
The Oval Office showdown heard round the world: From the Politics Desk
Happy Friday! Somehow it is already the last day of February. In today's edition, we break down the fallout at home and abroad from today's White House meeting between Donald Trump, JD Vance and Volodymyr Zelenskyy that devolved into a shouting match.
— Adam Wollner
The Oval Office showdown heard round the world
A White House meeting that was intended to kick off negotiations on a deal over Ukraine's rare earth minerals devolved this afternoon into a remarkable confrontation, with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance chastising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and telling him he wasn't grateful enough to the United States, Rebecca Shabad and Nnamdi Egwuonwu report.
The Oval Office shouting match has for now shattered hopes for the minerals deal, which Trump and his allies had presented as an important step forward for Ukraine on the road to peace with Russia more than three years after the war began.
A White House official told NBC News that Trump and other U.S. officials felt disrespected and asked Zelenskyy to leave the White House, saying that he was not welcome back on Friday. Zelenskyy abruptly departed and a planned joint news conference between the two leaders was called off.
The exchange underscored the tension that has emerged between the United States and Ukraine — along with many of its European allies — over the tougher line that Trump has taken toward the country since coming into office. (More on what this all means for Zelenskyy below.)
Vance's role: As Henry J. Gomez notes, it was a comment from Vance that sparked the unexpected, full-blown, high-volume argument for the world to watch.
It was a sign of how Vance, who as a senator was known for his opposition to U.S. aid for Ukraine, is asserting himself on matters of foreign policy immediately as vice president. Earlier this month, Vance made waves at the Munich Security Conference with a speech that took sharp aim at other world leaders. And on Thursday, the day before tangling with Zelenskyy, Vance mixed it up in an Oval Office meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer — albeit in a much lighter tone.
A source familiar with the planning for the Trump meeting said there was no predetermined strategy for Vance to confront Zelenskyy the way he did. Vance, the source added, felt compelled to respond after finding Zelenskyy needlessly provocative in his demeanor.
'No one expected Zelenskyy to come in there and act entitled,' said this person, who added that the expectation was the Oval Office meeting would go off like a typical bilateral meeting.
How Republicans are responding: GOP lawmakers largely rallied around Trump and Vance. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who has been a staunch supporter of aiding Ukraine, said he doesn't know if Trump and Zelenskyy can 'repair the damage' and resume peace talks.
'He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change,' Graham said of Zelenskyy.
A few more moderate House Republicans, though, struck a different tone. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., told NBC News that the heated exchange was 'a bad day for America's foreign policy.' Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., called the meeting a ' missed opportunity ' for both countries and said 'the only winner of today is Vladimir Putin.' And Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., called the day's events ' heartbreaking ' and said both sides should return to the negotiating table.
How Democrats are responding: Democrats universally slammed Trump and Vance, accusing them of kowtowing to Putin. Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., said during an interview on MSNBC that 'this is the beginning of the end. Putin starts not only walking all over Ukraine, but walking all over Europe.'
An earlier meeting Friday between Zelenskyy and senators was 'very bipartisan and very supportive,' Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said. Asked about the more rancorous tone in the Oval Office, Whitehouse said: 'That's what you get for letting Vance in the room.'
By Kristen Welker
The heated clash between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office has raised new questions about the prospects for peace in Ukraine. And it underscored the dilemma facing Zelenskyy as he tries to end his country's three-year war with Russia.
Zelenskyy has tried to stress the need for American support, while also warning that Ukraine must be involved in any peace negotiations and that Russian President Vladimir Putin cannot be trusted.
When I sat down with Zelenskyy earlier this month, he made it clear that the stakes are high.
'It will be very, very, very difficult,' Zelenskyy said when asked if Ukraine could survive without U.S. military support. 'And, of course, in all the difficult situations, you have a chance. But we will have low chance, low chance to survive without support of the United States.'
And the Ukrainian president seemed to choose his words carefully during our interview when asked if Trump was negotiating in good faith, saying, 'I hope so. Yes, I count on it. I count on it very much.'
But today, Zelenskyy was defiant, with tensions between him and Trump reaching a boiling point at the White House.
The confrontation left more questions than answers about the path forward for peace in Ukraine. Will the U.S. still be involved in any potential ceasefire negotiations? Can those talks succeed if the U.S. is not involved? And could Ukraine lose the U.S. as an ally?
'I don't want to think that we will not be strategic partners,' Zelenskyy told me earlier this month. 'I don't want to think about it because it will make a pressure on morale — morality of Ukrainians and it will be worst thing from the very beginning of the war.'
Today's Oval Office clash also raises questions about the future of U.S. alliances with its traditional European partners, many of whom rallied around Ukraine.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk expressed solidarity with Ukraine in social media posts after the meeting. French President Emmanuel Macron said, 'I think we were all right to help Ukraine and sanction Russia three years ago, and to continue to do so. And when I say 'we,' I mean the United States of America, the Europeans, the Canadians, the Japanese and many others.'
We will explore all of this and more on 'Meet the Press' this Sunday with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.; Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
5 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump arrives in Scotland for his first UK visit since re-election
US President Donald Trump has arrived in Scotland at the start of a five day visit - his first to the UK since his re-election. His presence will result in a significant operation from Police Scotland and thousands of officers, who are expected to deal with mass protests around his golf courses and major Scottish cities. Trade unions, disability rights activists, climate justice campaigners, Palestinian and Ukrainian solidarity groups and American diaspora organisations are among those holding demonstrations in protest of the visit. Trump will visit both of the golf clubs he owns in the country – Turnberry in South Ayrshire and Menie, near Aberdeen, in the coming days. During his time in Scotland, he will also meet Scottish First Minister John Swinney, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Von der Leyen announced her trip on X, saying: 'Following a good call with @POTUS, we have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong.' Trump indicated that he and Starmer could 'approve' the US-UK trade deal when they meet on Monday. Speaking to reporters before he began his travel on Friday, the president said: 'We're going to be talking about the trade deal that we made and maybe even approve it.' Before boarding the presidential plane Air Force One to fly to Scotland, he told journalists he has a 'lot of love' for Scotland.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
KEIR STARMER: 'The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza must end now'
Keir Starmer says the starvation and desperation in Gaza is 'utterly horrifying' and the UK will 'pull every lever we have to get food and lifesaving support to the Palestinians' The appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting. I know the British people are sickened by what is happening. The images of starvation and desperation in Gaza are utterly horrifying. The denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people – to children and babies – is completely unjustifiable. So is the continued captivity of the hostages. And so is Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza. Hundreds of civilians have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking aid. Children have been killed while collecting water. It is a humanitarian catastrophe. And it must end now. We have put millions of pounds of aid into Gaza. We have announced an extra £40 million of humanitarian support this year. But the help is not getting in. So we are scaling up our work. We are urgently accelerating efforts to evacuate children from Gaza who need critical medical assistance – bringing more Palestinian children to the UK for specialist medical treatment. News that Israel will allow countries to airdrop aid into Gaza has come far too late – but we will do everything we can to get aid in via this route. We are already working urgently with the Jordanian authorities to get British aid onto planes and into Gaza. We will pull every lever we have to get food and lifesaving support to the Palestinian people immediately. More broadly, alongside our closest allies, I am working on a pathway to peace in the region – focused on the practical solutions that will make a real difference to the lives of those that are suffering in this war. That pathway will set out concrete steps to turn the desperately needed ceasefire into a lasting peace. Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis. This is the way to ensure that recognition is a tool of maximum impact to improve the lives of those who are suffering – which must always be our ultimate goal. The fact we have rebuilt the UK's standing on the world stage enables us to rally international action behind real, purposeful, practical solutions. That's what we have done with the Coalition of the Willing to support Ukraine. That is what must happen in the Middle East – building a new international coalition behind a plan to end the suffering, now and for the long term.

Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as sanctions loom over nuclear deadlock
Representatives from the UK, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, gathered at the Iranian consulate for the first talks since Iran's 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US bombers striking nuclear-related facilities. The talks, which ended after four hours, centred on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran, that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The return of sanctions, known as a 'snapback' mechanism, 'remains on the table', according to a European diplomat. 'A possible delay in triggering snapback has been floated to the Iranians on the condition that there is credible diplomatic engagement by Iran, that they resume full cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and that they address concerns about their highly-enriched uranium stockpile,' the diplomat said. European leaders have said sanctions will resume by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran, meanwhile, has said the US, which withdrew from the 2015 deal during President Donald Trump 's first term, needs to rebuild faith in its role in negotiations. Deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran's engagement was dependent on 'several key principles' that included 'rebuilding Iran's trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States'. In a social media post on Thursday, he also said the talks should not be used 'as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action'. He said Iran's right to enrich uranium 'in line with its legitimate needs' should be respected and sanctions removed. Iran has repeatedly threatened to leave the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which commits it to refrain from developing nuclear weapons, if sanctions return. Mr Gharibabadi described Friday's talks as 'serious, frank and detailed'. On X, he said the two sides discussed lifting sanctions and the snapback mechanism while agreeing to further talks. 'Both sides came to the meeting with specific ideas,' he said. 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' Friday's talks were held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending Mr Gharibabadi and a fellow deputy foreign minister, Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal, alongside the US, Russia and China. When the US withdrew in 2018, Mr Trump said the agreement was not tough enough. Under the original deal, neither Russia nor China can veto reimposed sanctions. Since the Israeli and US strikes on Iran, in which American B-52 bombers hit three nuclear sites, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations while supporting Israel's attacks. Against the backdrop of the conflict, during which Iran responded with missile attacks on Israel and a strike on a US base in Qatar, the road ahead remains uncertain. While European officials have said they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out. Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the IAEA. A central concern for western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to more than 400kg.