logo
India flags finance as Bonn talks end

India flags finance as Bonn talks end

Hindustan Times3 days ago

India has endorsed the views of Like-Minded Developing Countries, G77 and China groupings that adherence to Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, which mandates developed nations to provide financial assistance to developing countries, is critical as the world approaches the annual climate conference scheduled for November. Bonn Climate Meetings act as a midway point before COP (AP)
During the closing plenary at the Bonn Climate Meetings, which act as a midway point before COP, India said that lack of progress on Article 9.1 has emerged as one of the foremost challenges related to climate finance.
'Lack of any progress on Article 9.1 is one of the foremost challenges related to climate finance. This is a global priority. This is a priority for Global South. This is not possible without international cooperation and the developed countries meeting their obligation and ensuring the urgent implementation of Article 9.1,' India's delegate at Bonn said.
India has also expressed concerns about unilateral trade measures.
'…we are concerned about the unilateral trade measures against the provision of Article 3.5 of the Convention. We are hearing unilateral carbon border adjustments, which directly contravene the principles of equity, CBDRRC, and the multilateral spirit of the Convention. We strongly urge parties to reflect on this and extend support to these matters in future deliberations,' Rajashree Ray, economic advisor, MoEFCC, said.
While Article 9.1 says that developed countries must provide financial resources to assist developing countries for mitigation and adaptation, Article 3.5 of the UNFCCC mandates countries to cooperate for a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development.
'We need to put our best foot forward to strengthen multilateralism, rebuild trust, and ensure to find a just and equitable solution that leaves no one behind. As ever, India stands ready to work constructively with all parties… India is committed to a scientific approach to addressing climate change,' she said.
One of the key agendas for COP30 is the 'Baku to Belem' road map to 1.3T, which is all about mobilising climate finance for the developing world.
The spokesperson for LMDC grouping said there were 'many, many unfulfilled promises' from developed country partners.
'We have faced a lot of resistance from our developed country partners in moving forward agenda items that would support actual implementation of the Paris Agreement... Instead, our partners prefer to talk about having more dialogues, obfuscating the real issues underlying their failure to fully comply with their long-standing commitments since 1994… And as if to add insult to the injury, against our needs which run into trillions of dollars, developed countries chose to offer to mobilise only $300 billion for the New Collective Quantified Goal on climate finance (NCQG),' said Diego Pacheco, Bolivia's climate negotiator and spokesperson for LMDC.
'COP30 needs to inspire all of us to implement the Paris Agreement, grounded squarely on the principles of the Convention, equity and CBDR-RC, while unlocking the provision of public finance through implementation of Article 9.1, while seriously addressing trade restricted unilateral measures,' he added.
At COP29, held in Baku, developing nations sought the mobilisation of $1.3 trillion with a $600 billion of this coming through grants and grants equivalent resources by 2030. However, the chair hastily gavelled a climate finance goal of 'at least $300 billion per year by 2035' from a wide variety of sources.
Experts said the Bonn discussions were an example of the 'hypocrisy' of wealthy countries.
'In Bonn, we saw the theater of rich nations once again dodging their duty, hiding behind the smokescreen of technical talks while communities in the Global South are left to drown in broken promises. After decades of negotiations, the fundamental truth remains unchanged: there is no climate justice without climate finance,' Harjeet Singh, Climate Activist and Founding Director, Satat Sampada Climate Foundation.
'And the hypocrisy is stark: wealthy countries can find trillions for military spending and the fossil fuel industry, yet they sideline the adaptation finance that is crucial for helping people suffering from losses and damages. We cannot achieve a just transition away from fossil fuels or protect our people from devastating climate impacts until the wealthy countries that created this crisis finally meet their commitments with real, public grants,' Singh said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Winners and losers in the Israel-Iran-US conflict
Winners and losers in the Israel-Iran-US conflict

Hindustan Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Winners and losers in the Israel-Iran-US conflict

The destructive 12-day aerial duel between Iran and Israel may have paused, but the region is far from being peaceful. Normalcy is elusive, and the calm is tenuous. Israel will go for general elections next year and a new wave of muscular nationalism can divert people's attention from the exhausting campaign in Gaza (AP) The reason for such a cautious, albeit pessimistic outlook is the statements carelessly dished out by two of the three players of the West Asian roulette — US President Donald Trump and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. On Friday, Trump said that if Iran continues its uranium enrichment programme, then America will bomb again. A day before, Khamenei vowed in front of his people that if America attacks Iran again, it should be prepared to face severe punishment. Iran is now bent on pursuing its nuclear armament programme. Before the attack, Tel Aviv claimed Iran would soon make a nuclear bomb, and it would become a permanent threat to Israel's existence. Another reason given was that the Khamenei regime is not only unpopular, but is full of terrorists filled with religious hatred under the garb of just rule. America also jumped into the conflict when there was no moral or strategic rationale for it to intervene. Experts are now asking what the 12-day war achieved. Unconfirmed reports suggest that Iran still has 400 kilograms of enriched uranium, which can be converted into nuclear weapons in a few weeks. As for Khamenei, he's firmly in the saddle and has chosen his successor. A barrage of claims of victory and defeat have been unleashed from both sides. However, nobody knows the real extent to which each country has suffered or gained. Was Israel, the aggressor in this case, able to achieve its stated aims? Could Iran extract revenge in its counter-attacks? Why did America enter this conflict when it didn't even have a modicum of excuse? Iran's nuclear programme was tightly controlled under the terms and conditions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). To strengthen it further, it was in talks with the US. The next round of talks was proposed just two days after the day of the attack. Israel attacked, claiming that it had already taken the US into confidence. Is this the reason why the US intervened to bring this war to a swift and decisive end? Why did it use stealth bombers like the B-2 and huge GBU-57 bombs? The harsh truth is that this war had no moral basis. If you have any doubts, look at the facts. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has repeatedly said that Iran has not yet acquired the capability to make a nuclear bomb. However, that did not deter Israel and America from acting against Iran. It means something else is at play. Could it be that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is becoming increasingly unpopular at home due to the endless disaster in Gaza, orchestrated the conflict for a fresh lease of life in office? Israel will go for general elections next year and a new wave of muscular nationalism can divert people's attention from the exhausting campaign in Gaza. It seems Netanyahu has succeeded in his aim for the time being. Part of the blame lies with Iran, too. After the Islamic Revolution, it installed a clock at Tehran's main square displaying a countdown to the end of Israel. The time was ticking every moment. Who would tolerate such senseless hatred? However, the conflict has once again laid bare America's deceit. In the 1980s, Iran and Iraq were locked in a long, bloody border conflict that lasted for eight years. At that time, America and its allies, the western countries, sided with Iraq and armed it to the teeth. Vaults of destructive weapons were opened for Saddam Hussein till he delivered on bleeding Iran. Later, what America did to Iraq during the two Gulf wars is well known. Before attacking Iraq for the second time, the US claimed that Baghdad had weapons of mass destruction. After the removal of Saddam Hussein, international inspectors and the media found it to be a grand lie; neither did Iraq possess such weapons nor was it trying to make them. The same disinformation playbook is playing out in the case of Iran today. Will this stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons? Certainly not. Tehran has voted to quit NPT and has publicly vowed to continue its nuclear programme. If military operations against Iran resume, the chances are that other Gulf countries would be sucked into it. The bombs that Iran dropped on American bases in Qatar and Iraq on Monday night were not just an attack on America but also on the sovereignty of those countries. Qatar even vowed revenge. The US has eight military bases in this region, and all of them are within the range of Iranian missiles. Another important aspect is the attitude of China and Russia. While openly protesting in sharp language, both were secretly working towards a ceasefire. A day before Trump announced a ceasefire, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi was in Moscow. He had a long chat with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, and met President Vladimir Putin. It would be better if China, Russia, and the US keep the situation under control. But fresh statements by Khamenei and Trump are making global leaders and the population apprehensive. It looks certain that after Gaza and Ukraine, Iran will be a simmering issue for some time to come. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal.

‘It's inconceivable': Donald Trump once again calls NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani a ‘pure communist'
‘It's inconceivable': Donald Trump once again calls NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani a ‘pure communist'

Hindustan Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘It's inconceivable': Donald Trump once again calls NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani a ‘pure communist'

US President Donald Trump on Sunday renewed his attack on New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, calling him a 'communist.' Donald Trump slammed Zohran Mamdani (R) after the latter won the Democratic mayoral primary.(AP) In American politics, being labelled a communist carries a strong stigma, rooted in the country's Cold War history with the former Soviet Union. While Mamdani identifies as a democratic socialist, critics, including Trump, have repeatedly referred to him as a communist. "He is a communist. I think it's very bad for New York. I don't think he is gonna get in, it's inconceivable. But he's a communist and a pure communist. I think he admits it. I can't imagine it, but let's say this: if he does get in, I am going to be president and he is going to have to do the right thing," Trump said on Fox's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. The Republican threatened to come down heavy on whoever becomes the mayor of New York City 'financially' if they don't 'behave'. 'I can tell you, whoever is mayor of New York is going to have to behave themselves, or the federal government is coming down very tough on them financially,' Trump added. Zohran Mamdani has promised to take action against ICE Zohran Mamdani has promised not to let Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operate in New York City if he is elected mayor in the November polls. The federal agency has come under scrutiny since Donald Trump returned to office in January, arresting and reporting many from various parts of the country, sometimes even in defiance of the courts. Mamdani, son of Indian-American filmmaker Mira Nair, defeated former New York governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primaries on Tuesday. In about four months, he will face incumbent mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent, and Republican candidate Curtis Silwa in the mayoral polls.

At least 71 killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's Evin prison, says Iran's judiciary
At least 71 killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's Evin prison, says Iran's judiciary

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

At least 71 killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's Evin prison, says Iran's judiciary

At least 71 people were killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's Evin prison, a notorious facility where many political prisoners and dissidents have been held, Iran's judiciary said on Sunday. Rescuers search through the rubble of a damaged section of Evin Prison following an Israeli strike.(AP) Judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir posted on the office's official Mizan news agency website that those killed on Monday included staff, soldiers, prisoners and members of visiting families. It was not possible to independently verify the claim. The June 23 attack, the day before the ceasefire between Israel and Iran took hold, hit several prison buildings and prompted concerns from rights groups about the safety of the inmates. It remains unclear why Israel targeted the prison, but it came on a day when the Defense Ministry said it was attacking 'regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran.' The news of the prison attack was quickly overshadowed by an Iranian attack on a U.S. base in Qatar later that same day, which caused no casualties, and the announcement of the ceasefire. Jahangir did not break down the casualty figures but said the attack had hit the prison's infirmary, engineering building, judicial affairs and visitation hall, where visiting family members were killed and injured. On the day of the attack, the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran criticized Israel for striking the prison, seen as a symbol of the Iranian regime's repression of any opposition, saying it violated the principle of distinction between civilian and military targets. Prison attack came near the end of 12 days of strikes Over the 12 days before a ceasefire was declared, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 of them civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said in a Saturday letter to United Nations officials that the international body should recognize Israel and the U.S. 'as the initiators of the act of aggression' against Iran over the war and that their targeting of sovereign country and its people should require 'compensation and reparation." 'The Security Council should also hold the aggressors accountable and prevent the recurrence of such heinous and serious crimes to enable it to maintain international peace and security,' Araghchi said in the letter obtained by The Associated Press. At the same time, advocates have said that Iran was legally obligated to protect the prisoners held in Evin, and slammed authorities in Tehran for their 'failure to evacuate, provide medical assistance or inform families' following the attack. Jahangir said some of the injured were treated on-site, while others were taken to hospitals. Iran had not previously announced any death figures, though on Saturday, it confirmed that top prosecutor Ali Ghanaatkar — whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups — had been killed in the attack. He was one of about 60 people for whom a massive public funeral procession was held on Saturday in Tehran, and he was to be buried at a shrine in Qom on Sunday. Iran worries whether the ceasefire will hold While both Israel and Iran have been adhering to the truce, Iranian officials raised suspicions Sunday about whether the other side would continue to keep its word. Abdolrahim Mousavi, the chief of staff for Iran's armed forces, said in a conversation with Saudi Arabia's defense minister that the country is prepared if there were to be another surprise Israeli attack. 'We did not initiate the war, but we responded to the aggressor with all our might, and since we have complete doubts about the enemy's adherence to its commitments, including the ceasefire, we are prepared to give them a strong response if they repeat the aggression,' Mousavi said, according to Iranian state TV agency IRNA. It's unclear how much damage was done to the nuclear program Meanwhile, a lot remained unclear about the status of Iran's nuclear program, which incited the initial Israeli attack. U.S. President Donald Trump says American strikes 'obliterated' the program while Iranians say that he's exaggerating. Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told CBS' 'Face the Nation' in an interview set to air Sunday that Iran's capacities remain but it is impossible to know the timeline or access the full damage to the program unless inspectors are allowed in, which Iranian officials have not allowed. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage, first of all. And secondly, Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store