Thailand's Judiciary Is Flexing Its Muscles, Yet Dozens of Activists Are at the Mercy of the Courts
On July 2, 2025, Thailand's Constitutional Court suspended Paetongtarn from office as a result of a leaked phone conversation in which she was heard disparaging Thailand's military and showing deference to former the prime minister of Cambodia, Hun Sen, despite an ongoing border dispute between the two countries. Initially set for 14 days, many onlookers believe the court's suspension is likely to become permanent.
Meanwhile, far from the prime minister's office is Arnon Nampa, another Thai national whose future is at the mercy of the Thai judiciary – in this case, the Criminal Court.
Arnon, a lawyer and internationally recognised human rights defender, is one of 32 political prisoners imprisoned over 'lèse majesté,' or insulting the Thai monarchy. He is currently serving a sentence of nearly 30 years for a speech questioning the monarchy during pro-democracy protests in 2020. Unless he is both acquitted in his remaining cases and his current convictions are overturned on appeal, Arnon will likely spend the rest of his life in prison.
The plights of Paetongtarn and Arnon may seem distant. But as a historian of Thai politics, I see the cases as connected by a judiciary using the law and its power to diminish the prospects for democracy in Thailand and constrain the ability of its citizens to participate freely in society.
Familiar Troubles
The Shinawatra family is no stranger to the reach of both the Thai military and the country's courts.
Paetongtarn is the third of her family to be prime minister – and could become the third to be ousted. Her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, was removed in a 2006 military coup. Her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra, was ousted prior to the May 22, 2014, coup. In common with past coups, the juntas who fomented them were shielded from the law, with none facing prosecution.
For now, it is unclear whether Paetongtarn's suspension is the precursor to another coup, the dissolution of parliament and new elections, or a reshuffle of the cabinet. But what is clear is that the Constitutional Court's intervention is one of several in which the nine appointed judges are playing a critical role in the future of Thai democracy.
Protecting the Monarchy
The root of the judiciary's power can be found in the way the modern Thai nation was set up nearly 100 years ago.
On June 24, 1932, Thailand transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. Since then, the country has experienced 13 coups, as the country has shifted from democracy to dictatorship and back again.
But throughout, the monarchy has remained a constant presence – protected by Article 112 of the Criminal Code, which defines the crime and penalty of lese majesté: 'Whoever defames, insults, or threatens the king, queen, heir-apparent or regent shall be subject to three-to-fifteen years imprisonment.'
The law is widely feared among dissidents in Thailand both because it is interpreted broadly to include any speech or action that is not laudatory and innocent verdicts are rare.
Although Article 112 has been law since 1957, it was rarely used until after the 2006 coup.
Since then, cases have risen steadily and reached record levels following a youth-led movement for democracy in 2020. At least 281 people have been, or are currently being, prosecuted for alleged violation of Article 112, according to Thai Lawyers for Human Rights.
Challenging the Status Quo
The 2020 youth-led movement for democracy was sparked by the Constitutional Court's dissolution of the progressive Future Forward Party at the beginning of that year, the disappearance of a Thai dissident in exile in Cambodia, and economic problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
In protests in Bangkok and in provinces across the country, they called for a new election, a new constitution and an end to state repression of dissent.
On August 3, 2020, Nampa added another demand: The monarchy must be openly discussed and questioned.
Without addressing such a key, unquestionable institution in the nation, Arnon argued, the struggle for democracy would inevitably fail.
This message resonated with many Thai citizens, and despite the fearsome Article 112, protests grew throughout the last months of 2020.
Students at Thammasat University, the centre of student protest since the 1950s, expanded Arnon's call into a 10-point set of demands for reform of the monarchy.
Making it clear that they did not aim to abolish the monarchy, the students' proposal aimed to clarify the monarchy's economic, political and military role and make it truly constitutional.
As the protests began to seem unstoppable, with tens of thousands joining, the police began cracking down on demonstrations. Many were arrested for violating anti-COVID-19 measures and other minor laws. By late November 2020, however, Article 112 charges began to be brought against Arnon and other protest leaders for their peaceful speech.
In September 2023, Arnon was convicted in his first case, and he has been behind bars since. He is joined by other political prisoners, whose numbers grow weekly as their cases move through the judicial process.
Capricious Courts
Unlike Arnon, Paetongtarn Shinawatra is not facing prison.
But the Constitutional Court's decision to suspend her from her position as prime minister because of a leaked recording of an indiscreet telephone conversation is, to many legal minds, a capricious response that has the effect of short-circuiting the democratic process.
So too, I believe, does bringing the weight of the law against Arnon and other political prisoners in Thailand who remain behind bars as the current political turmoil plays out.
Tyrell Haberkorn, Professor of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Thailand's Cabinet withdraws controversial bill to legalise casinos
Thailand's Cabinet on Tuesday withdrew a controversial bill that aims to legalise casinos after the Prime Minister was suspended last week over an ethics investigation. Deputy Minister of Finance Julapun Amornvivat said the government only wants to delay the bill and will reintroduce it at an appropriate time. He cited the current political situation and the Cabinet reshuffle as factors in the decision. The bill, also known as the " entertainment complexes bill ," was first approved by the Cabinet in January and was awaiting review by lawmakers. If passed, it would allow casinos to operate within complexes that also house other businesses such as hotels, convention halls, malls or theme parks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo The bill's withdrawal came after Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended by the Constitutional Court last week after a phone call between her and a senior Cambodian leader was leaked, sparking fresh political turmoil. Paetongtarn is under an ethics investigation over accusations that she made comments that damaged Thailand's national interests to Cambodia's Senate President Hun Sen when the two discussed a recent border dispute last month. Live Events The ruling Pheu Thai Party has said the bill would help attract more investments, boost tourism and solve issues of illegal gambling. But it has faced strong opposition from the public and Pheu Thai's former coalition partner, the Bhumjaithai Party , which quit the government last month over the leaked call. Julapun said the government needed more time to explain the benefits of the bill to the public, adding that the delay was regrettable. The Pheu Thai Party, which pledged to make the country's economic woes top of its agenda, stressed that casinos would be only a small part of a larger plan to boost tourism. Tourism is the main driver of the Thai economy and has always been the focus of different administrations to improve the economy.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 hours ago
- First Post
Thai casinos take unexpected hit from PM Paentongtarn Shinawatra's suspension
The so-called 'entertainment complex' bill, which aimed to authorise casinos and position Thailand as a regional gambling hub, was shelved amid mounting political uncertainty after PM Paetongtarn's suspension from office last week read more Thailand's ruling party had been seeking to legalise gambling at casinos in the country. Image courtesy: Pixabay Thailand's cabinet on Tuesday (July 8) dropped a bill to legalise casino gambling, dealing a blow to a key initiative of the embattled ruling Pheu Thai party and its recently suspended prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra. The so-called 'entertainment complex' bill, which aimed to authorise casinos and position Thailand as a regional gambling hub, was seen as a flagship project for the Pheu Thai government. The party argued the bill would bring an existing underground gambling economy into the mainstream and help revitalise the country's sluggish economy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the proposal has now been shelved, amid mounting political uncertainty after the Constitutional Court suspended Paetongtarn from office last week. She is under investigation for an alleged ethics violation related to her handling of a territorial dispute with neighbouring Cambodia. Bill pulled amid political vacuum Government spokesperson Jirayu Huangsab said the cabinet decided to withdraw the bill because it 'needs more studies that require further understanding and social context.' Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat also acknowledged the timing was unfavourable. 'We accept it's not the appropriate time,' he told reporters. 'It's a shame, the delay is a lost opportunity for the country.' The legislation had been a controversial but central component of Pheu Thai's economic agenda. Most forms of gambling remain illegal in Thailand, but Pheu Thai had pushed the bill as a pragmatic solution to both crack down on illegal betting and attract new revenue. Leadership in limbo Paetongtarn, 38, was suspended pending a court probe into her conduct during a diplomatic call with Cambodia aimed at easing tensions over a recent border dispute. The incident followed clashes in late May that resulted in the death of a Cambodian soldier. Until the Constitutional Court completes its investigation, a process that could take weeks or months, Interior Minister Phumtham Wechayachai is serving as acting prime minister. Despite her suspension, Paetongtarn remains in the cabinet as culture minister, a position she retained following a reshuffle she approved shortly before the court ruling. The prime minister's political troubles have also left the Pheu Thai party weakened. The party holds only a razor-thin parliamentary majority after several coalition partners distanced themselves amid the growing scandal. The setback to the gambling bill underscores how Paetongtarn's suspension has complicated efforts to push forward major legislation, particularly on contentious economic reforms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Wire
10 hours ago
- The Wire
Thailand's Judiciary Is Flexing Its Muscles, Yet Dozens of Activists Are at the Mercy of the Courts
Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is currently feeling the sharp end of the country's powerful judiciary. On July 2, 2025, Thailand's Constitutional Court suspended Paetongtarn from office as a result of a leaked phone conversation in which she was heard disparaging Thailand's military and showing deference to former the prime minister of Cambodia, Hun Sen, despite an ongoing border dispute between the two countries. Initially set for 14 days, many onlookers believe the court's suspension is likely to become permanent. Meanwhile, far from the prime minister's office is Arnon Nampa, another Thai national whose future is at the mercy of the Thai judiciary – in this case, the Criminal Court. Arnon, a lawyer and internationally recognised human rights defender, is one of 32 political prisoners imprisoned over 'lèse majesté,' or insulting the Thai monarchy. He is currently serving a sentence of nearly 30 years for a speech questioning the monarchy during pro-democracy protests in 2020. Unless he is both acquitted in his remaining cases and his current convictions are overturned on appeal, Arnon will likely spend the rest of his life in prison. The plights of Paetongtarn and Arnon may seem distant. But as a historian of Thai politics, I see the cases as connected by a judiciary using the law and its power to diminish the prospects for democracy in Thailand and constrain the ability of its citizens to participate freely in society. Familiar Troubles The Shinawatra family is no stranger to the reach of both the Thai military and the country's courts. Paetongtarn is the third of her family to be prime minister – and could become the third to be ousted. Her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, was removed in a 2006 military coup. Her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra, was ousted prior to the May 22, 2014, coup. In common with past coups, the juntas who fomented them were shielded from the law, with none facing prosecution. For now, it is unclear whether Paetongtarn's suspension is the precursor to another coup, the dissolution of parliament and new elections, or a reshuffle of the cabinet. But what is clear is that the Constitutional Court's intervention is one of several in which the nine appointed judges are playing a critical role in the future of Thai democracy. Protecting the Monarchy The root of the judiciary's power can be found in the way the modern Thai nation was set up nearly 100 years ago. On June 24, 1932, Thailand transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. Since then, the country has experienced 13 coups, as the country has shifted from democracy to dictatorship and back again. But throughout, the monarchy has remained a constant presence – protected by Article 112 of the Criminal Code, which defines the crime and penalty of lese majesté: 'Whoever defames, insults, or threatens the king, queen, heir-apparent or regent shall be subject to three-to-fifteen years imprisonment.' The law is widely feared among dissidents in Thailand both because it is interpreted broadly to include any speech or action that is not laudatory and innocent verdicts are rare. Although Article 112 has been law since 1957, it was rarely used until after the 2006 coup. Since then, cases have risen steadily and reached record levels following a youth-led movement for democracy in 2020. At least 281 people have been, or are currently being, prosecuted for alleged violation of Article 112, according to Thai Lawyers for Human Rights. Challenging the Status Quo The 2020 youth-led movement for democracy was sparked by the Constitutional Court's dissolution of the progressive Future Forward Party at the beginning of that year, the disappearance of a Thai dissident in exile in Cambodia, and economic problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In protests in Bangkok and in provinces across the country, they called for a new election, a new constitution and an end to state repression of dissent. On August 3, 2020, Nampa added another demand: The monarchy must be openly discussed and questioned. Without addressing such a key, unquestionable institution in the nation, Arnon argued, the struggle for democracy would inevitably fail. This message resonated with many Thai citizens, and despite the fearsome Article 112, protests grew throughout the last months of 2020. Students at Thammasat University, the centre of student protest since the 1950s, expanded Arnon's call into a 10-point set of demands for reform of the monarchy. Making it clear that they did not aim to abolish the monarchy, the students' proposal aimed to clarify the monarchy's economic, political and military role and make it truly constitutional. As the protests began to seem unstoppable, with tens of thousands joining, the police began cracking down on demonstrations. Many were arrested for violating anti-COVID-19 measures and other minor laws. By late November 2020, however, Article 112 charges began to be brought against Arnon and other protest leaders for their peaceful speech. In September 2023, Arnon was convicted in his first case, and he has been behind bars since. He is joined by other political prisoners, whose numbers grow weekly as their cases move through the judicial process. Capricious Courts Unlike Arnon, Paetongtarn Shinawatra is not facing prison. But the Constitutional Court's decision to suspend her from her position as prime minister because of a leaked recording of an indiscreet telephone conversation is, to many legal minds, a capricious response that has the effect of short-circuiting the democratic process. So too, I believe, does bringing the weight of the law against Arnon and other political prisoners in Thailand who remain behind bars as the current political turmoil plays out. Tyrell Haberkorn, Professor of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
