logo
Doc Talk Podcast: Oscar Winner Mstyslav Chernov On Being In The Oval Office When Trump Berated Zelensky, Plus CPH:DOX's Niklas Engstrøm On Europe's Trump Dilemma

Doc Talk Podcast: Oscar Winner Mstyslav Chernov On Being In The Oval Office When Trump Berated Zelensky, Plus CPH:DOX's Niklas Engstrøm On Europe's Trump Dilemma

Yahoo01-04-2025
The scene shocked the world: President Donald Trump inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the Oval Office on February 28, only to verbally attack him in front of the media and accuse him of fomenting World War III. Vice President J.D. Vance, eager to please his boss, dressed down Zelensky over what he considered his unsuitable attire.
It turns out Oscar-winning filmmaker Mstyslav Chernov was in the Oval Office with the Ukrainian leader on that stunning day. He joins the latest edition of Deadline's Doc Talk podcast to share his reaction to the shocking exchange that saw Zelensky ejected from the White House. He says the response by the Ukrainian people to that disrespectful treatment may come as a surprise to Trump and his Veep.
More from Deadline
'This Is Going To Be Great Television': Trump Creates Yet Another Shocking Oval Office Moment, But This Time The Stakes Could Not Be Higher
Doc Talk Podcast Debates Oscar Results And Travels To The True/False Film Fest
A Star Is Born In 'Flophouse America': Captivating Mikal Navigates Poverty And His Parents' Drinking In CPH:DOX World Premiere
Chernov, who won the Academy Award a year ago for his documentary 20 Days in Mariupol, tells us about his new film, 2000 Meters to Andriivka, also set in wartime Ukraine. The feature doc, which just won the F:ACT Award at CPH:DOX in Copenhagen, goes into the trenches with Ukrainian soldiers as they try to retake a village seized by Russian invaders.
At CPH:DOX we also talk with festival artistic director Niklas Engstrøm, an architect behind CPH:DOX's rise to becoming one of the world's most important nonfiction cinematic showcases. Engstrøm explains how the festival presciently chose human rights as the theme of this year's event months before the U.S. presidential election that returned Trump to office, where the president has made 'power … the only really important thing in international politics,' in Engstrøm's words.
He describes the times we're living in as 'scary' and says Europe is reacting with alarm to Trump's efforts to remake the world order – strengthening ties with Russia at the apparent expense of America's NATO allies. Engstrøm characterizes the souring of the relationship between the U.S. and Europe as the end of an 80-year marriage.
That's on the new episode of Doc Talk, hosted by Oscar winner John Ridley (12 Years a Slave, Shirley) and Matt Carey, Deadline's documentary editor. The pod is a production of Deadline and Ridley's Nō Studios.
Listen to the episode above or on major podcast platforms including Spotify, iHeart and Apple.
Best of Deadline
'The White Lotus' Season 3 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Arrive On Max?
'The White Lotus' Season 3: Everything We Know About The Cast, Premiere Date & More
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Senate report on Trump assassination attempt calls for more severe disciplinary action
New Senate report on Trump assassination attempt calls for more severe disciplinary action

CNBC

time31 minutes ago

  • CNBC

New Senate report on Trump assassination attempt calls for more severe disciplinary action

A new Senate report on the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last summer has revealed "multiple, unacceptable failures" in the U.S. Secret Service's planning and response, and called for more severe disciplinary action. Trump, then a presidential candidate, was grazed by a bullet during the rally as 20-year-old gunman Thomas Crooks fired eight shots. One attendee, Corey Comperatore, was killed, and two others were injured. A sniper subsequently killed the gunman, but the attack prompted questions about how Crooks was able to avoid detection by the country's top protective agency for nearly 45 minutes. "What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation," stated the report released Sunday by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Last December, a House task force investigating the incident made nearly a dozen recommendations for the Secret Service in a 180-page report that determined the shooting was "preventable." The latest report details a series of breakdowns that reveal "a disturbing pattern of communication failure and negligence that culminated in a preventable tragedy." It said the USSS became aware of a suspicious individual "nearly 45 minutes before shots were fired, and failed to act." Despite advance knowledge of line-of-sight vulnerabilities at the venue, officials did not address them, the report said, adding the agency assigned an inexperienced operator to oversee counter-unmanned aerial systems and that USSS headquarters "denied or left-unfulfilled at least 10 requests" by the Donald Trump Division for additional resources, including countersniper personnel. Last July, six Secret Service employees were suspended without pay, an agency official told NBC News last week. The suspensions ranged from 10 to 42 days without pay. It is unclear when the agents were formally suspended. Less than two weeks after the incident, Kimberly Cheatle stepped down as director of the Secret Service amid bipartisan calls for her resignation. At the time, she said she took "full responsibility for the security lapse." But the report also criticized the agency for "insufficient accountability" following the attack. "Not a single person has been fired," it said. "The Committee believes more than six individuals should have received disciplinary action as a result of their action (or inaction) on July 13, 2024. Those who were disciplined received penalties far too weak to match the severity of the failures." Investigators also found that the Secret Service "denied or left unfulfilled" multiple requests for additional staff, assets and resources to protect Trump. "This was not a single error. It was a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life," it said. "The American people deserve better." On Saturday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, released a separate Government Accountability Office report saying the USSS "failed to implement security measures that could have prevented the assassination attempt." "Prior to the July 13 rally, senior-level Secret Service officials became aware of a threat to then-former President Trump," the GAO report said. "This information was not specific to the July 13 rally or gunman. Nonetheless, due to the Secret Service's siloed practice for sharing classified threat information, Secret Service and local law enforcement personnel central to developing site security plans for the rally were unaware of the threat." In an interview with ABC News before she resigned, Cheatle said there was a "short period" of time between when the gunman was initially flagged as suspicious and when he began shooting. December's House investigation praised the response of the Secret Service to the second assassination attempt on Trump in September in West Palm Beach, Florida, crediting it for demonstrating "how properly executed protective measures can foil an attempted assassination."

Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class
Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said it was 'agonizing' to vote for the tax cut bill President Trump signed on July 4. As details of the legislation come into focus, it's obvious why it might cause heartburn even for Republicans who passed it, with no Democratic votes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as the law is clumsily known, will literally make the rich better off and the poor worse off. Some conservatives who want to pare the 'welfare state' may not care. But imposing austerity on millions of working-class voters is a stunning political risk for a party that is supposedly following President Trump's populist instincts. The law has two main elements. The first is a sweeping series of tax cuts and tax cut extensions that will generally benefit everybody but add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The second is a set of benefit cuts that are meant to reduce the overall cost of the bill. Those will hit working-class Americans and make the net effect of the bill punishing to them. The biggest part of the OBBBA is an extension of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017. Those were due to expire at the end of this year. The OBBBA makes the current individual income tax rates permanent. Those are not 'tax cuts' per se, since tax rates will be the same in future years as they are in 2025. But the law does prevent what would have been a de facto tax hike if the 2017 rates expired and the higher 2016 rates went back into effect. The law also includes some new tax breaks, such as the elimination of tax on income from tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. There's also a new tax break for some seniors and a much higher cap for deducting state and local taxes, which will mostly benefit wealthy homeowners who itemize deductions on their tax returns. The tax provisions generally benefit everybody, but the wealthy will gain the most. The average savings for all taxpayers will be about $2,900, compared with what the tax bill would have been if current rates expired, according to the Tax Policy Center. Those with incomes above $1 million would save nearly $60,000 on average. But the savings for workers with incomes below $30,000 would be less than $200 per year. Those provisions, at least, do no harm to most taxpayers. But the harm arrives when factoring in cuts to Medicaid, subsidies for people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, and food aid known as SNAP. The healthcare cutbacks will leave an additional 16 million people without coverage by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Cutbacks to the SNAP program could reduce or eliminate food aid going to 22 million families, according to the Urban Institute. Those changes will leave millions of Americans worse off. When accounting for the tax changes and benefit cuts combined, people in the lowest income quintile, with incomes below $13,500, will lose an average of $600 per year, according to the Yale Budget Lab. The next quintile will lose $65 per year. The healthcare and food aid cuts will have little impact on top earners, for obvious reasons. The top quintile will gain $6,500 in after-tax savings from all of the law's provisions, while the top 1% will net more than $30,000. This is what economists call a 'regressive' policy change because the economic burden falls more heavily on those with lower incomes. 'The bill has four overriding characteristics,' Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center wrote recently. 'It is regressive, expensive, complicated, and it treats people who make roughly the same amount of money in very different ways.'Tax cut defenders often point out that the wealthy typically get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the most taxes in the first place. That's generally true. But the wealthy are a distinct minority, which means a regressive law such as the OBBBA dis-serves millions of voters, and possibly a majority of them. The bottom two income quintiles, for instance, include roughly 92 million taxpaying units, whether singles, married couples, or other designations. There are only 26 million taxpaying units in the top quintile. Maybe that's what Murkowski found so agonizing. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter on July 2. 'I know in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' Trump can point to working-class provisions such as the elimination of taxes on tip income and overtime pay, with limitations based on the type of work and the amount of income. Some workers will in fact benefit from those carve-outs. But tax analysts argue that favoring certain types of work in that manner violates the principle of 'horizontal equity,' the idea that similar incomes should be taxed in similar ways. To use the example of a restaurant, a waiter earning tip income would get a tax break that a cook paid hourly would not. That distorts the tax code, creates incentives to cheat, and generates legitimate grievances among the unlucky workers not gifted a tax break. The OBBBA is already unpopular, with 64% of Americans disapproving and just 35% approving, in one poll. The real vote will come in the 2026 midterm elections, when Americans will express whether they feel better off or worse off under unified Republican control of government. Getting Americans to like this law might be a more agonizing ideal than passing it. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store