The hidden costs of gambling
In March, an online betting platform shared a story of someone turning a R4 wager into an astounding R83,701.54. While stories like this grab attention, the rise in online sports betting also brings important considerations.
According to the National Gambling Board's 2022/23 gambling statistics, sports betting in South Africa has expanded significantly over the past decade, growing from under 10% of the gambling sector in 2009/10 to over half in 2022/23.
'What stands out is that 36% of those who gamble do so to pay off debts or cover expenses,' explains Manyike, referring to the 2024 Old Mutual Savings and Investment Monitor. Among low-income earners (those earning between R8,000 and R15,000 per month), this figure rises to 41%, highlighting a concerning trend.
Understanding the risks
Despite rising costs of living and economic pressures, gambling has gained popularity, particularly due to the widespread use of mobile phones and internet access. This is especially evident among young African men. Advertising from betting companies further fuels this trend, increasing participation within this demographic.
'This can be risky, particularly for young people and low-income earners, who may see gambling as a way to improve their financial situation,' says Manyike. However, he notes that losses can add up quickly, sometimes leading to financial stress. 'In a country already facing high unemployment and economic challenges, it's important to be aware of the potential financial pitfalls of gambling.'
A game of chance, not strategy
Unlike investing, gambling is based purely on luck, yet many believe they can develop a winning approach. The truth is that the house edge ensures that bookmakers maintain a profit over time. For instance, when odds are at -110 on both sides of a bet, a bettor must risk R110 to win R100, meaning even skilled bettors face a statistical disadvantage in the long run.
The belief that that the system can be beaten can lead to risky financial decisions. 'Beyond financial losses, gambling can also take a psychological toll,' says Manyike. 'It can lead to stress, anxiety, and even a cycle of chasing previous bets in the hope of recovering losses.'
A 2016 study by the University of Cape Town's Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health noted a significant association between suicidality and pathological gambling. It found that pathological gamblers were five to ten times more likely to have a history of suicide attempts than non-gamblers.
Furthermore, gambling doesn't just affect individuals—it can have ripple effects on families, sometimes resulting in financial strain for loved ones. 'While gambling is legal,' Manyike points out, 'many people don't fully understand the long-term risks involved due to a lack of financial education.'
For those who feel their gambling habits might be affecting their financial well-being, Manyike advises seeking support. 'The South African Responsible Gambling Foundation offers free and confidential counselling services,' he says. Additionally, professional counsellors who specialise in gambling addiction can provide guidance.
'Gambling is not a reliable source of income, and without careful management, it can lead to serious financial setbacks,' concludes Manyike. 'By increasing financial awareness and promoting responsible gambling, we can help people make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary financial risks.'
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Joburg City Power launches campaign to recover R1. 6 billion in unpaid electricity bills
Embattled power utility City Power has launched a "targeted revenue collection" operation in Hursthill, Auckland Park, and Northcliff as part of a new weekly campaign Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media Embattled power utility City Power has launched a "targeted revenue collection" operation in Hursthill, Auckland Park, and Northcliff, as part of a new weekly campaign to recover R1.6 billion in unpaid electricity bills owed by defaulting residential and business customers. Last week, IOL reported that the power utility and Eskom reached a R3.2 billion settlement agreement aimed at resolving long-standing billing disputes and safeguarding Johannesburg's electricity supply. The Hursthill Service Delivery Centre (SDC) provides electricity to 46,141 customers: 19,880 postpaid, 26,033 prepaid, and 228 large power users. "Hursthill SDC has intensified operations to ensure financial stability and continued service delivery to all customers," Isaac Mangena, General Manager at City Power said. The operation, which was supported by the Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD) and private security, resulted in five successful disconnections collectively owing R5.4 million in electricity debt. "Among the most notable was a residential property on Grange Street in Hursthill, operating as both a spaza shop and rental unit, which was disconnected for arrears exceeding R2 million, following repeated obstruction of meter audits. The customer's account is also in arrears with other municipal entities, resulting in a level 2 disconnection". In the same suburb, two properties on St. Ermins and Threadneedle streets were also disconnected for a combined debt of nearly R700,000. "The customer on St. Ermins was found to have bypassed the electricity meter, while the Threadneedle property had previously blocked City Power technicians for meter audits. Both customers were subjected to Level 3 disconnections, in line with our enforcement measures". The power utility also warned that 'meter tampering is illegal and dangerous, and may lead to prosecution, disconnection, and confiscation of electrical equipment.' In Auckland Park, a hijacked property owing over R1.7 million was disconnected, along with another account on Ditton Road with arrears nearing R850,000. Malcolm de Lange, General Manager at Hursthill SDC, said the campaign strengthens City Power's ability 'to reinvest in critical infrastructure upgrades and improve supply reliability" "This renewed effort not only targets outstanding debt but also strengthens our ability to reinvest in critical infrastructure upgrades and improve supply reliability for all customers within its supply areas. We will continueour efforts to recoup R1.6 billion in electricity debt. Therefore, sending a firm message to defaulting customers who risk disconnection," IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
How the Two-Pot system is affecting South African retirement funds
South Africans are increasingly withdrawing from their retirement savings due to the Two-Pot system, raising concerns about long-term financial stability and the implications for the economy. Image: File photo. The Two-Pot system, designed to offer South Africans a lifeline in the event of a serious rainy day, has seen such high demand for withdrawals that experts are concerned that people will have only two-thirds of their savings left. Changes in the law, which came into effect last September, made it possible for people who have retirement savings to access a portion of them now, with the rest remaining invested until they stop working. Under the changes to the law, one-third of retirement savings went into a pot from which withdrawals could be made, and that allows people to pull out money once a year in an amount between R2,000 and R30,000. But there are drawbacks. In addition to the fact that the cash that is taken is subject to tax, any amount due to the South African Revenue Service (Sars) in unpaid tax is deducted from the payout. Those are the short-term consequences – longer-term, withdrawals now will exacerbate South Africa's already low savings rate. South Africans have a negative savings rate of 1.2%, according to Trading Economics. Hwalani Mabaso, executive of everyday advice and distribution at Absa Advice and Investments, says that the tax on withdrawals 'came as a rude awakening to some who saw their expected payout significantly reduced. Financial service providers also had to play catch-up, with reports of some charging excessive admin fees. The learning curve was steep – not just for members, but for the industry itself,' she notes. Michelle Hawkins, senior tax expert at PKF Octagon, says that Sars has collected R15 billion in taxes from Two-Pot withdrawals, of which R1bn was in overdue payments. Mabaso's calculations indicate that a R30,000 withdrawal could mean R22,000 lands in accounts after withholding tax, which doesn't take into account any overdue tax. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading One of Two-Pot's most vocal detractors is former statistician-general, Pali Lehohla. Lehohla tells Personal Finance that pulling money out of an already meager savings pool detracts from fund managers, such as the Public Investment Corporation, being able to invest in key sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and mining. This, Lehohla says, undermines the architecture of pension funds, adversely affecting South Africa's growth prospects. 'If you draw from it, you destroy a nation.' Gross domestic product (GDP) gained a better-than-expected 0.1% in the first quarter of the year after reaching 0.6% in 2024. Phil le Feuvre, member of the South African Reward Association, says that nearly R57bn has been withdrawn from retirement funds since last September. For context, the sector was worth about R4.6 trillion in 2022, the latest research available. Le Feuvre says there have, so far, been almost four million withdrawals, out of an estimated 18.6 million retirement fund members in South Africa. Of these, about 12% were repeat withdrawals following the start of the new tax year in March, he adds. Hawkins is concerned that there have been repeated withdrawals. 'This behaviour raised concerns that the system might be used more as a revolving credit facility than an emergency buffer,' says Mabaso. Yet, Mabaso says the 'bold and necessary reform' has benefitted those South Africans who are battling rising costs as it has been a 'financial lifeline'. She says, in addition to making emergency funds available without totally sabotaging long-term retirement savings, it has also had a macroeconomic benefit. 'Analysts estimate the system injected R40bn to R100bn of liquidity into the economy, boosting consumption and tax revenue, thanks to SARS collecting income tax on withdrawals. Some reports even suggest it could contribute up to 0.5% to GDP growth in 2025,' Mabaso says. Mabaso says, however, that the 'freedom to withdraw comes at a cost'. She explains that someone who pulls money out each year could reduce their retirement nest egg by 30% to 33%, which could be 'a potentially devastating impact in old age'. Hawkins says research conducted by various financial institutions has shown that most drawdowns are going towards debt, school fees, groceries, and other basic necessities. 'The pressures of the cost of living are the key driver for the two-pot withdrawals,' she says. 'Evidence suggests that a portion of the withdrawals is being used to pay off high-interest loans or, worse, fund consumer purchases, defeating the system's intent to promote financial resilience,' Mabaso explains. Le Feuvre adds that some beneficiaries used funds as a deposit to buy a car, leading to increased debt in the long run. 'Overall, the funds helped consumers reduce financial strain but also contributed to new credit uptake.' Mabaso says, like all policy tools, Two-Pot's success depends on how wisely it's used. She says people need educational support to understand tax, compound interest, and long-term implications. 'Handled with care, the system could offer South Africans the dignity of choice and financial resilience.' Reasons people draw draw down from two-pot. Image: Source for graphic: Le Feuvre PERSONAL FINANCE
The Citizen
21 hours ago
- The Citizen
Debt collection becoming a problem in SA – these are your rights
Many South Africans are facing unfair or illegal debt collection tactics. South African consumers are struggling to make ends meet and more often than not, they turn to credit and debt when they run out of money long before month-end due to high prices and interest rates. They are unable to pay their debts and now debt collection is becoming a problem. With the cost of living climbing steadily, more and more South Africans are finding themselves struggling with debt and instead of getting support, many are pushed around by unfair and sometimes illegal debt collection tactics. According to Experian, nearly 10 million South Africans are more than three months behind on their debt payments and instead of understanding or help, many face aggressive calls, threats and pressure to pay up, even when the debt should not be collected anymore. ALSO READ: How to deal with debt collectors Debt collection harassment Rynhardt de Lange, director and head of legal at Milaw Legal, says creditor harassment remains a major issue in the debt industry. One of the most common tricks he sees is how Section 129 notices are misused. 'Section 129 notices are meant to open a conversation between the consumer and creditor before any legal action but these days, they are often sent like a final warning meant to scare people instead of helping them figure out a way forward.' He says consumers often deal with calls late at night, extortion threats and being pushed to pay debts that are too old to collect. South African law protects consumers by limiting when collectors can call, requiring collectors to be registered and banning the collection of old (prescribed) debts. Unfortunately, De Lange says, these rules are regularly ignored and to make matters worse, financial pressure has been increasing steadily over the past few years. ALSO READ: Households still credit stressed while their finances weakened Difficult times cause more disputes about debt collections 'Since 2021 the prime interest rate climbed from 7% to 10.75%, while the cost of essentials such as fuel, food and housing surged sharply. Over the past five years, overall inflation increased by 26.7%, with food prices soaring by around 40%. 'The cost of electricity and household fuels saw the largest jump, increasing by 68.1%. Education expenses also increased significantly, with primary and secondary school fees up by 31.3%. With this kind of financial pressure, it is no surprise that disputes with creditors are increasing.' However, he says, consumers have the right to stand up for themselves. 'In the end, most South Africans are not trying to dodge their debts. They just want a fair chance to get back on track without being bullied.' ALSO READ: South Africans entering 2025 drowning in debt and without any savings Remember these rights about debt collections De Lange shares these five key protections every South African should know when dealing with debt or credit providers: 1. Creditors must follow the law before suing you: They have to send you a Section 129 notice and give you 20 days to respond before taking any legal action. They have to send you a Section 129 notice and give you 20 days to respond before taking any legal action. 2. Harassment is illegal: Collectors cannot call you after hours or on Sundays and they cannot use threats or intimidation. If you feel you are being harassed, report it to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) or the Debt Collectors Council. Collectors cannot call you after hours or on Sundays and they cannot use threats or intimidation. If you feel you are being harassed, report it to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) or the Debt Collectors Council. 3. You have the right to negotiate: You can ask for payment plans or apply for debt mediation and creditors are required to seriously consider any reasonable offers you make. You can ask for payment plans or apply for debt mediation and creditors are required to seriously consider any reasonable offers you make. 4. Old (prescribed) debt is not collectible: If you did not pay a debt or had contact from the creditor for three years or more, you can legally refuse to pay it. If you did not pay a debt or had contact from the creditor for three years or more, you can legally refuse to pay it. 5. Collectors must be registered and prove the debt: Always ask debt collectors for their ID and documentation proving you owe the debt. No proof means no payment. ALSO READ: Watch out! – Some SA banks rip off customers with shady debt collections Legal protection against illegal debt collections De Lange says the National Credit Act was designed to protect consumers and make sure lending is fair, affordable and transparent. 'It also set up the National Credit Regulator and National Consumer Tribunal to keep everyone in check. However, too many creditors still ignore these rules and consumers must know they have rights and that the law is on their side.'
