logo
Karnataka decides to levy 1% fire cess on newly constructed multi-storey buildings

Karnataka decides to levy 1% fire cess on newly constructed multi-storey buildings

The Hindu3 days ago
The State Cabinet on Thursday decided to levy 1% fire cess to the property tax of newly constructed multi-storey buildings in Karnataka.
The Chief Minister had announced in the 2024-25 Budget speech that 'according to the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964, to increase efficiency in the Fire and Emergency Department, 1% fire cess will be levied to the property tax of multi-storey buildings which will be newly constructed in the State.'
The Karnataka Fire Force (Amendment) Bill, 2025, will be tabled in the Monsoon Session of the State legislature that would commence on August 11, to introduce the new fire cess.
To enhance the efficiency of the Fire and Emergency Services Department, Section (15) of the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964, would be amended to levy 1% fire cess along with the property tax on multi-storey buildings which would be newly constructed in the State, Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H.K, Patil told reporters.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries
MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries

More than a year after the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 became effective, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has refused to share data on the total number of beneficiaries under the Act. A Bharatiya Janata Party MP from West Bengal told The Hindu that fewer than 100 people in his constituency had received citizenship under the CAA even though the number of intended beneficiaries, mostly belonging to the Matua sect, were around 1 lakh. There are around 2.8 crore people from the Matua and Namasudra communities who stand to benefit from the CAA in the State. The CAA Rules were notified on March 11, 2024 to give citizenship to undocumented members of Hindu, Sikh, Parsi, Jain, Buddhist and Christian communities from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh under the Act that was passed in 2019. Ranaghat MP Jagannath Sarkar told The Hindu that the requirement to submit any one document, which will help trace an applicant's roots to Bangladesh, should be dropped and the cut-off date for applying under CAA should be amended too. The existing cut-off date is December 31, 2014. 'Most people do not have any of the documents sought by the MHA to fulfil citizenship criteria. These people came to India to escape persecution, with barely any belongings. How will they provide documents?' Mr. Sarkar said. Following reports from West Bengal, Schedule 1A of the CAA Rules was tweaked on July 8, 2024, and the list of nine documents to prove that the applicant is a national of Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Pakistan was expanded to include any document issued by the State or the Centre or quasi-judicial authority in India identifying or representing the applicant or their parents or grandparents or great-grandparents as a national of these three countries . Anticipating non-cooperation in Opposition-ruled States, the CAA Rules entrusted Central government officials posted in States, including officials of Directorate of Census, Postal Department, Railways, National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Intelligence Bureau, to process the applications. On April 2, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai said in the Rajya Sabha that 'thousands were granted citizenship', while responding to Trinamool Congress member Sushmita Dev's remarks that merely 350 people were granted citizenship under the CAA. The Minister did not specify the number. The Act was mostly expected to benefit people in West Bengal and Assam as those who had arrived from Pakistan had entered legally and possessed one of the documents required to acquire citizenship. In West Bengal, most intended beneficiaries already have voter cards and other identity documents. One of the criteria to avail citizenship under the CAA is that the applicant has to declare that he or she is a foreigner. The Pakistani applicants from the six non-Muslim communities would have been eligible under the Citizenship Act, 1955 also after living in India continuously for 12 years. According to Hindu Singh, president, Seemant Lok Sangathan, a group that advocates for the rights of Pakistani minority migrants in India, of the around 8,500 people who applied under the CAA in Rajasthan, 7,250 were granted citizenship in the past one year. On March 10, Assam's Parliamentary Affairs Minister Chandra Mohan Patowary informed the Assembly that two applicants in Assam were granted citizenship under CAA. In Gujarat, at least 373 people had got citizenship via the CAA. While discussing the legislation in Rajya Sabha on December 11, 2019, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that 'lakhs and crores' of people would benefit from the law. However, Director, Intelligence Bureau had deposed before a parliamentary committee in 2018 that around 31,000 people would be the immediate beneficiaries. The MHA has refused to share information on how many people have either applied or had been granted citizenship. The Hindu filed a Right to Information Act (RTI) application in June 2024 and in September 2024, the MHA refused to provide the information. An appeal was also filed with the Central Information Commission (CIC), which hears appeals from applicants who have issues with RTI responses from public authorities of the Union government. The CIC's Chief Commissioner Heeralal Samariya heard The Hindu's case on July 9. The RTI was limited to applications received on the portal, which is run by the Home Ministry as the entire process is online. The Home Ministry's representative, Ram Dayal Meena, did not specifically dispute any of The Hindu's arguments during the hearing, and when asked by the CIC if he wanted to speak, declined to make any oral submissions. A written response reiterated the MHA's earlier refusals, which simply stated that the information was 'not being maintained as desired by you'. 'Upon perusal of records and examining the facts of the case at hand, it is noted that the Appellant's queries had been appropriately answered by the concerned PIO,' Mr. Samariya wrote in his order. 'The reply is self- explanatory and information as permissible under the provisions of the RTI Act has been duly supplied to the Appellant.' The decision was arrived at the same day, and was uploaded at a later date.

Karnataka government dilutes misinformation bill, drops ‘fake news'
Karnataka government dilutes misinformation bill, drops ‘fake news'

New Indian Express

time12 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Karnataka government dilutes misinformation bill, drops ‘fake news'

BENGALURU: The Congress-led state government seems to have diluted the controversial draft of Karnataka Misinformation Regulation Bill, 2025 by dropping 'fake news' from its title. It was earlier called the Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill. The new draft is likely to be discussed in the next cabinet meeting and tabled during the legislature session starting on August 11. The cabinet had first proposed the bill on June 19 to stop misinformation and fake news. As per the earlier draft, if social media content creators were found guilty of posting fake news, they faced an imprisonment of up to seven years and fine of up to Rs 10 lakh or both. The new draft, however, does not mention the quantum of penalty, while also dropping the prohibition of anti-feminism and disrespect to Sanatan symbols. It explains that to 'communicate' means dissemination of information to ten or more persons in person, through publication, communication device, computer resource, television, making or altering bots that disseminate misinformation or any other communication medium with a wide reach. The old draft had said one or more persons. As per the new draft, no person outside or inside Karnataka shall abet misinformation to persons in Karnataka that disrupts public tranquility or the conduct of free and fair elections or incites others to commit an offence. 'Misinformation' means knowingly or recklessly making a false or inaccurate statement in the context in which it appears, excluding opinions, religious or philosophical sermons, satire, comedy or parody or any other form of artistic expression.

"Home Ministry raised certain queries": Bengal Governor on returning Aparajita Bill to state govt
"Home Ministry raised certain queries": Bengal Governor on returning Aparajita Bill to state govt

Time of India

time15 hours ago

  • Time of India

"Home Ministry raised certain queries": Bengal Governor on returning Aparajita Bill to state govt

West Bengal Governor C V Ananda Bose has returned the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill to the state government for reconsideration, citing serious objections raised by the Centre. Speaking to on Saturday, he said that it is the Governor's constitutional obligation to either give assent to the bill or return it to the Assembly. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MCA Artificial Intelligence Data Analytics Data Science Healthcare CXO Public Policy Finance Cybersecurity Others Design Thinking Leadership Technology Digital Marketing Management Degree Operations Management healthcare MBA PGDM Data Science others Project Management Product Management Skills you'll gain: Programming Proficiency Data Handling & Analysis Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Master of Computer Applications Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details "It's a constitutional obligation of the Governor to either give assent to the bill, return it to the Assembly for reconsideration, or send it to the President for reserve. Given its broader implications, I reserved it for the President of India. Now the Home Ministry has raised certain queries, which I have also taken up with the state government for their response," said Bose. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Knee Pain? This Morning Trick Helps Wellnee Undo The Bill, passed unanimously by the West Bengal Assembly in September 2024, aims to enhance punishment for rape and sexual offences . The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has flagged multiple provisions in the Bill as "excessively harsh and disproportionate". The MHA has raised concerns about removing judicial discretion in sentencing, citing Supreme Court rulings that stress the importance of retaining judicial discretion. Live Events The Centre is of the view that removing stricter penalties for sexual assault of minors could weaken protections for vulnerable groups. Reacting to the Governor's move on Saturday, the father of the RG Kar rape and murder victim accused Kolkata Police of tampering with evidence and failing to act in his daughter's case. He told ANI, "Kolkata Police did nothing in my daughter's case except for evidence tampering... There was no provision for evidence tampering in this bill. It will not matter to us whether the bill is passed or not." He also criticised Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee , alleging that the bill was introduced in the Assembly to "deceive the people" of the state. "The Chief Minister introduced this bill in the Assembly to deceive the people of West Bengal. She also sent it to the Governor and the President. But they rejected the bill, which is a good thing," he said. Earlier on Thursday, Governor CV Ananda Bose sent back the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024, to the state government. The bill proposes the death penalty or life imprisonment for those convicted of rape and seeks to amend sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the new criminal code. The West Bengal Legislative Assembly had unanimously passed the Aparajita Bill on September 3, 2024. The Bill was sent to President Droupadi Murmu by the Governor on September 6, 2024. The legislation passed, following the rape and murder of a doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, provides for the death penalty in five categories of offences - rape, rape by a police officer or public servant, rape causing death or resulting in a persistent vegetative state, gang rape, and repeat offenders. According to Raj Bhawan officials, the bill proposes making the death penalty mandatory in cases where the victim dies or is left in a vegetative state under Section 66 of the BNS. The Bill also proposes to delete Section 65 of the BNS, 2023, thereby eliminating the distinction in punishment for the rape of women under 16 and under 12 years of age, according to Raj Bhawan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store