California Senate Committee Advances Bill to Expose Patients to Doctor Substance Abuse, Says Consumer watchdog
AB 408, authored by Assemblymember Berman and sponsored by the Medical Board of California, would create a secret drug and alcohol 'diversion program' where the Board would send doctors who have substance abuse problems, instead of taking disciplinary action. AB 408 does not require disclosure to Medical Board enforcement staff, or consequences, for a doctor in the program that fails a drug test, skips a drug test, or otherwise violates the program. This silence about relapse by doctors who are actively treating patients is not limited to doctors who choose treatment voluntarily, as proponents claim. It applies to doctors sent to the program by the Board who would otherwise have faced discipline, including those found using substances at work, said Consumer Watchdog.
KGTV San Diego ran this recent story about the secret drug program.
The chair of the committee, Senator Angelique Ashby, voiced her reservations about the bill, mirroring many of the concerns raised by medical negligence survivors, Consumer Watchdog and the Consumer Protection Policy Center.
Senator Caroline Menjivar also highlighted a troubling scenario: physicians under the influence could potentially arrive at work and, if discovered before causing any harm to patients, be allowed to enter the program. She said this raises a critical question – how many of these doctors might have worked while impaired in the weeks prior without ever being caught?
Tina Minasian, an advocate for patient rights in California, suffers lifelong injuries inflicted by a substance-abusing surgeon who was a participant in the former confidential physician diversion program. She played a pivotal role in advocating for the closure of the prior failed Diversion Program.
'I can't believe that eighteen years later I have to take on this fight again on behalf of all Californians,' stated Minasian who testified at today's hearing. 'We gained too many protections in the past fifteen years to give them up. I lost everything when I was harmed and cannot allow another Californian to endure what I did.'
The Medical Board's prior diversion program was abolished after failing five state audits because doctors who entered the program could relapse with no consequences and patients were harmed. To prevent this from happening again, the Legislature passed oversight rules called the 'Uniform Standards' and applied them to doctors in diversion programs. AB 408 exempts doctors from the law, eliminating oversight and accountability from the program. Consumer Watchdog has urged preserving those patient protections.
The bill would allow doctors to seek treatment to avoid discipline even if they were impaired on the job. For example: A San Francisco doctor suspected of stealing drugs from her hospital was recently arrested after she was found passed out in an operating room shortly after she was scheduled to participate in a toddler's surgery. Under AB 408 the Board could send that doctor into diversion instead of the disciplinary investigation, treatment oversight and consequences for relapse that are all mandatory under current law. The bill does not require reporting of a positive drug test to the Board, so the doctor could continue treating patients while keeping diversion program violations secret and place patients in harm's way.
Read Consumer Watchdog's opposition letters on AB 408 here and here.
The former confidential physician diversion program was subjected to a critical sunset review in 2007 after five failed audits by the state and a critical report from an Enforcement Monitor revealed significant failures in drug testing and oversight. In response, patients stepped forward to share their harrowing stories of harm and loss due to the negligence of doctors in the program.
The Medical Board of California recognized the severity of these revelations and terminated the program in 2008. That same year, a pivotal hearing on the diversion program was convened at the state Capitol. The chair of the joint committee announced SB 1441, legislation designed to establish Uniform Standards for Substance-Abusing Health Care Professionals in California. Passed into law in 2008, SB 1441 was a vital step toward rectifying the failures of the previous diversion program. It empowered the Medical Board with essential tools to monitor substance-abusing licensees and enforce meaningful consequences for offending physicians, prioritizing the protection of patients and fostering a culture of accountability among healthcare providers. In 2016, SB 1177 was enacted, which allowed the Medical Board of California to recreate a new physician diversion program that adhered to the Uniform Standards.
AB 408 discards those consumer protections and reconfigures any future program in the image of the failed diversion program.
AB 408 is expected to be heard before the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 15th.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
16-07-2025
- Malay Mail
‘One less thing to worry about': Sweden cuts red tape on legal gender change, lowers age limit to 16
STOCKHOLM, July 17 — After four years of waiting, Jenny Leonor Werner sees the light at the end of the tunnel, able to legally switch gender following a recent change to Swedish law. As of July 1, Sweden has removed some of the restrictions for changing gender legally and how it appears on official documents. 'It just feels good — one less thing to worry about,' Werner, 22, who was declared male at birth but identifies as female, told AFP. Now all that is needed to change is a medical certificate stating that a person's gender identity does not align with the one indicated on their birth certificate. Healthcare professionals have to evaluate whether the change better reflects the person's gender identity and must ensure that the person can live with their new gender identity for the foreseeable future. The minimum age to make the change has also been lowered from 18 to 16 years, although people under 18 need permission from their legal guardian. A week after the law came into effect, 106 people had submitted applications, according to Sweden's National Board of Health and Welfare. Previously, individuals wanting to change their legal gender had to undergo a lengthy evaluation process in order to obtain a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. That is a condition where a person experiences distress as a result of a mismatch between the sex they were assigned at birth and the gender they identify themselves as having. Werner had received this diagnosis in 2024 after a four-year process and could have already requested the legal change. But healthcare staff advised her 'to wait for the new law, as the process should be faster'. Gender dysphoria rise Access to surgical procedures is also simplified under the new law — the requirement to first change one's legal gender has been removed. Before the law was passed in April of last year, it was preceded by intense debates in parliament, with the right-wing ruling coalition government divided. The Moderates and Liberals were in favour of the text but government partner the Christian Democrats opposed it, as did the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, which is propping up the government. 'This law is a major step forward. The separation of law and medicine in the new law makes things much easier,' Frank Berglund, a policy expert at the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education (RFSU), told AFP. Berglund, 30, legally changed his gender at the age of 19. Like Werner, it took him about four years to obtain the gender dysphoria diagnosis. Currently, the waiting time to even begin an evaluation can stretch to several years, according to the National Board of Health and Welfare. The health agency has also noted a sharp increase in cases of gender dysphoria, particularly among 13- to 17-year-olds who were 'assigned female at birth'. The agency reported a 1,500-per cent jump between 2008 and 2018. Following the rapid increase and citing a need for caution, Swedish authorities decided in 2022 to halt hormone therapy for minors except in very rare cases. They also limited mastectomies for teenagers wanting to transition. Shorter waiting lists Berglund said the new law would help 'reduce waiting lists in healthcare to some extent'. He also welcomed the possibility of making the legal change before the age of 18, saying it was absurd that he had been able to complete the entire medical procedure before 18 but not the legal process. 'I had already changed my name, started hormone treatment and received the diagnosis,' he said. Werner recounted being asked: 'Is this you?' when showing her identification card. 'Now I can get a new ID card that I'm really happy with,' she said. 'I've never been satisfied with the ID cards and passports I've had before.' With the new law, Sweden is amending its gender identity legislation for the first time since it was first adopted in 1972. Back then, the Nordic country became a world pioneer by allowing people to legally change their gender. But campaigners want Sweden to go further and allow people to change their legal gender without requiring a medical certificate, as is the case in all other Nordic countries. — AFP
Malaysian Reserve
08-07-2025
- Malaysian Reserve
California Senate Committee Advances Bill to Expose Patients to Doctor Substance Abuse, Says Consumer watchdog
SACRAMENTO, Calif., July 7, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Despite pleas from families throughout California, who have voiced their concerns about exposing patients to substance-abusing doctors, the Senate Business & Professions Committee advanced AB 408 by an initial vote of 7 to 1. AB 408, authored by Assemblymember Berman and sponsored by the Medical Board of California, would create a secret drug and alcohol 'diversion program' where the Board would send doctors who have substance abuse problems, instead of taking disciplinary action. AB 408 does not require disclosure to Medical Board enforcement staff, or consequences, for a doctor in the program that fails a drug test, skips a drug test, or otherwise violates the program. This silence about relapse by doctors who are actively treating patients is not limited to doctors who choose treatment voluntarily, as proponents claim. It applies to doctors sent to the program by the Board who would otherwise have faced discipline, including those found using substances at work, said Consumer Watchdog. KGTV San Diego ran this recent story about the secret drug program. The chair of the committee, Senator Angelique Ashby, voiced her reservations about the bill, mirroring many of the concerns raised by medical negligence survivors, Consumer Watchdog and the Consumer Protection Policy Center. Senator Caroline Menjivar also highlighted a troubling scenario: physicians under the influence could potentially arrive at work and, if discovered before causing any harm to patients, be allowed to enter the program. She said this raises a critical question – how many of these doctors might have worked while impaired in the weeks prior without ever being caught? Tina Minasian, an advocate for patient rights in California, suffers lifelong injuries inflicted by a substance-abusing surgeon who was a participant in the former confidential physician diversion program. She played a pivotal role in advocating for the closure of the prior failed Diversion Program. 'I can't believe that eighteen years later I have to take on this fight again on behalf of all Californians,' stated Minasian who testified at today's hearing. 'We gained too many protections in the past fifteen years to give them up. I lost everything when I was harmed and cannot allow another Californian to endure what I did.' The Medical Board's prior diversion program was abolished after failing five state audits because doctors who entered the program could relapse with no consequences and patients were harmed. To prevent this from happening again, the Legislature passed oversight rules called the 'Uniform Standards' and applied them to doctors in diversion programs. AB 408 exempts doctors from the law, eliminating oversight and accountability from the program. Consumer Watchdog has urged preserving those patient protections. The bill would allow doctors to seek treatment to avoid discipline even if they were impaired on the job. For example: A San Francisco doctor suspected of stealing drugs from her hospital was recently arrested after she was found passed out in an operating room shortly after she was scheduled to participate in a toddler's surgery. Under AB 408 the Board could send that doctor into diversion instead of the disciplinary investigation, treatment oversight and consequences for relapse that are all mandatory under current law. The bill does not require reporting of a positive drug test to the Board, so the doctor could continue treating patients while keeping diversion program violations secret and place patients in harm's way. Read Consumer Watchdog's opposition letters on AB 408 here and here. The former confidential physician diversion program was subjected to a critical sunset review in 2007 after five failed audits by the state and a critical report from an Enforcement Monitor revealed significant failures in drug testing and oversight. In response, patients stepped forward to share their harrowing stories of harm and loss due to the negligence of doctors in the program. The Medical Board of California recognized the severity of these revelations and terminated the program in 2008. That same year, a pivotal hearing on the diversion program was convened at the state Capitol. The chair of the joint committee announced SB 1441, legislation designed to establish Uniform Standards for Substance-Abusing Health Care Professionals in California. Passed into law in 2008, SB 1441 was a vital step toward rectifying the failures of the previous diversion program. It empowered the Medical Board with essential tools to monitor substance-abusing licensees and enforce meaningful consequences for offending physicians, prioritizing the protection of patients and fostering a culture of accountability among healthcare providers. In 2016, SB 1177 was enacted, which allowed the Medical Board of California to recreate a new physician diversion program that adhered to the Uniform Standards. AB 408 discards those consumer protections and reconfigures any future program in the image of the failed diversion program. AB 408 is expected to be heard before the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 15th.
Malaysian Reserve
23-04-2025
- Malaysian Reserve
Assembly Committee Votes to Expose Patients to Doctor Substance Abuse; Advances Bill to Overturn Law Requiring Medical Board Act When Doctors Fail Drug Test, Says Consumer Watchdog
SACRAMENTO, Calif., April 23, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — AB 408 by Assemblymember Berman to create a secret Medical Board program that will place patients at risk of harm at the hands of doctors abusing drugs or alcohol passed out of the Assembly Business & Professions Committee yesterday. The bill, AB 408 (Berman), would recreate a failed Medical Board 'diversion' program that allowed doctors under investigation by the Board because of substance abuse to evade discipline by entering the program. That program was shut down for putting patients at risk after failing five state audits and two reports by a Legislatively-appointed Enforcement Monitor. Consumer Watchdog testified in opposition to the bill in Sacramento on Tuesday. 'The bill would eliminate a basic patient safety responsibility of the Medical Board: that the Board investigate and act if it refers a doctor to treatment and that doctor fails a drug test,' testified Consumer Watchdog executive director Carmen Balber at the Tuesday hearing. The Legislature and the Board addressed the failures of the past diversion program by shutting that program down, and putting in place standards for monitoring doctors in diversion, a report to Medical Board enforcement staff, and consequences if a doctor referred to a diversion program fails a drug test or other program requirements. AB 408 does away with those protections. 'While keeping a failed drug test secret may be good for the doctor, it isn't good for patients being treated by that doctor,' said Balber. 'This isn't about doctors who voluntarily seek treatment; it would keep information secret about doctors who are already a clear and present danger to patients. If the board knows of a doctor's substance abuse, sends them to treatment, and then they fail a drug test, that fact can't be kept secret from the Board.' Read Consumer Watchdog's letter of opposition to AB 408. Tina Minasian, an advocate for patient rights in California, suffers lifelong injuries inflicted by a substance-abusing surgeon who was a participant in the former confidential physician diversion program. Tina, along with other harmed patients, played a pivotal role in advocating for the closure of the prior failed Diversion Program. 'I can't believe that eighteen years later I have to take on this fight again on behalf of all Californians,' stated Minasian. 'We gained too many protections in the past fifteen years to give them up. I lost everything when I was harmed and cannot allow another Californian to endure what I did.' The History of the Medical Board and Physician Diversion The former confidential physician diversion program was subjected to a critical sunset review in 2007 after five failed audits by the state and a critical report from an Enforcement Monitor revealed significant failures in drug testing and oversight. In response, patients bravely stepped forward to share their harrowing stories of harm and loss due to the negligence of substance-abusing physicians. The Medical Board of California recognized the severity of these revelations and terminated the program in 2008. That same year, a pivotal hearing on the diversion program was convened at the state Capitol. Following, the chair of the joint committee announced the authorship of SB 1441, legislation designed to establish Uniform Standards for Substance-Abusing Health Care Professionals in California. Passed into law in 2008, SB 1441 was a vital step toward rectifying the failures of the previous diversion program. It empowered the Medical Board with essential tools to monitor substance-abusing licensees and enforce meaningful consequences for offending physicians, prioritizing the protection of patients and fostering a culture of accountability among healthcare providers. In 2016, SB 1177 was enacted, which allowed the Medical Board of California to recreate a new physician diversion program that adhered to the Uniform Standards. AB 408 discards those consumer protections and reconfigures any future program in the image of the failed diversion program.
