Castle Rock approves controversial Pine Canyon development, annexes Colorado land into town
Hundreds of homes will be coming to Castle Rock as part of a controversial development called Pine Canyon Ranch. Up until now, the proposed Pine Canyon development was in unincorporated Douglas County but was surrounded by the town of Castle Rock. For decades, it has been a cattle ranch belonging to the Scott and now Walker family.
CBS
The land is located on both the east and west sides of Interstate 25. To the east, it is north of Scott Boulevard, south of Black Feather Trail, west of Founders Parkway and east of Front Street. West of I-25, the property is east of Prairie Hawk Drive, south of Highway 85 and bisected by Liggett Road.
At a Tuesday night meeting, the Castle Rock Town Council voted to annex the land into the town of Castle Rock and approve its development plan and zoning.
This has been a controversial development, with neighbors saying they worry about its impact on traffic and town resources. But the public was notably absent from Tuesday night's meeting, as originally there was no public comment scheduled.
CBS
After the vote, landowner Kurt Walker spoke to CBS Colorado on camera for the first time.
"What's the next step for you guys now?" CBS Colorado's Olivia Young asked Kurt Walker, Pine Canyon project manager and sixth-generation landowner.
"Take a breath!" Walker replied.
It's the yes Walker and his family have been waiting 20 years for.
"It's been a very, very long lead-up, multiple decades. We're excited and relieved to have this chapter closed," Walker said.
Most recently, Walker sought approval for the development through Douglas County, which drew outcry from neighbors and the town of Castle Rock itself, citing concerns that the development would develop solely off nonrenewable groundwater and would tax town resources without supporting them.
Ultimately, county commissioners directed the applicant to meet with the town of Castle Rock, and after months of moving through the town's process, the land Walker's family has ranched for the last 150 years will soon be officially a part of Castle Rock. It has also been greenlit for development.
"As of today, we get to be part of the fabric of the town itself and we are darn excited about integrating into the town," Walker said.
The proposed Pine Canyon Ranch will include 800 single-family homes, 1,000 multifamily homes, open space and commercial space, which could include a hotel and spa. Many community members have said it's too much.
"I'm worried about the traffic on Founders," said Laura Cavey, Castle Rock mayor pro tem. "I would love to see a little less density and some real focus on the traffic."
"Nobody wants a hotel there. Everybody I talk to thinks it's a bad idea," said Castle Rock Town Councilmember Mark Davis.
Echoing those concerns, three town councilors voted against the development plan.
"I cannot vote yes," said Castle Rock Town Councilmember Tim Deitz. "We have one shot to do this right. Basically, I don't like the fact that we would piece-meal it."
CBS
But with four councilmembers voting yes, the development plan and zoning regulations passed. The annexation passed unanimously, and a final motion to approve annexation, a vested property rights agreement, and vesting site development plans passed 6-1. The only no vote was Councilmember Deitz, who said at times he felt the town was being "held hostage" in this process.
"They're giving us all of our groundwater and we'll be able to keep our sanitation process safe going forward," said Kevin Bracken, Castle Rock town councilmember.
Bracken voted yes on the development plan, saying he was not willing to risk having the development move through the county. He and other councilmembers said it would be a "bait and switch" to reject the proposal now.
"We've worked really hard and done our due diligence to make sure it's done in the town of Castle Rock," said Jason Gray, Castle Rock mayor. "There are some things we don't love about this. At the same time, we do love that it's in the town of Castle Rock and not the county."
Walker, pledging to listen to those concerns, as development begins: "We very much appreciate those comments and we look forward to working to do exactly what was said, which was work together to find the solution that works for the entire community," Walker said.
While the project has been greenlit, the approval won't be formally official for 30 days. A town spokesperson said:
"The annexation and zoning for Pine Canyon was approved by Town Council. There is a 30-day referendum period that starts now. Following that, the applicant will provide all of their signed mylars and agreements to the town for recording. Every project is different on when final documents are signed and submitted to the town. This typically ranges from one to six months from when the annexation and zoning was approved. The annexation and zoning are effective once all final documents are signed and recorded with the Douglas County Clerk and Recorder's Office."
This approval is just the first step of a long development process. Next, site development plans will be submitted for approval. The developers say they will look at doing an updated traffic study as part of this process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
SCOOP: Blue state Republican could oppose Trump tax bill over Medicaid changes
FIRST ON FOX: A House Republican representing part of Southern California will oppose President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" if it returns to her chamber without the House's original language on Medicaid, a source familiar with her thinking told Fox News Digital. Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., is one of several moderates who are uneasy on Saturday after the Senate released updated text of the massive bill advancing Trump's agenda on tax, immigration, defense, energy, and the national debt. Two other sources told Fox News Digital that as many as 20 to 30 moderate Republicans are reaching out to Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., with serious concerns about the Senate's bill. The source familiar with Kim's thinking said, "As she's said throughout this process, 'I will continue to make clear that a budget resolution that does not protect vital Medicaid services for the most vulnerable, provide tax relief for small businesses, and address the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions will not receive my vote.'" The Senate released the nearly 1,000-page bill minutes before midnight on Friday night. It makes some notable modifications to the House's version of the bill – which passed that chamber by just one vote in May – particularly on Medicaid and green energy credits. Among their issues is the difference in provider tax rates and state-directed payments, both of which states use to help fund their share of Medicaid costs. Whereas the House bill called for freezing provider taxes at their current rates and blocking new ones from being implemented, the Senate's bill went a step further – forcing states to gradually phase down their provider tax rates to 3.5%, if they adopted the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Medicaid expansion. That would include 40 states and Washington, D.C. The Senate's most recent bill text shows that phase-down happening between 2028 and 2032. Sixteen House GOP moderates wrote a letter to congressional leaders sounding the alarm on those Medicaid provisions earlier this week. They said it "undermines the balanced approach taken to craft the Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1—particularly regarding provider taxes and state-directed payments." "The Senate version treats expansion and non-expansion states unfairly, fails to preserve existing state programs, and imposes stricter limits that do not give hospitals sufficient time to adjust to new budgetary constraints or to identify alternative funding sources," the letter read. To offset Senate Republicans' concerns about their chamber's proposed limits on state-directed payments and provider tax rates, the Senate Finance Committee included a $25 billion rural hospital fund in their legislation. It was enough to sway Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who told reporters on Saturday that he would support the bill after expressing earlier concern about the Medicaid provisions' impact on rural hospitals. But in the House, sources are signaling to Fox News Digital that moderate Republicans could still need convincing if the bill passes the Senate this weekend. It could pose problems for House GOP leaders given their thin three-vote majority, though it's worth noting that the legislation could still change before it reaches the lower chamber. But one senior House GOP aide told Fox News Digital they believe the moderates will ultimately fall in line, even if the text doesn't change. "Moderate Republicans can plead and beg with House leadership all they want – the reforms to Medicaid made in the Senate are here to stay," the senior aide said. "And ultimately, these lawmakers will roll over and vote for the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' because the wrath of President Trump is far worse than a lower provider tax." Fox News Digital reached out to Speaker Mike Johnson's office for comment. For his part, Johnson, R-La., has publicly urged the Senate on multiple occasions to change the bill as little as possible – given the fragile unity that must be struck in the House to pass it.
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Your Work Culture Deserves Tender Loving Care
. Pixabay Culture, it's been said, is how employees' hearts and stomachs feel about Monday morning on Sunday night. If you're a leader in your workplace, organizational culture is arguably the only sustainable competitive advantage that's completely within your control. Is that a big deal? As Peter Drucker famously said, 'Culture eats strategy for breakfast.' Organizational psychologist Laura Hamill has invested her career in studying culture. She was director of People Research at Microsoft and co-founded Limeade, an employee experience software company. Dr. Hamill brings both scientific rigor and practical insight to the topic of culture. Her book is The Power of Culture: Bringing Values to Life at Work . Hamill talks about what she calls the concept of cultural betrayal. 'When a company's aspirational culture differs significantly from the reality that people experience, leaders and organizations quickly lose credibility,' she says. 'People are acutely aware when leaders aren't walking the talk, and a sense of cultural betrayal can take root. Employees understandably feel resentful when what they were 'sold' about an organization is not what they receive—and this can have a significant impact on employees, especially in mission-driven companies.' Hamill says the impact of perceived cultural betrayal can run deep, generating negative feelings about the company, withdrawal behaviors (such as not participating in company meetings and events), and increased employee attrition. 'By contrast,' she says, 'when the aspirational culture is clearly articulated and consistent with what employees experience, intentional culture is alive and well. Unfortunately, many organizations tend to stop their culture work after they have posted their values on their website, not realizing that they are only at the beginning of the journey.' Laura Hamill . She also talks about power and culture. 'The value placed on power within an organization influences the extent to which power shapes its culture,' she says. 'Shared power and its distribution among leaders, managers, and employees also play a significant role in reinforcing specific aspects of culture.' Hamill says leaders are crucial in shaping organizational culture, serving as role models and culture architects. 'They must be aware of their power and intentional about their actions and communications,' she says. 'However, leaders often lack awareness of their power and how their actions, even small ones, can be misinterpreted as cues about what's valued in the organization. As 'culture megaphones,' leaders' explicit and implicit messages significantly impact the organization's values and priorities. So, to understand culture, you must also understand power.' Hamill uses the term 'intentional culture' to emphasize the importance of deliberate focus on the mindsets and behaviors that produce desired outcomes. 'Most organizations are not intentional about their culture and don't work to have an explicit connection between what they are trying to achieve and the culture they have,' she says. 'If you aren't intentional about your culture, it's unlikely that it's working to your advantage.' 'Toxic culture' seems to be a popular term these days. Is that just a new term for an old problem, or are there actually more cultures that are problematic? 'I think toxic cultures have always been around, but maybe we have more awareness about them and—thank goodness—less tolerance for them now,' Hamill says. 'Also, I think now we are articulating and sharing the impact toxic culture is having on people and organizations.' What are the tell-tale signs that an organization's culture has become toxic? There are several key indicators to watch for, Hamill says. 'One of the most obvious signs is a high turnover rate, particularly among those who have the ability to find employment elsewhere. They are often the first to leave, seeking better opportunities and a more positive work environment. However, even before employees make the decision to depart, there are early warning signs that can signal a toxic culture. You may notice withdrawal behaviors, such as a decline in participation and engagement. Employees may start to skip company meetings or events, finding reasons to avoid participating. When they do attend, they may be hesitant to speak up, ask questions, or contribute to discussions. This silence can be a red flag, suggesting that employees feel uncomfortable or unheard.' . . Hamill says another concerning indicator is a growing sense of apathy among the workforce. 'When employees lose enthusiasm for their work and seem to be merely going through the motions, it can be a sign that they have become disengaged and disconnected from the company,' she says. 'This apathy can be contagious, spreading throughout the organization and eroding morale. I look for signs in the language like using 'they' instead of 'we' when talking about the company and saying things like 'That's beyond my pay grade' or 'Not on my job description.' While these signs can be disheartening to witness, recognizing them early is crucial for addressing the underlying issues and taking steps to improve the workplace culture.' For maximum positive impact, how should an organization's culture be aligned with its operational strategy? 'Explicitly,' Hamill says. 'Effective leaders recognize the critical link between culture and business strategy. They understand that a strong, positive culture can be a powerful driver of organizational success, while a dysfunctional culture can hinder progress and performance. By aligning cultural work with the overall business strategy, leaders can ensure that the changes they implement support the company's mission, values, and goals.' Hamill says this strategic alignment helps create a culture that not only engages and empowers employees but also contributes to the organization's competitive advantage and long-term success.
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Republicans Lavish Alaska With Benefits in Policy Bill, Grasping for a Key Vote
When Senate Republicans released the latest version of their sprawling domestic policy package in the wee hours of Saturday morning, it contained a number of new provisions that might have seemed out of place — including a measure aimed at helping Alaskan whaling captains. But the seemingly random items were anything but arbitrary; they appeared to be aimed at winning the support of a critical Republican holdout whose vote could make or break the measure: Senator Lisa Murkowski. Ms. Murkowski has made no secret of her problems with her party's bill and the harm she believes it could bring to her state. Chief among her concerns were new work requirements for Medicaid recipients and a provision that would require states to pay for a share of nutrition assistance payments currently paid entirely by the federal government. 'I want to try to do what we can to address certain aspects of our entitlement spending,' Ms. Murkowski said in an interview last weekend on CBS. 'We've got to do that. But doing it with the most vulnerable bearing the brunt of that is not the answer.' As G.O.P. leaders scrounged on Saturday for the votes to pass the legislation, they seem to have addressed many of her concerns, insulating Ms. Murkowski's state from some of its most painful cuts while including an assortment of other Alaska-friendly provisions in the bill. The latest version, which leaders hoped to begin voting on as early as Saturday afternoon, would provide a new tax exemption to fishers from villages in western Alaska. There is now an exemption from new work requirements for food assistance. And several provisions have been added that would funnel federal dollars to Alaskan health care providers. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
