Polish supreme court ratifies nationalist's presidential vote win
In the country's highly polarised political landscape, concerns had also been voiced over the legitimacy of the court chamber which will issue the verdict.
Karol Nawrocki, backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, scored 51 percent of votes to win the June 1 runoff election, according to official results -- a major blow for the pro-EU government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk and LGBTQ rights campaigners.
Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, the candidate put forward by the government, lost out by 369,000 votes in the country of 38 million people.
"All of the circumstances clearly demonstrate that Karol Tadeusz Nawrocki garnered more votes than Rafał Kazimierz Trzaskowski during the second round of the vote," judge Krzysztof Wiak announced after a hearing, also confirming the election result.
Prosecutors had alleged that the vote count was falsified in Nawrocki's favour at some polling stations, fuelling calls for a national recount.
PiS dismissed doubts about the vote as an attempt to "steal the election".
According to the Polish constitution, the Supreme Court had to validate the ballot before the winner could be sworn in at a joint session of parliament -- a ceremony planned for August 6.
However, European courts and legal experts have questioned the legitimacy of the Exceptional Supervision and Public Matters Chamber, the Supreme Court body that issued the ruling on Tuesday.
The European Court of Human Rights said in 2023 that the Chamber does not fulfil the definition of "an independent and impartial tribunal established by law".
Justice Minister Adam Bodnar, who is also the prosecutor general, had asked in vain for all of the chamber's judges to be excluded.
Tusk has criticised the chamber, but recognised on Monday that "it is the Supreme Court's responsibility to rule whether an election is valid or not".
"It is not possible... for the Supreme Court to be replaced in this matter... by the prosecutor general or the government," the prime minister said.
- 'Paralyse the Supreme Court' -
The Supreme Court had received around 56,000 election protests since the second round of voting.
Judges have already dismissed, without taking further action, more than 50,000 complaints, many of which were based on protest templates shared on social media.
Supreme Court chief justice Malgorzata Manowska criticised the sending of template-based protests as an "operation meant to... paralyse the Supreme Court".
Bodnar complained that prosecutors were not given access to all of the 56,000 protests and suggested that the chamber's examination of those could be nothing more than a "facade".
Still, the court ordered the results from 13 polling stations to be recounted earlier this month.
National prosecutors later said that in some of those polling stations votes were transferred from one candidate to another, mainly in Nawrocki's favour.
Government coalition lawmaker Roman Giertych authored one of the protest templates, claiming that votes had been reassigned to Nawrocki and alleging ballot rigging.
Giertych and several experts have demanded a national recount and called for the presidential inauguration to be postponed in order to clarify the alleged irregularities.
These experts assert that the previous nationalist government and outgoing president Andrzej Duda introduced reforms which have undermined the rule of law in Poland.
The reforms have long put Poland at odds with the European Commission, but the victory of a pro-EU coalition in October 2023 parliamentary elections mitigated the conflict.
Parliament speaker Szymon Holownia, like other members of the ruling coalition, has so far firmly rejected the idea of postponing the presidential oath ceremony.
Independently, Bodnar has ordered a group of prosecutors to examine "irregularities" in the vote counting.
"It is the prosecution's role... to inquire everywhere, where there is a suspicion of crime," Tusk said.
sw/dt/jhb/bc/giv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Supreme Court to review state bans on transgender athletes in girls' sports
The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to hear a case that will determine whether transgender female student athletes can be prevented from joining girls and women's sports teams at public schools. The justices are set to hear challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia after lower court rulings in sided with transgender students who sued when they were blocked from competing. 'I am optimistic that after hearing the case, the Supreme Court will restore sanity to athletics and allow West Virginia to enforce its commonsense law that prevents boys from competing in girl's sports,' Mountain State Gov. Patrick Morrisey fired off in an X post. Advertisement The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to review whether transgender student athletes can be banned from joining female sports teams at public schools. AP Twenty-seven states have passed laws in recent years that restrict participation in female sports for male-to-female trans students. In Idaho and West Virginia specifically, state laws specify that sports teams at public schools are based on 'biological sex' and ban 'students of the male sex' from joining female athletic teams. Advertisement The challenge to the West Virginia law was brought by Becky Pepper-Jackson in 2021 after her middle school banned her from joining the girls' cross country and track teams. Pepper-Jackson has been taking puberty-blocking medication and has publicly identified as a girl since she was in the third grade. The justices are set to hear two cases out of Idaho and West Virginia after earlier lower court rulings in each state sided with transgender students who sued. Getty Images A federal judge initially ruled in the student's favor at an early stage of the case, but later reversed course and ended up siding with the state. Advertisement The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Jackson's exclusion from girls' teams violated Title IX, which forbids sex discrimination in education. '[Pepper-Jackson] has been publicly living as a girl for more than five years. During that time, her elementary and middle schools created gender support plans to affirm her gender identity and ensure she is recognized as a girl at school,' the appeals court ruling read. 'To align with her gender identity, [Pepper-Jackson] has changed her name, and the State of West Virginia (whose Act is challenged here) has issued a birth certificate that recognizes her changed name and lists her sex as female. [Pepper-Jackson] also takes puberty blocking medication to prevent her body from experiencing male adolescent development and estrogen hormone therapy, which is leading her to develop the outward physical characteristics—including fat distribution, pelvic shape, and bone size—of an adolescent female. Her family, teachers, and classmates have all known [Pepper-Jackson] as a girl for several years, and—beginning in elementary school—she has participated only on girls athletic teams. 'Given these facts, offering [Pepper-Jackson] a 'choice' between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is no real choice at all.' Meanwhile, the Idaho challenge was brought by Lindsay Hecox — a trans Boise State University student who had tried to join the women's track and cross-country teams, but failed to qualify. Advertisement Instead, Hecox has participating in sports clubs, including soccer and running, at the public university. A federal judge blocked Idaho's law in 2020, ruling that it likely violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and unlawfully discriminated based on sex and transgender status. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld initial ruling in 2023 and again in an amended ruling last year. While the Supreme Court agreed to take up the cases from Idaho and West Virginia, the justices opted not to act on a third case from Arizona that raises the same issue. The cases will be heard sometime after the justices convene for the new court term Oct. 6. Last month, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on transgender puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments for minors — a major win for states that have similar laws on the books. With Post wires
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind
By Dave Graham ZURICH (Reuters) -Switzerland is exploring what concessions it can make to secure a deal with Washington on trade, but it must tread carefully to protect its interests with key trading partner, the European Union, politicians and people familiar with the matter said. The Swiss cabinet last month approved its biggest trade policy overhaul in years with the EU, two months after the U.S. stunned Switzerland by announcing 31% tariffs - well above the 20% rate Washington set out for the 27-nation bloc. That shock prompted a scramble by business leaders and officials to underline how much Switzerland invests in the United States and the tariff threat was suspended for a 90-day period ending July 9. Talks are continuing. Nicolas Walder, a Greens member of the lower house of parliament's foreign policy committee, said Switzerland must insist on its commitment to multilateralism with the U.S. "A deal should not interfere with any agreement that Switzerland has signed or wants to sign, and should specifically mention the bilateral agreement with the EU," said Walder, whose committee is regularly briefed on the trade talks. The Swiss mandate for negotiating with the U.S. stipulates that relations with its other trade partners be upheld. Any U.S. deal must be compatible with Switzerland's future relations with the EU, a Swiss source familiar with the matter said. Swiss officials and lawmakers believe that a 31% tariff can be averted, but say U.S. President Donald Trump's existing 10% baseline tariff looks likely to stay. "Switzerland is negotiating in good faith with the U.S. government, aiming for a positive outcome," the Swiss Economy Ministry said in a statement in response to questions on the points made by Reuters in this article. The EU trade agreement faces a lengthy approval process and is almost certain to be put to a national referendum under Switzerland's system of direct democracy. CONCESSIONS Trump's unpredictable approach to trade policy has been a challenge for Switzerland, which abolished its own industrial tariffs last year and sets great store by adherence to rules. Eager to offer Trump something, Switzerland is exploring granting concessions to the U.S., such as greater market access for produce like seafood and citrus fruits, the source said. Home to pharmaceutical giants Roche and Novartis - both big U.S. investors - Switzerland also knows Washington has been investigating trade practices in the sector and does not want any deal to be muddied later by pharma tariffs, the source said. "This is absolutely crucial," said Simon Michel, a federal lawmaker and CEO of medical technology company Ypsomed. Jean-Philippe Kohl, deputy director of industry association Swissmem, said even if only a 10% tariff applies, the dollar's decline against the Swiss franc amid the trade uncertainty was already making exporters' goods dearer in the U.S. And if the EU secured better tariff terms with Washington, that could put Swiss firms at a disadvantage. "It's therefore important that the dialogue with the U.S. quickly lead to a positive outcome," he said. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Hundreds of Palestinian families flee West Bank camp ahead of Israeli demolition orders
TULKAREM REFUGEE CAMP, West Bank (AP) — Hundreds of Palestinians have fled a section of the Tulkarem refugee camp in the occupied West Bank after receiving Israeli demolition orders — joining tens of thousands of people to be displaced by an open-ended military offensive in the area. The residents loaded all of their earthly possessions -- mattresses, blankets, washing machines -- onto vehicles on Wednesday before taking one last glimpse of their homes and speeding off. The new demolition order affects some 104 buildings, and at least 400 families now face homelessness, said Faisal Salama, a local official in the camp. Late Wednesday, Israel's Supreme Court temporarily froze the planned demolitions in response to a request from Adalah, a Palestinian human rights group in Israel. The order gave the army until Sept. 2 to respond. But as of late Thursday, none of the displaced residents had returned. The Israeli army declined comment on the order. The exodus on Wednesday is the latest triggered by Israeli operations to stamp out militancy in West Bank refugee camps in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack that ignited the war in Gaza. Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been driven out of their homes this year in the largest displacement in the West Bank since Israel captured the territory in the 1967 Mideast war. The Israeli military justified the planned demolitions in Tulkarem, saying it operates in areas 'with high level of terrorism.' It said the decision to demolish buildings in the camp were made based on 'operational necessity' to allow Israeli forces to operate freely and move in the area, and was made after other options were considered. Israel's raids have emptied out and largely destroyed several urban refugee camps in the northern West Bank, such as Tulkarem and nearby Nur Shams. Israel says troops will stay in some camps for a year. Salama said with the latest orders, a total of 1,000 families have been displaced by recent demolition orders. 'Where will these families live? Where will they go? Their fate is uncertain and unknown,' he said. Subhi Hamdan, 65, said he was given just one day to leave. He is worried he won't be able to afford an apartment despite having registered for assistance with the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority. 'Until now we haven't seen anything at all,' he said. 'Where can anyone go?'
