Air India 171 crash: UK man finds stranger's remains' in mother's casket, India says victims were handled with ‘professionalism'
Family raises questions over identification process
Miten Patel's parents, Ashok and Shobhana Patel, were on board the Gatwick-bound Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on June 12. The crash claimed the lives of 260 people, including 53 British nationals.
The couple were among the first victims to be repatriated to the UK. Miten Patel said the discovery of mixed-up remains was deeply upsetting. 'People were tired and there was a lot of pressure. But there has to be a level of responsibility that you're sending the right bodies to the UK," he told the BBC. 'How do I know there aren't other remains in the casket with her?'
A British family getting ready to bury a relative who died in the Air India Flight 171 crash were reportedly given the wrong body, causing them to postpone the funeral. According to the Daily Mail, the mistake came to light when the remains in the coffin did not correspond to the…
Media reports highlight multiple alleged mix-ups
The Daily Mail reported two cases where UK families allegedly received the wrong bodies. In one case, the wrong body was sent entirely, and in another, remains from multiple individuals were reportedly found in a single casket. The newspaper also claimed that families have suffered additional distress due to errors made in the repatriation process.
Indian authorities respond to allegations
India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded to the reports by stating that all mortal remains were handled with 'utmost professionalism' and dignity. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said authorities followed established protocols and technical guidelines during the identification process.
'We have seen the report and have been working closely with the UK side from the moment these concerns and issues were brought to our attention,' Jaiswal said. 'We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue.'
The Indian government has not confirmed any mishandling but stated it remains engaged with UK officials to address the concerns raised.
The investigation into the crash and the processes that followed remain ongoing. For affected families, the latest revelations have added a new layer of grief as they seek clarity and accountability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Nimisha Priya case: Yemen cancels death sentence of Indian nurse, claims Grand Muft's office
Nimisha Priya case: Yemen cancels death sentence of Indian nurse, claims Grand Muft's office In a big relief for Nimisha Priya, the Indian nurse who was facing the death penalty in Yemen, her death sentence has now been officially cancelled. This good news was shared by the office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jane Street to argue that retail demand drove its India trades
Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Cybersecurity Healthcare Data Science Leadership Design Thinking Data Science Product Management healthcare Data Analytics PGDM Operations Management others Technology Project Management Management CXO Artificial Intelligence MCA Others Digital Marketing Finance Degree MBA Public Policy Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months MIT xPRO CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity Starts on undefined Get Details Jane Street said on Monday it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, SEBI lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($560 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from SEBI detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinized. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. Live Events On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2% at the open and fell further during the day. SEBI alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Agencies Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. Partial Hedging SEBI's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16% and 25% of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10% of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. SEBI did not respond to a request for comment. Huge Turnover Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at SEBI's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Nimisha Priya's death sentence overturned by Yemen authorities: Grand Mufti's office
The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, an Indian nurse convicted of murder in Yemen, has been "completely overturned," according to a statement released Monday by the office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar. The Grand Mufti's office said the decision came following a high-level meeting in Yemen's capital, Sanaa, where authorities agreed to fully revoke the death penalty, which had previously been under temporary suspension. According to the statement, as reported by ANI 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier' Nimisha Priya, a 37-year-old Indian nurse from Kerala, was scheduled to be executed on July 16, after she was convicted of killing a Yemeni national in June 2018, a decision that was upheld by the country's Supreme Judicial Council in November 2023. However, her execution was postponed, following "concerted efforts" by the Government of India. Earlier on July 17, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that it was actively working to support Nimisha Priya and was extending all possible assistance in the case. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during a press briefing, stated that the MEA had appointed a lawyer to assist Priya's family in navigating the complex legal process in Yemen. This includes exploring options for clemency or pardon under Sharia law. Nimisha Priya is a trained nurse and has worked in private hospitals in Yemen for a few years. Her husband and minor daughter returned to India in 2014 because of financial reasons, and in that same year, Yemen was gripped by civil war, and they could not go back as the country stopped issuing new visas. Later in 2015, Nimisha joined hands with a Yemeni citizen, Talal Abdo Mahdi, to set up her clinic in Sanaa. She sought Mahdi's support because, under Yemen's law, only nationals are allowed to set up clinics and business firms. In 2015, Mahdi accompanied Nimisha Priya to Kerala when she came for a month-long holiday. During the visit, he stole a wedding photograph of Nimisha, which he later manipulated to claim that he was married to her. A plea made by the mother of Nimisha Priya had stated, "After a while, Nimisha's clinic began, Mahdi manipulated the ownership documents of the clinic. He also began to take money out of her monthly earnings after telling everyone that Nimisha was his wife. Nimisha had alleged that Mahdi had been harassing her and her family for years. Mahdi also seized her passport. This was done to ensure that she would not leave Yemen. He tortured her under the influence of drugs. He threatened her at gunpoint several times. He took all the money from the clinic and her ornaments." The plea further alleged that, unable to cope with the torture, Nimisha complained to the police in Sanaa, but instead of taking action against Mahdi, the police arrested her and put her in jail for six days. It was further alleged that on her return from jail, the severity of the torture increased manifold. In July 2017, Nimisha took the help of a warden of a jail located near her clinic. The warden suggested that she should try to sedate him and then convince him to give her the passport. However, sedation did not affect Mahdi, who was a substance abuser. She tried sedating him again, using a stronger sedative in order to retrieve her passport, but he died within a few minutes due to a drug overdose. (ANI)
