"No Free Lunches": J&K Ex-Top Cop Explores 4 Reasons Behind Trump-Munir Meet
Former Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP) Shesh Paul Vaid on Thursday reacted to the recent lunch meeting between US President Donald Trump and Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal General Syed Asim Munir, stating that "there are no free lunches" and outlined four possible reasons behind the interaction.
Mr Vaid posted a video on his social media 'X' and said, "There is an idiom that there are no free lunches. Yesterday, US President Donald Trump invited Asim Munir for lunch. It's not the first time such a meeting has happened. In the past, Pakistan Army Chiefs have met US Presidents on three occasions. But those meetings occurred when the Army Chiefs had assumed the role of President of Pakistan."
Explaining his first point, Mr Vaid said, "At that time, they met the US President as the head of Pakistan. But if we look at this situation, Asim Munir has not taken over as the head of the country. Is it a hint? There are possibilities that this could happen."
There are no free lunches. Is Asim Munir seizing power in Pakistan with Trump's blessings planning to overthrow Shehbaz Sharif? Will Pakistan's air bases be handed over to the U.S. Air Force to target Shia Iranians? Or was the meeting really about Trump's family crypto interests… pic.twitter.com/tdGslZcx5T
— Shesh Paul Vaid (@spvaid) June 19, 2025
For the second reason, he speculated a personal motive.
"Trump's son runs a crypto business and has recently visited Pakistan. Could the meeting have been personal? Was it for business purposes?" Mr Vaid questioned in a video message.
He suggested a third possibility, saying, "The US may need airbases in Pakistan to maintain control over Iran."
Lastly, Mr Vaid pointed to speculation around former Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, who is currently in jail.
"The fourth reason could be concerns regarding Imran Khan. He is a popular leader, and the issue might have been raised. Only time will reveal the true motive," he concluded.
On Wednesday, Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal General Syed Asim Munir, at the White House. Discussions reportedly included the escalating Iran-Israel conflict and broader regional security.
Speaking later at a White House event, Trump said, "Well, I stopped a war between Pakistan... I love Pakistan... and I think Modi is a fantastic man... I spoke to him last night... I think we are going to have a trade deal with Modi of India... but I stopped a war between Pakistan and India. This man (Munir) was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistani side...Modi from the Indian side."
However, after the meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a 35-minute phone call with Trump, firmly stating that the ceasefire following the May 7-10 military standoff had been achieved through direct communication between the Indian and Pakistani militaries, without any external mediation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran to meet European leaders for renewed nuclear talks amid threats of UN sanctions
The meeting, set to take place in Istanbul, will be the first since Israel's mid-June attack on Iran, which sparked a 12-day war and targeted key nuclear and military sites. read more People walk past a mural drawn by the "Grafitiyul" graffiti art group depicting Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on a street in the Israeli coastal city of Tel Aviv on July 22, 2025. AFP Iranian diplomats will meet counterparts from Germany, Britain and France on Friday for renewed nuclear talks, amid warnings that the three European powers could trigger 'snapback' sanctions outlined under the 2015 deal. The meeting, set to take place in Istanbul, will be the first since Israel's mid-June attack on Iran, which sparked a 12-day war and targeted key nuclear and military sites. Israel's offensive – which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others as residential areas were struck as well – also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger the 'snapback mechanism', which would reinstate United Nations sanctions on Iran by the end of August, under the effectively moribund 2015 nuclear deal. The option to trigger the snapback expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. 'Inaction by the E3 is not an option,' a European source said, noting that Tehran would be reminded during the meeting that the snapback window closes this autumn. The source said Europeans are preparing to trigger the mechanism 'in the absence of a negotiated solution' and called on Iran to make 'clear gestures' regarding uranium enrichment and the resumption of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who will attend the talks Friday, alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, warned this week that triggering sanctions 'is completely illegal'. He also accused European powers of 'halting their commitments' to the deal after the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation,' said Gharibabadi. Sanctions Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions are reimposed. Restoring sanctions would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the United States itself struck Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, Washington and Tehran were divided over uranium enrichment, which Iran has described as a 'non-negotiable' right, while the United States called it a 'red line'. The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity – far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons – a charge Tehran has consistently denied. 'National pride' Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, which Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called a source of 'national pride'. 'Especially after the recent war, it is important for them to understand that the Islamic Republic of Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue. We will not give up this right of the Iranian people,' Araghchi said on the eve of the Istanbul talks. The full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Trump has claimed the sites were 'completely destroyed', but US media reports have cast doubt over the scale of destruction. Araghchi has noted that enrichment is currently 'stopped' due to 'serious and severe' damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes. Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country, but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a 'new form'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability. Iran has pledged a 'harsh response' to any future attacks.
India.com
14 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump Makes Surprise Pivot On Elon Musk, Says Want Him To Thrive Like Never Before
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump clarified on Thursday that he supports Elon Musk and wants his companies to "thrive." He emphasized that he wants all American businesses to "thrive like never before," amid speculation of a fallout between the two after Musk criticized Trump's major tax and domestic policy bill. In a post on Truth Social, Trump addressed circulating claims that he may withdraw federal support for Musk's companies, Tesla and SpaceX. "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large-scale subsidies he receives from the US government. This is not so!" Trump wrote. "I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!" He went on to highlight how the prosperity of Musk's companies could benefit the nation overall. "The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us," Trump added, noting that the country is "setting records every day," and he intends to continue on that path. Earlier this month, tensions flared when Trump dismissed Musk's launch of a new political outfit, the America Party, calling the move 'ridiculous.' "It's ridiculous to start a third party. We have tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system. Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous," Trump told reporters, according to media sources. Meanwhile, Musk on Wednesday cautioned his investors about the possibility of US policy changes that could reduce support for electric vehicles, a move that he said might result in "a few rough quarters" for the company.
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre
The Union government has no plans or intention to remove the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble to the Constitution, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal told Parliament on Thursday. Meghwal acknowledged that 'certain groups' were seeking the removal of the two words from the Preamble. 'Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions,' Meghwal told Rajya Sabha. The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment. In November, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Subramanian Swamy and Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, in addition to a separate plea by a man named Balram Singh, challenging the 1976 amendment. Citing this ruling, the Union law minister said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.' The court had said in its order that there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later. The minister's response to Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman's questions in the Rajya Sabha came about a month after a political row erupted about the inclusion of the words in the Constitution. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in June called for a review of the two terms. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling BJP. A day after the comment by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, Jagdeep Dhankhar, the vice president at the time, had said that the addition of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency was a ' sacrilege to the spirit of sanatana '. Sanatana dharma is a term some people use as a synonym for Hinduism. Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had also voiced their support for a review. Chouhan had claimed that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' are not core to Indian culture and called for a discussion on their removal from the Constitution. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had criticised the RSS for seeking a review of the two words in the Preamble, saying that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '. In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted. In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble
