Watchdogs say corruption, cadre deployment worse under GNU
Image: IOL Graphics
Talk is cheap, and the GNU is proving it. Civil society watchdog, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse and Accountability Now warns that corruption has not just continued under the coalition government, in some departments, it's getting even worse.
The GNU, formed after the African National Congress (ANC) lost its majority in the May 2024 general elections, has come under fire for continuing many of the same practices that plagued previous administrations.
The GNU was established after the ANC entered into a coalition with its long-time rival, the Democratic Alliance (DA), and several smaller parties.
While the arrangement was praised as a new chapter in South African politics, tensions over corruption cases, policy implementation, governance, and ethics have plagued the coalition from the start.
Despite pledges to curb corruption, cadre deployment, and nepotism, these issues have persisted.
Others argue that they have even worsened.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Speaking to IOL News, Wayne Duvenage, CEO of the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA), said while there have been signs of improvement in governance, particularly in departments led by the DA - corruption remains rampant.
'In fact, it's worse because the networks that exist within many of the government departments, especially in higher education and transport, are still plundering away. That I can assure you,' Duvenage said.
He said that these networks were established during the fifth and sixth ANC administrations and continue to exert influence.
Among the most notable scandals under the GNU are allegations involving senior ANC members:
Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane, who reportedly took a R575,600 loan from the now-collapsed VBS Mutual Bank to buy a Sandton coffee shop while serving as the mayor of Polokwane.
Appearing before the Justice Portfolio Committee in Parliament last year, Simelane denied any wrong-doing regarding the controversial VBS scandal and a loan she had taken to buy a coffee shop.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has since removed Simelane as Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development following corruption allegations and moved her to Human Settlements.
Mmamoloko Kubayi, who was the Minister of Human Settlements was appointed to the portfolio previously held by Simelane.
She has also been linked to inflated billing with an Eskom contractor, claims she denies.
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, who has been under investigation by the Hawks for R2.5 million in alleged tender fraud during her tenure at Ba-Phalaborwa Municipality.
ANC secretary general Fikile Mbalula has previously defended Ntshavheni, saying that she has to respond to the allegations.
IOL News previously reported that speaking at a media briefing three months ago, Mbalula said the party would not be drawn into commenting on the matter suffice to say that the ANC will respond on "something tangible".
Accusing the DPCI or Hawks of trying to ruin Ntshavheni's image, Mbalula said law enforcement must not seek to find people guilty through media.
Ntshavheni has not said anything regarding the allegations.
Despite mounting calls from political parties for Ramaphosa to take action against the two, no action has yet been taken against either minister.
Recently, the Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) has faced public backlash following controversial board appointments by Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, including figures with strong ANC ties, including Gwede Mantashe's son, Buyambo.
The appointments were later withdrawn.
The National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) has also been embroiled in corruption allegations.
The previous board was dissolved, and the institution placed under administration.
A new board has since been appointed, with a mandate to clean up operations.
Duvenage acknowledged that the GNU has led to more civil society engagement and less unilateral decision-making than in previous administrations.
He pointed to the rejection of a proposed 2% VAT increase as a sign of healthy political contestation.
'It's been going for a year, and it has had its ups and downs, but it has held its ground,' he said.
'The fact that they couldn't steamroll the budget through Parliament is a positive sign.'
He added that despite ideological differences, the ANC and DA have managed to hold the coalition together.
'So far, actually, so good,' he added.
However, Duvenage admitted that true accountability remains elusive.
'There's a long way to go.'
Meanwhile, accountability advocate Paul Hoffman of Accountability Now emphasised the structural weaknesses in prosecuting corruption.
'The Zondo Commission identified more than 1,000 individuals involved in corruption. But the Criminal Justice Administration has done little,' Hoffman said.
He criticised the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), established to tackle high-level graft, calling it ineffective.
Hoffman argued that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is not independent enough to deal with serious corruption, as it operates under the control of the Department of Justice.
'The Constitutional Court has said corruption should be handled by a body outside executive control,' Hoffman told IOL News.
'The NPA is not that body.'
The DA has previously introduced two bills in Parliament calling for a new Chapter 9 anti-corruption commission, a move Hoffman believes could be transformative, if passed.
'It will need ANC support to pass, requiring a two-thirds majority. Until that happens, the culture of impunity will continue,' he said.
The DA has previously put forward two private member's bills to fight corruption and cybercrime.
One calls for a new Chapter 9 Anti-Corruption Commission to tackle serious graft and organized crime, while the other proposes a Cyber Commission to deal with digital threats.
He added that effective governance under the GNU depends heavily on whether structural reforms are enacted.
'The GNU has improved parliamentary accountability in some ways, like with the budget process. But that's not enough.'
Hoffman also tied corruption to South Africa's broader socio-economic crises, including high unemployment, inequality, crime, and poor infrastructure.
'You can't grow the economy while investors are afraid of losing their money to corruption,' he said.
'Addressing corruption is the number one priority.'
According to both Duvenage and Hoffman, without institutional reform and political will, South Africa's long-standing issues will remain unresolved.
This comes as the GNU enters its second year, the coalition faces mounting pressure to act decisively.
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
32 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Government finalising support package for companies vulnerable to US tariffs
The government says it is finalising a support package for companies, producers and workers affected by the tariffs on South African exports to the United States (US). This as the Trump-led administration stands firm on imposing a 30% tariff on local exports. Zululand Observer reports that President Cyril Ramaphosa said, while they continue to engage the US on the subject, a support package, to be detailed at a later stage, will be in place to assist those vulnerable to the reciprocal tariffs. 'The reciprocal tariffs have been imposed by the US on a significant number of its trade partners and South Africa has not been spared. South Africa will continue negotiating with the US regarding the 30% tariff announced by the US, which will come into effect on or after 12:01 eastern daylight time, seven days after August 1,' said Ramaphosa. He said all applicable exceptions published in the previous US Executive Order are set to remain in force. These exceptions covered products such as copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy and energy products. 'South Africa and US trade relations are complementary in nature, and South African exports do not pose a threat to US industry. Importantly, SA exports to the US contain inputs from the African continent and contribute to intra-Africa trade. 'South Africa will continue to pursue all diplomatic efforts to safeguard its national interests. It is important that as a country, we keep our people at work and our companies producing some of the high-quality products destined for many parts of the world,' said Ramaphosa. He said they are exploring alternative markets as part of a diversification strategy in hopes of creating resilience of the country's economy. An export support desk has also been established to provide updates on development and provide advisory services to exporters. 'The details are to be published by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition on its website,' said Ramaphosa. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on
IOL News
39 minutes ago
- IOL News
Prasa revises fare structure after public outcry
Prasa's revised fare structure aims to provide affordable rates for South African commuters, following significant pressure from trade unions and community groups. Image: Picture: David Ritchie The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) has made significant changes to its fare structure in response to intense objections from trade unions, commuter groups, and civil society organisations, just before the planned fare increase. This follows days of escalating pressure, with the United Commuters Voice (UCV) announcing that the new fares will now offer more affordable rates for working-class commuters, ensuring better access to public transport. The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) was among those that voiced concern ahead of the increase, calling for fare adjustments to be tied to inflation and warning that steep hikes would alienate commuters still reeling from the high cost of living. 'While Cosatu welcomes the huge improvements Prasa has made to its infrastructure as well as the rollout of the new trains, the federation believes the proposed ticket price hike is high and will be burdensome to commuters who are already battling to cope,' said Tony Ehrenreich, Cosatu deputy parliamentary coordinator. The federation argued that Prasa should use this period to rebuild public trust by positioning itself as the primary transport option for the working class. 'To achieve this, the federation urges Prasa to limit the fare increase to the prevailing inflation rate,' it said. The new Prasa fares that came into effect on Friday. Image: Prasa It also cautioned that a sharp increase could reinforce negative perceptions from the past when Prasa was known for mismanagement and unreliable service. Instead of driving up ticket costs, Cosatu recommended attracting more passengers to improve revenue. 'Prasa should steer clear of implementing a price increase that will change the cost structure of rail transport fees,' Cosatu said. 'While mindful of the significant investment in infrastructure, the rail agency should aim to recoup costs by swelling the number of commuters rather than relying solely on increased fare contribution.' Cosatu added that any fare increases above inflation should only be implemented after public transport subsidy policies are finalised through Nedlac. UCV, which led coordinated objections with support from commuters, labour, and community groups, confirmed that Prasa has now backed down from its initial fare plan. 'The fare increase, originally scheduled for full implementation on 1 August 2025, has now been adjusted downwards to reflect more affordable rates that take into account the financial strain on low-income commuters,' said UCV National Chairperson Paul Soto. 'We thank all stakeholders who stood in solidarity with us against the initially proposed fare hikes that were threatening affordability and access to public transport,' Soto said. 'Your voices have made it clear that decisions affecting the poor must be made in consultation with the key stakeholders.' The new structure includes lower monthly ticket increases than those originally communicated, and discounts for school children, military veterans, and senior citizens. • Monthly ticket increases have been scaled down. • Pensioners and military veterans will retain their 50% off-peak discount• Schoolchildren in full uniform will receive a 50% discount at all times. • A 40% off-peak discount remains in place for general commuters travelling between 9am and 2pm. Prasa said the updated fares had been approved by the Minister of Transport and noted that this was its first fare adjustment in 10 years. 'Despite these adjustments, rail remains South Africa's most affordable public transport mode,' Prasa stated in its official announcement. The agency confirmed that the amendments were made after identifying discrepancies in the original fare table and following feedback from commuter stakeholders. It said the changes would support improved service delivery, safety, and reliability across the Metrorail network. Both Cosatu and UCV reiterated their commitment to advocating for an affordable, safe, and reliable public transport system. Cosatu also signalled its readiness to help fast-track policy processes at Nedlac that ensure fare increases are equitable and rooted in commuters' lived realities. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
SA's electricity price is soaring: Why protests are often the only way for people to be heard
Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. Millions of unemployed South Africans, many of whom survive on a Social Relief of Distress Grant government grant of R370 (about US$21) per month, are not able to pay for electricity and still afford food and shelter. In the working class community of Thembisa in South Africa's industrial heartland of Gauteng, the local government recently tried to make all families pay a fixed monthly fee of R126 (US$7) for electricity. But the residents could not afford this and in late July, occupied roads and shut down the area. Within a day, the mayor scrapped the electricity fee. Luke Sinwell, a scholar of popular history and grassroots mobilisation in South Africa, explains how protests might just be the only way for working class South Africans to make their voices heard. Is electricity affordable in South Africa? No. Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. It is also crucial to view electricity prices in a socio-economic context. For example, the cost of electricity needs to be assessed relative to the disposable income of the household buying it. Low-income families spend up to twenty percent of their household income on energy, making electricity very unaffordable. ALSO READ: Thembisa protest raises risk of national unrest About half of all South African households (approximately 15 million people) don't have nearly enough food to eat. This means that the heads of impoverished or working class households (mostly women of Colour) are forced to decide between putting ideally nutritious food on the table and lighting their houses at night. They're forced to choose between using energy for heating to keep warm during winter or ensuring that their limited fresh food supplies stay cold so that they do not spoil. I'm part of a group of researchers who use the term energy racism to describe the systemic oppression that prevents Black working class people from accessing the electricity they need to survive and prosper. South Africans have been protesting for decades about high electricity prices. Why hasn't the problem been solved? There are weaknesses in South Africa's democratic process. Municipalities (local government) responses to the concerns and demands of communities tend to be shortsighted and inadequate. Currently, the major political parties in South Africa focus mainly on obtaining consensus at the polls through elections every five years. The South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is overseeing a 'National Dialogue' which he claims will allow the voices of ordinary people to be heard in the corridors of power. It's been designed to appear as an inclusive and democratic process. However, based on my previous research, I believe that hidden beneath the surface, government has largely already decided the agenda and a set of policies that the dialogue will recommend. The South African government is continuing to rely on market-oriented, neoliberal policies which serve profit at the expense of the working class. READ MORE: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands This guarantees that electricity prices will remain extremely high. It also means that the government will continue to lack interest in proactively engaging those very communities about the cost of electricity. It is useful to remember what happened in September 2011 in Thembisa. About 2 000 residents went to the streets to protest against electricity cuts. Schools were closed, at least 100 residents arrested for public violence, and rubber bullets fired at protestors by police. When the residents of Thembisa shut down their area again recently, the mayor, undoubtedly aware of this history, wanted to avoid a similar situation. This gave residents an advantage – they were aware that protests would jolt the authorities into a favourable response. This means that when local government does not take the initiative to discuss important matters like the price of electricity with residents, communities will inevitably create their own formations through which to mobilise and influence local politics and beyond. How effective are protests against high prices of basic services? Protests are often an immediate response to desperate communities faced with an acute economic crisis. The recent protest in Thembisa is also part of a broader trend of protests and collective action around the lack of electricity in townships and informal settlements in other parts of Gauteng. For example, my research over six years in the informal settlement of Thembelihle in the south west of Johannesburg, found that people burned to death in their shacks because local government had failed to provide electricity. Residents had no alternative but to rely on imbawula (a homemade brazier). This was coal and wood in an oven or tin connected to a makeshift pipe to let smoke out. Many shacks caught fire as a result. They negotiated with authorities for more than 10 years. READ MORE: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO] Still, Thembelihle residents had no effective way to access the levers of decision-making authority which could electrify their homes. So they accessed power on their own terms, forcing authorities to the negotiating table using protest. Following a three-week occupation in 2015, the government conceded to the basic demands to formally electrify a relatively small piece of land where they lived. A sizeable amount of R323 million would electrify 7000 homes. The politics of a community struggle which had once been criminalised and excluded from the halls of power was now enshrined in policy. What does the recent Thembisa electricity price protest tell us? It demonstrates that the most effective way for people to get the government to implement pro-poor decisions is not by voting or attending national dialogues hosted by presidents and parliamentarians. It is by organising in communities and engaging in mass actions which force those in power to concede to the people's demands. The recent protest also tells us that impoverished and working class residents cannot and should not be forced to pay more than they can afford for basic services. READ MORE: Land invaders erecting shacks dispersed with rubber bullets and stun grenades near Makhanda The municipality held Integrated Development Plan and budget meetings with residents a few months before the protests where they revealed the new electricity prices. But these meetings did not seem to acknowledge that the people of Thembisa could not afford to pay. The mayoral decision to suspend the new electricity charges in Thembisa demonstrates that when basic services fail communities, protests work. They also just might be the only reliable means by which ordinary people can access the levers of government policy. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
