Nick Kyrgios calls for huge rule change at Wimbledon to ‘make everyone happy'
The former Grand Slam finalist believes making every match before the quarter-final stage of Grand Slams would 'solve a lot of issues'.
In the current landscape, men's Grand Slam matches are played as best-of-five sets while women's are best-of-three.
The length of Grand Slam matches has been debated for decades, with many of the opinion that women should play the longer format.
Others believe the only change should see men's matches – which can last five hours if they go to a fifth and final set – reduced.
The debate has resurfaced at Wimbledon after world number three Jessica Pegula said she believed best-of-five set tennis was too long and argued the shorter format should be adopted in the men's game.
Kyrgios has a slightly different take, suggesting both men and women should play best-of-three until the quarter-finals, when it would go up to a potential five sets for both sets of players.
'My idea to make everyone happy would be the first week of Grand Slams should be best-of-three sets and then from the quarter-finals onwards, it should be best-of-five sets,' Kyrgios told talkSPORT.
'It would solve a lot of issues early on, it would see a lot of different players making their way through to the quarter-finals.
'These bigger players, once they lose the first set in some of these earlier matches, they're already under the pump.
'They know that they don't have that wiggle room to make their way back into the match.
'So I think the first week should be best-of-three and then the quarter-finals onwards should be best-of-five, so we get those kind of marathon matches with the best players in the world.
'You look at the French Open final between Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, that was some of the best tennis that the sport's ever seen.
'I don't think we should completely lose it altogether but I think from the quarter-finals onwards, it should be best-of-five sets.'
American tennis star Pegula was tipped for a productive run at Wimbledon but suffered a shock first-round defeat to Elisabetta Cocciaretto.
Asked asked the loss if she was keen for women's tennis to be played over five sets, Pegula said: 'No. I would rather the men play two-out-of-three.
'I don't think we all need to start playing three-out-of-five. For me it's too long. I personally lose interest watching the matches.
'I personally will not watch a full five-hour match. People can't even hold their attention long enough they say these days with phones. More Trending
'How are they holding their attention for five hours? I don't know. Just not my thing. I know some people love it.
'I think it would be a lot easier for TV, for scheduling. TV's always talking about making everything faster and quicker, all of that stuff.
'But it's been such a staple for the men. I find it hard to believe they're ever going to change it. Maybe if they could play three-out-of-five from the quarters on. Something like that.
'Maybe there's something where they look at changing it for certain rounds. I think that might be interesting. But I think that's very far away.'
For more stories like this, check our sport page.
Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
MORE: Wimbledon star held back from umpire as crowd boo 'embarrassing' decision
MORE: Comedian admits he 'nearly got into a punch-up' at Wimbledon
MORE: Tim Henman names two 'favourites' to win Wimbledon as Novak Djokovic advances
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
6 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova accuses officials of home bias after technology failure
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova accused Wimbledon of home bias after an embarrassing malfunction of its new electronic line-calling system on Centre Court. At 4-4 in the first set of Pavlyuchenkova's fourth-round match against Britain's Sonay Kartal and with the Russian serving at game point, she was convinced a backhand from her opponent had landed long. Umpire Nico Helwerth stopped the point to check whether the technology, which has controversially replaced line judges this year, had worked, informing the crowd after a delay that it had not. Intriguing scenes! Pavlyuchenkova thinks Kartal has put her forehand long and stops before the Brit slams back a winner. The umpire checks and confirms the electronic line calling system was unable to track the point, which leads to the point being replayed. #Wimbledon — BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 6, 2025 With no official evidence of whether the ball was in or out, Helwerth ordered the point to be replayed, and Pavlyuchenkova, who would have won the game had the shot been called out, went on to drop serve. The 34-year-old reacted furiously at the change of ends, saying to Helwerth: 'Because she is local, they can say whatever. You took the game away from me.' TV replays showed the ball was considerably long, and Wimbledon revealed the problem had been caused by human error. A spokesman said: 'Due to operator error, the system was deactivated on the point in question. The chair umpire followed the established process.' Pavlyuchenkova discussed the matter with Helwerth after the match, and she said: 'It was very confusing in the beginning because the ball looked very long to me. 'It was a very crucial moment in the match. I expected a different decision. I just thought also the chair umpire could take the initiative. That's why he's there sitting on the chair. He also saw it out, he told me after the match. I don't know if it's something to do because she's local. 'I think we are losing a little bit of the charm of actually having human beings. Like during Covid, we didn't have ball boys. It just becomes a little bit weird and robot sort of orientated. 'They're very good at giving fines, though, and code violations. This they don't miss because every time any little thing, they are just right there on it. I would prefer they looked at the lines and call the errors better.' Kartal, who insisted she did not know if the ball was in or out, defended Helwerth's handling of the situation. 'That situation is a rarity,' she said. 'I don't think it's really ever happened. It's tough luck. What can you do? The umpire is trying his best in that situation. I think he handled it fine. I think the fairest way was what he did, to replay the point.' Pavlyuchenkova regrouped well after the incident, saving a Kartal set point and going on to claim a 7-6 (3) 6-4 victory and a place in the quarter-finals. Asked how she would have felt had she lost, the 34-year-old joked: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back here.' The incident is hugely embarrassing for Wimbledon, with organisers having staunchly defended the innovation amid controversy over the removal of line judges. Britain's leading duo Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu have both complained about the accuracy of the system, which is now widely used on the tour, this week. After her defeat by Aryna Sabalenka on Friday, Raducanu said: 'It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong.' Pavlyuchenkova also has her doubts, saying: 'Sometimes when we play, I'm thinking, 'Am I crazy, or I just feel like the ball is long?' Then nothing is happening. There is no automatic line calling. 'The chair umpire was so confused. I think the chair umpire needs to maybe have a clear plan if that happens. We probably should have this system like in football to review.'
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cam Norrie into Wimbledon quarter-finals after epic five-set battle against Jarry
Cameron Norrie was practically fighting for his tennis life by the final set of an agonising four-hour duel on his beloved No 1 Court. As he watched ace after ace fly past him from one of the most destructive servers in the world, Norrie's momentum had disappeared along with his two-set lead and match point. The Briton has been on an unforgettable journey over the past few years and after enduring one of the most difficult periods of his career, he has rebounded with even greater courage and self-belief. He drew upon that conviction in the final moments as he continued his brilliant run at Wimbledon by bravely holding his nerve to close out a 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 win over the qualifier Nicolás Jarry after four hours and 27 minutes. The victory marks Norrie's second grand slam quarter-final, having won his first, also in SW19, in 2022. Despite the greater attention that other players receive, he is again the last British player standing at Wimbledon. After spending such a long time watching his lead shrink against an opponent who fired down 44 aces, Norrie dragged himself over the line, using his supreme competitive spirit and his ability to maintain his composure at all costs. The 29-year-old has enjoyed a spectacular residency on No 1 Court this year, which was in fine voice again, but his stellar performances may well have earned him a first sighting of Centre Court. He will face either Carlos Alcaraz, the two-time defending champion and second seed, or the 14th seed Andrey Rublev on Tuesday. The recent trajectory of Norrie's career has been fascinating. Having already been struggling with his form in 2024, a left biceps injury compounded his misery. From his career high ranking of No 8, he fell as low as 91st in May. Norrie is an extremely ambitious person and at his lowest point, as he compared his frustrating level to his form when he reached the top 10, he was weighed down by his expectations. The world No 61 has found his way again by focusing solely on his enjoyment of the sport, finding happiness and satisfaction in every single workout, practice and match, regardless of the result. Now, on the biggest stages in the world, his results are also a source of joy again. This was always likely to be a massive challenge. Having climbed as high as No 16 last year, Jarry has fallen to his current ranking of No 143 in large part due to a severe case of vestibular neuritis, an ear condition that has affected his balance, perception and vision, leading to spells of dizziness. The Chilean stands at 6ft 7in and at its best, his serve is untouchable. He pairs it with relentless aggression behind his forehand in order to cover up his deficient movement and return game. He has been the best version of himself throughout his run from qualifying. In the first round here, he recovered from two sets down against the No 8 seed Holger Rune. The ease with which Norrie moved through the first set, confidently taking advantage of one poor service game from Jarry, did not hint at the struggles to come. Midway through the second set, Jarry fired down aces at will, flitting through his own service games. Holding serve was essential here. After Norrie won the second set, the pair soon found themselves in a second tie-break and after establishing a 5-3 lead, Norrie's nerves finally surfaced as he double-faulted while two points away from victory. Although he recovered well to force a match point on his serve at 6-5, Jarry produced a rare, spectacular backhand return off a first serve to scupper the danger. He then took the racket out of Norrie's hand with his serving and relentless attack to force a fourth set. Suddenly, the terms of engagement had completely changed. Having spent the previous hour easing through his service games, Norrie's serve was under attack. While Jarry's audacious serving continued, almost every one of Norrie's games became an extended tussle. Although Norrie still had not been broken all match, he still could not halt Jarry's frantic momentum, who slammed down another ace to force a fifth set. Both men steadied for the decider with a toilet break and when they returned the match shifted again. While Jarry had served and attacked freely while he chased Norrie's lead down, he felt a different kind of pressure at the beginning of the fifth set. As Norrie desperately tried to land returns, to chase down every ball and offer his opponent no free points, the Chilean opened the set with a poor service game, offering up loose unforced errors he had not committed for two hours. Having spent so much of his time in a futile chase for Jarry's serve, there was no chance that Norrie was going to let this opportunity pass him by as he closed out a win that further re-establishes him at the top of the game.
South Wales Argus
7 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Cameron Norrie the last Briton standing at Wimbledon after gruelling five-setter
The 29-year-old led by two sets and had a match point in the third, but was taken to a fifth by the towering Chilean. However, Norrie held his nerve in the decider and did not drop serve all day in a 6-3 7-6 (4) 6-7 (7) 6-7 (5) 6-3 victory over a gruelling four hours and 27 minutes. Norrie, a semi-finalist in 2022, is now only the third British man to reach the last eight more than once in the last 50 years, after Tim Henman and Andy Murray. He is also the last home player left in either draw after Sonay Kartal's defeat to Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova earlier on Sunday. It is a fine achievement for a player who had slipped from eight in the world to 91 after a tough couple of years, and who is now on the verge of a return to the top 50. He will have his work cut out to get much further, though, with two-time defending champion Carlos Alcaraz his likely quarter-final opponent. Norrie, who has now won nine of his 10 matches on his favourite Court One, said: 'I hung tough when I needed to and the atmosphere was so good. Nicolas Jarry hit 46 aces (Jordan Pettitt/PA) 'Credit to Nico, he did an unbelievable job staying with me. I just had to keep fighting. 'It's my coach's birthday and I forgot to get him a present, so I got him the win.' Jarry was clearly unhappy about something at the end, with the two players engaged in a long, heated conversation after shaking hands. 'He said I was a little bit vocal, but that's my energy. It was a competitive match,' added Norrie. WHAT A WAY TO FINISH IT OFF! 🤩 Cameron Norrie is into the quarter-finals of #Wimbledon after being forced to a decider by Nicolas Jarry, but he gets it done by winning 6-3, 7-6(4), 6-7(7), 6-7(5), 6-3 🇬🇧 Just look at what it means 😁 — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 6, 2025 The first three sets were peak Norrie, with him simply keeping the ball in play and waiting for his opponent to make a mistake. The 6ft 7in South American obliged with 43 unforced errors, while risk-averse Norrie had made just 13. However, when Norrie had a match point on serve in the third set tie-break, Jarry saved it with a fine return and volley before converting his second set point. Jarry's charge through qualifying to the fourth round has been one of the stories of the Championships, his ranking having plummeted from 16 this time last year to 143 due to a health issue which has affected his vision and balance. The winners were now starting to mount up from Jarry's racket – he hit 103 in total including 46 aces – one of which secured the fourth set, again after a tie-break. Yet some three-and-a-half hours after he first broke the Jarry serve Norrie, aided by an untimely double-fault, managed it again at the start of the fifth. Norrie backed that up by saving two break points for a massive hold after a 10-minute game to lead 3-0. He stayed strong down the home straight and when Jarry put one last, tired forehand into the net the British number three was able to celebrate a memorable win.
