Why no one adopted Naruto: The heartbreaking truth behind his lonely childhood
He was born the son of heroes but he was raised completely alone. Fans to this day are left asking why.
If you've ever seen or even just heard of Naruto, you are familiar with the single most popular anime program on the planet. To date, the long-running series has followed
Naruto Uzumaki
, a rambunctious, energetic ninja with a big mouth and bigger dreams of being Hokage—the leader and protector of his village. What many neglect to consider is that before he was a hero, Naruto was a lonely, unwanted orphan.
His parents, who were never characters in the series until that point, died defending the Hidden Leaf Village. No one intervened to take him into their care. No adoption, no foster family—no nothing, just an orphan left to live on ramen and his own spirit energy. Alright, but then why didn't anybody pick up Naruto? Why was the son of the Fourth Hokage allowed to grow up alone?
Let's unpack the real motivation behind one of the anime's most heartbreaking realities.
Naruto was feared, not loved
The Village Rejected Him Due to the Nine-Tails. When Naruto was born, his father—the Fourth Hokage—sealed a terrible monster known as the
Nine-Tailed Fox
(Kurama) into Naruto to protect the village. This turned Naruto into a 'Jinchuriki'—a human vessel for a potent monster.
Instead of being celebrated as a hero's son, Naruto became a pariah. The villagers therefore took out their anger on him, punishing him for the destruction wrought by the Nine-Tails despite the fact that he was completely innocent. The result was that most adults refused to cross it, dissuading their children from doing so as well.
Naruto's pranks were a desperate call for help
Due to his upbringing without any love or teachings, Naruto was a troublemaker. He enacted these pranks and goofed off—not out of mischief, but because he was desperate for someone, anyone, to see him.
Sadly, this privilege did nothing but intensify his villain portrayal. To potential adoptive parents, he might have appeared too challenging, too feral, or even a threat. No one wanted to jeopardize their reputation or safety by raising a boy with an actual demon within.
Why didn't the Hokage or his mentors step in?
During these episodes, the fandom often questions why characters such as the Third Hokage, Kakashi Hatake, or Jiraiya didn't take Naruto in. They were in positions of power and obviously deeply invested in his success. So what stopped them from going all in?
The Third Hokage took care of Naruto's financial and physical needs and assured he had the money for food and an apartment. Naruto needed more than that. To be honest, his responsibilities as the village head must have consumed every ounce of his time and attention.
Kakashi Hatake, one of the most beloved characters, was repeatedly put on high-risk missions and marked by the trauma of losing his friends. He was not in the position to care for a child.
As a 'wandering ninja' who operated in the shadows of moral ambiguity as a spy and warrior, Naruto's godfather Jiraiya embodied a roguish lifestyle. He confessed he was unworthy of being a father and kept his distance from guilt and shame.
Even the kind, compassionate teacher Iruka Umino, who would have an important training role in Naruto's life, was able to really provide all of what a home should be, as a young instructor with little power or resources.
Ultimately, the people who possibly could have stepped in just weren't prepared or equipped to care for a child in such drastic conditions.
Life in a Ninja world was harsh
The Hidden Leaf Village was a war-torn, high-risk environment. Ninjas were constantly training or away on deadly missions. Families struggled with grief, loss, and poverty. In such a world, the idea of adopting a troubled child—especially one carrying a legendary beast—felt impossible.
Even kind-hearted villagers likely thought,
'I can't do this.'
Fear, social pressure, and a lack of emotional stability made Naruto's chances of finding a family close to zero.
From orphan to Hokage—His story inspired millions
Despite everything, Naruto never gave up. He built friendships with people like Iruka, Kakashi, Sakura, Jiraiya, Shikamaru, and eventually Tsunade. They became the family he never had.
In time, Naruto achieved his dream: he became Hokage and earned the love of the entire village. He married Hinata Hyuga, had children, and built the kind of family he was once denied.
His pain didn't stop him—it made him stronger. And that's why fans love him so much.
Why Naruto's loneliness still matters
Naruto wasn't adopted because of fear, stigma, and the harsh reality of life in the ninja world. But that pain helped shape one of the most inspiring stories in anime history.
He may have started life completely alone, but he ended up surrounded by love—and proved that family isn't always about blood. It's about who stands by your side when no one else will.
Check out our list of the
latest Hindi
,
English
,
Tamil
,
Telugu
,
Malayalam
, and
Kannada movies
. And don't miss our picks for the
best Hindi movies
,
best Tamil movies,
and
best Telugu films
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation': Netizens react to Suniel Shetty's comment on marriages; expert on balancing gender roles in parenting
When actor Suniel Shetty recently shared his thoughts on marriage and parenting in an interview, his comments ignited a wave of backlash online. Speaking to Pinkvilla, he said, 'Shaadi kya chiz hai mujhe samajh mein hi nahi aata. Bachhon mein patience hai hi nahi. Shaadi kuch time ke baad ek samjhauta hota hai (I don't understand what marriage is anymore. Kids these days have no patience. Marriage is a compromise after some time), where you have to understand each other, and live for each other. Uske baad ek bacha aata hai, aur patni ko yeh jaan na zaruri hai ki husband career banayega toh bachhe ko main dekh rahi hoon (Then comes a child, and the wife needs to know that if the husband makes a career, I will take care of the kids). Husband, of course, saath mein dekhega hi. Aaj kal sab cheez mein pressure bohot ho gaya hai, kyuki gyaan dene wale bohot log hain. (The husband will, of course, look after them together, but there is a lot of pressure in everything these days, because there are a lot of people to give you unsolicited advice).' He added, 'I think experience se hum seekhe toh better hota hai (if we learn, it is better) – from the mother, from the naani, from the daadi, the sister, the in-laws. I think woh cheez bohot maine rakhta hai (That is very important, I think).' His remarks, suggesting that the wife should take primary responsibility for raising a child so that her husband can focus on his career, drew strong criticism on social media platforms. Many netizens didn't hold back. While some called his mindset outdated and 'typical of Indian uncles,' others described it as outright misogynistic. One Reddit user commented, 'Honestly, guys why are you surprised. He is not exactly speaking for our generation. He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation.' Another wrote, 'So he's a typical misogynist,' while one user remarked, 'I'm a hard-core feminist. Yeah, he's imagining a world where husband is the one working, and life can continue on a single income. But there's nothing intentionally sexist about it.' Neha Parashar, clinical psychologist, Mindtalk, tells 'This assumption stems from deeply entrenched gender roles that view caregiving as a woman's natural duty and career-building as a man's. When society reinforces this narrative, it strips both partners of the opportunity to choose roles based on personal strengths, preferences, or practical realities.' Psychologically, she mentions that it positions motherhood as an obligation rather than a choice, which can lead to 'internalised guilt or resentment in women who wish to pursue professional goals.' It also places undue pressure on men to be sole providers, potentially cutting them off from emotionally rewarding aspects of parenthood. 'The first step is to remove the idea that caregiving has a default gender. Parenting needs to be viewed as a skill set, not a role based on gender. Couples should actively discuss their expectations, values, and support systems even before the child arrives,' notes Parashar. In dual-income households, transparency and planning are key. This means dividing responsibilities not just based on availability but also taking into account each partner's emotional bandwidth, career stages, and long-term goals. Most importantly, couples must give each other permission to be vulnerable, tired, or imperfect. Co-parenting is about mutual respect and emotional presence from both sides, concludes the expert.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US Congress to ban anime? Speculations rise over proposed SCREEN Act
Anime, which mostly refers to Japanese animated content, has a wide following, and one of the largest happens to be in North America. Infillion estimates that around 52.8 million North American viewers watch anime on Crunchyroll. Hence, there's been quite a lot of chatter over speculations that the US might be banning anime. It is estimated around 52.8 million North American viewers watch anime on Crunchyroll. Image for representation.(X/@Go_Jover) However, what started this chatter? Are the fears founded? Here, we take a look into the possibility of US Congress banning anime. What's the chatter about US banning anime? The chatter online – both Reddit and X – seem to suggest that Congress might be planning to ban anime. 'Who's here after hearing that Congress is going to ban anime?,' a person asked on Reddit. 'They're what now??,' one person exclaimed, while another wondered how it would 'even work'. On X too, people were defiant. 'Us Congress wants to ban anime????? Good luck with that,' said one user, while another stated 'To anyone freaking out about congress anime ban... don't. Think about it, how are they even going to enforce it...'. Is the US actually banning anime? Here's the truth Despite the chatter, there seems to be no concrete proof that the US Congress is actually trying to ban anime. Grok has noted that while there is no anime ban proposed, the SCREEN Act, which seeks to protect children from being exposed to pornography, and seeks to focus on age verification for online platforms, could impact some anime content. Further, the AI assistant notes that this chatter could be related to the Texas Congress' SB-20 Bill which seeks to criminalize obscene depictions of minors in the media. However, the wording of the bill is obscure and it may end up impacting anime content, perhaps even leading to a ban, NBC's Click2Houston reported. One person on Reddit, explained as much, saying 'For people confused, it's about the Texas Anti-CP bill that was signed a few months ago for the State, which mainly has to do with AI Deepfakes, BUT has some rather murky wording, which has anime fans worried.' The Texas bill states 'a person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses, accesses with intent to view, or promotes obscene visual material containing a depiction that appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B), regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software.' The person, when posed with the question of what would be considered as child porn, and the gray area of anime getting affected, further noted 'Miller test, UNLESS something like that Mike Lee bill ever passes (which is extremely unlikely, like you'd have a better chance of winning the lottery than that bill passing).' This is a reference to the SCREEN Act, which comes from Congresswoman Mary Miller and Senator Mike Lee. Anime fans worried about Texas bill The move from the Texas lawmakers has anime stakeholders worried. Denise Leigh, the owner of The Anime Bar, told Click2Houston 'there's been a fear of this bill, because…it's so vague.' Vincent Tran, the Otaku food festival organizer, noted 'some Asian body types look more adolescent, and Japan's otaku culture already has a history with this kind of thing,' adding, 'I draw the line at actual porn, but some artists' work might have to be disallowed at events.' While these fears are quite founded, the wider speculations about an anime ban in the US are untrue, and if there is any impact, it would be limited to Texas and not across the nation. Some people online seem to have realized this as well, with one Reddit user commenting 'Eh it's only in the extreme red state of texas,' and another person on X saying 'TX congress trying to ban anime is the disaster movie of the summer I'm here to see. They don't understand the crash out that will take place.'
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Can you spot the fourth cat in this mind-bending photo? Most people can't
Source: X/Firebird071 At first glance, it looks like a cozy scene: a trio of calico cats lounging lazily on a patterned blanket. But a viral Reddit post is leaving viewers scratching their heads, because apparently, there's a fourth cat hiding in plain sight. The now-famous photo shows three black, orange, and white cats curled up on a blanket that almost perfectly matches their fur. The blanket's pattern mirrors their colors so precisely that the cats nearly vanish into the fabric. Their bodies melt into the chaos of the print, turning what should be an easy count into a genuine puzzle. Adding to the confusion, part of a curtain drapes into the corner of the frame, further breaking up the visual flow and giving the brain even more to process. The result? A camouflage masterpiece. But here's the twist: the post's caption claims there's one more feline hidden in the image. That's right, there's a fourth cat somewhere in the photo, cleverly disguised in the clutter of colors and textures. Let us see if you can find where the cat is. And if you can't then you are not alone and Redditors too found it almost impossible to zoom in on the 4th cat. Source: X/Firebird071 One user blamed it on the resolution, 'I feel like I would be pretty good at this game but this sub downsizes images to potato cam resolution.' A second user hilariously said, 'I have pspspsps-ed at the pic, cat will appear in sometime.' A third user declared defeat and said, 'I am literally stumped, this is a good one!' As to the answer to this puzzle, the person who posted the picture wrote in the comment section that the cat was peeking from behind the curtain. The patterned blankets and cats on it distracts the viewers from actually looking at the entire picture, making it a great puzzle.
