue to be heard in ATCs.
The ATCs have officially declared the 58 individuals evading arrest as absconders and issued non-bailable arrest warrants against them.
It is worth noting that widespread protests had broken out across the province, particularly in Peshawar, Mohmand, and Khyber, following Imran Khan's arrest.
Several incidents involved attacks on public and private properties. Consequently, hundreds of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders and workers, including many current members of the provincial assembly, were named in these cases.
According to sources, despite the passage of two years, authorities are yet to apprehend the 58 fugitives and their arrest warrants remain active.
Last year in December, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar had stated that attacks on military installations would be tried in military courts and urged the PTI to refrain from politicising or disputing the matter.
During a press conference in Islamabad, he criticised the PTI for using military courts as a political tool, aiming to create a controversy around them.
He clarified that military courts only handled cases involving attacks on the defence establishment, citing incidents such as the attacks on the Corps Commander's House, Mardan, and Bala Hisar.
"When an attack is carried out on a defence institution or its property is set ablaze, it becomes the responsibility of the relevant authorities to apprehend the culprits. Just as railway police handle crimes on railway premises, military courts address offences targeting military assets. So when attacks on military assets occur, the Military Act is enforced", he explained.
While highlighting the PTI's shifting stance, he recalled that during Imran Khan's tenure, military court trials were praised. "Statements praising military courts from the PTI's leadership are still available on social media. Yet now, the same individuals are lobbying internationally against these courts," Tarar remarked.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Opposition huddle
Listen to article There is a twinkle of hope for the opposition as it, at least, managed to gather under an umbrella and call out the government for its extra-constitutional actions. The assembling of the opposition conglomerate, nonetheless, was a telling tale of hide and seek, as the local administration in the federal capital went on a witch-hunt. This reflected the political intolerance that is now well-embedded within the ruling collation as it apparently believes in exterminating the dissent voices, and going solo in contravention of the essentials of a participatory democracy. The fact that the opposition alliance Tehreek-i-Tahafuz-i-Ayeen-i-Pakistan (TTAP) was able to come out with a strong narrative, after a long hiatus, and called for a grand dialogue and a new charter of democracy is a welcome sign. It should pave the way for reconciliation. The coalition of six opposition parties, of which the PTI is a component, was categorical in demanding an end to what they described as a "wave of fascism and political manipulation" in the country. It also offered its 'blanket support' for all anti-government protests, calling upon the authorities to release all political prisoners, including Imran Khan and Baloch dissidents. The opposition is now unanimous in calling for supremacy of the Constitution and Parliament, rule of law, independence of the judiciary, appointment of an independent Election Commission and fair elections. Likewise, setting up of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission was underscored to address in de jure terms the excesses that have been committed against the people, so that a new congenial order could emerge in the country. The call for repealing the 26th amendment and reforming the judiciary was at the bastion, as the alliance insisted that the fundamental spirit of the Constitution and distribution of powers among the organs of the state stood shattered, leading to erosion of public trust in the system. This definitely necessitates a grand dialogue, and the government would be well advised to lend an attentive ear, rather than scoffing at it in a knee-jerk reaction.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Aleema Khan says Imran's sons have applied for new NICOPs after losing their old ones
Listen to article Aleema Khan, sister of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan, has rejected claims that the former prime minister stopped his children from visiting Pakistan, clarifying that they were unable to travel after losing their National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOPs). 'Imran Khan did not stop his children from coming to Pakistan. This is a lie. They already have NICOP cards, but they were lost. His children have applied for new NICOPs and visas,' Aleema told reporters outside Adiala Jail on Saturday. A day earlier, In a statement shared on X, Aleema revealed that Sulaiman and Kasim had submitted their visa applications a few days ago. She said the High Commission had confirmed receipt of the applications and conveyed that their approval was pending with the Ministry of Interior. However, Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhry has raised questions regarding the nationality status of former prime minister Imran Khan's children, citing Aleema's earlier statement that the children hold National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOP). Responding to her post on X, Chaudhry said, 'You previously stated that the children hold NICOPs. If that is true, they do not require visas to enter Pakistan. If they do need visas, that means they are not 'Pakistani Nationals.' What is the real truth behind it all?' Read More: Imran's son's visa case takes new turn Further speaking on the matter outside Adiala Jail, Aleema added that she had the tracking numbers of the visa applications, contradicting embassy officials' claims that no such requests were made. 'It is surprising that the embassy says no applications were filed. A friend called the ambassador, who said permission was needed from the Interior Ministry. I told them to get it from Mohsin Naqvi if necessary. Later, they said the Foreign Ministry must issue the visas. Now the ambassador is not responding,' she noted, adding that in emergencies visas are usually granted within an hour. When asked about Mishal Yousafzai's appointment as senator, Aleema said, 'I don't want to waste my time discussing such people. My view is that justice should have been done. If it were about merit, many others besides Mishal Yousafzai qualified.' On the broader political climate, Aleema relayed a message from Imran Khan, saying, 'First the mandate was stolen, then democracy was undermined. The media has been silenced, and after the 26th amendment, the judiciary has been reduced to a state institution with no independent authority. Judges now only do what they are told.' She further criticised the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), comparing them to the former Q League, and accused them of continuing 'loot and plunder.' Commenting on the security situation in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, she said Imran Khan had sent a message through PTI leader Ali Amin opposing a planned operation in the province. She added that Khan believes Pakistan must maintain good relations with Afghanistan as a neighbouring country. Aleema stressed that PTI's ongoing movement is not linked to Khan's children but to his release. 'We are working for our brother's release. We have been coming to court for two years. If they want to arrest us, they can. The movement will continue until Imran Khan is free.' Also Read: PTI dismisses claims of Imran Khan barring sons from visiting Pakistan She concluded by criticising the government for barring Imran Khan's sons from entering Pakistan. 'Why is the government not allowing his sons to come? They must be given visas,' she said. Earlier this month, Khan's sister Aleema Khan had told reporters that Sulaiman and Qasim would participate in the protest movement. 'They will first go to the United States to raise awareness about the injustices faced by their father and then take part in the movement in Pakistan,' she had said. Reports also suggested that the brothers had held meetings with key individuals in the United States ahead of their possible arrival in Pakistan. However, the issue has drawn reactions from the government as well. Prime Minister's Adviser on Political Affairs Rana Sanaullah warned that Khan's sons, who reside in the United Kingdom with their mother Jemima Goldsmith, would be arrested if they participated in the protest.
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
NICOPs of Imran's sons missing, says Aleema
Incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan's sister Aleema Khan on Saturday said National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOPs) of Imran's sons were missing, hence, they had applied for NICOPs as well along visas for Pakistan. Speaking to media outside the Adiyala jail in Rawalpindi, Aleema said, 'One of the (Imran's) child has lost the NICOP, while the other has misplaced it.' She said this in response to a query that why Sulaiman and Kasim need visas when they hold NICOPs. She said NICOPs of Imran's sons were still valid for next 6-7 years. How they can snatch their right to travel to Pakistan, we have tracking numbers of their applications, she said, repudiating the claim allegedly made by some authorities that the brothers did not apply for visas at the London high commission. Aleema said they are utilising both the options to reach Pakistan to meet their father in the jail. 'If they (the authorities) wanted to grant them permission they could do so in no time,' she added. A day ago, she had said Sulaiman and Kasim have applied for Pakistani visas. In a post on X, Aleema had said, 'A few days ago Suleiman and Kasim applied for their visas with the Pakistan high commission in London. The ambassador has intimated that he is awaiting approval from the ministry of interior in Islamabad.' In a statement last week, Aleema had said that Kasim and Sulaiman held NICOPs and were expected to visit Pakistan soon to meet their imprisoned father. Imran Khan's sons appear on Piers Morgan show Speaking to reporters outside Adiala Jail, she had confirmed that both the sons of the ex-prime minister possessed valid travel documents and 'will come to see their father anytime soon.' However, she had withheld specific dates, hinting at the fluidity and uncertainty surrounding their planned visits amid a politically charged environment. Government ministers have suggested the possibility that visa refusals might prevent the young men from entering the country. But Aleema had dismissed such claims as a transparent ploy – a calculated attempt by authorities fearful that the presence of Imran's sons could galvanise public support and intensify demands for his release. 'This is nothing but political harassment and an infringement upon the rights of a Pakistani citizen,' she had lamented. 'They want to isolate my brother, weaken his morale, and prevent the masses from seeing his condition. But we will not be intimidated.' She had revealed that her sisters, Noreen Khan and Uzma Khan, were denied permission again to meet Imran. Previously, the Adiyala jail had allowed six visitors at a time; this was subsequently reduced to just two.
