logo
Australian woman found guilty of triple murder with toxic mushrooms

Australian woman found guilty of triple murder with toxic mushrooms

Sinar Daily6 hours ago
MORWELL - An Australian woman murdered her husband's parents and aunt by lacing their beef Wellington lunch with toxic mushrooms, a jury found Monday at the climax of a trial watched around the world.
Keen home cook Erin Patterson hosted an intimate meal in July 2023 that started with good-natured banter and earnest prayer -- but ended with three guests dead.
Throughout a trial lasting more than two months, Patterson maintained the beef-and-pastry dish was accidentally poisoned with death cap mushrooms, the world's most-lethal fungus.
But a 12-person jury on Monday found the 50-year-old guilty of triple murder.
She was also found guilty of attempting to murder a fourth guest who survived.
The trial has drawn podcasters, film crews and true crime fans to the rural town of Morwell, a sedate hamlet in the state of Victoria better known for prize-winning roses.
Newspapers from New York to New Delhi have followed every twist of what many now simply call the "mushroom murders".
On July 29, 2023, Patterson set the table for an intimate family meal at her tree-shaded country property. This photo taken on June 17, 2025 shows people in a Melbourne laneway walking past a mural by street artist Jarrod Grech of Erin Patterson, an Australian woman accused of murdering three members of her husband's family with a toxic mushroom-laced beef Wellington lunch. - (Photo by WILLIAM WEST / AFP)
Her lunch guests that afternoon were Don and Gail Patterson, the elderly parents of her long-estranged husband Simon.
Places were also set for Simon's maternal aunt Heather and her husband Ian, a well-known pastor at the local Baptist church.
Husband Simon was urged to come but he declined because he felt "uncomfortable".
In the background, Patterson's relationship with Simon was starting to turn sour.
The pair -- still legally married -- had been fighting over Simon's child support contributions.
Patterson forked out for expensive cuts of beef, which she slathered in a duxelles of minced mushrooms and wrapped in pastry to make individual parcels of beef Wellington.
Guests said grace before tucking in -- and prayed once more after eating -- with Heather later gushing about the "delicious and beautiful" meal.
Death cap mushrooms are easily mistaken for other edible varieties, and reportedly possess a sweet taste that belies their potent toxicity.
- 'Not survivable' -
The guests' blood was soon coursing with deadly amatoxin, a poison produced by the death cap mushrooms known to sprout under the oak trees of Victoria.
Don, Gail and Heather died of organ failure within a week.
"It was very apparent that this was not survivable," intensive care specialist Stephen Warrillow told the trial.
Detectives soon found signs that Patterson -- herself a true crime buff -- had dished up the meal with murderous intent.
Patterson told guests she had received a cancer diagnosis and needed advice on breaking the news to her children, prosecutors alleged.
But medical records showed Patterson received no such diagnosis.
The prosecution said this was a lie cooked up to lure the diners to her table.
She also lied about owning a food dehydrator which police later found dumped in a rubbish tip.
Forensic tests found the appliance contained traces of the fatal fungi.
"I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Patterson told the trial.
A computer seized from her house had browsed a website pinpointing death cap mushrooms spotted a short drive from her house a year before the lunch, police said.
- 'Super sleuth' - Death caps are the most lethal mushrooms on the planet, responsible for some 90 per cent of all fatalities due to consuming toxic fungi.
Baptist preacher Ian Wilkinson was the only guest to survive, pulling through after weeks in hospital.
He told the court how guests' meals were served on four gray plates, while Patterson ate from a smaller orange dish.
But he could not explain why Patterson wanted him dead.
Patterson was a devoted mother-of-two with an active interest in her tight-knit community, volunteering to edit the village newsletter and film church services.
She was also a well-known true crime buff, joining a Facebook group to chew over details from infamous Australian murders.
Friend Christine Hunt told the jury Patterson had a reputation as "a bit of a super sleuth".
Patterson said the meal was accidentally contaminated with death cap mushrooms, but maintained through her lawyers it was nothing more than a "terrible accident".
"She didn't do it deliberately. She didn't do it intentionally," defence lawyer Colin Mandy told the trial.
"She denies that she ever deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms."
The trial heard from doctors, detectives, computer experts and mushroom specialists as it picked apart the beef Wellington lunch in forensic detail.
Confronted with countless hours of intricate expert testimony, it took the jury a week to judge Patterson guilty.
She will be sentenced at a later date. - William West
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bangladesh lawyers challenge ex-PM Hasina's murder trial charges
Bangladesh lawyers challenge ex-PM Hasina's murder trial charges

The Sun

time35 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Bangladesh lawyers challenge ex-PM Hasina's murder trial charges

DHAKA: State-appointed defence lawyers for Bangladesh's former prime minister Sheikh Hasina have moved to dismiss the charges against her in an ongoing crimes against humanity trial. The case stems from a violent crackdown on protesters last year, which reportedly left up to 1,400 dead. Sheikh Hasina, 77, fled to India following a student-led uprising in August 2024 and has refused to return to Dhaka for the trial, which began in absentia on June 1. Defence lawyer Md Amir Hossain argued that the charges were 'false, fabricated and politically motivated,' though he admitted he had not communicated directly with the former leader. Prosecutors allege Hasina bore command responsibility for the violence, filing five charges including failure to prevent mass murder, which qualify as crimes against humanity under Bangladeshi law. The trial is set to resume on July 10. This development follows Hasina's recent six-month sentence for contempt of court in a separate case on July 2. The UN has documented the deaths during last year's unrest, adding international scrutiny to the proceedings. - AFP

Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury
Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury

A month into the trial of the Australian woman accused of murdering three of her estranged husband's elderly relatives with poisonous mushrooms, her barrister Colin Mandy stood and delivered one of the case's pivotal moments. "The defence will call Erin Patterson," Mandy told the court. Patterson, who was convicted on Monday of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, was the only witness for her defence in a 10-week trial that gripped Australia. She told the court she had a loving relationship with the three people who died, including her mother and father-in-law, saying they were all she had in a frequently troubled life. In fact, she murdered three of them and attempted to kill a fourth by slipping lethal death cap mushrooms into individual Beef Wellingtons she served at a July 2023 lunch, a jury found. An alleged murderer testifying as a witness in their own defence is a rare strategy and normally a last resort, said Nicholas Papas, a veteran criminal barrister based in Melbourne who frequently acts in murder trials. "The risk is that when you call your client, then suddenly people start focusing on your client," he said. Patterson's decision also opened her up to five days of tense cross-examination by prosecutor Nanette Rogers, with whom she repeatedly clashed over minor details. Patterson's version of events – that she had included the deadly mushrooms by accident and she had not died herself after eating the tainted meal due to an eating disorder – was rejected by the jury as unreliable. "You're actually putting (the case) in the hands of your client, and lawyers don't tend to want to necessarily do that," Papas said. "We like to control the process if we can." Patterson, 50, grew up Melbourne, the daughter of an academic. She qualified as an air traffic controller and had been accepted to study nursing at the time of her arrest, after a life marred by a tempestuous marriage and problems with her weight and low self-esteem, the court heard. In her own testimony, she hinted at a strained relationship with her now-deceased parents, who were "in Russia, on a train" on her wedding day in 2007, she told the court. During a 2009 road-trip across Australia with her estranged husband Simon, she left abruptly in one of their many separations, leaving him alone with their son, then only a few months old. She frequently wept as she spoke of her close bond with the Patterson family, including her father-in-law, Don, with whom she shared a love of learning, she said. The judge presiding in the case, Justice Christopher Beale, instructed the jury that Patterson could only be found guilty if they rejected her testimony, which they did unanimously. Patterson initially told police she had bought the mushrooms used in the meal from a local supermarket, before then saying she had got them from an Asian grocer in Melbourne. A 2023 search of Asian grocers in the city found no evidence death cap mushrooms had been sold. During the trial, Patterson said she may have foraged for the mushrooms but did not ultimately know where they had come from. She had also lied about a cancer diagnosis to her guests because she was embarrassed to admit she was actually having gastric band surgery, Patterson said in evidence. She told the court she wanted her relatives' advice and assistance with looking after her two children while she had the surgery, and named a clinic in Melbourne that was later found never to have offered the procedure. From the wood-panelled dock at the back of Court 4 at the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court in Morwell, where Patterson sat for most of the trial, she stared intently at the jury as they entered and exited the courtroom. Flanked by two custody officers, she appeared alert but relaxed during the proceedings, occasionally donning a pair of black-rimmed spectacles to study evidence on a court-issued tablet. The prosecution offered no motive for Patterson's decision to murder her in-laws. Under Australian law, it did not have to prove one to secure a conviction. Patterson will be sentenced at a later date, at a hearing that will consider the reasons for her offending. For now, the only person who truly knows why she poisoned the lunch is Erin Patterson herself.

Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury
Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's decision to testify fails to convince jury

MORWELL, Australia (Reuters) -A month into the trial of the Australian woman accused of murdering three of her estranged husband's elderly relatives with poisonous mushrooms, her barrister Colin Mandy stood and delivered one of the case's pivotal moments. 'The defence will call Erin Patterson,' Mandy told the court. Patterson, who was convicted on Monday of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, was the only witness for her defence in a 10-week trial that gripped Australia. She told the court she had a loving relationship with the three people who died, including her mother and father-in-law, saying they were all she had in a frequently troubled life. In fact, she murdered three of them and attempted to kill a fourth by slipping lethal death cap mushrooms into individual Beef Wellingtons she served at a July 2023 lunch, a jury found. An alleged murderer testifying as a witness in their own defence is a rare strategy and normally a last resort, said Nicholas Papas, a veteran criminal barrister based in Melbourne who frequently acts in murder trials. 'The risk is that when you call your client, then suddenly people start focusing on your client,' he said. Patterson's decision also opened her up to five days of tense cross-examination by prosecutor Nanette Rogers, with whom she repeatedly clashed over minor details. Patterson's version of events – that she had included the deadly mushrooms by accident and she had not died herself after eating the tainted meal due to an eating disorder – was rejected by the jury as unreliable. 'You're actually putting (the case) in the hands of your client, and lawyers don't tend to want to necessarily do that,' Papas said. 'We like to control the process if we can.' TROUBLED LIFE Patterson, 50, grew up Melbourne, the daughter of an academic. She qualified as an air traffic controller and had been accepted to study nursing at the time of her arrest, after a life marred by a tempestuous marriage and problems with her weight and low self-esteem, the court heard. In her own testimony, she hinted at a strained relationship with her now-deceased parents, who were 'in Russia, on a train' on her wedding day in 2007, she told the court. During a 2009 road-trip across Australia with her estranged husband Simon, she left abruptly in one of their many separations, leaving him alone with their son, then only a few months old. She frequently wept as she spoke of her close bond with the Patterson family, including her father-in-law, Don, with whom she shared a love of learning, she said. The judge presiding in the case, Justice Christopher Beale, instructed the jury that Patterson could only be found guilty if they rejected her testimony, which they did unanimously. Patterson initially told police she had bought the mushrooms used in the meal from a local supermarket, before then saying she had got them from an Asian grocer in Melbourne. A 2023 search of Asian grocers in the city found no evidence death cap mushrooms had been sold. During the trial, Patterson said she may have foraged for the mushrooms but did not ultimately know where they had come from. She had also lied about a cancer diagnosis to her guests because she was embarrassed to admit she was actually having gastric band surgery, Patterson said in evidence. She told the court she wanted her relatives' advice and assistance with looking after her two children while she had the surgery, and named a clinic in Melbourne that was later found never to have offered the procedure. From the wood-panelled dock at the back of Court 4 at the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court in Morwell, where Patterson sat for most of the trial, she stared intently at the jury as they entered and exited the courtroom. Flanked by two custody officers, she appeared alert but relaxed during the proceedings, occasionally donning a pair of black-rimmed spectacles to study evidence on a court-issued tablet. The prosecution offered no motive for Patterson's decision to murder her in-laws. Under Australian law, it did not have to prove one to secure a conviction. Patterson will be sentenced at a later date, at a hearing that will consider the reasons for her offending. For now, the only person who truly knows why she poisoned the lunch is Erin Patterson herself. (Reporting by Alasdair Pal in Morwell; Editing by Kate Mayberry)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store