&w=3840&q=100)
Air India: DGCA audit flags 51 safety lapses, training, and crew gaps
Although the audit is unrelated to the recent Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people, it comes at a time of increased scrutiny for the airline.
Significant violations, compliance deadlines
The 11-page confidential DGCA report flagged seven serious 'Level I' safety breaches that must be addressed by July 30. It also listed 44 other compliance issues that need to be resolved by August 23.
The report revealed 'recurrent training gaps' among some Boeing 787 and 777 pilots. These pilots reportedly failed to complete mandatory observation duties—where they monitor cockpit instruments—before their periodic evaluations.
Air India operates 34 Boeing 787s and 23 Boeing 777s, as per data from Flightradar24.
Training at challenging airports falls short
The DGCA criticised Air India's approach to training for Category C airports—airfields that are known to have difficult layouts or surrounding terrain. According to the report, the airline used simulators that did not meet required standards for this training.
'This may account to non-consideration of safety risks during approaches to challenging airports,' the report stated.
Air India's response
In a statement to Reuters, Air India said it had been 'fully transparent' during the audit and would 'submit our response to the regulator within the stipulated time frame, along with the details of the corrective actions.'
A preliminary report into the June crash suggested confusion in the cockpit, with one pilot asking the other why he had turned off the fuel switches. The other pilot reportedly replied that he had not.
Fatigue & flight-time limits breached
The DGCA audit also highlighted ongoing issues with crew fatigue management. In one instance, a Milan-to-Delhi flight operated by Air India last month exceeded the legal flight-duty time limit by 2 hours and 18 minutes, which was classified as a 'Level I' violation.
The audit team, which included 10 inspectors and four additional auditors, criticised the airline's rostering software for not issuing strong alerts when crew numbers fell short of required minimums. The report cited at least four international flights that departed with too few cabin crew on board.
Operational oversight, passenger complaints
Since Tata Group acquired Air India in 2022, the airline has expanded its global reach but continues to face complaints about service quality, including broken armrests, dirty cabins, and malfunctioning entertainment systems.
Reuters recently reported that senior Air India officials, including the directors of flight operations and training, were issued notices on July 23 pointing to 29 'systemic' lapses and ignoring 'repeated' warnings. Air India has said it plans to respond.
Gaps in supervision & documentation
The DGCA report further noted discrepancies in 'door checks and equipment checks' and pointed out missing or incomplete training records. It also highlighted that no chief pilots had been appointed for the Airbus A320 and A350 fleets.
'This results in a lack of accountability, and effective monitoring of flight operations for these aircraft types,' the report said.
Last year, aviation authorities penalised airlines 23 times for safety breaches -- 11 of which involved the Air India Group. The most severe penalty was a $127,000 fine for not maintaining adequate oxygen supply on certain international flights.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Fraudsters tried to dupe us saying they would sue Boeing: Family of AI 171 victim
The Udaipur police have lodged an FIR after some men allegedly tried to dupe and mislead the family members of Vardi Chand Menaria, who lost his life in the Air India flight AI 171 to London which crashed moments after taking off in Ahmedabad on June 12. The men, allegedly posing as representatives of the central government and a Supreme Court lawyer, claimed that they would get the family Rs 8-10 crore compensation, and pressured them to sign certain documents. While the incident is from July 18-19, the FIR was lodged on July 29 on the directions of the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA). It has been lodged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita section 329 (3) for 'criminal trespass', which carries a maximum imprisonment of up to three months and a fine of Rs 5,000. In his complaint, Menaria's son Deepak Menaria said that on the evening of July 17, he received a call from a person who identified himself as one Bhupendra, saying that he will come for verification on behalf of the central government. 'I was told that a team from Delhi and Mumbai will come to my house and 'secret verification' will be done, so for this, a copy of my late father's passport and ticket will be needed. They tried to lure me saying that if I file a case against Boeing, I will get Rs 8-10 crore,' he wrote in his complaint. In a purported audio recording of the call, the man is heard telling Deepak to keep it a secret, because if he speaks about it to relatives, they may start seeking money too. 'On July 18, around 7:45 pm, a man and a woman reached my house in Rundeda in a Gujarat numbered vehicle. Both of them entered my house and started talking in a confusing manner to my mother. My mother called and told me that two people had come. I immediately reached home and found them sitting in my house, claiming to be from the Supreme Court,' he said. 'They pressured me and my mother to put my thumb impression and sign some documents. When I asked them the purpose, they spoke about a case against Boeing in America. When I told them that I will file a case, the duo unethically pressured me to give my thumb impression and signature on the documents,' he alleged, adding that after he did not yield, both of them left around 8:40 pm. The next day, he sought assistance from the local police, but claimed that they weren't of much help. Later in the day, around 4:30 pm, the alleged fraudsters parked their vehicle a kilometre away from the Menaria residence and walked the rest of the distance. As they repeated some of the things they had said the day before, Deepak called his neighbours for help. Subsequently, police from Vallabh Nagar police station reached his residence and took the men to the police station. Deepak alleged that the Station House Officer of Vallabh Nagar police station did not lodge an FIR, saying that he should collect it from the SP's office since he had already lodged a complaint there. He claimed an FIR was lodged only after he approached the DLSA. Udaipur Superintendent of Police Yogesh Goyal said that, 'An FIR has been lodged. As per the primary inquiry, some advocates and some locals wanted (the family) to become their client and file a case against the airline. They wanted to take their consent, as per the initial investigation. However, the family says that they were persisting on a regular basis.'


Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
Colombia's former president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
Former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe has been sentenced to 12 years of house arrest after being found guilty of bribing a public official and abusing the legal process, according to a court document seen by Reuters and a source familiar with the case. Uribe, 73, was convicted on Monday by Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia in a long-running case that began more than a decade ago. The sentencing will be officially announced in court on Friday. The document, also reported by local media, states that Uribe will pay a fine of $578,000. This is the first time a former Colombian president has been found guilty in court. The ruling comes ahead of Colombia's 2026 presidential election, in which several politicians close to Uribe are expected to run. The case could also affect Colombia's ties with the United States. This week, US Senator Marco Rubio said the ruling shows the 'weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges,' according to Reuters. Some analysts have warned the decision could lead to a reduction in US aid. Uribe has always denied wrongdoing. He and his supporters argue the case is politically motivated. 'This is a persecution,' they have said. But critics say the conviction is significant, as Uribe has long faced allegations of links to right-wing paramilitary groups but had never been convicted until now. The case centres on accusations that Uribe tried to manipulate witnesses in a case against him.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Brazil's Supreme Court judge Moraes defies US sanctions, vows to continue Bolsonaro trial
Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against Trump ally Bolsonaro, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and 'ignore the sanctions' imposed by the US that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system read more Brazil's Supreme Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes talks during Brazil's Supreme Court trial over an alleged coup attempt, in Brasilia, Brazil on June 9, 2025. Reuters File Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against an ally of President Donald Trump, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and 'ignore the sanctions' imposed by the United States that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system. On Wednesday, the US imposed sanctions on Moraes for overseeing the trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing the judge of authorising arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Justice Moraes has presided over the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup to overturn Brazil's 2022 presidential election after his supporters violently stormed government buildings following the election victory of leftist Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The US sanctions were accompanied by an executive order imposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, which was also tied to the case Moraes is overseeing against Bolsonaro, an unwavering supporter of the US president. Bolsonaro, a far-right former army captain, and several of his closest allies were charged with plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss, in a case that was in many ways similar to accusations against Trump. Moraes said the court would not submit itself to foreign coercion or what he likened to new coup attempts by Bolsonaro's allies. Moraes said the Federal Supreme Court will continue to exercise its role as guardian of the Constitution. 'It will continue to exercise its role in criminal proceedings so that it can provide a final answer to all Brazilian society regarding who was truly responsible' for the attempted coup, he said, adding that there will be due process of law with no internal or external interference. Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who moved to the U.S. to persuade the White House to intervene in his father's favor, has claimed credit for Trump's policies on Brazil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This criminal organization's insistence on implementing measures harmful to Brazil, by encouraging the imposition of these tariffs and making spurious and illegal attacks against Brazilian public officials, is aimed at creating a severe economic crisis in the country,' he said. 'But to the dismay of these traitorous Brazilians, that crisis will not happen.' Moraes added that the court would conclude the trial of those accused of attempting a coup d'état before the end of the year.