Kansbahal irrigation project: Odisha HC asks Government to pay compensation to displaced
A petition was filed by in 2021 by 12 persons, who were among the displaced families seeking direction to the authorities concerned to release the compensation amount with interest to the families belonging to Badanuagaon, Dungajhore, Ranipia and Maldihi villages in accordance with law within a stipulated period.
The petition also sought direction to extend the benefits as per the Rehabilitation Policy formulated by the state irrigation department in 1990.
Advocate Sanjeev Udgata, representing the petitioners, pointed out that even though the amount was deposited way back in 2014 and clarification was sought on what rate the rehabilitation assistance would be paid, no such clarification has yet been received by the Sundargarh collector, for which there is inordinate delay in disbursement of the compensation.
Taking note of it, the division bench of Justices Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Sibo Sankar Mishra directed the director of Resettlement & Rehabilitation (Water Resources department) to immediately give the clarification sought by the district collector.
The bench posted the matter to May 13 and further ordered for disbursement of the compensation amount by then.
The case records showed that the executive Engineer, Sundargarh Irrigation Division had deposited `4,38,89,000 in 2014 for disbursement to the displaced families as per sanctioned estimate and rules in force.
Later, on February 5, 2014, the district collector had in letter to the director of Resettlement & Rehabilitation sought clarification in connection with rehabilitation assistance to the project-affected persons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu pushing Banakacherla to divert attention from Polavaram project, says APCC chief Sharmila
APCC president Y.S. Sharmila on Saturday accused Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu of pushing forward the Banakacherla project to divert people's attention from his government's failure to realise the all-important Polavaram project. In a statement, Ms. Sharmila alleged that the TDP-led NDA government was betraying the people by reducing the Polavaram project's height to 41 metres from 45 metres to avoid Relief and Rehabilitation (R&R) costs, saving the Centre ₹25,000 crore. In 2019, the estimated cost of the project was ₹55,000 crore. The revised cost in 2024 was Rs. 30,000 crore, she said, adding that it was converted from a gravity to a lift irrigation project, weakening its original intent and benefits. She criticised the ruling party MPs for not raising the issue in Parliament, and said they were either afraid of the BJP or resorting to 'political compromises.' Referring to the Banakacherla project, the APCC chief said it did not have the required permissions, especially from the Forest Department. Out of the 50,000 acres required, 20,000 acres were forest lands. Pointing to the whopping estimated cost of ₹ 80,000 crore, she said there was no clarity on the sources of funding.
New Indian Express
3 days ago
- New Indian Express
Odisha High Court tells state govt to speed up regular V-C appointment in public universities
CUTTACK: The Orissa High Court on Tuesday scheduled July 23 for further hearing on the PIL alleging violation of the Odisha Universities Act, 1989, in appointing a university faculty member as acting vice-chancellor of Utkal University. High Court lawyer and Utkal University alumnus Prabir Kumar Das filed the PIL which specifically challenged the Chancellor's notification dated May 27, 2025, designating Professor Jagneshwar Dandapat, as in-charge V-C until a regular appointment is made. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice MS Raman focused on Section 6(10) of the Odisha Universities (Amendment) Act, 2024 - notified on April 17, 2025 - which now permits the Chancellor, in consultation with the state government, to appoint any vice-chancellor of a public university in the state as acting V-C, instead of restricting the choice to V-Cs from neighbouring universities. The bench noted that the recent amendment sets a maximum period of one year (including extensions) for such interim arrangements. It also took note of a recent Supreme Court directive to expedite permanent V-C appointments, with the state already initiating the process. Appreciating the state's intent to rectify the issue, the court underscored the need to strictly adhere to the statutory provisions. Advocate general Pitambar Acharya assured the bench that he would personally review the matter to ensure compliance with the law. The court has directed the state to take appropriate corrective steps before then. On June 24, the court had observed that Section 6(8) of the Act allows the Chancellor to extend the outgoing V-C's term for up to six months, but the current notification failed to meet this criterion. 'Prime facie, the issue raised needs to be determined finally, as this may become a recurring feature in other universities as well,' the bench remarked. Utkal University has been operating without a regular vice-chancellor since November 24, 2024, following the expiry of the previous incumbent's term.
New Indian Express
5 days ago
- New Indian Express
Odisha HC grants bail to DRDO espionage case accused after nearly four years in jail
CUTTACK: The Orissa High Court has granted bail to Basanta Kumar Behera, a key accused in the high-profile espionage case involving the alleged leak of classified defence information from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) of DRDO at Chandipur in Balasore district. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy delivered the judgment noting the prolonged pre-trial detention and absence of any misuse of earlier interim bail granted to him. However, Behera who is lodged in Balasore jail has not been released as on date, as the bail conditions have not been complied so far. Behera was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs 5 lakh with two solvent sureties and compliance with several conditions, including fortnightly attendance at the local police station for six months and a ban on leaving the trial court's jurisdiction without permission. He must also keep the court and investigating agency informed about his residence and contact details. Advocate Ashutosh Mishra argued on behalf of Behera. The espionage case is pending before the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge in Balasore. Behera, a contractual AC operator at ITR, was arrested in September 2021 along with several others on charges of spying for a Pakistani handler after allegedly being honey-trapped. The case, initially investigated by Odisha police and later transferred to the State CID-Crime Branch, involves allegations of compromising national security by passing sensitive missile testing information to foreign nationals. In his judgment, Justice Satapathy emphasised that bail should not be denied merely due to the gravity of the allegations, particularly when the accused has already spent a significant time in custody and the trial has not progressed. 'If the state is unable to provide a speedy trial, it should not oppose bail on the ground of seriousness of the offence,' he observed, citing Article 21 of the Constitution. The judge highlighted that Behera had earlier availed interim bail on two occasions and had not misused the concession. Given the delay in trial proceedings and the bail granted to co-accused Sachin Kumar Chhata and Tapas Ranjan Nayak, the court ruled that Behera had made out a strong case for bail.
