Has Trump banned Tesla in US amid feud with Elon Musk? Fact-checking viral video
Trump said in the video that Teslas are"junk cars" that only "nerds" like. He added that he only bought one "to show my support for Elon,' calling the X owner a 'snake' who he would not allow to make 'money in this country while I'm the president."
The video was widely shared on X and other social media platforms with the claim that Trump has banned Tesla production in the US.
No credible sources confirm a ban on the production of Teslas. According to various fact-checking outlets, including Factly and Newschecker, the video was manipulated using AI tools. A community note under the above video says, 'Misinformation! This video is AI-generated. Nothing to do with reality.'
Factly also found the original video, uploaded on the YouTube channel of ABC 10 News on 31 May, 2025, titled 'Trump Honors Elon Musk in Final Day at White House | Full Video'. The video description reads, 'President Donald Trump bid farewell to Elon Musk in the Oval Office, recognizing his impact as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk, known for his leadership at Tesla, SpaceX, and X, was credited with reforming bureaucracy and cutting billions in federal spending. Though controversial, Musk's tenure is considered one of the most sweeping government reform efforts in modern U.S. history.'
However, in the entire video, nowhere did Trump announce a ban on Tesla. The transcript of the press conference did not reveal any reference to a ban either. The truth is, the video was manipulated using AI, and no such ban has really been announced.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump says US has 'great' relationship with S. Korea after trade deal
Washington: US President Donald Trump has said that the United States has a "great" relationship with South Korea, after Seoul and Washington reached a trade deal earlier this week following months of gruelling tariff negotiations. Trump made the remarks during a press availability, responding to a reporter's question about his anticipated summit with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, which he said will take place at the White House in two weeks. "We have a great relationship with South Korea," Trump said tersely, reports Yonhap news agency. On Wednesday, Trump announced the trade deal, under which his administration agreed to lower "reciprocal" tariffs on Korea to 15 percent from the proposed 25 percent in return for Korea's investment commitments and other pledges. He also said that his South Korean counterpart will visit the White House in two weeks. Seoul's Foreign Minister Cho Hyun said later that talks are underway to coordinate and set a summit date. Meanwhile, the South Korean government reaffirmed that its trade deal with the United States does not include further opening of the country's rice market to American products. "The Korea-U.S. trade deal did not cover the rice issue," the finance, industry and agriculture ministries said in a joint press release. The announcement came after White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the trade deal provides market access to American goods, including rice, which reiterated U.S. President Donald Trump's earlier claim on agricultural market access. On Thursday, the two countries struck an agreement under which the U.S. lowered its reciprocal tariff rate for South Korea to 15 percent from the initially proposed 25 percent in return for Seoul's pledge to invest US$350 billion in the world's largest economy and purchase $100 billion worth of American liquefied natural gas and other energy products over the next four years. The U.S. administration had reportedly pressured Seoul to further open up its rice and beef markets, raising issue with Korea's import ban on American beef products from cattle aged 30 months or older.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia not worried over Trump's nuke submarines threat? Lawmaker urges ‘agreement' to stop World War 3 talks
A member of the Russian Parliament Duma said there are enough Russian nuclear submarines in the high seas to tackle two American subs dispatched by US President Donald Trump to counter Russia. "The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones," a senior Russian lawmaker, Viktor Vodolatsky, was quoted as saying by TASS. He added that the submarines that US President Donald Trump ordered to be "redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their [Russian nuclear submarines] control." "So, no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required," Vodolatsky said. Vodolatsky's statement came after Trump wrote on his Truth Social post that he had ordered the redeployment of US submarines "to appropriate regions" allegedly over "extremely provocative statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is also the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council. "Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now," the Russian lawmaker said. "A fundamental agreement that must be concluded between Russia and America so that the whole world calms down and stops talking about the beginning of World War III," he added. Meanwhile, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, said that Trump's nuclear submarine statement should not be taken seriously for now. "Trump, as we know, runs his own channel and reacts, so to speak, emotionally, humanely and spontaneously. I think that the armed forces, the naval forces of the United States read this with great surprise," Lukyanov told local private news channel RBC TV. "If this exchange of opinions continues, and Trump continues to be drawn into it, then, one way or another, he will probably have to take some action. In my opinion, so far this is only at the level of words," Lukyanov said. Following the American leader's statements, the Moscow Exchange index plummeted 2,709.26 points (0.99%) by 08:01 pm Moscow time (10:31 pm IST) on Friday. Earlier, responding to a media question over US State Department Secretary Marco Rubio's recent interview with Fox News, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia agrees with the US administration that a direct military confrontation between Moscow and Washington must not happen. "While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO and preparing for potential conflict with Russia, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided," Lavrov said. "We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue," Lavrov said.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's Tesla fined over ₹1,996 crore in Florida autopilot crash case; jury flags ‘responsibility' amid tech failure
Elon Musk's Tesla has been ordered to pay more than $240 million in damages to victims of a deadly car crash in Florida that involved its Autopilot driver assist technology after a Miami jury found the EV maker responsible for the incident. Tesla had significant responsibility as its technology failed, the federal jury observed. Not all the blame can be put on the driver of the car, even the one who confessed that he was distracted by his mobile phone when he hit a young strargazing couple. The jury's decision comes at a time when Elon Musk is trying to convince Americans that Tesla's cars are safe to be self-driven, as he seeks to roll out a driverless taxi firm in several cities shortly. The jury's decision ends a four-year-long case, which stands out not just for its outcome but the very fact that it even made it to trial. Several such cases against Tesla have earlier been dismissed or settled by the company to avoid controversial trials. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.
