Tax hike fears mount after government borrowing jumps in May
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said borrowing surged to £17.7 billion last month, the second highest figure on record for May, surpassed only at the height of Covid.
May borrowing was £700 million higher than a year earlier, though it was slightly less than the £18 billion most economists had been expecting.
The higher borrowing came in spite of a surge in the tax take from national insurance after Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employer contributions in April.
The decision, which was announced in last autumn's budget, has seen wage costs soar for firms across the UK as they also faced a minimum wage rise in the same month.
Experts warned the higher borrowing figures raised the chances of tax hikes to come in the budget later this year, with Ms Reeves under pressure to balance the books amid rising borrowing and her spending commitments.
Thomas Pugh, economist at audit and consulting firm RSM UK, said he is pencilling in tax increases of between £10 billion and £20 billion.
He said: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9 billion of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.
'Throw in the tough outlook for many Government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending and the Chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.'
Danni Hewson, AJ Bell head of financial analysis, said the borrowing figures 'will only add to speculation that the Chancellor will have to announce more spending cuts or further tax increases at the next budget if she wants to meet her fiscal rules and pay for her spending plans'.
'One big shock could wipe out any headroom Rachel Reeves might have, and there are still question marks about how much of GDP (gross domestic product) should be spent on defence and where the money is going to come from,' she added.
Borrowing for the first two months of the financial year to date was £37.7 billion, £1.6 billion more than the same two-month period in 2024, according to the ONS.
The data showed so-called compulsory social contributions, largely made up of national insurance contributions (NICs), jumped by £3.9 billion or 14.7% to a record £30.2 billion in April and May combined.
Rob Doody, deputy director for public sector finances, said: 'While receipts were up, thanks partly to higher income tax revenue and national insurance contributions, spending was up more, affected by increased running costs and inflation-linked uplifts to many benefits.'
While May's borrowing out-turn was lower than economists were expecting, it was more than the £17.1 billion pencilled in by the UK's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), in March.
The figures showed that central government tax receipts in May increased by £3.5 billion to £61.7 billion, while higher NICs saw social contributions rise by £1.8 billion to £15.1 billion last month alone.
Public sector net debt, excluding public sector banks, stood at £2.87 trillion at the end of May and was estimated at 96.4% of GDP, which was 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s.
The ONS said the sale of the final tranche of taxpayer shares in NatWest, formerly Royal Bank of Scotland, cut net debt by £800 million last month, but did not have an impact on borrowing in the month.
Interest payments on debt, which are linked to inflation, fell £700 million to £7.6 million due to previous falls in the Retail Prices Index (RPI).
But recent rises in RPI are expected to see debt interest payments race higher in June.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones insisted the Government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'.
'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
37 minutes ago
- Metro
Everything we know so far about the welfare bill vote
Later today, MPs will vote for the first time on plans to reform the UK's welfare system. It's not a moment government ministers are likely to be looking forward to. These plans, which will mainly affect recipients of Universal Credit and the Personal Independence Payment, have been controversial from the start. They were first unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall in March, shortly before Chancellor Rachel Reeves made them a central element of her spring statement. Both argued cuts were badly needed to secure the future of the welfare state as costs continue to balloon, and that those on benefits needed to be encouraged into work. But many emboldened Labour MPs said they could not face voting to cut off support for those who need it. A rebellion of more than 120 backbenchers appears to have been staved off by a raft of concessions made last week, but Sir Keir Starmer is still facing one of the trickiest votes since he became PM almost exactly a year ago. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Here's all we know about the bill ahead of the second reading vote this evening. The full name of the bill that will be debated today is hefty: it's called the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. That name, though, gets to the heart of the changes that are being proposed. If enacted, the legislation would make two of the headline changes announced earlier this year. In order to get PIP, which is meant to help pay for the additional costs faced by people with disabilities, would-be recipients are assessed on how much assistance they need for everyday tasks. The person is rated on a points scale of 0 to 12. At the moment, they would need a score of eight or more across the range of tasks to qualify. Citizens Advice has more information here. If the bill goes ahead, there would be an additional requirement that the person must score at least four on at least one of the tasks to qualify. That won't apply to everyone after changes announced by the government last week, though – find more on those details below. There are two parts to Universal Credit – the standard allowance, which is for all recipients, and the health element, for people with disabilities and health conditions that affect their ability to work. Under the new bill, the standard allowance would increase above inflation for the next four years. However, the health element would be halved for new recipients from April 2026 and then frozen for the next four years. The government argues this would 'support people towards work, address perverse incentives and to start to improve basic adequacy'. Facing the very real possibility of a Labour rebellion dooming a major government bill, government figures held crisis talks with MPs last week. The results of those talks were revealed in full yesterday. They include concessions on both the PIP and UC parts of the bill. First, PIP: the changes mean the additional requirement outlined above would not apply to current recipients, who would continue to get their payment under the old terms. Only new claimants from November 2026 onwards would be assessed according to the new requirements. A consultation into PIP would also take place, to be published next autumn. For UC, Liz Kendall told MPs yesterday that current recipients of the health top-up would see their income – combined with the standard allowance – rise at least in line with inflation for the rest of the Parliament. The same would also go for new claimants with severe lifelong health conditions and those at the end of life. Her announcement responded to concerns over the effects of a proposed freeze on the health top-up for current claimants – though Kendall did not explicitly say this freeze would not go ahead. Longstanding Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier led the first 'reasoned amendment' which aimed to stop the bill in its tracks, gaining a lot of traction last week. At its peak, more than 120 backbenchers from the party were signed onto it. That figure was enough to overturn the government's huge majority. Among them were seasoned rebels from the left of the party, including Richard Burgon and Nadia Whittome, as well as those who are typically more loyal, such as Sarah Owen and Dame Meg. The signatories also included one former government minister: former Transport Secretary Louise Haigh. More Trending Many of the rebels thought the vote today would be pulled, but instead the concessions outlined above were made. They appear to have won around enough MPs to ensure the bill will pass its second reading. But lots could still vote against, and several are also expected to abstain. The exact numbers will make a big difference to how things pan out. If the bill is rejected in today's vote – held on the first day of Disability Pride Month – the government will have to go back to the drawing board in its effort to reform the welfare system. But just as significantly, the leadership of Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves would take a massive hit and the government would be plunged into a serious crisis. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Benefit cuts will push 150,000 people into poverty despite U-turn, government admits MORE: Streeting tells Israel to 'get your own house in order' over Glastonbury criticism MORE: I'll be watching Kneecap's prime time Glastonbury set – they deserve to be there
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
What Rachel Reeves' cut to ISA allowances will do to your savings
Rachel Reeves is expected to announce plans to reduce the annual allowance for cash ISAs in her Mansion House speech on 15 July. The proposed reform aims to encourage individuals to invest more and achieve better long-term returns, rather than solely holding cash. While the overall £20,000 tax -free ISA allowance will not be cut, the specific limit for cash ISAs is under discussion, marking the first major alteration since 2017-18. The move has drawn criticism, with Martin Lewis stating it could lead to more tax for ordinary savers and expressing concern that it might not effectively encourage investment. Industry voices like AJ Bell advocate for broader reforms, such as simplifying the ISA landscape and removing stamp duty, to genuinely encourage investment rather than just cutting Cash ISA limits.
Glasgow Times
43 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'
The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15. The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet. 'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them. 'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach. 'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors. 'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.' The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments. The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit. 'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products. 'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either. 'People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset. 'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals. 'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.' Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone. 'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year. 'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.' He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares. 'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.' But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. 'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.' In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year. In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now. Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.' The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas. While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide. Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations. 'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
